-
SuperBIT Superpressure Flight Instrument Overview and Performance: Near diffraction-limited Astronomical Imaging from the Stratosphere
Authors:
Ajay S. Gill,
Steven J. Benton,
Christopher J. Damaren,
Spencer W. Everett,
Aurelien A. Fraisse,
John W. Hartley,
David Harvey,
Bradley Holder,
Eric M. Huff,
Mathilde Jauzac,
William C. Jones,
David Lagattuta,
Jason S. -Y. Leung,
Lun Li,
Thuy Vy T. Luu,
Richard Massey,
Jacqueline E. McCleary,
Johanna M. Nagy,
C. Barth Netterfield,
Emaad Paracha,
Susan F. Redmond,
Jason D. Rhodes,
Andrew Robertson,
L. Javier Romualdez,
Jürgen Schmoll
, et al. (4 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
SuperBIT was a 0.5-meter near-ultraviolet to near-infrared wide-field telescope that launched on a NASA superpressure balloon into the stratosphere from New Zealand for a 45-night flight. SuperBIT acquired multi-band images of galaxy clusters to study the properties of dark matter using weak gravitational lensing. We provide an overview of the instrument and its various subsystems. We then present…
▽ More
SuperBIT was a 0.5-meter near-ultraviolet to near-infrared wide-field telescope that launched on a NASA superpressure balloon into the stratosphere from New Zealand for a 45-night flight. SuperBIT acquired multi-band images of galaxy clusters to study the properties of dark matter using weak gravitational lensing. We provide an overview of the instrument and its various subsystems. We then present the instrument performance from the flight, including the telescope and image stabilization system, the optical system, the power system, and the thermal system. SuperBIT successfully met the instrument's technical requirements, achieving a telescope pointing stability of 0.34 +/- 0.10 arcseconds, a focal plane image stability of 0.055 +/- 0.027 arcseconds, and a PSF FWHM of ~ 0.35 arcseconds over 5-minute exposures throughout the 45-night flight. The telescope achieved a near-diffraction limited point-spread function in all three science bands (u, b, and g). SuperBIT served as a pathfinder to the GigaBIT observatory, which will be a 1.34-meter near-ultraviolet to near-infrared balloon-borne telescope.
△ Less
Submitted 3 August, 2024;
originally announced August 2024.
-
Enhancing weak lensing redshift distribution characterization by optimizing the Dark Energy Survey Self-Organizing Map Photo-z method
Authors:
A. Campos,
B. Yin,
S. Dodelson,
A. Amon,
A. Alarcon,
C. Sánchez,
G. M. Bernstein,
G. Giannini,
J. Myles,
S. Samuroff,
O. Alves,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
J. Blazek,
H. Camacho,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
R. Cawthon,
C. Chang,
R. Chen,
A. Choi,
J. Cordero,
C. Davis,
J. DeRose
, et al. (89 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Characterization of the redshift distribution of ensembles of galaxies is pivotal for large scale structure cosmological studies. In this work, we focus on improving the Self-Organizing Map (SOM) methodology for photometric redshift estimation (SOMPZ), specifically in anticipation of the Dark Energy Survey Year 6 (DES Y6) data. This data set, featuring deeper and fainter galaxies than DES Year 3 (…
▽ More
Characterization of the redshift distribution of ensembles of galaxies is pivotal for large scale structure cosmological studies. In this work, we focus on improving the Self-Organizing Map (SOM) methodology for photometric redshift estimation (SOMPZ), specifically in anticipation of the Dark Energy Survey Year 6 (DES Y6) data. This data set, featuring deeper and fainter galaxies than DES Year 3 (DES Y3), demands adapted techniques to ensure accurate recovery of the underlying redshift distribution. We investigate three strategies for enhancing the existing SOM-based approach used in DES Y3: 1) Replacing the Y3 SOM algorithm with one tailored for redshift estimation challenges; 2) Incorporating $\textit{g}$-band flux information to refine redshift estimates (i.e. using $\textit{griz}$ fluxes as opposed to only $\textit{riz}$); 3) Augmenting redshift data for galaxies where available. These methods are applied to DES Y3 data, and results are compared to the Y3 fiducial ones. Our analysis indicates significant improvements with the first two strategies, notably reducing the overlap between redshift bins. By combining strategies 1 and 2, we have successfully managed to reduce redshift bin overlap in DES Y3 by up to 66$\%$. Conversely, the third strategy, involving the addition of redshift data for selected galaxies as an additional feature in the method, yields inferior results and is abandoned. Our findings contribute to the advancement of weak lensing redshift characterization and lay the groundwork for better redshift characterization in DES Year 6 and future stage IV surveys, like the Rubin Observatory.
△ Less
Submitted 1 August, 2024;
originally announced August 2024.
-
From SuperBIT to GigaBIT: Informing next-generation balloon-borne telescope design with Fine Guidance System flight data
Authors:
Philippe Voyer,
Steven J. Benton,
Christopher J. Damaren,
Spencer W. Everett,
Aurelien A. Fraisse,
Ajay S. Gill,
John W. Hartley,
David Harvey,
Michael Henderson,
Bradley Holder,
Eric M. Huff,
Mathilde Jauzac,
William C. Jones,
David Lagattuta,
Jason S. -Y. Leung,
Lun Li,
Thuy Vy T. Luu,
Richard Massey,
Jacqueline E. McCleary,
Johanna M. Nagy,
C. Barth Netterfield,
Emaad Paracha,
Susan F. Redmond,
Jason D. Rhodes,
Andrew Robertson
, et al. (6 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Super-pressure Balloon-borne Imaging Telescope (SuperBIT) is a near-diffraction-limited 0.5m telescope that launched via NASA's super-pressure balloon technology on April 16, 2023. SuperBIT achieved precise pointing control through the use of three nested frames in conjunction with an optical Fine Guidance System (FGS), resulting in an average image stability of 0.055" over 300-second exposure…
▽ More
The Super-pressure Balloon-borne Imaging Telescope (SuperBIT) is a near-diffraction-limited 0.5m telescope that launched via NASA's super-pressure balloon technology on April 16, 2023. SuperBIT achieved precise pointing control through the use of three nested frames in conjunction with an optical Fine Guidance System (FGS), resulting in an average image stability of 0.055" over 300-second exposures. The SuperBIT FGS includes a tip-tilt fast-steering mirror that corrects for jitter on a pair of focal plane star cameras. In this paper, we leverage the empirical data from SuperBIT's successful 45-night stratospheric mission to inform the FGS design for the next-generation balloon-borne telescope. The Gigapixel Balloon-borne Imaging Telescope (GigaBIT) is designed to be a 1.35m wide-field, high resolution imaging telescope, with specifications to extend the scale and capabilities beyond those of its predecessor SuperBIT. A description and analysis of the SuperBIT FGS will be presented along with methodologies for extrapolating this data to enhance GigaBIT's FGS design and fine pointing control algorithm. We employ a systems engineering approach to outline and formalize the design constraints and specifications for GigaBIT's FGS. GigaBIT, building on the SuperBIT legacy, is set to enhance high-resolution astronomical imaging, marking a significant advancement in the field of balloon-borne telescopes.
△ Less
Submitted 14 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
Euclid. I. Overview of the Euclid mission
Authors:
Euclid Collaboration,
Y. Mellier,
Abdurro'uf,
J. A. Acevedo Barroso,
A. Achúcarro,
J. Adamek,
R. Adam,
G. E. Addison,
N. Aghanim,
M. Aguena,
V. Ajani,
Y. Akrami,
A. Al-Bahlawan,
A. Alavi,
I. S. Albuquerque,
G. Alestas,
G. Alguero,
A. Allaoui,
S. W. Allen,
V. Allevato,
A. V. Alonso-Tetilla,
B. Altieri,
A. Alvarez-Candal,
A. Amara,
L. Amendola
, et al. (1086 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The current standard model of cosmology successfully describes a variety of measurements, but the nature of its main ingredients, dark matter and dark energy, remains unknown. Euclid is a medium-class mission in the Cosmic Vision 2015-2025 programme of the European Space Agency (ESA) that will provide high-resolution optical imaging, as well as near-infrared imaging and spectroscopy, over about 14…
▽ More
The current standard model of cosmology successfully describes a variety of measurements, but the nature of its main ingredients, dark matter and dark energy, remains unknown. Euclid is a medium-class mission in the Cosmic Vision 2015-2025 programme of the European Space Agency (ESA) that will provide high-resolution optical imaging, as well as near-infrared imaging and spectroscopy, over about 14,000 deg^2 of extragalactic sky. In addition to accurate weak lensing and clustering measurements that probe structure formation over half of the age of the Universe, its primary probes for cosmology, these exquisite data will enable a wide range of science. This paper provides a high-level overview of the mission, summarising the survey characteristics, the various data-processing steps, and data products. We also highlight the main science objectives and expected performance.
△ Less
Submitted 22 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: simulation-based cosmological inference with wavelet harmonics, scattering transforms, and moments of weak lensing mass maps II. Cosmological results
Authors:
M. Gatti,
G. Campailla,
N. Jeffrey,
L. Whiteway,
A. Porredon,
J. Prat,
J. Williamson,
M. Raveri,
B. Jain,
V. Ajani,
G. Giannini,
M. Yamamoto,
C. Zhou,
J. Blazek,
D. Anbajagane,
S. Samuroff,
T. Kacprzak,
A. Alarcon,
A. Amon,
K. Bechtol,
M. Becker,
G. Bernstein,
A. Campos,
C. Chang,
R. Chen
, et al. (77 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a simulation-based cosmological analysis using a combination of Gaussian and non-Gaussian statistics of the weak lensing mass (convergence) maps from the first three years (Y3) of the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We implement: 1) second and third moments; 2) wavelet phase harmonics; 3) the scattering transform. Our analysis is fully based on simulations, spans a space of seven $νw$CDM cosm…
▽ More
We present a simulation-based cosmological analysis using a combination of Gaussian and non-Gaussian statistics of the weak lensing mass (convergence) maps from the first three years (Y3) of the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We implement: 1) second and third moments; 2) wavelet phase harmonics; 3) the scattering transform. Our analysis is fully based on simulations, spans a space of seven $νw$CDM cosmological parameters, and forward models the most relevant sources of systematics inherent in the data: masks, noise variations, clustering of the sources, intrinsic alignments, and shear and redshift calibration. We implement a neural network compression of the summary statistics, and we estimate the parameter posteriors using a simulation-based inference approach. Including and combining different non-Gaussian statistics is a powerful tool that strongly improves constraints over Gaussian statistics (in our case, the second moments); in particular, the Figure of Merit $\textrm{FoM}(S_8, Ω_{\textrm{m}})$ is improved by 70 percent ($Λ$CDM) and 90 percent ($w$CDM). When all the summary statistics are combined, we achieve a 2 percent constraint on the amplitude of fluctuations parameter $S_8 \equiv σ_8 (Ω_{\textrm{m}}/0.3)^{0.5}$, obtaining $S_8 = 0.794 \pm 0.017$ ($Λ$CDM) and $S_8 = 0.817 \pm 0.021$ ($w$CDM). The constraints from different statistics are shown to be internally consistent (with a $p$-value>0.1 for all combinations of statistics examined). We compare our results to other weak lensing results from the DES Y3 data, finding good consistency; we also compare with results from external datasets, such as \planck{} constraints from the Cosmic Microwave Background, finding statistical agreement, with discrepancies no greater than $<2.2σ$.
△ Less
Submitted 17 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Weak lensing combined with the kinetic Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect: A study of baryonic feedback
Authors:
L. Bigwood,
A. Amon,
A. Schneider,
J. Salcido,
I. G. McCarthy,
C. Preston,
D. Sanchez,
D. Sijacki,
E. Schaan,
S. Ferraro,
N. Battaglia,
A. Chen,
S. Dodelson,
A. Roodman,
A. Pieres,
A. Ferte,
A. Alarcon,
A. Drlica-Wagner,
A. Choi,
A. Navarro-Alsina,
A. Campos,
A. J. Ross,
A. Carnero Rosell,
B. Yin,
B. Yanny
, et al. (100 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Extracting precise cosmology from weak lensing surveys requires modelling the non-linear matter power spectrum, which is suppressed at small scales due to baryonic feedback processes. However, hydrodynamical galaxy formation simulations make widely varying predictions for the amplitude and extent of this effect. We use measurements of Dark Energy Survey Year 3 weak lensing (WL) and Atacama Cosmolo…
▽ More
Extracting precise cosmology from weak lensing surveys requires modelling the non-linear matter power spectrum, which is suppressed at small scales due to baryonic feedback processes. However, hydrodynamical galaxy formation simulations make widely varying predictions for the amplitude and extent of this effect. We use measurements of Dark Energy Survey Year 3 weak lensing (WL) and Atacama Cosmology Telescope DR5 kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (kSZ) to jointly constrain cosmological and astrophysical baryonic feedback parameters using a flexible analytical model, `baryonification'. First, using WL only, we compare the $S_8$ constraints using baryonification to a simulation-calibrated halo model, a simulation-based emulator model and the approach of discarding WL measurements on small angular scales. We find that model flexibility can shift the value of $S_8$ and degrade the uncertainty. The kSZ provides additional constraints on the astrophysical parameters and shifts $S_8$ to $S_8=0.823^{+0.019}_{-0.020}$, a higher value than attained using the WL-only analysis. We measure the suppression of the non-linear matter power spectrum using WL + kSZ and constrain a mean feedback scenario that is more extreme than the predictions from most hydrodynamical simulations. We constrain the baryon fractions and the gas mass fractions and find them to be generally lower than inferred from X-ray observations and simulation predictions. We conclude that the WL + kSZ measurements provide a new and complementary benchmark for building a coherent picture of the impact of gas around galaxies across observations.
