-
Simple Chopsticks: Playing with any number of hands and fingers
Authors:
Antoine Dailly,
Valentin Gledel,
Richard J. Nowakowski,
Carlos Pereira dos Santos
Abstract:
Chopsticks is a game played by two players where they start with one finger raised on each hand. On their turn, each player moves by pointing an attacking hand at one of their opponent's hands. The number of fingers on the pointed hand increases by the number of fingers on the attacking hand. If, after a move, a hand contains more than five fingers, it is removed from play. There are also other ru…
▽ More
Chopsticks is a game played by two players where they start with one finger raised on each hand. On their turn, each player moves by pointing an attacking hand at one of their opponent's hands. The number of fingers on the pointed hand increases by the number of fingers on the attacking hand. If, after a move, a hand contains more than five fingers, it is removed from play. There are also other rules that allow players to move fingers from one hand to another, but we focus on this simple setup.
We introduce a generalization of Chopsticks, called Simple Chopsticks, in which the players may have any number of $n$-fingered hands. We find that having more hands than your opponent is generally good, and use this fact to fully characterize the outcomes of \octopus/ in the case where the players have 2-fingered hands.
△ Less
Submitted 13 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Affine Normal Play
Authors:
Urban Larsson,
Richard J. Nowakowski,
Carlos P. Santos
Abstract:
There are many combinatorial games in which a move can terminate the game, such as a checkmate in chess. These moves give rise to diverse situations that fall outside the scope of the classical normal play structure. To analyze these games, an algebraic extension is necessary, including infinities as elements. In this work, affine normal play, the algebraic structure resulting from that extension,…
▽ More
There are many combinatorial games in which a move can terminate the game, such as a checkmate in chess. These moves give rise to diverse situations that fall outside the scope of the classical normal play structure. To analyze these games, an algebraic extension is necessary, including infinities as elements. In this work, affine normal play, the algebraic structure resulting from that extension, is analyzed. We prove that it is possible to compare two affine games using only their forms. Furthermore, affine games can still be reduced, although the reduced forms are not unique. We establish that the classical normal play is order-embedded in the extended structure, constituting its substructure of invertible elements. Additionally, as in classical theory, affine games born by day n form a lattice with respect to the partial order of games.
△ Less
Submitted 8 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
A complete solution for the partisan chocolate game
Authors:
Tomoaki Abuku,
Hikaru Manabe,
Richard J. Nowakowski,
Carlos P. Santos,
Koki Suetsugu
Abstract:
The class of Poset Take-Away games includes many interesting and difficult games. Playing on an $n$-dimensional positive quadrant (the origin being the bottom of the poset) gives rise to nim, wythoff's nim and chomp. These are impartial games. We introduce a partisan game motivated by chomp and the recent chocolate-bar version. Our game is played on a chocolate bar with alternately flavored pieces…
▽ More
The class of Poset Take-Away games includes many interesting and difficult games. Playing on an $n$-dimensional positive quadrant (the origin being the bottom of the poset) gives rise to nim, wythoff's nim and chomp. These are impartial games. We introduce a partisan game motivated by chomp and the recent chocolate-bar version. Our game is played on a chocolate bar with alternately flavored pieces (or a checkerboard). We solve this game by showing it is equivalent to blue-red hackenbush strings. This equivalence proves that the values of game are numbers and it gives an algorithm for optimal play when there is more than one chocolate bar. The checkerboard interpretation leads to many natural questions.
△ Less
Submitted 20 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Indecomposable combinatorial games
Authors:
Michael Fisher,
Neil A. McKay,
Rebecca Milley,
Richard J. Nowakowski,
Carlos P. Santos
Abstract:
In Combinatorial Game Theory, short game forms are defined recursively over all the positions the two players are allowed to move to. A form is decomposable if it can be expressed as a disjunctive sum of two forms with smaller birthday. If there are no such summands, then the form is indecomposable. The main contribution of this document is the characterization of the indecomposable nimbers and th…
▽ More
In Combinatorial Game Theory, short game forms are defined recursively over all the positions the two players are allowed to move to. A form is decomposable if it can be expressed as a disjunctive sum of two forms with smaller birthday. If there are no such summands, then the form is indecomposable. The main contribution of this document is the characterization of the indecomposable nimbers and the characterization of the indecomposable numbers. More precisely, a nimber is indecomposable if and only if its size is a power of two, and a number is indecomposable if and only if its absolute value is less or equal than one.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
A complete solution for a nontrivial ruleset with entailing moves
Authors:
Urban Larsson,
Richard J. Nowakowski,
Carlos P. Santos
Abstract:
Combinatorial Game Theory typically studies sequential rulesets with perfect information where two players alternate moves. There are rulesets with {\em entailing moves} that break the alternating play axiom and/or restrict the other player's options within the disjunctive sum components. Although some examples have been analyzed in the classical work Winning Ways, such rulesets usually fall outsi…
▽ More
Combinatorial Game Theory typically studies sequential rulesets with perfect information where two players alternate moves. There are rulesets with {\em entailing moves} that break the alternating play axiom and/or restrict the other player's options within the disjunctive sum components. Although some examples have been analyzed in the classical work Winning Ways, such rulesets usually fall outside the scope of the established normal play mathematical theory. At the first Combinatorial Games Workshop at MSRI, John H. Conway proposed that an effort should be made to devise some nontrivial ruleset with entailing moves that had a complete analysis. Recently, Larsson, Nowakowski, and Santos proposed a more general theory, {\em affine impartial}, which facilitates the mathematical analysis of impartial rulesets with entailing moves. Here, by using this theory, we present a complete solution for a nontrivial ruleset with entailing moves.
