-
Including a Luminous Central Remnant in Radiative Transfer Simulations for Type Iax Supernovae
Authors:
F. P. Callan,
S. A. Sim,
C. E. Collins,
L. J. Shingles,
F. Lach,
F. K. Roepke,
R. Pakmor,
M. Kromer,
S. Srivastav
Abstract:
Type Iax supernovae (SNe Iax) are proposed to arise from deflagrations of Chandrasekhar mass white dwarfs (WDs). Previous deflagration simulations have achieved good agreement with the light curves and spectra of intermediate-luminosity and bright SNe Iax. However, the model light curves decline too quickly after peak, particularly in red optical and near-infrared (NIR) bands. Deflagration models…
▽ More
Type Iax supernovae (SNe Iax) are proposed to arise from deflagrations of Chandrasekhar mass white dwarfs (WDs). Previous deflagration simulations have achieved good agreement with the light curves and spectra of intermediate-luminosity and bright SNe Iax. However, the model light curves decline too quickly after peak, particularly in red optical and near-infrared (NIR) bands. Deflagration models with a variety of ignition configurations do not fully unbind the WD, leaving a remnant polluted with $^{56}\mathrm{Ni}$. Emission from such a remnant may contribute to the luminosity of SNe Iax. Here we investigate the impact of adding a central energy source, assuming instantaneous powering by $^{56}\mathrm{Ni}$ decay in the remnant, in radiative transfer calculations of deflagration models. Including the remnant contribution improves agreement with the light curves of SNe Iax, particularly due to the slower post-maximum decline of the models. Spectroscopic agreement is also improved, with intermediate-luminosity and faint models showing greatest improvement. We adopt the full remnant $^{56}\mathrm{Ni}$ mass predicted for bright models, but good agreement with intermediate-luminosity and faint SNe Iax is only possible for remnant $^{56}\mathrm{Ni}$ masses significantly lower than those predicted. This may indicate that some of the $^{56}\mathrm{Ni}$ decay energy in the remnant does not contribute to the radiative luminosity but instead drives mass ejection, or that escape of energy from the remnant is significantly delayed. Future work should investigate the structure of remnants predicted by deflagration models and the potential roles of winds and delayed energy escape, as well as extend radiative transfer simulations to late times.
△ Less
Submitted 19 April, 2024; v1 submitted 22 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Models of pulsationally assisted gravitationally confined detonations with different ignition conditions
Authors:
F. Lach,
F. P. Callan,
S. A. Sim,
F. K. Roepke
Abstract:
Over the past decades, many explosion scenarios for Type Ia supernovae have been proposed and investigated including various combinations of deflagrations and detonations in white dwarfs of different masses up to the Chandrasekhar mass. One of these is the gravitationally confined detonation model. In this case a weak deflagration burns to the surface, wraps around the bound core, and collides at…
▽ More
Over the past decades, many explosion scenarios for Type Ia supernovae have been proposed and investigated including various combinations of deflagrations and detonations in white dwarfs of different masses up to the Chandrasekhar mass. One of these is the gravitationally confined detonation model. In this case a weak deflagration burns to the surface, wraps around the bound core, and collides at the antipode. A subsequent detonation is then initiated in the collision area. Since the parameter space for this scenario, that is, varying central densities and ignition geometries, has not been studied in detail, we used pure deflagration models of a previous parameter study dedicated to Type Iax supernovae as initial models to investigate the gravitationally confined detonation scenario. We aim to judge whether this channel can account for one of the many subgroups of Type Ia supernovae, or even normal events. To this end, we employed a comprehensive pipeline for three-dimensional Type Ia supernova modeling that consists of hydrodynamic explosion simulations, nuclear network calculations, and radiative transfer. The observables extracted from the radiative transfer are then compared to observed light curves and spectra. The study produces a wide range in masses of synthesized 56 Ni ranging from 0.257 to 1.057 $M_\odot$ , and, thus, can potentially account for subluminous as well as overluminous Type Ia supernovae in terms of brightness. However, a rough agreement with observed light curves and spectra can only be found for 91T-like objects. Although several discrepancies remain, we conclude that the gravitationally confined detonation model cannot be ruled out as a mechanism to produce 91T-like objects. However, the models do not provide a good explanation for either normal Type Ia supernovae or Type Iax supernovae.