△ Less
Submitted 9 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
SPT Clusters with DES and HST Weak Lensing. II. Cosmological Constraints from the Abundance of Massive Halos
Authors:
S. Bocquet,
S. Grandis,
L. E. Bleem,
M. Klein,
J. J. Mohr,
T. Schrabback,
T. M. C. Abbott,
P. A. R. Ade,
M. Aguena,
A. Alarcon,
S. Allam,
S. W. Allen,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
A. J. Anderson,
J. Annis,
B. Ansarinejad,
J. E. Austermann,
S. Avila,
D. Bacon,
M. Bayliss,
J. A. Beall,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
A. N. Bender
, et al. (171 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present cosmological constraints from the abundance of galaxy clusters selected via the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect in South Pole Telescope (SPT) data with a simultaneous mass calibration using weak gravitational lensing data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). The cluster sample is constructed from the combined SPT-SZ, SPTpol ECS, and SPTpol 500d…
▽ More
We present cosmological constraints from the abundance of galaxy clusters selected via the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect in South Pole Telescope (SPT) data with a simultaneous mass calibration using weak gravitational lensing data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). The cluster sample is constructed from the combined SPT-SZ, SPTpol ECS, and SPTpol 500d surveys, and comprises 1,005 confirmed clusters in the redshift range $0.25-1.78$ over a total sky area of 5,200 deg$^2$. We use DES Year 3 weak-lensing data for 688 clusters with redshifts $z<0.95$ and HST weak-lensing data for 39 clusters with $0.6<z<1.7$. The weak-lensing measurements enable robust mass measurements of sample clusters and allow us to empirically constrain the SZ observable--mass relation. For a flat $Λ$CDM cosmology, and marginalizing over the sum of massive neutrinos, we measure $Ω_\mathrm{m}=0.286\pm0.032$, $σ_8=0.817\pm0.026$, and the parameter combination $σ_8\,(Ω_\mathrm{m}/0.3)^{0.25}=0.805\pm0.016$. Our measurement of $S_8\equivσ_8\,\sqrt{Ω_\mathrm{m}/0.3}=0.795\pm0.029$ and the constraint from Planck CMB anisotropies (2018 TT,TE,EE+lowE) differ by $1.1σ$. In combination with that Planck dataset, we place a 95% upper limit on the sum of neutrino masses $\sum m_ν<0.18$ eV. When additionally allowing the dark energy equation of state parameter $w$ to vary, we obtain $w=-1.45\pm0.31$ from our cluster-based analysis. In combination with Planck data, we measure $w=-1.34^{+0.22}_{-0.15}$, or a $2.2σ$ difference with a cosmological constant. We use the cluster abundance to measure $σ_8$ in five redshift bins between 0.25 and 1.8, and we find the results to be consistent with structure growth as predicted by the $Λ$CDM model fit to Planck primary CMB data.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2024; v1 submitted 4 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Data downloaded via parachute from a NASA super-pressure balloon
Authors:
Ellen L. Sirks,
Richard Massey,
Ajay S. Gill,
Jason Anderson,
Steven J. Benton,
Anthony M. Brown,
Paul Clark,
Joshua English,
Spencer W. Everett,
Aurelien A. Fraisse,
Hugo Franco,
John W. Hartley,
David Harvey,
Bradley Holder,
Andrew Hunter,
Eric M. Huff,
Andrew Hynous,
Mathilde Jauzac,
William C. Jones,
Nikky Joyce,
Duncan Kennedy,
David Lagattuta,
Jason S. -Y. Leung,
Lun Li,
Stephen Lishman
, et al. (18 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In April to May 2023, the superBIT telescope was lifted to the Earth's stratosphere by a helium-filled super-pressure balloon, to acquire astronomical imaging from above (99.5% of) the Earth's atmosphere. It was launched from New Zealand then, for 40 days, circumnavigated the globe five times at a latitude 40 to 50 degrees South. Attached to the telescope were four 'DRS' (Data Recovery System) cap…
▽ More
In April to May 2023, the superBIT telescope was lifted to the Earth's stratosphere by a helium-filled super-pressure balloon, to acquire astronomical imaging from above (99.5% of) the Earth's atmosphere. It was launched from New Zealand then, for 40 days, circumnavigated the globe five times at a latitude 40 to 50 degrees South. Attached to the telescope were four 'DRS' (Data Recovery System) capsules containing 5 TB solid state data storage, plus a GNSS receiver, Iridium transmitter, and parachute. Data from the telescope were copied to these, and two were dropped over Argentina. They drifted 61 km horizontally while they descended 32 km, but we predicted their descent vectors within 2.4 km: in this location, the discrepancy appears irreducible below 2 km because of high speed, gusty winds and local topography. The capsules then reported their own locations to within a few metres. We recovered the capsules and successfully retrieved all of superBIT's data - despite the telescope itself being later destroyed on landing.
△ Less
Submitted 14 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: simulation-based cosmological inference with wavelet harmonics, scattering transforms, and moments of weak lensing mass maps I: validation on simulations
Authors:
M. Gatti,
N. Jeffrey,
L. Whiteway,
J. Williamson,
B. Jain,
V. Ajani,
D. Anbajagane,
G. Giannini,
C. Zhou,
A. Porredon,
J. Prat,
M. Yamamoto,
J. Blazek,
T. Kacprzak,
S. Samuroff,
A. Alarcon,
A. Amon,
K. Bechtol,
M. Becker,
G. Bernstein,
A. Campos,
C. Chang,
R. Chen,
A. Choi,
C. Davis
, et al. (76 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Beyond-two-point statistics contain additional information on cosmological as well as astrophysical and observational (systematics) parameters. In this methodology paper we provide an end-to-end simulation-based analysis of a set of Gaussian and non-Gaussian weak lensing statistics using detailed mock catalogues of the Dark Energy Survey. We implement: 1) second and third moments; 2) wavelet phase…
▽ More
Beyond-two-point statistics contain additional information on cosmological as well as astrophysical and observational (systematics) parameters. In this methodology paper we provide an end-to-end simulation-based analysis of a set of Gaussian and non-Gaussian weak lensing statistics using detailed mock catalogues of the Dark Energy Survey. We implement: 1) second and third moments; 2) wavelet phase harmonics (WPH); 3) the scattering transform (ST). Our analysis is fully based on simulations, it spans a space of seven $νw$CDM cosmological parameters, and it forward models the most relevant sources of systematics of the data (masks, noise variations, clustering of the sources, intrinsic alignments, and shear and redshift calibration). We implement a neural network compression of the summary statistics, and we estimate the parameter posteriors using a likelihood-free-inference approach. We validate the pipeline extensively, and we find that WPH exhibits the strongest performance when combined with second moments, followed by ST. and then by third moments. The combination of all the different statistics further enhances constraints with respect to second moments, up to 25 per cent, 15 per cent, and 90 per cent for $S_8$, $Ω_{\rm m}$, and the Figure-Of-Merit ${\rm FoM_{S_8,Ω_{\rm m}}}$, respectively. We further find that non-Gaussian statistics improve constraints on $w$ and on the amplitude of intrinsic alignment with respect to second moments constraints. The methodological advances presented here are suitable for application to Stage IV surveys from Euclid, Rubin-LSST, and Roman with additional validation on mock catalogues for each survey. In a companion paper we present an application to DES Year 3 data.
△ Less
Submitted 4 November, 2023; v1 submitted 26 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
SPT Clusters with DES and HST Weak Lensing. I. Cluster Lensing and Bayesian Population Modeling of Multi-Wavelength Cluster Datasets
Authors:
S. Bocquet,
S. Grandis,
L. E. Bleem,
M. Klein,
J. J. Mohr,
M. Aguena,
A. Alarcon,
S. Allam,
S. W. Allen,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
B. Ansarinejad,
D. Bacon,
M. Bayliss,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
B. A. Benson,
G. M. Bernstein,
M. Brodwin,
D. Brooks,
A. Campos,
R. E. A. Canning,
J. E. Carlstrom,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind
, et al. (108 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a Bayesian population modeling method to analyze the abundance of galaxy clusters identified by the South Pole Telescope (SPT) with a simultaneous mass calibration using weak gravitational lensing data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). We discuss and validate the modeling choices with a particular focus on a robust, weak-lensing-based mass calibrati…
▽ More
We present a Bayesian population modeling method to analyze the abundance of galaxy clusters identified by the South Pole Telescope (SPT) with a simultaneous mass calibration using weak gravitational lensing data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). We discuss and validate the modeling choices with a particular focus on a robust, weak-lensing-based mass calibration using DES data. For the DES Year 3 data, we report a systematic uncertainty in weak-lensing mass calibration that increases from 1% at $z=0.25$ to 10% at $z=0.95$, to which we add 2% in quadrature to account for uncertainties in the impact of baryonic effects. We implement an analysis pipeline that joins the cluster abundance likelihood with a multi-observable likelihood for the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect, optical richness, and weak-lensing measurements for each individual cluster. We validate that our analysis pipeline can recover unbiased cosmological constraints by analyzing mocks that closely resemble the cluster sample extracted from the SPT-SZ, SPTpol ECS, and SPTpol 500d surveys and the DES Year 3 and HST-39 weak-lensing datasets. This work represents a crucial prerequisite for the subsequent cosmological analysis of the real dataset.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2024; v1 submitted 18 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Beyond the 3rd moment: A practical study of using lensing convergence CDFs for cosmology with DES Y3
Authors:
D. Anbajagane,
C. Chang,
A. Banerjee,
T. Abel,
M. Gatti,
V. Ajani,
A. Alarcon,
A. Amon,
E. J. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
R. Chen,
A. Choi,
C. Davis,
J. DeRose,
H. T. Diehl,
S. Dodelson,
C. Doux,
A. Drlica-Wagner,
K. Eckert,
J. Elvin-Poole
, et al. (73 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Widefield surveys of the sky probe many clustered scalar fields -- such as galaxy counts, lensing potential, gas pressure, etc. -- that are sensitive to different cosmological and astrophysical processes. Our ability to constrain such processes from these fields depends crucially on the statistics chosen to summarize the field. In this work, we explore the cumulative distribution function (CDF) at…
▽ More
Widefield surveys of the sky probe many clustered scalar fields -- such as galaxy counts, lensing potential, gas pressure, etc. -- that are sensitive to different cosmological and astrophysical processes. Our ability to constrain such processes from these fields depends crucially on the statistics chosen to summarize the field. In this work, we explore the cumulative distribution function (CDF) at multiple scales as a summary of the galaxy lensing convergence field. Using a suite of N-body lightcone simulations, we show the CDFs' constraining power is modestly better than that of the 2nd and 3rd moments of the field, as they approximately capture the information from all moments of the field in a concise data vector. We then study the practical aspects of applying the CDFs to observational data, using the first three years of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3) data as an example, and compute the impact of different systematics on the CDFs. The contributions from the point spread function are 2-3 orders of magnitude below the cosmological signal, while those from reduced shear approximation contribute $\lesssim 1\%$ to the signal. Source clustering effects and baryon imprints contribute $1-10\%$. Enforcing scale cuts to limit systematics-driven biases in parameter constraints degrades these constraints a noticeable amount, and this degradation is similar for the CDFs and the moments. We also detect correlations between the observed convergence field and the shape noise field at $13σ$. We find that the non-Gaussian correlations in the noise field must be modeled accurately to use the CDFs, or other statistics sensitive to all moments, as a rigorous cosmology tool.
△ Less
Submitted 7 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Detection of the significant impact of source clustering on higher-order statistics with DES Year 3 weak gravitational lensing data
Authors:
M. Gatti,
N. Jeffrey,
L. Whiteway,
V. Ajani,
T. Kacprzak,
D. Zürcher,
C. Chang,
B. Jain,
J. Blazek,
E. Krause,
A. Alarcon,
A. Amon,
K. Bechtol,
M. Becker,
G. Bernstein,
A. Campos,
R. Chen,
A. Choi,
C. Davis,
J. Derose,
H. T. Diehl,
S. Dodelson,
C. Doux,
K. Eckert,
J. Elvin-Poole
, et al. (76 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We demonstrate and measure the impact of source galaxy clustering on higher-order summary statistics of weak gravitational lensing data. By comparing simulated data with galaxies that either trace or do not trace the underlying density field, we show this effect can exceed measurement uncertainties for common higher-order statistics for certain analysis choices. Source clustering effects are large…
▽ More
We demonstrate and measure the impact of source galaxy clustering on higher-order summary statistics of weak gravitational lensing data. By comparing simulated data with galaxies that either trace or do not trace the underlying density field, we show this effect can exceed measurement uncertainties for common higher-order statistics for certain analysis choices. Source clustering effects are larger at small scales and for statistics applied to combinations of low and high redshift samples, and diminish at high redshift. We evaluate the impact on different weak lensing observables, finding that third moments and wavelet phase harmonics are more affected than peak count statistics. Using Dark Energy Survey Year 3 data we construct null tests for the source-clustering-free case, finding a $p$-value of $p=4\times10^{-3}$ (2.6 $σ$) using third-order map moments and $p=3\times10^{-11}$ (6.5 $σ$) using wavelet phase harmonics. The impact of source clustering on cosmological inference can be either be included in the model or minimized through \textit{ad-hoc} procedures (e.g. scale cuts). We verify that the procedures adopted in existing DES Y3 cosmological analyses (using map moments and peaks) were sufficient to render this effect negligible. Failing to account for source clustering can significantly impact cosmological inference from higher-order gravitational lensing statistics, e.g. higher-order N-point functions, wavelet-moment observables (including phase harmonics and scattering transforms), and deep learning or field level summary statistics of weak lensing maps. We provide recipes both to minimise the impact of source clustering and to incorporate source clustering effects into forward-modelled mock data.