△ Less
Submitted 2 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Infinitely many absolute universes
Authors:
U. Larsson,
R. J. Nowakowski,
C. P. Santos
Abstract:
Absolute combinatorial game theory was recently developed as a unifying tool for constructive/local game comparison (Larsson et al. 2018). The theory concerns {\em parental universes} of combinatorial games; standard closure properties are satisfied and each pair of non-empty sets of forms of the universe makes a form of the universe. Here we prove that there is an infinite number of absolute misè…
▽ More
Absolute combinatorial game theory was recently developed as a unifying tool for constructive/local game comparison (Larsson et al. 2018). The theory concerns {\em parental universes} of combinatorial games; standard closure properties are satisfied and each pair of non-empty sets of forms of the universe makes a form of the universe. Here we prove that there is an infinite number of absolute misère universes, by recursively expanding the dicot misère universe and the dead-ending universe. On the other hand, we prove that normal-play has exactly two absolute universes, namely the full space, and the universe of all-small games.
△ Less
Submitted 9 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Æquitas: Two-Player Counterfeit Coin Games
Authors:
Kyle Burke,
Tanya Khovanova,
Joshua Lee,
Richard J. Nowakowski,
Amelia Rowland,
Craig Tennenhouse
Abstract:
We discuss games involving a counterfeit coin. Given one counterfeit coin among a number of otherwise identical coins, two players with full knowledge of the fake coin take turns weighing coins on a two-pan scale, under the condition that on every turn they reveal some information to an Observer with limited prior knowledge about the coins. We study several games depending on the types of the coun…
▽ More
We discuss games involving a counterfeit coin. Given one counterfeit coin among a number of otherwise identical coins, two players with full knowledge of the fake coin take turns weighing coins on a two-pan scale, under the condition that on every turn they reveal some information to an Observer with limited prior knowledge about the coins. We study several games depending on the types of the counterfeit coin, the end-game condition, and the availability of extra genuine coins. We present the winning positions and the Grundy numbers for these games.
△ Less
Submitted 12 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
The game of Flipping Coins
Authors:
Anthony Bonato,
Melissa A. Huggan,
Richard J. Nowakowski
Abstract:
We consider Flipping Coins, a partizan version of the impartial game Turning Turtles, played on lines of coins. We show the values of this game are numbers, and these are found by first applying a reduction, then decomposing the position into an iterated ordinal sum. This is unusual since moves in the middle of the line do not eliminate the rest of the line. Moreover, when $G$ is decomposed into l…
▽ More
We consider Flipping Coins, a partizan version of the impartial game Turning Turtles, played on lines of coins. We show the values of this game are numbers, and these are found by first applying a reduction, then decomposing the position into an iterated ordinal sum. This is unusual since moves in the middle of the line do not eliminate the rest of the line. Moreover, when $G$ is decomposed into lines $H$ and $K$, then $G=(H:K^R)$. This is in contrast to Hackenbush Strings where $G= (H:K)$.
