-
RETINA: Distributed and Secure Trust Management for Smart Grid Applications and Energy Trading
Authors:
Vaios Boulgourasa,
Thodoris Ioannidis,
Ilias Politis,
Christos Xenakis
Abstract:
The rapid adoption of smart grids demands robust security and efficiency measures due to their critical role in delivering electricity and their potential for customer-oriented benefits. This paper presents an innovative framework, named RETINA, which provides a resilient and secure energy trading mechanism within smart grid systems. RETINA tackles the inherent security and infrastructure challeng…
▽ More
The rapid adoption of smart grids demands robust security and efficiency measures due to their critical role in delivering electricity and their potential for customer-oriented benefits. This paper presents an innovative framework, named RETINA, which provides a resilient and secure energy trading mechanism within smart grid systems. RETINA tackles the inherent security and infrastructure challenges in smart grids by establishing a trust-based security layer and facilitating energy transactions through blockchain technology. Our proposed solution integrates Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and the Web of Trust (WoT) concepts, promoting decentralized communication channels and robust key management. We further introduce a smart contract-based energy trading mechanism that factors in trust, distance, and energy type (green or non-green) in cost calculation. The utility and robustness of RETINA have been validated in a virtualized testbed environment with 500 nodes, demonstrating superior performance in terms of scalability and resilience compared to the existing WoT scheme. Furthermore, RETINA successfully enables a secure and efficient energy trading scheme, promoting the use of renewable energy sources. Future enhancements will include application to a realistic smart grid deployment and the integration of additional functionalities. This groundbreaking solution has the potential to revolutionize the smart grid ecosystem, addressing its current limitations and propelling the industry towards a future of advanced and secure energy exchange.
△ Less
Submitted 13 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Template-Based Question Answering over Linked Geospatial Data
Authors:
Dharmen Punjani,
Markos Iliakis,
Theodoros Stefou,
Kuldeep Singh,
Andreas Both,
Manolis Koubarakis,
Iosif Angelidis,
Konstantina Bereta,
Themis Beris,
Dimitris Bilidas,
Theofilos Ioannidis,
Nikolaos Karalis,
Christoph Lange,
Despina-Athanasia Pantazi,
Christos Papaloukas,
Georgios Stamoulis
Abstract:
Large amounts of geospatial data have been made available recently on the linked open data cloud and the portals of many national cartographic agencies (e.g., OpenStreetMap data, administrative geographies of various countries, or land cover/land use data sets). These datasets use various geospatial vocabularies and can be queried using SPARQL or its OGC-standardized extension GeoSPARQL. In this p…
▽ More
Large amounts of geospatial data have been made available recently on the linked open data cloud and the portals of many national cartographic agencies (e.g., OpenStreetMap data, administrative geographies of various countries, or land cover/land use data sets). These datasets use various geospatial vocabularies and can be queried using SPARQL or its OGC-standardized extension GeoSPARQL. In this paper, we go beyond these approaches to offer a question-answering engine for natural language questions on top of linked geospatial data sources. Our system has been implemented as re-usable components of the Frankenstein question answering architecture. We give a detailed description of the system's architecture, its underlying algorithms, and its evaluation using a set of 201 natural language questions. The set of questions is offered to the research community as a gold standard dataset for the comparative evaluation of future geospatial question answering engines.
△ Less
Submitted 29 April, 2021; v1 submitted 14 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Evaluating Geospatial RDF stores Using the Benchmark Geographica 2
Authors:
Theofilos Ioannidis,
George Garbis,
Kostis Kyzirakos,
Konstantina Bereta,
Manolis Koubarakis
Abstract:
Since 2007, geospatial extensions of SPARQL, like GeoSPARQL and stSPARQL, have been defined and corresponding geospatial RDF stores have been implemented. In addition, some work on developing benchmarks for evaluating geospatial RDF stores has been carried out. In this paper, we revisit the Geographica benchmark defined by our group in 2013 which uses both real world and synthetic data to test the…
▽ More
Since 2007, geospatial extensions of SPARQL, like GeoSPARQL and stSPARQL, have been defined and corresponding geospatial RDF stores have been implemented. In addition, some work on developing benchmarks for evaluating geospatial RDF stores has been carried out. In this paper, we revisit the Geographica benchmark defined by our group in 2013 which uses both real world and synthetic data to test the performance and functionality of geospatial RDF stores. We present Geographica 2, a new version of the benchmark which extends Geographica by adding one more workload, extending our existing workloads and evaluating 5 more RDF stores. Using three different real workloads, Geographica 2 tests the efficiency of primitive spatial functions in RDF stores and the performance of the RDF stores in real use case scenarios, a more detailed evaluation is performed using a synthetic workload and the scalability of the RDF stores is stressed with the scalability workload. In total eight systems are evaluated out of which six adequately support GeoSPARQL and two offer limited spatial support.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