△ Less
Submitted 27 July, 2023; v1 submitted 25 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Lensing in the Blue II: Estimating the Sensitivity of Stratospheric Balloons to Weak Gravitational Lensing
Authors:
Jacqueline E. McCleary,
Spencer W. Everett,
Mohamed M. Shaaban,
Ajay S. Gill,
Georgios N. Vassilakis,
Eric M. Huff,
Richard J. Massey,
Steven J. Benton,
Anthony M. Brown,
Paul Clark,
Bradley Holder,
Aurelien A. Fraisse,
Mathilde Jauzac,
William C. Jones,
David Lagattuta,
Jason S. -Y. Leung,
Lun Li,
Thuy Vy T. Luu,
Johanna M. Nagy,
C. Barth Netterfield,
Emaad Paracha,
Susan F. Redmond,
Jason D. Rhodes,
J\''urgen Schmoll,
Ellen Sirks
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Superpressure Balloon-borne Imaging Telescope (SuperBIT) is a diffraction-limited, wide-field, 0.5 m, near-infrared to near-ultraviolet observatory designed to exploit the stratosphere's space-like conditions. SuperBIT's 2023 science flight will deliver deep, blue imaging of galaxy clusters for gravitational lensing analysis. In preparation, we have developed a weak lensing measurement pipelin…
▽ More
The Superpressure Balloon-borne Imaging Telescope (SuperBIT) is a diffraction-limited, wide-field, 0.5 m, near-infrared to near-ultraviolet observatory designed to exploit the stratosphere's space-like conditions. SuperBIT's 2023 science flight will deliver deep, blue imaging of galaxy clusters for gravitational lensing analysis. In preparation, we have developed a weak lensing measurement pipeline with modern algorithms for PSF characterization, shape measurement, and shear calibration. We validate our pipeline and forecast SuperBIT survey properties with simulated galaxy cluster observations in SuperBIT's near-UV and blue bandpasses. We predict imaging depth, galaxy number (source) density, and redshift distribution for observations in SuperBIT's three bluest filters; the effect of lensing sample selections is also considered. We find that in three hours of on-sky integration, SuperBIT can attain a depth of b = 26 mag and a total source density exceeding 40 galaxies per square arcminute. Even with the application of lensing-analysis catalog selections, we find b-band source densities between 25 and 30 galaxies per square arcminute with a median redshift of z = 1.1. Our analysis confirms SuperBIT's capability for weak gravitational lensing measurements in the blue.
△ Less
Submitted 6 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
DES Y3 + KiDS-1000: Consistent cosmology combining cosmic shear surveys
Authors:
Dark Energy Survey,
Kilo-Degree Survey Collaboration,
:,
T. M. C. Abbott,
M. Aguena,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
M. Asgari,
S. Avila,
D. Bacon,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
E. Bertin,
M. Bilicki,
J. Blazek,
S. Bocquet,
D. Brooks,
P. Burger,
D. L. Burke,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell
, et al. (138 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a joint cosmic shear analysis of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3) and the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS-1000) in a collaborative effort between the two survey teams. We find consistent cosmological parameter constraints between DES Y3 and KiDS-1000 which, when combined in a joint-survey analysis, constrain the parameter $S_8 = σ_8 \sqrt{Ω_{\rm m}/0.3}$ with a mean value of…
▽ More
We present a joint cosmic shear analysis of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3) and the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS-1000) in a collaborative effort between the two survey teams. We find consistent cosmological parameter constraints between DES Y3 and KiDS-1000 which, when combined in a joint-survey analysis, constrain the parameter $S_8 = σ_8 \sqrt{Ω_{\rm m}/0.3}$ with a mean value of $0.790^{+0.018}_{-0.014}$. The mean marginal is lower than the maximum a posteriori estimate, $S_8=0.801$, owing to skewness in the marginal distribution and projection effects in the multi-dimensional parameter space. Our results are consistent with $S_8$ constraints from observations of the cosmic microwave background by Planck, with agreement at the $1.7σ$ level. We use a Hybrid analysis pipeline, defined from a mock survey study quantifying the impact of the different analysis choices originally adopted by each survey team. We review intrinsic alignment models, baryon feedback mitigation strategies, priors, samplers and models of the non-linear matter power spectrum.
△ Less
Submitted 19 October, 2023; v1 submitted 26 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
The Dark Energy Survey Year 3 and eBOSS: constraining galaxy intrinsic alignments across luminosity and colour space
Authors:
S. Samuroff,
R. Mandelbaum,
J. Blazek,
A. Campos,
N. MacCrann,
G. Zacharegkas,
A. Amon,
J. Prat,
S. Singh,
J. Elvin-Poole,
A. J. Ross,
A. Alarcon,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
R. Cawthon,
C. Chang,
R. Chen,
A. Choi,
M. Crocce,
C. Davis,
J. DeRose
, et al. (82 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present direct constraints on galaxy intrinsic alignments using the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3), the Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS) and its precursor, the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS). Our measurements incorporate photometric red sequence (redMaGiC) galaxies from DES with median redshift $z\sim0.2-1.0$, luminous red galaxies (LRGs) from eBOSS a…
▽ More
We present direct constraints on galaxy intrinsic alignments using the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3), the Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS) and its precursor, the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS). Our measurements incorporate photometric red sequence (redMaGiC) galaxies from DES with median redshift $z\sim0.2-1.0$, luminous red galaxies (LRGs) from eBOSS at $z\sim0.8$, and also a SDSS-III BOSS CMASS sample at $z\sim0.5$. We measure two point intrinsic alignment correlations, which we fit using a model that includes lensing, magnification and photometric redshift error. Fitting on scales $6<r_{\rm p} < 70$ Mpc$/h$, we make a detection of intrinsic alignments in each sample, at $5σ-22σ$ (assuming a simple one parameter model for IAs). Using these red samples, we measure the IA-luminosity relation. Our results are statistically consistent with previous results, but offer a significant improvement in constraining power, particularly at low luminosity. With this improved precision, we see detectable dependence on colour between broadly defined red samples. It is likely that a more sophisticated approach than a binary red/blue split, which jointly considers colour and luminosity dependence in the IA signal, will be needed in future. We also compare the various signal components at the best fitting point in parameter space for each sample, and find that magnification and lensing contribute $\sim2-18\%$ of the total signal. As precision continues to improve, it will certainly be necessary to account for these effects in future direct IA measurements. Finally, we make equivalent measurements on a sample of Emission Line Galaxies (ELGs) from eBOSS at $z\sim 0.8$. We report a null detection, constraining the IA amplitude (assuming the nonlinear alignment model) to be $A_1=0.07^{+0.32}_{-0.42}$ ($|A_1|<0.78$ at $95\%$ CL).
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Non-local contribution from small scales in galaxy-galaxy lensing: Comparison of mitigation schemes
Authors:
J. Prat,
G. Zacharegkas,
Y. Park,
N. MacCrann,
E. R. Switzer,
S. Pandey,
C. Chang,
J. Blazek,
R. Miquel,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
R. Chen,
A. Choi,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
R. Cawthon,
J. Cordero,
M. Crocce
, et al. (90 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Recent cosmological analyses with large-scale structure and weak lensing measurements, usually referred to as 3$\times$2pt, had to discard a lot of signal-to-noise from small scales due to our inability to accurately model non-linearities and baryonic effects. Galaxy-galaxy lensing, or the position-shear correlation between lens and source galaxies, is one of the three two-point correlation functi…
▽ More
Recent cosmological analyses with large-scale structure and weak lensing measurements, usually referred to as 3$\times$2pt, had to discard a lot of signal-to-noise from small scales due to our inability to accurately model non-linearities and baryonic effects. Galaxy-galaxy lensing, or the position-shear correlation between lens and source galaxies, is one of the three two-point correlation functions that are included in such analyses, usually estimated with the mean tangential shear. However, tangential shear measurements at a given angular scale $θ$ or physical scale $R$ carry information from all scales below that, forcing the scale cuts applied in real data to be significantly larger than the scale at which theoretical uncertainties become problematic. Recently there have been a few independent efforts that aim to mitigate the non-locality of the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal. Here we perform a comparison of the different methods, including the Y-transformation, the Point-Mass marginalization methodology and the Annular Differential Surface Density statistic. We do the comparison at the cosmological constraints level in a combined galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis. We find that all the estimators yield equivalent cosmological results assuming a simulated Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) Year 1 like setup and also when applied to DES Y3 data. With the LSST Y1 setup, we find that the mitigation schemes yield $\sim$1.3 times more constraining $S_8$ results than applying larger scale cuts without using any mitigation scheme.
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2023; v1 submitted 7 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
The Dark Energy Survey Year 3 high redshift sample: Selection, characterization and analysis of galaxy clustering
Authors:
C. Sánchez,
A. Alarcon,
G. M. Bernstein,
J. Sanchez,
S. Pandey,
M. Raveri,
J. Prat,
N. Weaverdyck,
I. Sevilla-Noarbe,
C. Chang,
E. Baxter,
Y. Omori,
B. Jain,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
J. Blazek,
A. Choi,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
M. Crocce,
D. Cross,
J. DeRose
, et al. (75 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The fiducial cosmological analyses of imaging galaxy surveys like the Dark Energy Survey (DES) typically probe the Universe at redshifts $z < 1$. This is mainly because of the limited depth of these surveys, and also because such analyses rely heavily on galaxy lensing, which is more efficient at low redshifts. In this work we present the selection and characterization of high-redshift galaxy samp…
▽ More
The fiducial cosmological analyses of imaging galaxy surveys like the Dark Energy Survey (DES) typically probe the Universe at redshifts $z < 1$. This is mainly because of the limited depth of these surveys, and also because such analyses rely heavily on galaxy lensing, which is more efficient at low redshifts. In this work we present the selection and characterization of high-redshift galaxy samples using DES Year 3 data, and the analysis of their galaxy clustering measurements. In particular, we use galaxies that are fainter than those used in the previous DES Year 3 analyses and a Bayesian redshift scheme to define three tomographic bins with mean redshifts around $z \sim 0.9$, $1.2$ and $1.5$, which significantly extend the redshift coverage of the fiducial DES Year 3 analysis. These samples contain a total of about 9 million galaxies, and their galaxy density is more than 2 times higher than those in the DES Year 3 fiducial case. We characterize the redshift uncertainties of the samples, including the usage of various spectroscopic and high-quality redshift samples, and we develop a machine-learning method to correct for correlations between galaxy density and survey observing conditions. The analysis of galaxy clustering measurements, with a total signal-to-noise $S/N \sim 70$ after scale cuts, yields robust cosmological constraints on a combination of the fraction of matter in the Universe $Ω_m$ and the Hubble parameter $h$, $Ω_m h = 0.195^{+0.023}_{-0.018}$, and 2-3% measurements of the amplitude of the galaxy clustering signals, probing galaxy bias and the amplitude of matter fluctuations, $b σ_8$. A companion paper $\textit{(in preparation)}$ will present the cross-correlations of these high-$z$ samples with CMB lensing from Planck and SPT, and the cosmological analysis of those measurements in combination with the galaxy clustering presented in this work.
△ Less
Submitted 1 December, 2022; v1 submitted 29 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Weak lensing in the blue: a counter-intuitive strategy for stratospheric observations
Authors:
Mohamed M. Shaaban,
Ajay S. Gill,
Jacqueline McCleary,
Richard J. Massey,
Steven J. Benton,
Anthony M. Brown,
Christopher J. Damaren,
Tim Eifler,
Aurelien A. Fraisse,
Spencer Everett,
Mathew N. Galloway,
Michael Henderson,
Bradley Holder,
Eric M. Huff,
Mathilde Jauzac,
William C. Jones,
David Lagattuta,
Jason Leung,
Lun Li,
Thuy Vy T. Luu Johanna M. Nagy,
C. Barth Netterfield,
Susan F. Redmond,
Jason D. Rhodes,
Andrew Robertson,
Jurgen Schmoll
, et al. (2 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The statistical power of weak lensing measurements is principally driven by the number of high redshift galaxies whose shapes are resolved. Conventional wisdom and physical intuition suggest this is optimised by deep imaging at long (red or near IR) wavelengths, to avoid losing redshifted Balmer break and Lyman break galaxies. We use the synthetic Emission Line EL-COSMOS catalogue to simulate lens…
▽ More
The statistical power of weak lensing measurements is principally driven by the number of high redshift galaxies whose shapes are resolved. Conventional wisdom and physical intuition suggest this is optimised by deep imaging at long (red or near IR) wavelengths, to avoid losing redshifted Balmer break and Lyman break galaxies. We use the synthetic Emission Line EL-COSMOS catalogue to simulate lensing observations using different filters, from various altitudes. Here were predict the number of exposures to achieve a target z > 0.3 source density, using off-the-shelf and custom filters. Ground-based observations are easily better at red wavelengths, as (more narrowly) are space-based observations. However, we find that SuperBIT, a diffraction-limited observatory operating in the stratosphere, should instead perform its lensing-quality observations at blue wavelengths.
△ Less
Submitted 17 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Magnification modeling and impact on cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing
Authors:
J. Elvin-Poole,
N. MacCrann,
S. Everett,
J. Prat,
E. S. Rykoff,
J. De Vicente,
B. Yanny,
K. Herner,
A. Ferté,
E. Di Valentino,
A. Choi,
D. L. Burke,
I. Sevilla-Noarbe,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
J. Blazek,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell
, et al. (71 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We study the effect of magnification in the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 analysis of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing, using two different lens samples: a sample of Luminous red galaxies, redMaGiC, and a sample with a redshift-dependent magnitude limit, MagLim. We account for the effect of magnification on both the flux and size selection of galaxies, accounting for systematic effects usin…
▽ More
We study the effect of magnification in the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 analysis of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing, using two different lens samples: a sample of Luminous red galaxies, redMaGiC, and a sample with a redshift-dependent magnitude limit, MagLim. We account for the effect of magnification on both the flux and size selection of galaxies, accounting for systematic effects using the Balrog image simulations. We estimate the impact of magnification on the galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing cosmology analysis, finding it to be a significant systematic for the MagLim sample. We show cosmological constraints from the galaxy clustering auto-correlation and galaxy-galaxy lensing signal with different magnifications priors, finding broad consistency in cosmological parameters in $Λ$CDM and $w$CDM. However, when magnification bias amplitude is allowed to be free, we find the two-point correlations functions prefer a different amplitude to the fiducial input derived from the image simulations. We validate the magnification analysis by comparing the cross-clustering between lens bins with the prediction from the baseline analysis, which uses only the auto-correlation of the lens bins, indicating systematics other than magnification may be the cause of the discrepancy. We show adding the cross-clustering between lens redshift bins to the fit significantly improves the constraints on lens magnification parameters and allows uninformative priors to be used on magnification coefficients, without any loss of constraining power or prior volume concerns.