△ Less
Submitted 25 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
Impartial games with entailing moves
Authors:
Urban Larsson,
Richard J. Nowakowski,
Carlos P. Santos
Abstract:
Combinatorial Game Theory has also been called `additive game theory', whenever the analysis involves sums of independent game components. Such {\em disjunctive sums} invoke comparison between games, which allows abstract values to be assigned to them. However, there are rulesets with {\em entailing moves} that break the alternating play axiom and/or restrict the other player's options within the…
▽ More
Combinatorial Game Theory has also been called `additive game theory', whenever the analysis involves sums of independent game components. Such {\em disjunctive sums} invoke comparison between games, which allows abstract values to be assigned to them. However, there are rulesets with {\em entailing moves} that break the alternating play axiom and/or restrict the other player's options within the disjunctive sum components. These situations are exemplified in the literature by a ruleset such as {\sc nimstring}, a normal play variation of the classical children's game {\sc dots \& boxes}, and {\sc top~entails}, an elegant ruleset introduced in the classical work Winning Ways, by Berlekamp Conway and Guy. Such rulesets fall outside the scope of the established normal play theory. Here, we axiomatize normal play via two new terminating games, $\infty$ (Left wins) and $\overline\infty$ (Right wins), and a more general theory is achieved. We define {\em affine impartial}, which extends classical impartial games, and we analyze their algebra by extending the established Sprague-Grundy theory, with an accompanying minimum excluded rule. Solutions of {\sc nimstring} and {\sc top~entails} are given to illustrate the theory.
△ Less
Submitted 27 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
A Note on Numbers
Authors:
Alda Carvalho,
Melissa A. Huggan,
Richard J. Nowakowski,
Carlos Pereira dos Santos
Abstract:
When are all positions of a game numbers? We show that two properties are necessary and sufficient. These properties are consequences of that, in a number, it is not an advantage to be the first player. One of these properties implies the other. However, checking for one or the other, rather than just one, can often be accomplished by only looking at the positions on the `board'. If the stronger p…
▽ More
When are all positions of a game numbers? We show that two properties are necessary and sufficient. These properties are consequences of that, in a number, it is not an advantage to be the first player. One of these properties implies the other. However, checking for one or the other, rather than just one, can often be accomplished by only looking at the positions on the `board'. If the stronger property holds for all positions, then the values are integers.
△ Less
Submitted 25 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Partizan Subtraction Games
Authors:
Eric Duchêne,
Marc Heinrich,
Richard J. Nowakowski,
Aline Parreau
Abstract:
Partizan subtraction games are combinatorial games where two players, say Left and Right, alternately remove a number n of tokens from a heap of tokens, with $n \in S_L$ (resp. $n \in S_R$) when it is Left's (resp. Right's) turn. The first player unable to move loses. These games were introduced by Fraenkel and Kotzig in 1987, where they introduced the notion of dominance, i.e. an asymptotic behav…
▽ More
Partizan subtraction games are combinatorial games where two players, say Left and Right, alternately remove a number n of tokens from a heap of tokens, with $n \in S_L$ (resp. $n \in S_R$) when it is Left's (resp. Right's) turn. The first player unable to move loses. These games were introduced by Fraenkel and Kotzig in 1987, where they introduced the notion of dominance, i.e. an asymptotic behavior of the outcome sequence where Left always wins if the heap is sufficiently large. In the current paper, we investigate the other kinds of behaviors for the outcome sequence. In addition to dominance, three other disjoint behaviors are defined, namely weak dominance, fairness and ultimate impartiality. We consider the problem of computing this behavior with respect to $S_L$ and $S_R$, which is connected to the well-known Frobenius coin problem. General results are given, together with arithmetic and geometric characterizations when the sets $S_L$ and $S_R$ have size at most 2.
△ Less
Submitted 5 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Ordinal Sums, Clockwise Hackenbush, and Domino Shave
Authors:
Alda Carvalho,
Melissa A. Huggan,
Richard J. Nowakowski,
Carlos Pereira dos Santos
Abstract:
We present two rulesets, Domino Shave and Clockwise Hackenbush. The first is somehow natural and, as special cases, includes Stirling Shave and Hetyei's Bernoulli game. Clockwise Hackenbush seems artificial yet it is equivalent to Domino Shave. From the pictorial form of the game, and a knowledge of Hackenbush, the decomposition into ordinal sums is immediate. The values of Clockwise Blue-Red Hack…
▽ More
We present two rulesets, Domino Shave and Clockwise Hackenbush. The first is somehow natural and, as special cases, includes Stirling Shave and Hetyei's Bernoulli game. Clockwise Hackenbush seems artificial yet it is equivalent to Domino Shave. From the pictorial form of the game, and a knowledge of Hackenbush, the decomposition into ordinal sums is immediate. The values of Clockwise Blue-Red Hackenbush are numbers and we provide an explicit formula for the ordinal sum of numbers where the literal form of the base is $\{x\,|\,\}$ or $\{\,|\,x\}$, and $x$ is a number. That formula generalizes van Roode's signed binary number method for Blue-Red Hackenbush.