△ Less
Submitted 19 March, 2022; v1 submitted 29 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Type Iax supernovae from deflagrations in Chandrasekhar mass white dwarfs
Authors:
F. Lach,
F. P. Callan,
D. Bubeck,
F. K. Roepke,
S. A. Sim,
M. Schrauth,
S. T. Ohlmann,
M. Kromer
Abstract:
Due to the increasing number of observations Type Ia supernovae are nowadays regarded as a heterogeneous class of objects consisting of several subclasses. One of the largest of these is the class of Type Iax supernovae (SNe Iax) which have been suggested to originate from pure deflagrations in CO Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarfs (WDs). Although a few deflagration studies have been carried out, the…
▽ More
Due to the increasing number of observations Type Ia supernovae are nowadays regarded as a heterogeneous class of objects consisting of several subclasses. One of the largest of these is the class of Type Iax supernovae (SNe Iax) which have been suggested to originate from pure deflagrations in CO Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarfs (WDs). Although a few deflagration studies have been carried out, the full diversity of the class is not captured yet. We therefore present a parameter study of single-spot ignited deflagrations with varying ignition locations, central densities, metallicities and compositions. We also explore a rigidly rotating progenitor and carry out 3D hydrodynamic simulations, nuclear network calculations and radiative transfer. The new models extend the range in brightness covered by previous studies to the lower end. Our explosions produce $^{56}$Ni masses from $5.8 \times 10^{-3}$ to $9.2 \times 10^{-2}\,M_\odot$. In spite of the wide exploration of the parameter space the main characteristics of the models are primarily driven by the mass of $^{56}$Ni. Secondary parameters have too little impact to explain the observed trend among faint SNe~Iax. We report kick velocities of the bound explosion remnants from $6.9$ to $369.8\,$km$\,s^{-1}$. The wide exploration of the parameter space and viewing-angle effects in the radiative transfer lead to a significant spread in the synthetic observables. The trends towards the faint end of the class are, however, not reproduced. This motivates a quantification of the systematic uncertainties in the modeling procedure and the influence of the $^{56}$Ni-rich bound remnant. While the pure deflagration scenario remains a favorable explanation for bright and intermediate luminosity SNe~Iax, the possibility that SNe~Iax do not consist of a single explosion scenario needs to be considered.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2021; v1 submitted 7 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Metallicity-dependent nucleosynthetic yields of Type Ia supernovae originating from double detonations of sub-M$_{\text{Ch}}$ white dwarfs
Authors:
Sabrina Gronow,
Benoit Cote,
Florian Lach,
Ivo R. Seitenzahl,
Christine E. Collins,
Stuart A. Sim,
Friedrich K. Roepke
Abstract:
Double detonations in sub-Chandrasekhar mass carbon-oxygen white dwarfs with helium shell are a potential explosion mechanism for a Type Ia supernova (SNe Ia). It comprises a shell detonation and subsequent core detonation. The focus of our study is on the effect of the progenitor metallicity on the nucleosynthetic yields. For this, we compute and analyse a set of eleven different models with vary…
▽ More
Double detonations in sub-Chandrasekhar mass carbon-oxygen white dwarfs with helium shell are a potential explosion mechanism for a Type Ia supernova (SNe Ia). It comprises a shell detonation and subsequent core detonation. The focus of our study is on the effect of the progenitor metallicity on the nucleosynthetic yields. For this, we compute and analyse a set of eleven different models with varying core and shell masses at four different metallicities each. This results in a total of 44 models at metallicities between 0.01$Z_\odot$ and 3$Z_\odot$. Our models show a strong impact of the metallicity in the high density regime. The presence of $^{22}$Ne causes a neutron-excess which shifts the production from $^{56}$Ni to stable isotopes such as $^{54}$Fe and $^{58}$Ni in the $α$-rich freeze-out regime. The isotopes of the metallicity implementation further serve as seed nuclei for additional reactions in the shell detonation. Most significantly, the production of $^{55}$Mn increases with metallicity confirming the results of previous work. A comparison of elemental ratios relative to iron shows a relatively good match to solar values for some models. Super-solar values are reached for Mn at 3$Z_\odot$ and solar values in some models at $Z_\odot$. This indicates that the required contribution of SNe Ia originating from Chandrasekhar mass WDs can be lower than estimated in orevious work to reach solar values of [Mn/Fe] at [Fe/H]$=0$. Our galactic chemical evolution models suggest that SNe Ia from sub-Chandrasekhar mass white dwarfs, along with core-collapse supernovae, could account for more than 80% of the solar Mn abundance. Using metallicity-dependent SN Ia yields helps to reproduce the upward trend of [Mn/Fe] as a function of metallicity for the solar neighborhood. These chemical evolution predictions, however, depend on the massive star yields adopted in the calculations.