△ Less
Submitted 26 May, 2023; v1 submitted 20 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Redshift Calibration of the MagLim Lens Sample from the combination of SOMPZ and clustering and its impact on Cosmology
Authors:
G. Giannini,
A. Alarcon,
M. Gatti,
A. Porredon,
M. Crocce,
G. M. Bernstein,
R. Cawthon,
C. Sánchez,
C. Doux,
J. Elvin-Poole,
M. Raveri,
J. Myles,
A. Amon,
S. Allam,
O. Alves,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
J. Blazek,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
A. Choi
, et al. (89 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present an alternative calibration of the MagLim lens sample redshift distributions from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) first three years of data (Y3). The new calibration is based on a combination of a Self-Organising Maps based scheme and clustering redshifts to estimate redshift distributions and inherent uncertainties, which is expected to be more accurate than the original DES Y3 redshift ca…
▽ More
We present an alternative calibration of the MagLim lens sample redshift distributions from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) first three years of data (Y3). The new calibration is based on a combination of a Self-Organising Maps based scheme and clustering redshifts to estimate redshift distributions and inherent uncertainties, which is expected to be more accurate than the original DES Y3 redshift calibration of the lens sample. We describe in detail the methodology, we validate it on simulations and discuss the main effects dominating our error budget. The new calibration is in fair agreement with the fiducial DES Y3 redshift distributions calibration, with only mild differences ($<3σ$) in the means and widths of the distributions. We study the impact of this new calibration on cosmological constraints, analysing DES Y3 galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements, assuming a $Λ$CDM cosmology. We obtain $Ω_{\rm m} = 0.30\pm 0.04$, $σ_8 = 0.81\pm 0.07 $ and $S_8 = 0.81\pm 0.04$, which implies a $\sim 0.4σ$ shift in the $Ω_{\rm}-S_8$ plane compared to the fiducial DES Y3 results, highlighting the importance of the redshift calibration of the lens sample in multi-probe cosmological analyses.
△ Less
Submitted 18 October, 2023; v1 submitted 13 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Constraints on extensions to $Λ$CDM with weak lensing and galaxy clustering
Authors:
DES Collaboration,
T. M. C. Abbott,
M. Aguena,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
J. Annis,
S. Avila,
D. Bacon,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
S. Birrer,
J. Blazek,
S. Bocquet,
A. Brandao-Souza,
S. L. Bridle,
D. Brooks,
D. L. Burke,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
J. Carretero
, et al. (137 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We constrain extensions to the $Λ$CDM model using measurements from the Dark Energy Survey's first three years of observations and external data. The DES data are the two-point correlation functions of weak gravitational lensing, galaxy clustering, and their cross-correlation. We use simulated data and blind analyses of real data to validate the robustness of our results. In many cases, constraini…
▽ More
We constrain extensions to the $Λ$CDM model using measurements from the Dark Energy Survey's first three years of observations and external data. The DES data are the two-point correlation functions of weak gravitational lensing, galaxy clustering, and their cross-correlation. We use simulated data and blind analyses of real data to validate the robustness of our results. In many cases, constraining power is limited by the absence of nonlinear predictions that are reliable at our required precision. The models are: dark energy with a time-dependent equation of state, non-zero spatial curvature, sterile neutrinos, modifications of gravitational physics, and a binned $σ_8(z)$ model which serves as a probe of structure growth. For the time-varying dark energy equation of state evaluated at the pivot redshift we find $(w_{\rm p}, w_a)= (-0.99^{+0.28}_{-0.17},-0.9\pm 1.2)$ at 68% confidence with $z_{\rm p}=0.24$ from the DES measurements alone, and $(w_{\rm p}, w_a)= (-1.03^{+0.04}_{-0.03},-0.4^{+0.4}_{-0.3})$ with $z_{\rm p}=0.21$ for the combination of all data considered. Curvature constraints of $Ω_k=0.0009\pm 0.0017$ and effective relativistic species $N_{\rm eff}=3.10^{+0.15}_{-0.16}$ are dominated by external data. For massive sterile neutrinos, we improve the upper bound on the mass $m_{\rm eff}$ by a factor of three compared to previous analyses, giving 95% limits of $(ΔN_{\rm eff},m_{\rm eff})\leq (0.28, 0.20\, {\rm eV})$. We also constrain changes to the lensing and Poisson equations controlled by functions $Σ(k,z) = Σ_0 Ω_Λ(z)/Ω_{Λ,0}$ and $μ(k,z)=μ_0 Ω_Λ(z)/Ω_{Λ,0}$ respectively to $Σ_0=0.6^{+0.4}_{-0.5}$ from DES alone and $(Σ_0,μ_0)=(0.04\pm 0.05,0.08^{+0.21}_{-0.19})$ for the combination of all data. Overall, we find no significant evidence for physics beyond $Λ$CDM.
△ Less
Submitted 29 October, 2023; v1 submitted 12 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Joint analysis of DES Year 3 data and CMB lensing from SPT and Planck III: Combined cosmological constraints
Authors:
T. M. C. Abbott,
M. Aguena,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
J. Annis,
B. Ansarinejad,
S. Avila,
D. Bacon,
E. J. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
B. A. Benson,
G. M. Bernstein,
E. Bertin,
J. Blazek,
L. E. Bleem,
S. Bocquet,
D. Brooks,
E. Buckley-Geer,
D. L. Burke,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
J. E. Carlstrom
, et al. (146 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present cosmological constraints from the analysis of two-point correlation functions between galaxy positions and galaxy lensing measured in Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data and measurements of cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing from the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. When jointly analyzing the DES-only two-point functions and the DES cross-correlations with SPT+Planck CMB l…
▽ More
We present cosmological constraints from the analysis of two-point correlation functions between galaxy positions and galaxy lensing measured in Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data and measurements of cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing from the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. When jointly analyzing the DES-only two-point functions and the DES cross-correlations with SPT+Planck CMB lensing, we find $Ω_{\rm m} = 0.344\pm 0.030$ and $S_8 \equiv σ_8 (Ω_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.773\pm 0.016$, assuming $Λ$CDM. When additionally combining with measurements of the CMB lensing autospectrum, we find $Ω_{\rm m} = 0.306^{+0.018}_{-0.021}$ and $S_8 = 0.792\pm 0.012$. The high signal-to-noise of the CMB lensing cross-correlations enables several powerful consistency tests of these results, including comparisons with constraints derived from cross-correlations only, and comparisons designed to test the robustness of the galaxy lensing and clustering measurements from DES. Applying these tests to our measurements, we find no evidence of significant biases in the baseline cosmological constraints from the DES-only analyses or from the joint analyses with CMB lensing cross-correlations. However, the CMB lensing cross-correlations suggest possible problems with the correlation function measurements using alternative lens galaxy samples, in particular the redMaGiC galaxies and high-redshift MagLim galaxies, consistent with the findings of previous studies. We use the CMB lensing cross-correlations to identify directions for further investigating these problems.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Constraining the Baryonic Feedback with Cosmic Shear Using the DES Year-3 Small-Scale Measurements
Authors:
A. Chen,
G. Aricò,
D. Huterer,
R. Angulo,
N. Weaverdyck,
O. Friedrich,
L. F. Secco,
C. Hernández-Monteagudo,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
J. Blazek,
A. Brandao-Souza,
S. L. Bridle,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
R. Cawthon,
C. Chang
, et al. (117 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We use the small scales of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year-3 cosmic shear measurements, which are excluded from the DES Year-3 cosmological analysis, to constrain the baryonic feedback. To model the baryonic feedback, we adopt a baryonic correction model and use the numerical package \texttt{Baccoemu} to accelerate the evaluation of the baryonic nonlinear matter power spectrum. We design our ana…
▽ More
We use the small scales of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year-3 cosmic shear measurements, which are excluded from the DES Year-3 cosmological analysis, to constrain the baryonic feedback. To model the baryonic feedback, we adopt a baryonic correction model and use the numerical package \texttt{Baccoemu} to accelerate the evaluation of the baryonic nonlinear matter power spectrum. We design our analysis pipeline to focus on the constraints of the baryonic suppression effects, utilizing the implication given by a principal component analysis on the Fisher forecasts. Our constraint on the baryonic effects can then be used to better model and ameliorate the effects of baryons in producing cosmological constraints from the next generation large-scale structure surveys. We detect the baryonic suppression on the cosmic shear measurements with a $\sim 2 σ$ significance. The characteristic halo mass for which half of the gas is ejected by baryonic feedback is constrained to be $M_c > 10^{13.2} h^{-1} M_{\odot}$ (95\% C.L.). The best-fit baryonic suppression is $\sim 5\%$ at $k=1.0 {\rm Mpc}\ h^{-1}$ and $\sim 15\%$ at $k=5.0 {\rm Mpc} \ h^{-1}$. Our findings are robust with respect to the assumptions about the cosmological parameters, specifics of the baryonic model, and intrinsic alignments.
△ Less
Submitted 17 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Joint analysis of DES Year 3 data and CMB lensing from SPT and Planck II: Cross-correlation measurements and cosmological constraints
Authors:
C. Chang,
Y. Omori,
E. J. Baxter,
C. Doux,
A. Choi,
S. Pandey,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
F. Bianchini,
J. Blazek,
L. E. Bleem,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
R. Cawthon,
R. Chen,
J. Cordero,
T. M. Crawford,
M. Crocce
, et al. (141 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Cross-correlations of galaxy positions and galaxy shears with maps of gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) are sensitive to the distribution of large-scale structure in the Universe. Such cross-correlations are also expected to be immune to some of the systematic effects that complicate correlation measurements internal to galaxy surveys. We present measurements and model…
▽ More
Cross-correlations of galaxy positions and galaxy shears with maps of gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) are sensitive to the distribution of large-scale structure in the Universe. Such cross-correlations are also expected to be immune to some of the systematic effects that complicate correlation measurements internal to galaxy surveys. We present measurements and modeling of the cross-correlations between galaxy positions and galaxy lensing measured in the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey with CMB lensing maps derived from a combination of data from the 2500 deg$^2$ SPT-SZ survey conducted with the South Pole Telescope and full-sky data from the Planck satellite. The CMB lensing maps used in this analysis have been constructed in a way that minimizes biases from the thermal Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect, making them well suited for cross-correlation studies. The total signal-to-noise of the cross-correlation measurements is 23.9 (25.7) when using a choice of angular scales optimized for a linear (nonlinear) galaxy bias model. We use the cross-correlation measurements to obtain constraints on cosmological parameters. For our fiducial galaxy sample, which consist of four bins of magnitude-selected galaxies, we find constraints of $Ω_{m} = 0.272^{+0.032}_{-0.052}$ and $S_{8} \equiv σ_8 \sqrt{Ω_{m}/0.3}= 0.736^{+0.032}_{-0.028}$ ($Ω_{m} = 0.245^{+0.026}_{-0.044}$ and $S_{8} = 0.734^{+0.035}_{-0.028}$) when assuming linear (nonlinear) galaxy bias in our modeling. Considering only the cross-correlation of galaxy shear with CMB lensing, we find $Ω_{m} = 0.270^{+0.043}_{-0.061}$ and $S_{8} = 0.740^{+0.034}_{-0.029}$. Our constraints on $S_8$ are consistent with recent cosmic shear measurements, but lower than the values preferred by primary CMB measurements from Planck.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2022; v1 submitted 23 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Joint analysis of DES Year 3 data and CMB lensing from SPT and Planck I: Construction of CMB Lensing Maps and Modeling Choices
Authors:
Y. Omori,
E. J. Baxter,
C. Chang,
O. Friedrich,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
J. Blazek,
L. E. Bleem,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
R. Cawthon,
R. Chen,
A. Choi,
J. Cordero,
T. M. Crawford,
M. Crocce,
C. Davis,
J. DeRose
, et al. (138 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Joint analyses of cross-correlations between measurements of galaxy positions, galaxy lensing, and lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) offer powerful constraints on the large-scale structure of the Universe. In a forthcoming analysis, we will present cosmological constraints from the analysis of such cross-correlations measured using Year 3 data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), and…
▽ More
Joint analyses of cross-correlations between measurements of galaxy positions, galaxy lensing, and lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) offer powerful constraints on the large-scale structure of the Universe. In a forthcoming analysis, we will present cosmological constraints from the analysis of such cross-correlations measured using Year 3 data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), and CMB data from the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. Here we present two key ingredients of this analysis: (1) an improved CMB lensing map in the SPT-SZ survey footprint, and (2) the analysis methodology that will be used to extract cosmological information from the cross-correlation measurements. Relative to previous lensing maps made from the same CMB observations, we have implemented techniques to remove contamination from the thermal Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect, enabling the extraction of cosmological information from smaller angular scales of the cross-correlation measurements than in previous analyses with DES Year 1 data. We describe our model for the cross-correlations between these maps and DES data, and validate our modeling choices to demonstrate the robustness of our analysis. We then forecast the expected cosmological constraints from the galaxy survey-CMB lensing auto and cross-correlations. We find that the galaxy-CMB lensing and galaxy shear-CMB lensing correlations will on their own provide a constraint on $S_8=σ_8 \sqrt{Ω_{\rm m}/0.3}$ at the few percent level, providing a powerful consistency check for the DES-only constraints. We explore scenarios where external priors on shear calibration are removed, finding that the joint analysis of CMB lensing cross-correlations can provide constraints on the shear calibration amplitude at the 5 to 10% level.