△ Less
Submitted 23 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
Atomic weights and the combinatorial game of Bipass
Authors:
Urban Larsson,
Richard J. Nowakowski
Abstract:
We define an all-small ruleset, Bipass, within the framework of normal-play combinatorial games. A game is played on finite strips of black and white stones. Stones of different colors are swapped provided they do not bypass one of their own kind. We find a surjective function from the strips to integer atomic weights (Berlekamp, Conway and Guy 1982) that measures the number of units in all-small…
▽ More
We define an all-small ruleset, Bipass, within the framework of normal-play combinatorial games. A game is played on finite strips of black and white stones. Stones of different colors are swapped provided they do not bypass one of their own kind. We find a surjective function from the strips to integer atomic weights (Berlekamp, Conway and Guy 1982) that measures the number of units in all-small games. This result provides explicit winning strategies for many games, and in cases where it does not, it gives narrow bounds for the canonical form game values. We prove that the game value *2 does not appear as a disjunctive sum of Bipass. Moreover, we find game values for some parametrized families of games, including an infinite number of strips of value *.
△ Less
Submitted 23 July, 2020; v1 submitted 8 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Cops and an Insightful Robber
Authors:
Melissa A. Huggan,
Richard J. Nowakowski
Abstract:
The 'Cheating Robot' version of Cops and Robbers is played on a finite, simple, connected graph. The players move in the same time period. However, before moving, the robot observes to which vertices the cops are moving and it is fast enough to complete its move in the time period. The cops also know that the robot will use this information. More cops are required to capture a robot than to captur…
▽ More
The 'Cheating Robot' version of Cops and Robbers is played on a finite, simple, connected graph. The players move in the same time period. However, before moving, the robot observes to which vertices the cops are moving and it is fast enough to complete its move in the time period. The cops also know that the robot will use this information. More cops are required to capture a robot than to capture a robber. Indeed, the minimum degree is a lower bound on the number of cops required to capture a robot. Only on a tree is one cop guaranteed to capture a robot, although two cops are sufficient to capture both a robber and a robot on outerplanar graphs. In graphs where retracts are involved, we show how cop strategies against a robber can be modified to capture a robot. This approach gives exact numbers for hypercubes, and $k$-dimensional grids in general.
△ Less
Submitted 10 March, 2021; v1 submitted 27 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Cheating Robot Games: A model for insider information
Authors:
Melissa A. Huggan,
Richard J. Nowakowski
Abstract:
Combinatorial games are two-player games of pure strategy where the players, usually called Left and Right, move alternately. In this paper, we introduce Cheating Robot games. These arise from simultaneous-play combinatorial games where one player has insider information ('cheats'). Play occurs in rounds. At the beginning of a round, both players know the moves that are available to them. Left cho…
▽ More
Combinatorial games are two-player games of pure strategy where the players, usually called Left and Right, move alternately. In this paper, we introduce Cheating Robot games. These arise from simultaneous-play combinatorial games where one player has insider information ('cheats'). Play occurs in rounds. At the beginning of a round, both players know the moves that are available to them. Left chooses a move. Knowing Left's move, Right then chooses a move. Right's move is not constrained by Left's choice. The round is not completed until both players have made a choice. A game is finished only when one or both players do not have a move at the beginning of a round. Right choosing a move, knowing Left's, makes the games deterministic, distinguishing them from simultaneous games. Also, the ending condition distinguishes this class of games from combinatorial games, since the outcomes are now Left-win, Right-win and draw.
The basic theory and properties are developed, including showing that there is an equivalence relation and partial order on the games. Whilst there are no inverses in the class of all games, we show that there is a sub-class, simple hot games, in which the integers have inverses. In this sub-class, the optimal strategies are obtained by the solutions to a minimum-weight matching problem on a graph whose number of vertices equals the number of summands in the disjunctive sum.
△ Less
Submitted 9 February, 2022; v1 submitted 24 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Bounding Game Temperature Using Confusion Intervals
Authors:
Svenja Huntemann,
Richard J. Nowakowski,
Carlos Pereira dos Santos
Abstract:
For combinatorial games, temperature is a measure of the volatility, that is, by how much the advantage can change. Typically, the temperature has been measured for individual positions within specific games. In this paper, we give the first general upper bounds on the temperature for any class of games.
For a position $G$, the closure of the set of numbers $\{g\}$ such that $G-g$ is a first pla…
▽ More
For combinatorial games, temperature is a measure of the volatility, that is, by how much the advantage can change. Typically, the temperature has been measured for individual positions within specific games. In this paper, we give the first general upper bounds on the temperature for any class of games.
