GroundBIRD : A CMB polarization experiment with MKID arrays
Authors:
Kyungmin Lee,
Jihoon Choi,
Ricardo Tanausú Génova-Santos,
Makoto Hattori,
Masashi Hazumi,
Shunsuke Honda,
Takuji Ikemitsu,
Hidesato Ishida,
Hikaru Ishitsuka,
Yonggil Jo,
Kenichi Karatsu,
Kenji Kiuchi,
Junta Komine,
Ryo Koyano,
Hiroki Kutsuma,
Satoru Mima,
Makoto Minowa,
Joonhyeok Moon,
Makoto Nagai,
Taketo Nagasaki,
Masato Naruse,
Shugo Oguri,
Chiko Otani,
Michael Peel,
Rafael Rebolo
, et al. (9 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
GroundBIRD is a ground-based experiment for the precise observation of the polarization of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). To achieve high sensitivity at large angular scale, we adopt three features in this experiment: fast rotation scanning, microwave kinetic inductance detector (MKID) and cold optics. The rotation scanning strategy has the advantage to suppress $1/f$ noise. It also provid…
▽ More
GroundBIRD is a ground-based experiment for the precise observation of the polarization of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). To achieve high sensitivity at large angular scale, we adopt three features in this experiment: fast rotation scanning, microwave kinetic inductance detector (MKID) and cold optics. The rotation scanning strategy has the advantage to suppress $1/f$ noise. It also provides a large sky coverage of 40\%, which corresponds to the large angular scales of $l \sim 6$. This allows us to constrain the tensor-to-scalar ratio by using low $l$ B-mode spectrum. The focal plane consists of 7 MKID arrays for two target frequencies, 145 GHz and 220 GHz band. There are 161 pixels in total, of which 138 are for 144 GHz and 23 are for 220 GHz. This array is currently under development and the prototype will soon be evaluated in telescope. The GroundBIRD telescope will observe the CMB at the Teide observatory. The telescope was moved from Japan to Tenerife and is now under test. We present the status and plan of the GroundBIRD experiment.
△ Less
Submitted 15 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
A measurement method for responsivity of microwave kinetic inductance detector by changing power of readout microwaves
Authors:
Hiroki Kutsuma,
Makoto Hattori,
Ryo Koyano,
Satoru Mima,
Shugo Oguri,
Chiko Otani,
Tohru Taino,
Osamu Tajima
Abstract:
Superconducting detectors are a modern technology applied in various fields. The microwave kinetic inductance detector (MKID) is one of cutting-edge superconducting detector. It is based on the principle of a superconducting resonator circuit. A radiation entering the MKID breaks the Cooper pairs in the superconducting resonator, and the intensity of the radiation is detected as a variation of the…
▽ More
Superconducting detectors are a modern technology applied in various fields. The microwave kinetic inductance detector (MKID) is one of cutting-edge superconducting detector. It is based on the principle of a superconducting resonator circuit. A radiation entering the MKID breaks the Cooper pairs in the superconducting resonator, and the intensity of the radiation is detected as a variation of the resonant condition. Therefore, calibration of the detector responsivity, i.e., the variation of the resonant phase with respect to the number of Cooper-pair breaks (quasiparticles), is important. We propose a method for responsivity calibration. Microwaves used for the detector readout locally raise the temperature in each resonator, which increases the number of quasiparticles. Since the magnitude of the temperature rise depends on the power of readout microwaves, the number of quasiparticles also depends on the power of microwaves. By changing the power of the readout microwaves, we simultaneously measure the phase difference and lifetime of quasiparticles. We calculate the number of quasiparticles from the measured lifetime and by using a theoretical formula. This measurement yields a relation between the phase response as a function of the number of quasiparticles. We demonstrate this responsivity calibration using the MKID maintained at 285mK. We also confirm consistency between the results obtained using this method and conventional calibration methods in terms of the accuracy.
△ Less
Submitted 8 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