△ Less
Submitted 1 September, 2021; v1 submitted 25 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
From supernova to supernova remnant: comparison of thermonuclear explosion models
Authors:
Gilles Ferrand,
Donald C. Warren,
Masaomi Ono,
Shigehiro Nagataki,
Friedrich K. Roepke,
Ivo R. Seitenzahl,
Florian Lach,
Hiroyoshi Iwasaki,
Toshiki Sato
Abstract:
Progress in the three-dimensional modeling of supernovae (SN) prompts us to revisit the supernova remnant (SNR) phase. We continue our study of the imprint of a thermonuclear explosion on the SNR it produces, that we started with a delayed-detonation model of a Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarf. Here we compare two different types of explosion models, each with two variants: two delayed detonation mo…
▽ More
Progress in the three-dimensional modeling of supernovae (SN) prompts us to revisit the supernova remnant (SNR) phase. We continue our study of the imprint of a thermonuclear explosion on the SNR it produces, that we started with a delayed-detonation model of a Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarf. Here we compare two different types of explosion models, each with two variants: two delayed detonation models (N100ddt, N5ddt) and two pure deflagration models (N100def, N5def), where the N number parametrizes the ignition. The output of each SN simulation is used as input of a SNR simulation carried on until 500 yr after the explosion. While all SNR models become more spherical over time and overall display the theoretical structure expected for a young SNR, clear differences are visible amongst the models, depending on the geometry of the ignition and on the presence or not of detonation fronts. Compared to N100 models, N5 models have a strong dipole component, and produce asymmetric remnants. N5def produces a regular-looking, but offset remnant, while N5ddt produces a two-sided remnant. Pure deflagration models exhibit specific traits: a central over-density, because of the incomplete explosion, and a network of seam lines across the surface, boundaries between burning cells. Signatures from the SN dominate the morphology of the SNR up to 100 yr to 300 yr after the explosion, depending on the model, and are still measurable at 500 yr, which may provide a way of testing explosion models.
△ Less
Submitted 9 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
Nucleosynthesis imprints from different Type Ia Supernova explosion scenarios and implications for galactic chemical evolution
Authors:
F. Lach,
F. K. Roepke,
I. R. Seitenzahl,
B. Coté,
S. Gronow,
A. J. Ruiter
Abstract:
We analyze the nucleosynthesis yields of various Type Ia supernova explosion simulations including pure detonations in sub- Chandrasekhar mass white dwarfs, double detonations and pure helium detonations of sub-Chandrasekhar mass white dwarfs with an accreted helium envelope, a violent merger model of two white dwarfs and deflagrations as well as delayed detonations in Chandrasekhar mass white dwa…
▽ More
We analyze the nucleosynthesis yields of various Type Ia supernova explosion simulations including pure detonations in sub- Chandrasekhar mass white dwarfs, double detonations and pure helium detonations of sub-Chandrasekhar mass white dwarfs with an accreted helium envelope, a violent merger model of two white dwarfs and deflagrations as well as delayed detonations in Chandrasekhar mass white dwarfs. We focus on the iron peak elements Mn, Zn and Cu. To this end, we also briefly review the different burning regimes and production sites of these elements as well as the results of abundance measurements and several galactic chemical evolution studies. We find that super-solar values of [Mn/Fe] are not restricted to Chandrasekhar mass explosion models. Scenarios including a helium detonation can significantly contribute to the production of Mn, in particular the models proposed for calcium-rich transients. Although Type Ia supernovae are often not accounted for as production sites of Zn and Cu, our models involving helium shell detonations can produce these elements in super-solar ratios relative to Fe. Our results suggest a re-consideration of Type Ia supernova yields in galactic chemical evolution models. A detailed comparison with observations can provide new insight into the progenitor and explosion channels of these events.
△ Less
Submitted 27 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