△ Less
Submitted 23 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmological constraints from the analysis of cosmic shear in harmonic space
Authors:
C. Doux,
B. Jain,
D. Zeurcher,
J. Lee,
X. Fang,
R. Rosenfeld,
A. Amon,
H. Camacho,
A. Choi,
L. F. Secco,
J. Blazek,
C. Chang,
M. Gatti,
E. Gaztanaga,
N. Jeffrey,
M. Raveri,
S. Samuroff,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
A. Campos
, et al. (113 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present cosmological constraints from the analysis of angular power spectra of cosmic shear maps based on data from the first three years of observations by the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3). Our measurements are based on the pseudo-$C_\ell$ method and offer a view complementary to that of the two-point correlation functions in real space, as the two estimators are known to compress and select Ga…
▽ More
We present cosmological constraints from the analysis of angular power spectra of cosmic shear maps based on data from the first three years of observations by the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3). Our measurements are based on the pseudo-$C_\ell$ method and offer a view complementary to that of the two-point correlation functions in real space, as the two estimators are known to compress and select Gaussian information in different ways, due to scale cuts. They may also be differently affected by systematic effects and theoretical uncertainties, such as baryons and intrinsic alignments (IA), making this analysis an important cross-check. In the context of $Λ$CDM, and using the same fiducial model as in the DES Y3 real space analysis, we find ${S_8 \equiv σ_8 \sqrt{Ω_{\rm m}/0.3} = 0.793^{+0.038}_{-0.025}}$, which further improves to ${S_8 = 0.784\pm 0.026 }$ when including shear ratios. This constraint is within expected statistical fluctuations from the real space analysis, and in agreement with DES~Y3 analyses of non-Gaussian statistics, but favors a slightly higher value of $S_8$, which reduces the tension with the Planck cosmic microwave background 2018 results from $2.3σ$ in the real space analysis to $1.5σ$ in this work. We explore less conservative IA models than the one adopted in our fiducial analysis, finding no clear preference for a more complex model. We also include small scales, using an increased Fourier mode cut-off up to $k_{\rm max}={5}{h{\rm Mpc}^{-1}}$, which allows to constrain baryonic feedback while leaving cosmological constraints essentially unchanged. Finally, we present an approximate reconstruction of the linear matter power spectrum at present time, which is found to be about 20\% lower than predicted by Planck 2018, as reflected by the $1.5σ$ lower $S_8$ value.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Consistent lensing and clustering in a low-$S_8$ Universe with BOSS, DES Year 3, HSC Year 1 and KiDS-1000
Authors:
A. Amon,
N. C. Robertson,
H. Miyatake,
C. Heymans,
M. White,
J. DeRose,
S. Yuan,
R. H. Wechsler,
T. N. Varga,
S. Bocquet,
A. Dvornik,
S. More,
A. J. Ross,
H. Hoekstra,
A. Alarcon,
M. Asgari,
J. Blazek,
A. Campos,
R. Chen,
A. Choi,
M. Crocce,
H. T. Diehl,
C. Doux,
K. Eckert,
J. Elvin-Poole
, et al. (83 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We evaluate the consistency between lensing and clustering probes of large-scale structure based on measurements of projected galaxy clustering from BOSS combined with overlapping galaxy-galaxy lensing from three surveys: DES Y3, HSC Y1, and KiDS-1000. An intra-lensing-survey study finds good agreement between these lensing data. We model the observations using the Dark Emulator and fit the data a…
▽ More
We evaluate the consistency between lensing and clustering probes of large-scale structure based on measurements of projected galaxy clustering from BOSS combined with overlapping galaxy-galaxy lensing from three surveys: DES Y3, HSC Y1, and KiDS-1000. An intra-lensing-survey study finds good agreement between these lensing data. We model the observations using the Dark Emulator and fit the data at two fixed cosmologies: Planck, with $S_8=0.83$, and a Lensing cosmology with $S_8=0.76$. For a joint analysis limited to scales with $R>5.25h^{-1}$Mpc, we find that both cosmologies provide an acceptable fit to the data. Full utilisation of the small-scale clustering and lensing measurements is hindered by uncertainty in the impact of baryon feedback and assembly bias, which we account for with a reasoned theoretical error budget. We incorporate a systematic scaling parameter for each redshift bin, $A$, that decouples the lensing and clustering to capture any inconsistency. When a wide range of scales ($0.15<R<60h^{-1}$Mpc) are incorporated, we find different results for the consistency of clustering and lensing between the two cosmologies. Limiting the analysis to the bins for which the impact of the selection of the lens sample is expected to be minimal, for the low-$S_8$ Lensing cosmology, the measurements are consistent with $A$=1; $A=0.91\pm0.04$ using DES+KiDS and $A=0.97\pm0.06$ using HSC. For the Planck cosmology case, we find a discrepancy: $A=0.79\pm0.03$ using DES+KiDS and $A=0.84\pm0.05$ using HSC. We demonstrate that a kSZ-based estimate for baryonic effects alleviates some of the discrepancy in the Planck cosmology. This analysis demonstrates the statistical power of these small-scale measurements, but also indicates that caution is still warranted given current uncertainties in modelling baryonic effects, assembly bias, and selection effects in the foreground sample.
△ Less
Submitted 13 October, 2022; v1 submitted 15 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
The DES view of the Eridanus supervoid and the CMB Cold Spot
Authors:
A. Kovács,
N. Jeffrey,
M. Gatti,
C. Chang,
L. Whiteway,
N. Hamaus,
O. Lahav,
G. Pollina,
D. Bacon,
T. Kacprzak,
B. Mawdsley,
S. Nadathur,
D. Zeurcher,
J. García-Bellido,
A. Alarcon,
A. Amon,
K. Bechtol,
G. M. Bernstein,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
R. Cawthon,
R. Chen,
A. Choi,
J. Cordero
, et al. (97 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Cold Spot is a puzzling large-scale feature in the Cosmic Microwave Background temperature maps and its origin has been subject to active debate. As an important foreground structure at low redshift, the Eridanus supervoid was recently detected, but it was subsequently determined that, assuming the standard $Λ$CDM model, only about 10-20$\%$ of the observed temperature depression can be accoun…
▽ More
The Cold Spot is a puzzling large-scale feature in the Cosmic Microwave Background temperature maps and its origin has been subject to active debate. As an important foreground structure at low redshift, the Eridanus supervoid was recently detected, but it was subsequently determined that, assuming the standard $Λ$CDM model, only about 10-20$\%$ of the observed temperature depression can be accounted for via its Integrated Sachs-Wolfe imprint. However, $R\gtrsim100~h^{-1}\mathrm{Mpc}$ supervoids elsewhere in the sky have shown ISW imprints $A_{\mathrm{ISW}}\approx5.2\pm1.6$ times stronger than expected from $Λ$CDM ($A_{\mathrm{ISW}}=1$), which warrants further inspection. Using the Year-3 redMaGiC catalogue of luminous red galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey, here we confirm the detection of the Eridanus supervoid as a significant under-density in the Cold Spot's direction at $z<0.2$. We also show, with $\mathrm{S/N}\gtrsim5$ significance, that the Eridanus supervoid appears as the most prominent large-scale under-density in the dark matter mass maps that we reconstructed from DES Year-3 gravitational lensing data. While we report no significant anomalies, an interesting aspect is that the amplitude of the lensing signal from the Eridanus supervoid at the Cold Spot centre is about $30\%$ lower than expected from similar peaks found in N-body simulations based on the standard $Λ$CDM model with parameters $Ω_{\rm m} = 0.279$ and $σ_8 = 0.82$. Overall, our results confirm the causal relation between these individually rare structures in the cosmic web and in the CMB, motivating more detailed future surveys in the Cold Spot region.
△ Less
Submitted 14 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Marginalisation over redshift distribution uncertainties using ranking of discrete realisations
Authors:
Juan P. Cordero,
Ian Harrison,
Richard P. Rollins,
G. M. Bernstein,
S. L. Bridle,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
A. Choi,
J. DeRose,
S. Dodelson,
K. Eckert,
T. F. Eifler,
S. Everett,
X. Fang,
O. Friedrich,
D. Gruen,
R. A. Gruendl,
W. G. Hartley,
E. M. Huff,
E. Krause,
N. Kuropatkin
, et al. (70 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Cosmological information from weak lensing surveys is maximised by dividing source galaxies into tomographic sub-samples for which the redshift distributions are estimated. Uncertainties on these redshift distributions must be correctly propagated into the cosmological results. We present hyperrank, a new method for marginalising over redshift distribution uncertainties in cosmological analyses, u…
▽ More
Cosmological information from weak lensing surveys is maximised by dividing source galaxies into tomographic sub-samples for which the redshift distributions are estimated. Uncertainties on these redshift distributions must be correctly propagated into the cosmological results. We present hyperrank, a new method for marginalising over redshift distribution uncertainties in cosmological analyses, using discrete samples from the space of all possible redshift distributions. This is demonstrated in contrast to previous highly simplified parametric models of the redshift distribution uncertainty. In hyperrank the set of proposed redshift distributions is ranked according to a small (in this work between one and four) number of summary values, which are then sampled along with other nuisance parameters and cosmological parameters in the Monte Carlo chain used for inference. This can be regarded as a general method for marginalising over discrete realisations of data vector variation with nuisance parameters, which can consequently be sampled separately to the main parameters of interest, allowing for increased computational efficiency. We focus on the case of weak lensing cosmic shear analyses and demonstrate our method using simulations made for the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We show the method can correctly and efficiently marginalise over a range of models for the redshift distribution uncertainty. Finally, we compare hyperrank to the common mean-shifting method of marginalising over redshift uncertainty, validating that this simpler model is sufficient for use in the DES Year 3 cosmology results presented in companion papers.
△ Less
Submitted 17 January, 2022; v1 submitted 20 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Galaxy-halo connection from galaxy-galaxy lensing
Authors:
G. Zacharegkas,
C. Chang,
J. Prat,
S. Pandey,
I. Ferrero,
J. Blazek,
B. Jain,
M. Crocce,
J. DeRose,
A. Palmese,
S. Seitz,
E. Sheldon,
W. G. Hartley,
R. H. Wechsler,
S. Dodelson,
P. Fosalba,
E. Krause,
Y. Park,
C. Sánchez,
A. Alarcon,
A. Amon,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
A. Campos
, et al. (92 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Galaxy-galaxy lensing is a powerful probe of the connection between galaxies and their host dark matter halos, which is important both for galaxy evolution and cosmology. We extend the measurement and modeling of the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal in the recent Dark Energy Survey Year 3 cosmology analysis to the highly nonlinear scales ($\sim 100$ kpc). This extension enables us to study the galaxy-…
▽ More
Galaxy-galaxy lensing is a powerful probe of the connection between galaxies and their host dark matter halos, which is important both for galaxy evolution and cosmology. We extend the measurement and modeling of the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal in the recent Dark Energy Survey Year 3 cosmology analysis to the highly nonlinear scales ($\sim 100$ kpc). This extension enables us to study the galaxy-halo connection via a Halo Occupation Distribution (HOD) framework for the two lens samples used in the cosmology analysis: a luminous red galaxy sample (redMaGiC) and a magnitude-limited galaxy sample (MagLim). We find that redMaGiC (MagLim) galaxies typically live in dark matter halos of mass $\log_{10}(M_{h}/M_{\odot}) \approx 13.7$ which is roughly constant over redshift ($13.3-13.5$ depending on redshift). We constrain these masses to $\sim 15\%$, approximately $1.5$ times improvement over previous work. We also constrain the linear galaxy bias more than 5 times better than what is inferred by the cosmological scales only. We find the satellite fraction for redMaGiC (MagLim) to be $\sim 0.1-0.2$ ($0.1-0.3$) with no clear trend in redshift. Our constraints on these halo properties are broadly consistent with other available estimates from previous work, large-scale constraints and simulations. The framework built in this paper will be used for future HOD studies with other galaxy samples and extensions for cosmological analyses.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2022; v1 submitted 15 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
Authors:
DES Collaboration,
T. M. C. Abbott,
M. Aguena,
A. Alarcon,
S. Allam,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
J. Annis,
S. Avila,
D. Bacon,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
S. Bhargava,
S. Birrer,
J. Blazek,
A. Brandao-Souza,
S. L. Bridle,
D. Brooks,
E. Buckley-Geer,
D. L. Burke,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos
, et al. (146 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the first cosmology results from large-scale structure in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) spanning 5000 deg$^2$. We perform an analysis combining three two-point correlation functions (3$\times$2pt): (i) cosmic shear using 100 million source galaxies, (ii) galaxy clustering, and (iii) the cross-correlation of source galaxy shear with lens galaxy positions. The analysis was designed to miti…
▽ More
We present the first cosmology results from large-scale structure in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) spanning 5000 deg$^2$. We perform an analysis combining three two-point correlation functions (3$\times$2pt): (i) cosmic shear using 100 million source galaxies, (ii) galaxy clustering, and (iii) the cross-correlation of source galaxy shear with lens galaxy positions. The analysis was designed to mitigate confirmation or observer bias; we describe specific changes made to the lens galaxy sample following unblinding of the results. We model the data within the flat $Λ$CDM and $w$CDM cosmological models. We find consistent cosmological results between the three two-point correlation functions; their combination yields clustering amplitude $S_8=0.776^{+0.017}_{-0.017}$ and matter density $Ω_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.339^{+0.032}_{-0.031}$ in $Λ$CDM, mean with 68% confidence limits; $S_8=0.775^{+0.026}_{-0.024}$, $Ω_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.352^{+0.035}_{-0.041}$, and dark energy equation-of-state parameter $w=-0.98^{+0.32}_{-0.20}$ in $w$CDM. This combination of DES data is consistent with the prediction of the model favored by the Planck 2018 cosmic microwave background (CMB) primary anisotropy data, which is quantified with a probability-to-exceed $p=0.13$ to $0.48$. When combining DES 3$\times$2pt data with available baryon acoustic oscillation, redshift-space distortion, and type Ia supernovae data, we find $p=0.34$. Combining all of these data sets with Planck CMB lensing yields joint parameter constraints of $S_8 = 0.812^{+0.008}_{-0.008}$, $Ω_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.306^{+0.004}_{-0.005}$, $h=0.680^{+0.004}_{-0.003}$, and $\sum m_ν<0.13 \;\mathrm{eV\; (95\% \;CL)}$ in $Λ$CDM; $S_8 = 0.812^{+0.008}_{-0.008}$, $Ω_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.302^{+0.006}_{-0.006}$, $h=0.687^{+0.006}_{-0.007}$, and $w=-1.031^{+0.030}_{-0.027}$ in $w$CDM. (abridged)
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2022; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Multi-Probe Modeling Strategy and Validation
Authors:
E. Krause,
X. Fang,
S. Pandey,
L. F. Secco,
O. Alves,
H. Huang,
J. Blazek,
J. Prat,
J. Zuntz,
T. F. Eifler,
N. MacCrann,
J. DeRose,
M. Crocce,
A. Porredon,
B. Jain,
M. A. Troxel,
S. Dodelson,
D. Huterer,
A. R. Liddle,
C. D. Leonard,
A. Amon,
A. Chen,
J. Elvin-Poole,
A. Ferté,
J. Muir
, et al. (99 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper details the modeling pipeline and validates the baseline analysis choices of the DES Year 3 joint analysis of galaxy clustering and weak lensing (a so-called "3$\times$2pt" analysis). These analysis choices include the specific combination of cosmological probes, priors on cosmological and systematics parameters, model parameterizations for systematic effects and related approximations,…
▽ More
This paper details the modeling pipeline and validates the baseline analysis choices of the DES Year 3 joint analysis of galaxy clustering and weak lensing (a so-called "3$\times$2pt" analysis). These analysis choices include the specific combination of cosmological probes, priors on cosmological and systematics parameters, model parameterizations for systematic effects and related approximations, and angular scales where the model assumptions are validated. We run a large number of simulated likelihood analyses using synthetic data vectors to test the robustness of our baseline analysis. We demonstrate that the DES Year 3 modeling pipeline, including the calibrated scale cuts, is sufficiently accurate relative to the constraining power of the DES Year 3 analyses. Our systematics mitigation strategy accounts for astrophysical systematics, such as galaxy bias, intrinsic alignments, source and lens magnification, baryonic effects, and source clustering, as well as for uncertainties in modeling the matter power spectrum, reduced shear, and estimator effects. We further demonstrate excellent agreement between two independently-developed modeling pipelines, and thus rule out any residual uncertainties due to the numerical implementation.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmology from combined galaxy clustering and lensing -- validation on cosmological simulations
Authors:
J. DeRose,
R. H. Wechsler,
M. R. Becker,
E. S. Rykoff,
S. Pandey,
N. MacCrann,
A. Amon,
J. Myles,
E. Krause,
D. Gruen,
B. Jain,
M. A. Troxel,
J. Prat,
A. Alarcon,
C. Sánchez,
J. Blazek,
M. Crocce,
G. Giannini,
M. Gatti,
G. M. Bernstein,
J. Zuntz,
S. Dodelson,
X. Fang,
O. Friedrich,
L. F. Secco
, et al. (92 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a validation of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) $3\times2$-point analysis choices by testing them on Buzzard v2.0, a new suite of cosmological simulations that is tailored for the testing and validation of combined galaxy clustering and weak lensing analyses. We show that the Buzzard v2.0 simulations accurately reproduce many important aspects of the DES Y3 data, including photom…
▽ More
We present a validation of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) $3\times2$-point analysis choices by testing them on Buzzard v2.0, a new suite of cosmological simulations that is tailored for the testing and validation of combined galaxy clustering and weak lensing analyses. We show that the Buzzard v2.0 simulations accurately reproduce many important aspects of the DES Y3 data, including photometric redshift and magnitude distributions, and the relevant set of two-point clustering and weak lensing statistics. We then show that our model for the $3\times2$-point data vector is accurate enough to recover the true cosmology in simulated surveys assuming the true redshift distributions for our source and lens samples, demonstrating robustness to uncertainties in the modeling of the non-linear matter power spectrum, non-linear galaxy bias and higher-order lensing corrections. Additionally, we demonstrate for the first time that our photometric redshift calibration methodology, including information from photometry, spectroscopy, clustering cross-correlations, and galaxy-galaxy lensing ratios, is accurate enough to recover the true cosmology in simulated surveys in the presence of realistic photometric redshift uncertainties.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing using the MagLim lens sample
Authors:
A. Porredon,
M. Crocce,
J. Elvin-Poole,
R. Cawthon,
G. Giannini,
J. De Vicente,
A. Carnero Rosell,
I. Ferrero,
E. Krause,
X. Fang,
J. Prat,
M. Rodriguez-Monroy,
S. Pandey,
A. Pocino,
F. J. Castander,
A. Choi,
A. Amon,
I. Tutusaus,
S. Dodelson,
I. Sevilla-Noarbe,
P. Fosalba,
E. Gaztanaga,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
F. Andrade-Oliveira
, et al. (119 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Two of the most sensitive probes of the large scale structure of the universe are the clustering of galaxies and the tangential shear of background galaxy shapes produced by those foreground galaxies, so-called galaxy-galaxy lensing. Combining the measurements of these two two-point functions leads to cosmological constraints that are independent of the galaxy bias factor. The optimal choice of fo…
▽ More
Two of the most sensitive probes of the large scale structure of the universe are the clustering of galaxies and the tangential shear of background galaxy shapes produced by those foreground galaxies, so-called galaxy-galaxy lensing. Combining the measurements of these two two-point functions leads to cosmological constraints that are independent of the galaxy bias factor. The optimal choice of foreground, or lens, galaxies is governed by the joint, but conflicting requirements to obtain accurate redshift information and large statistics. We present cosmological results from the full 5000 sq. deg. of the Dark Energy Survey first three years of observations (Y3) combining those two-point functions, using for the first time a magnitude-limited lens sample (MagLim) of 11 million galaxies especially selected to optimize such combination, and 100 million background shapes. We consider two cosmological models, flat $Λ$CDM and $w$CDM. In $Λ$CDM we obtain for the matter density $Ω_m = 0.320^{+0.041}_{-0.034}$ and for the clustering amplitude $S_8 = 0.778^{+0.037}_{-0.031}$, at 68% C.L. The latter is only 1$σ$ smaller than the prediction in this model informed by measurements of the cosmic microwave background by the Planck satellite. In $w$CDM we find $Ω_m = 0.32^{+0.044}_{-0.046}$, $S_8=0.777^{+0.049}_{-0.051}$, and dark energy equation of state $w=-1.031^{+0.218}_{-0.379}$. We find that including smaller scales while marginalizing over non-linear galaxy bias improves the constraining power in the $Ω_m-S_8$ plane by $31$% and in the $Ω_m-w$ plane by $41$% while yielding consistent cosmological parameters from those in the linear bias case. These results are combined with those from cosmic shear in a companion paper to present full DES-Y3 constraints from the three two-point functions (3x2pt).
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2022; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Constraints on cosmological parameters and galaxy bias models from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing using the redMaGiC sample
Authors:
S. Pandey,
E. Krause,
J. DeRose,
N. MacCrann,
B. Jain,
M. Crocce,
J. Blazek,
A. Choi,
H. Huang,
C. To,
X. Fang,
J. Elvin-Poole,
J. Prat,
A. Porredon,
L. F. Secco,
M. Rodriguez-Monroy,
N. Weaverdyck,
Y. Park,
M. Raveri,
E. Rozo,
E. S. Rykoff,
G. M. Bernstein,
C. Sánchez,
M. Jarvis,
M. A. Troxel
, et al. (116 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We constrain cosmological and galaxy-bias parameters using the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements from the Dark Energy Survey Year-3 data. We describe our modeling framework, and choice of scales analyzed, validating their robustness to theoretical uncertainties in small-scale clustering by analyzing simulated data. Using a linear galaxy bias model and redMaGiC…
▽ More
We constrain cosmological and galaxy-bias parameters using the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements from the Dark Energy Survey Year-3 data. We describe our modeling framework, and choice of scales analyzed, validating their robustness to theoretical uncertainties in small-scale clustering by analyzing simulated data. Using a linear galaxy bias model and redMaGiC galaxy sample, we obtain constraints on the matter density to be $Ω_{\rm m} = 0.325^{+0.033}_{-0.034}$. We also implement a non-linear galaxy bias model to probe smaller scales that includes parameterization based on hybrid perturbation theory and find that it leads to a 17% gain in cosmological constraining power. We perform robustness tests of our methodology pipeline and demonstrate the stability of the constraints to changes in the theoretical model. Using the redMaGiC galaxy sample as foreground lens galaxies, we find the galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements to exhibit significant signals akin to de-correlation between galaxies and mass on large scales, which is not expected in any current models. This likely systematic measurement error biases our constraints on galaxy bias and the $S_8$ parameter. We find that a scale-, redshift- and sky-area-independent phenomenological de-correlation parameter can effectively capture the impact of this systematic error. We trace the source of this de-correlation to a color-dependent photometric issue and minimize its impact on our result by changing the selection criteria of redMaGiC galaxies. Using this new sample, our constraints on the $S_8$ parameter are consistent with previous studies, and we find a small shift in the $Ω_{\rm m}$ constraints compared to the fiducial redMaGiC sample. We constrain the mean host halo mass of the redMaGiC galaxies in this new sample to be approximately $1.6 \times 10^{13} M_{\odot}/h$.
△ Less
Submitted 25 September, 2022; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Cosmic Shear and Robustness to Modeling Uncertainty
Authors:
L. F. Secco,
S. Samuroff,
E. Krause,
B. Jain,
J. Blazek,
M. Raveri,
A. Campos,
A. Amon,
A. Chen,
C. Doux,
A. Choi,
D. Gruen,
G. M. Bernstein,
C. Chang,
J. DeRose,
J. Myles,
A. Ferté,
P. Lemos,
D. Huterer,
J. Prat,
M. A. Troxel,
N. MacCrann,
A. R. Liddle,
T. Kacprzak,
X. Fang
, et al. (129 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This work and its companion paper, Amon et al. (2021), present cosmic shear measurements and cosmological constraints from over 100 million source galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data. We constrain the lensing amplitude parameter $S_8\equivσ_8\sqrt{Ω_\textrm{m}/0.3}$ at the 3% level in $Λ$CDM: $S_8=0.759^{+0.025}_{-0.023}$ (68% CL). Our constraint is at the 2% level when using angu…
▽ More
This work and its companion paper, Amon et al. (2021), present cosmic shear measurements and cosmological constraints from over 100 million source galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data. We constrain the lensing amplitude parameter $S_8\equivσ_8\sqrt{Ω_\textrm{m}/0.3}$ at the 3% level in $Λ$CDM: $S_8=0.759^{+0.025}_{-0.023}$ (68% CL). Our constraint is at the 2% level when using angular scale cuts that are optimized for the $Λ$CDM analysis: $S_8=0.772^{+0.018}_{-0.017}$ (68% CL). With cosmic shear alone, we find no statistically significant constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at our present statistical power. We carry out our analysis blind, and compare our measurement with constraints from two other contemporary weak-lensing experiments: the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS) and Hyper-Suprime Camera Subaru Strategic Program (HSC). We additionally quantify the agreement between our data and external constraints from the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). Our DES Y3 result under the assumption of $Λ$CDM is found to be in statistical agreement with Planck 2018, although favors a lower $S_8$ than the CMB-inferred value by $2.3σ$ (a $p$-value of 0.02). This paper explores the robustness of these cosmic shear results to modeling of intrinsic alignments, the matter power spectrum and baryonic physics. We additionally explore the statistical preference of our data for intrinsic alignment models of different complexity. The fiducial cosmic shear model is tested using synthetic data, and we report no biases greater than 0.3$σ$ in the plane of $S_8\timesΩ_\textrm{m}$ caused by uncertainties in the theoretical models.
△ Less
Submitted 13 January, 2022; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Cosmic Shear and Robustness to Data Calibration
Authors:
A. Amon,
D. Gruen,
M. A. Troxel,
N. MacCrann,
S. Dodelson,
A. Choi,
C. Doux,
L. F. Secco,
S. Samuroff,
E. Krause,
J. Cordero,
J. Myles,
J. DeRose,
R. H. Wechsler,
M. Gatti,
A. Navarro-Alsina,
G. M. Bernstein,
B. Jain,
J. Blazek,
A. Alarcon,
A. Ferté,
M. Raveri,
P. Lemos,
A. Campos,
J. Prat
, et al. (123 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This work, together with its companion paper, Secco and Samuroff et al. (2021), presents the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 cosmic shear measurements and cosmological constraints based on an analysis of over 100 million source galaxies. With the data spanning 4143 deg$^2$ on the sky, divided into four redshift bins, we produce the highest significance measurement of cosmic shear to date, with a signal-…
▽ More
This work, together with its companion paper, Secco and Samuroff et al. (2021), presents the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 cosmic shear measurements and cosmological constraints based on an analysis of over 100 million source galaxies. With the data spanning 4143 deg$^2$ on the sky, divided into four redshift bins, we produce the highest significance measurement of cosmic shear to date, with a signal-to-noise of 40. We conduct a blind analysis in the context of the $Λ$CDM model and find a 3% constraint of the clustering amplitude, $S_8\equiv σ_8 (Ω_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.759^{+0.025}_{-0.023}$. A $Λ$CDM-Optimized analysis, which safely includes smaller scale information, yields a 2% precision measurement of $S_8= 0.772^{+0.018}_{-0.017}$ that is consistent with the fiducial case. The two low-redshift measurements are statistically consistent with the Planck Cosmic Microwave Background result, however, both recovered $S_8$ values are lower than the high-redshift prediction by $2.3σ$ and $2.1σ$ ($p$-values of 0.02 and 0.05), respectively. The measurements are shown to be internally consistent across redshift bins, angular scales and correlation functions. The analysis is demonstrated to be robust to calibration systematics, with the $S_8$ posterior consistent when varying the choice of redshift calibration sample, the modeling of redshift uncertainty and methodology. Similarly, we find that the corrections included to account for the blending of galaxies shifts our best-fit $S_8$ by $0.5σ$ without incurring a substantial increase in uncertainty. We examine the limiting factors for the precision of the cosmological constraints and find observational systematics to be subdominant to the modeling of astrophysics. Specifically, we identify the uncertainties in modeling baryonic effects and intrinsic alignments as the limiting systematics.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2022; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Exploiting small-scale information with lensing shear ratios
Authors:
C. Sánchez,
J. Prat,
G. Zacharegkas,
S. Pandey,
E. Baxter,
G. M. Bernstein,
J. Blazek,
R. Cawthon,
C. Chang,
E. Krause,
P. Lemos,
Y. Park,
M. Raveri,
J. Sanchez,
M. A. Troxel,
A. Amon,
X. Fang,
O. Friedrich,
D. Gruen,
A. Porredon,
L. F. Secco,
S. Samuroff,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
F. Andrade-Oliveira
, et al. (116 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Using the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey, we use ratios of small-scale galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements around the same lens sample to constrain source redshift uncertainties, intrinsic alignments and other nuisance parameters of our model. Instead of using a simple geometric approach for the ratios, we use the full modeling of the galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements, inclu…
▽ More
Using the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey, we use ratios of small-scale galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements around the same lens sample to constrain source redshift uncertainties, intrinsic alignments and other nuisance parameters of our model. Instead of using a simple geometric approach for the ratios, we use the full modeling of the galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements, including the corresponding integration over the power spectrum and the contributions from intrinsic alignments and lens magnification. We perform extensive testing of the small-scale shear ratio (SR) modeling by studying the impact of different effects such as the inclusion of baryonic physics, non-linear biasing, halo occupation distribution descriptions and lens magnification, among others, and using realistic $N$-body simulations. We validate the robustness of our constraints in the data by using two independent lens samples, and by deriving constraints using the corresponding large-scale ratios for which the modeling is simpler. The DES Y3 results demonstrate how the ratios provide significant improvements in constraining power for several nuisance parameters in our model, especially on source redshift calibration and intrinsic alignments (IA). For source redshifts, SR improves the constraints from the prior by up to 38\% in some redshift bins. Such improvements, and especially the constraints it provides on IA, translate to tighter cosmological constraints when SR is combined with cosmic shear and other 2pt functions. In particular, for the DES Y3 data, SR improves $S_8$ constraints from cosmic shear by up to 31\%, and for the full combination of probes (3$\times$2pt) by up to 10\%. The shear ratios presented in this work are used as an additional likelihood for cosmic shear, 2$\times$2pt and the full 3$\times$2pt in the fiducial DES Y3 cosmological analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 5 April, 2022; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: High-precision measurement and modeling of galaxy-galaxy lensing
Authors:
J. Prat,
J. Blazek,
C. Sánchez,
I. Tutusaus,
S. Pandey,
J. Elvin-Poole,
E. Krause,
M. A. Troxel,
L. F. Secco,
A. Amon,
J. DeRose,
G. Zacharegkas,
C. Chang,
B. Jain,
N. MacCrann,
Y. Park,
E. Sheldon,
G. Giannini,
S. Bocquet,
C. To,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol
, et al. (116 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present and characterize the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal measured using the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3) covering 4132 deg$^2$. These galaxy-galaxy measurements are used in the DES Y3 3$\times$2pt cosmological analysis, which combines weak lensing and galaxy clustering information. We use two lens samples: a magnitude-limited sample and the redMaGic sample, wh…
▽ More
We present and characterize the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal measured using the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3) covering 4132 deg$^2$. These galaxy-galaxy measurements are used in the DES Y3 3$\times$2pt cosmological analysis, which combines weak lensing and galaxy clustering information. We use two lens samples: a magnitude-limited sample and the redMaGic sample, which span the redshift range $\sim 0.2-1$ with 10.7 M and 2.6 M galaxies respectively. For the source catalog, we use the Metacalibration shape sample, consisting of $\simeq$100 M galaxies separated into 4 tomographic bins. Our galaxy-galaxy lensing estimator is the mean tangential shear, for which we obtain a total S/N of $\sim$148 for MagLim ($\sim$120 for redMaGic), and $\sim$67 ($\sim$55) after applying the scale cuts of 6 Mpc/$h$. Thus we reach percent-level statistical precision, which requires that our modeling and systematic-error control be of comparable accuracy. The tangential shear model used in the 3$\times$2pt cosmological analysis includes lens magnification, a five-parameter intrinsic alignment model (TATT), marginalization over a point-mass to remove information from small scales and a linear galaxy bias model validated with higher-order terms. We explore the impact of these choices on the tangential shear observable and study the significance of effects not included in our model, such as reduced shear, source magnification and source clustering. We also test the robustness of our measurements to various observational and systematics effects, such as the impact of observing conditions, lens-source clustering, random-point subtraction, scale-dependent Metacalibration responses, PSF residuals, and B-modes.
△ Less
Submitted 5 April, 2022; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Galaxy clustering and systematics treatment for lens galaxy samples
Authors:
M. Rodríguez-Monroy,
N. Weaverdyck,
J. Elvin-Poole,
M. Crocce,
A. Carnero Rosell,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
S. Avila,
K. Bechtol,
G. M. Bernstein,
J. Blazek,
H. Camacho,
R. Cawthon,
J. De Vicente,
J. DeRose,
S. Dodelson,
S. Everett,
X. Fang,
I. Ferrero,
A. Ferté,
O. Friedrich,
E. Gaztanaga,
G. Giannini,
R. A. Gruendl,
W. G. Hartley,
K. Herner
, et al. (80 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In this work we present the galaxy clustering measurements of the two DES lens galaxy samples: a magnitude-limited sample optimized for the measurement of cosmological parameters, MagLim, and a sample of luminous red galaxies selected with the redMaGiC algorithm. MagLim / redMaGiC sample contains over 10 million / 2.5 million galaxies and is divided into six / five photometric redshift bins spanni…
▽ More
In this work we present the galaxy clustering measurements of the two DES lens galaxy samples: a magnitude-limited sample optimized for the measurement of cosmological parameters, MagLim, and a sample of luminous red galaxies selected with the redMaGiC algorithm. MagLim / redMaGiC sample contains over 10 million / 2.5 million galaxies and is divided into six / five photometric redshift bins spanning the range $z\in[0.20,1.05]$ / $z\in[0.15,0.90]$. Both samples cover 4143 deg$^2$ over which we perform our analysis blind, measuring the angular correlation function with a S/N $\sim 63$ for both samples. In a companion paper (DES Collaboration et al. 2021)), these measurements of galaxy clustering are combined with the correlation functions of cosmic shear and galaxy-galaxy lensing of each sample to place cosmological constraints with a 3$\times$2pt analysis. We conduct a thorough study of the mitigation of systematic effects caused by the spatially varying survey properties and we correct the measurements to remove artificial clustering signals. We employ several decontamination methods with different configurations to ensure the robustness of our corrections and to determine the systematic uncertainty that needs to be considered for the final cosmology analyses. We validate our fiducial methodology using log-normal mocks, showing that our decontamination procedure induces biases no greater than $0.5σ$ in the $(Ω_m, b)$ plane, where $b$ is galaxy bias. We demonstrate that failure to remove the artificial clustering would introduce strong biases up to $\sim 7 σ$ in $Ω_m$ and of more than $4 σ$ in galaxy bias.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: curved-sky weak lensing mass map reconstruction
Authors:
N. Jeffrey,
M. Gatti,
C. Chang,
L. Whiteway,
U. Demirbozan,
A. Kovacs,
G. Pollina,
D. Bacon,
N. Hamaus,
T. Kacprzak,
O. Lahav,
F. Lanusse,
B. Mawdsley,
S. Nadathur,
J. L. Starck,
P. Vielzeuf,
D. Zeurcher,
A. Alarcon,
A. Amon,
K. Bechtol,
G. M. Bernstein,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
R. Cawthon
, et al. (105 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present reconstructed convergence maps, \textit{mass maps}, from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) third year (Y3) weak gravitational lensing data set. The mass maps are weighted projections of the density field (primarily dark matter) in the foreground of the observed galaxies. We use four reconstruction methods, each is a \textit{maximum a posteriori} estimate with a different model for the prior…
▽ More
We present reconstructed convergence maps, \textit{mass maps}, from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) third year (Y3) weak gravitational lensing data set. The mass maps are weighted projections of the density field (primarily dark matter) in the foreground of the observed galaxies. We use four reconstruction methods, each is a \textit{maximum a posteriori} estimate with a different model for the prior probability of the map: Kaiser-Squires, null B-mode prior, Gaussian prior, and a sparsity prior. All methods are implemented on the celestial sphere to accommodate the large sky coverage of the DES Y3 data. We compare the methods using realistic $Λ$CDM simulations with mock data that are closely matched to the DES Y3 data. We quantify the performance of the methods at the map level and then apply the reconstruction methods to the DES Y3 data, performing tests for systematic error effects. The maps are compared with optical foreground cosmic-web structures and are used to evaluate the lensing signal from cosmic-void profiles. The recovered dark matter map covers the largest sky fraction of any galaxy weak lensing map to date.
△ Less
Submitted 22 November, 2021; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Probing gravity with the DES-CMASS sample and BOSS spectroscopy
Authors:
S. Lee,
E. M. Huff,
A. Choi,
J. Elvin-Poole,
C. Hirata,
K. Honscheid,
N. MacCrann,
A. J. Ross,
M. A. Troxel,
T. F. Eifler,
H. Kong,
A. Ferté,
J. Blazek,
D. Huterer,
A. Amara,
A. Campos,
A. Chen,
S. Dodelson,
P. Lemos,
C. D. Leonard,
V. Miranda,
J. Muir,
M. Raveri,
L. F. Secco,
N. Weaverdyck
, et al. (80 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The DES-CMASS sample (DMASS) is designed to optimally combine the weak lensing measurements from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and redshift-space distortions (RSD) probed by the CMASS galaxy sample from the Baryonic Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS). In this paper, we demonstrate the feasibility of adopting DMASS as the equivalent of BOSS CMASS for a joint analysis of DES and BOSS in the fram…
▽ More
The DES-CMASS sample (DMASS) is designed to optimally combine the weak lensing measurements from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and redshift-space distortions (RSD) probed by the CMASS galaxy sample from the Baryonic Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS). In this paper, we demonstrate the feasibility of adopting DMASS as the equivalent of BOSS CMASS for a joint analysis of DES and BOSS in the framework of modified gravity. We utilize the angular clustering of the DMASS galaxies, cosmic shear of the DES METACALIBRATION sources, and cross-correlation of the two as data vectors. By jointly fitting the combination of the data with the RSD measurements from the BOSS CMASS sample and Planck data, we obtain the constraints on modified gravity parameters $μ_0 = -0.37^{+0.47}_{-0.45}$ and $Σ_0 = 0.078^{+0.078}_{-0.082}$. We do not detect any significant deviation from General Relativity. Our constraints of modified gravity measured with DMASS are tighter than those with the DES Year 1 redMaGiC galaxy sample with the same external data sets by $29\%$ for $μ_0$ and $21\%$ for $Σ_0$, and comparable to the published results of the DES Year 1 modified gravity analysis despite this work using fewer external data sets. This improvement is mainly because the galaxy bias parameter is shared and more tightly constrained by both CMASS and DMASS, effectively breaking the degeneracy between the galaxy bias and other cosmological parameters. Such an approach to optimally combine photometric and spectroscopic surveys using a photometric sample equivalent to a spectroscopic sample can be applied to combining future surveys having a limited overlap such as DESI and LSST.
△ Less
Submitted 25 October, 2021; v1 submitted 29 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Galaxy-galaxy lensing with the DES-CMASS catalogue: measurement and constraints on the galaxy-matter cross-correlation
Authors:
S. Lee,
M. A. Troxel,
A. Choi,
J. Elvin-Poole,
C. Hirata,
K. Honscheid,
E. M. Huff,
N. MacCrann,
A. J. Ross,
T. F. Eifler,
C. Chang,
R. Miquel,
Y. Omori,
J. Prat,
G. M. Bernstein,
C. Davis,
J. DeRose,
M. Gatti,
M. M. Rau,
S. Samuroff,
C. Sánchez,
P. Vielzeuf,
J. Zuntz,
M. Aguena,
S. Allam
, et al. (68 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The DMASS sample is a photometric sample from the DES Year 1 data set designed to replicate the properties of the CMASS sample from BOSS, in support of a joint analysis of DES and BOSS beyond the small overlapping area. In this paper, we present the measurement of galaxy-galaxy lensing using the DMASS sample as gravitational lenses in the DES Y1 imaging data. We test a number of potential systemat…
▽ More
The DMASS sample is a photometric sample from the DES Year 1 data set designed to replicate the properties of the CMASS sample from BOSS, in support of a joint analysis of DES and BOSS beyond the small overlapping area. In this paper, we present the measurement of galaxy-galaxy lensing using the DMASS sample as gravitational lenses in the DES Y1 imaging data. We test a number of potential systematics that can bias the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal, including those from shear estimation, photometric redshifts, and observing conditions. After careful systematic tests, we obtain a highly significant detection of the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal, with total $S/N=25.7$. With the measured signal, we assess the feasibility of using DMASS as gravitational lenses equivalent to CMASS, by estimating the galaxy-matter cross-correlation coefficient $r_{\rm cc}$. By jointly fitting the galaxy-galaxy lensing measurement with the galaxy clustering measurement from CMASS, we obtain $r_{\rm cc}=1.09^{+0.12}_{-0.11}$ for the scale cut of $4~h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$ and $r_{\rm cc}=1.06^{+0.13}_{-0.12}$ for $12~h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$ in fixed cosmology. By adding the angular galaxy clustering of DMASS, we obtain $r_{\rm cc}=1.06\pm 0.10$ for the scale cut of $4~h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$ and $r_{\rm cc}=1.03\pm 0.11$ for $12~h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$. The resulting values of $r_{\rm cc}$ indicate that the lensing signal of DMASS is statistically consistent with the one that would have been measured if CMASS had populated the DES region within the given statistical uncertainty. The measurement of galaxy-galaxy lensing presented in this paper will serve as part of the data vector for the forthcoming cosmology analysis in preparation.
△ Less
Submitted 20 October, 2021; v1 submitted 22 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Measuring the Survey Transfer Function with Balrog
Authors:
S. Everett,
B. Yanny,
N. Kuropatkin,
E. M. Huff,
Y. Zhang,
J. Myles,
A. Masegian,
J. Elvin-Poole,
S. Allam,
G. M. Bernstein,
I. Sevilla-Noarbe,
M. Splettstoesser,
E. Sheldon,
M. Jarvis,
A. Amon,
I. Harrison,
A. Choi,
W. G. Hartley,
A. Alarcon,
C. Sánchez,
D. Gruen,
K. Eckert,
J. Prat,
M. Tabbutt,
V. Busti
, et al. (75 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We describe an updated calibration and diagnostic framework, Balrog, used to directly sample the selection and photometric biases of the Dark Energy Survey's (DES) Year 3 (Y3) dataset. We systematically inject onto the single-epoch images of a random 20% subset of the DES footprint an ensemble of nearly 30 million realistic galaxy models derived from DES Deep Field observations. These augmented im…
▽ More
We describe an updated calibration and diagnostic framework, Balrog, used to directly sample the selection and photometric biases of the Dark Energy Survey's (DES) Year 3 (Y3) dataset. We systematically inject onto the single-epoch images of a random 20% subset of the DES footprint an ensemble of nearly 30 million realistic galaxy models derived from DES Deep Field observations. These augmented images are analyzed in parallel with the original data to automatically inherit measurement systematics that are often too difficult to capture with traditional generative models. The resulting object catalog is a Monte Carlo sampling of the DES transfer function and is used as a powerful diagnostic and calibration tool for a variety of DES Y3 science, particularly for the calibration of the photometric redshifts of distant "source" galaxies and magnification biases of nearer "lens" galaxies. The recovered Balrog injections are shown to closely match the photometric property distributions of the Y3 GOLD catalog, particularly in color, and capture the number density fluctuations from observing conditions of the real data within 1% for a typical galaxy sample. We find that Y3 colors are extremely well calibrated, typically within ~1-8 millimagnitudes, but for a small subset of objects we detect significant magnitude biases correlated with large overestimates of the injected object size due to proximity effects and blending. We discuss approaches to extend the current methodology to capture more aspects of the transfer function and reach full coverage of the survey footprint for future analyses.
△ Less
Submitted 25 January, 2022; v1 submitted 23 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Assessing tension metrics with Dark Energy Survey and Planck data
Authors:
P. Lemos,
M. Raveri,
A. Campos,
Y. Park,
C. Chang,
N. Weaverdyck,
D. Huterer,
A. R. Liddle,
J. Blazek,
R. Cawthon,
A. Choi,
J. DeRose,
S. Dodelson,
C. Doux,
M. Gatti,
D. Gruen,
I. Harrison,
E. Krause,
O. Lahav,
N. MacCrann,
J. Muir,
J. Prat,
M. M. Rau,
R. P. Rollins,
S. Samuroff
, et al. (81 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Quantifying tensions -- inconsistencies amongst measurements of cosmological parameters by different experiments -- has emerged as a crucial part of modern cosmological data analysis. Statistically-significant tensions between two experiments or cosmological probes may indicate new physics extending beyond the standard cosmological model and need to be promptly identified. We apply several tension…
▽ More
Quantifying tensions -- inconsistencies amongst measurements of cosmological parameters by different experiments -- has emerged as a crucial part of modern cosmological data analysis. Statistically-significant tensions between two experiments or cosmological probes may indicate new physics extending beyond the standard cosmological model and need to be promptly identified. We apply several tension estimators proposed in the literature to the Dark Energy Survey (DES) large-scale structure measurement and Planck cosmic microwave background data. We first evaluate the responsiveness of these metrics to an input tension artificially introduced between the two, using synthetic DES data. We then apply the metrics to the comparison of Planck and actual DES Year 1 data. We find that the parameter differences, Eigentension, and Suspiciousness metrics all yield similar results on both simulated and real data, while the Bayes ratio is inconsistent with the rest due to its dependence on the prior volume. Using these metrics, we calculate the tension between DES Year 1 $3\times 2$pt and Planck, finding the surveys to be in $\sim 2.3σ$ tension under the $Λ$CDM paradigm. This suite of metrics provides a toolset for robustly testing tensions in the DES Year 3 data and beyond.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2021; v1 submitted 17 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
DES Y3 results: Blending shear and redshift biases in image simulations
Authors:
N. MacCrann,
M. R. Becker,
J. McCullough,
A. Amon,
D. Gruen,
M. Jarvis,
A. Choi,
M. A. Troxel,
E. Sheldon,
B. Yanny,
K. Herner,
S. Dodelson,
J. Zuntz,
K. Eckert,
R. P. Rollins,
T. N. Varga,
G. M. Bernstein,
R. A. Gruendl,
I. Harrison,
W. G. Hartley,
I. Sevilla-Noarbe,
A. Pieres,
S. L. Bridle,
J. Myles,
A. Alarcon
, et al. (71 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
As the statistical power of galaxy weak lensing reaches percent level precision, large, realistic and robust simulations are required to calibrate observational systematics, especially given the increased importance of object blending as survey depths increase. To capture the coupled effects of blending in both shear and photometric redshift calibration, we define the effective redshift distributi…
▽ More
As the statistical power of galaxy weak lensing reaches percent level precision, large, realistic and robust simulations are required to calibrate observational systematics, especially given the increased importance of object blending as survey depths increase. To capture the coupled effects of blending in both shear and photometric redshift calibration, we define the effective redshift distribution for lensing, $n_γ(z)$, and describe how to estimate it using image simulations. We use an extensive suite of tailored image simulations to characterize the performance of the shear estimation pipeline applied to the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 dataset. We describe the multi-band, multi-epoch simulations, and demonstrate their high level of realism through comparisons to the real DES data. We isolate the effects that generate shear calibration biases by running variations on our fiducial simulation, and find that blending-related effects are the dominant contribution to the mean multiplicative bias of approximately $-2\%$. By generating simulations with input shear signals that vary with redshift, we calibrate biases in our estimation of the effective redshfit distribution, and demonstrate the importance of this approach when blending is present. We provide corrected effective redshift distributions that incorporate statistical and systematic uncertainties, ready for use in DES Year 3 weak lensing analyses.
△ Less
Submitted 26 January, 2022; v1 submitted 15 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Redshift Calibration of the Weak Lensing Source Galaxies
Authors:
J. Myles,
A. Alarcon,
A. Amon,
C. Sánchez,
S. Everett,
J. DeRose,
J. McCullough,
D. Gruen,
G. M. Bernstein,
M. A. Troxel,
S. Dodelson,
A. Campos,
N. MacCrann,
B. Yin,
M. Raveri,
A. Amara,
M. R. Becker,
A. Choi,
J. Cordero,
K. Eckert,
M. Gatti,
G. Giannini,
J. Gschwend,
R. A. Gruendl,
I. Harrison
, et al. (83 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Determining the distribution of redshifts of galaxies observed by wide-field photometric experiments like the Dark Energy Survey is an essential component to mapping the matter density field with gravitational lensing. In this work we describe the methods used to assign individual weak lensing source galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Weak Lensing Source Catalogue to four tomographic bins…
▽ More
Determining the distribution of redshifts of galaxies observed by wide-field photometric experiments like the Dark Energy Survey is an essential component to mapping the matter density field with gravitational lensing. In this work we describe the methods used to assign individual weak lensing source galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Weak Lensing Source Catalogue to four tomographic bins and to estimate the redshift distributions in these bins. As the first application of these methods to data, we validate that the assumptions made apply to the DES Y3 weak lensing source galaxies and develop a full treatment of systematic uncertainties. Our method consists of combining information from three independent likelihood functions: Self-Organizing Map $p(z)$ (SOMPZ), a method for constraining redshifts from galaxy photometry; clustering redshifts (WZ), constraints on redshifts from cross-correlations of galaxy density functions; and shear ratios (SR), which provide constraints on redshifts from the ratios of the galaxy-shear correlation functions at small scales. Finally, we describe how these independent probes are combined to yield an ensemble of redshift distributions encapsulating our full uncertainty. We calibrate redshifts with combined effective uncertainties of $σ_{\langle z \rangle}\sim 0.01$ on the mean redshift in each tomographic bin.
△ Less
Submitted 14 June, 2021; v1 submitted 15 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
A machine learning approach to galaxy properties: joint redshift-stellar mass probability distributions with Random Forest
Authors:
S. Mucesh,
W. G. Hartley,
A. Palmese,
O. Lahav,
L. Whiteway,
A. F. L. Bluck,
A. Alarcon,
A. Amon,
K. Bechtol,
G. M. Bernstein,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
A. Choi,
K. Eckert,
S. Everett,
D. Gruen,
R. A. Gruendl,
I. Harrison,
E. M. Huff,
N. Kuropatkin,
I. Sevilla-Noarbe,
E. Sheldon,
B. Yanny,
M. Aguena,
S. Allam
, et al. (50 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We demonstrate that highly accurate joint redshift-stellar mass probability distribution functions (PDFs) can be obtained using the Random Forest (RF) machine learning (ML) algorithm, even with few photometric bands available. As an example, we use the Dark Energy Survey (DES), combined with the COSMOS2015 catalogue for redshifts and stellar masses. We build two ML models: one containing deep phot…
▽ More
We demonstrate that highly accurate joint redshift-stellar mass probability distribution functions (PDFs) can be obtained using the Random Forest (RF) machine learning (ML) algorithm, even with few photometric bands available. As an example, we use the Dark Energy Survey (DES), combined with the COSMOS2015 catalogue for redshifts and stellar masses. We build two ML models: one containing deep photometry in the $griz$ bands, and the second reflecting the photometric scatter present in the main DES survey, with carefully constructed representative training data in each case. We validate our joint PDFs for $10,699$ test galaxies by utilizing the copula probability integral transform and the Kendall distribution function, and their univariate counterparts to validate the marginals. Benchmarked against a basic set-up of the template-fitting code BAGPIPES, our ML-based method outperforms template fitting on all of our predefined performance metrics. In addition to accuracy, the RF is extremely fast, able to compute joint PDFs for a million galaxies in just under $6$ min with consumer computer hardware. Such speed enables PDFs to be derived in real time within analysis codes, solving potential storage issues. As part of this work we have developed GALPRO, a highly intuitive and efficient Python package to rapidly generate multivariate PDFs on-the-fly. GALPRO is documented and available for researchers to use in their cosmology and galaxy evolution studies.
△ Less
Submitted 19 February, 2021; v1 submitted 10 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Euclid: Forecasts for $k$-cut $3 \times 2$ Point Statistics
Authors:
P. L. Taylor,
T. Kitching,
V. F. Cardone,
A. Ferté,
E. M. Huff,
F. Bernardeau,
J. Rhodes,
A. C. Deshpande,
I. Tutusaus,
A. Pourtsidou,
S. Camera,
C. Carbone,
S. Casas,
M. Martinelli,
V. Pettorino,
Z. Sakr,
D. Sapone,
V. Yankelevich,
N. Auricchio,
A. Balestra,
C. Bodendorf,
D. Bonino,
A. Boucaud,
E. Branchini,
M. Brescia
, et al. (70 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Modelling uncertainties at small scales, i.e. high $k$ in the power spectrum $P(k)$, due to baryonic feedback, nonlinear structure growth and the fact that galaxies are biased tracers poses a significant obstacle to fully leverage the constraining power of the {\it Euclid} wide-field survey. $k$-cut cosmic shear has recently been proposed as a method to optimally remove sensitivity to these scales…
▽ More
Modelling uncertainties at small scales, i.e. high $k$ in the power spectrum $P(k)$, due to baryonic feedback, nonlinear structure growth and the fact that galaxies are biased tracers poses a significant obstacle to fully leverage the constraining power of the {\it Euclid} wide-field survey. $k$-cut cosmic shear has recently been proposed as a method to optimally remove sensitivity to these scales while preserving usable information. In this paper we generalise the $k$-cut cosmic shear formalism to $3 \times 2$ point statistics and estimate the loss of information for different $k$-cuts in a $3 \times 2$ point analysis of the {\it Euclid} data. Extending the Fisher matrix analysis of~\citet{blanchard2019euclid}, we assess the degradation in constraining power for different $k$-cuts. We work in the idealised case and assume the galaxy bias is linear, the covariance is Gaussian, while neglecting uncertainties due to photo-z errors and baryonic feedback. We find that taking a $k$-cut at $2.6 \ h \ {\rm Mpc} ^{-1}$ yields a dark energy Figure of Merit (FOM) of 1018. This is comparable to taking a weak lensing cut at $\ell = 5000$ and a galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing cut at $\ell = 3000$ in a traditional $3 \times 2$ point analysis. We also find that the fraction of the observed galaxies used in the photometric clustering part of the analysis is one of the main drivers of the FOM. Removing $50 \% \ (90 \%)$ of the clustering galaxies decreases the FOM by $19 \% \ (62 \%)$. Given that the FOM depends so heavily on the fraction of galaxies used in the clustering analysis, extensive efforts should be made to handle the real-world systematics present when extending the analysis beyond the luminous red galaxy (LRG) sample.
△ Less
Submitted 20 July, 2021; v1 submitted 8 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Dark Energy Survey internal consistency tests of the joint cosmological probes analysis with posterior predictive distributions
Authors:
C. Doux,
E. Baxter,
P. Lemos,
C. Chang,
A. Alarcon,
A. Amon,
A. Campos,
A. Choi,
M. Gatti,
D. Gruen,
M. Jarvis,
N. MacCrann,
Y. Park,
J. Prat,
M. M. Rau,
M. Raveri,
S. Samuroff,
J. DeRose,
W. G. Hartley,
B. Hoyle,
M. A. Troxel,
J. Zuntz,
T. M. C. Abbott,
M. Aguena,
S. Allam
, et al. (63 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Beyond-$Λ$CDM physics or systematic errors may cause subsets of a cosmological data set to appear inconsistent when analyzed assuming $Λ$CDM. We present an application of internal consistency tests to measurements from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) joint probes analysis. Our analysis relies on computing the posterior predictive distribution (PPD) for these data under the assumption of…
▽ More
Beyond-$Λ$CDM physics or systematic errors may cause subsets of a cosmological data set to appear inconsistent when analyzed assuming $Λ$CDM. We present an application of internal consistency tests to measurements from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) joint probes analysis. Our analysis relies on computing the posterior predictive distribution (PPD) for these data under the assumption of $Λ$CDM. We find that the DES Y1 data have an acceptable goodness of fit to $Λ$CDM, with a probability of finding a worse fit by random chance of ${p = 0.046}$. Using numerical PPD tests, supplemented by graphical checks, we show that most of the data vector appears completely consistent with expectations, although we observe a small tension between large- and small-scale measurements. A small part (roughly 1.5%) of the data vector shows an unusually large departure from expectations; excluding this part of the data has negligible impact on cosmological constraints, but does significantly improve the $p$-value to 0.10. The methodology developed here will be applied to test the consistency of DES Year 3 joint probes data sets.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2021; v1 submitted 6 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.