For a position $G$, the closure of the set of numbers $\{g\}$ such that $G-g$ is a first player win, is called the confusion interval of $G$. Let $\ell(G)$ be the length of this interval. Our first main result is: For a class of games $\mathscr{S}$, if there are constants $J$ and $K$ such that $\ell(G^L),\ell(G^R)\leq J$ and $\ell(G)\leq K$ for for every $G\in \mathscr{S}$, then the temperature of every game is bounded by $K/2+J$. We give an example to show that this bound is tight.
Our second main result is a method to find a bound for the confusion intervals. In $G^L-G$ when Left gets to go first, the number of passing moves required by Right to win gives an upper bound on $\ell(G)$.
This is the first general upper bound on temperature. As examples of the bound and the method, we give upper bounds on the temperature of subclasses of Domineering and Snort.
△ Less
Submitted 22 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
Simultaneous Combinatorial Game Theory
Authors:
Melissa Huggan,
Richard J. Nowakowski,
Paul Ottaway
Abstract:
Combinatorial game theory (CGT), as introduced by Berlekamp, Conway and Guy, involves two players who move alternately in a perfect information, zero-sum game, and there are no chance devices. Also the games have the finite descent property (every game terminates in a finite number of moves). The two players are usually called Left and Right. The games often break up into components and the player…
▽ More
Combinatorial game theory (CGT), as introduced by Berlekamp, Conway and Guy, involves two players who move alternately in a perfect information, zero-sum game, and there are no chance devices. Also the games have the finite descent property (every game terminates in a finite number of moves). The two players are usually called Left and Right. The games often break up into components and the players must choose one of the components in which to play. One main aim of CGT is to analyze the components individually (rather than analyzing the sum as a whole) then use this information to analyze the sum.
In this paper, the players move simultaneously in a combinatorial game. Three sums are considered which are defined by the termination rules: (i) one component does not have a simultaneous move; (ii) no component has a simultaneous move; (iii) one player has no move in any component. These are combined with a winning convention which is either: (i) based on which player has moves remaining; or (ii) the greatest score. In each combination, we show that equality of games induces an equivalence relation and the equivalence classes are partially ordered. Also, where possible, given games $A$ and $B$, we give checks to determine if Left prefers to replace $A$ by $B$ in a sum.
△ Less
Submitted 5 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
A Variation on Chip-Firing: the diffusion game
Authors:
C. Duffy,
T. F. Lidbetter,
M. E. Messinger,
R. J. Nowakowski
Abstract:
We introduce a natural variant of the parallel chip-firing game, called the diffusion game. Chips are initially assigned to vertices of a graph. At every step, all vertices simultaneously send one chip to each neighbour with fewer chips. As the dynamics of the parallel chip-firing game occur on a finite set the process is inherently periodic. However the diffusion game is not obviously periodic: e…
▽ More
We introduce a natural variant of the parallel chip-firing game, called the diffusion game. Chips are initially assigned to vertices of a graph. At every step, all vertices simultaneously send one chip to each neighbour with fewer chips. As the dynamics of the parallel chip-firing game occur on a finite set the process is inherently periodic. However the diffusion game is not obviously periodic: even if $2|E(G)|$ chips are assigned to vertices of graph G, there may exist time steps where some vertices have a negative number of chips. We investigate the process, prove periodicity for a number of graph classes, and pose some questions for future research.
△ Less
Submitted 15 January, 2018; v1 submitted 19 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
-
When game comparison becomes play: Absolutely Categorical Game Theory
Authors:
Urban Larsson,
Richard J. Nowakowski,
Carlos P. Santos
Abstract:
Absolute Universes of combinatorial games, as defined in a recent paper by the same authors, include many standard short normal- misère- and scoring-play monoids. In this note we show that the class is categorical, by extending Joyal's construction of arrows in normal-play games. Given $G$ and $H$ in an Absolute Universe $U$, we study instead the Left Provisonal Game $[G, H]$, which is a normal-pl…
▽ More
Absolute Universes of combinatorial games, as defined in a recent paper by the same authors, include many standard short normal- misère- and scoring-play monoids. In this note we show that the class is categorical, by extending Joyal's construction of arrows in normal-play games. Given $G$ and $H$ in an Absolute Universe $U$, we study instead the Left Provisonal Game $[G, H]$, which is a normal-play game, independently of the particular Absolute Universe, and find that $G\longrightarrow H$ (implying $G\succcurlyeq H$) corresponds to the set of winning strategies for Left playing second in $[G,H]$. By this we define the category ${\bf LNP(U)}$.
△ Less
Submitted 9 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
-
Simplicial Complexes are Game Complexes
Authors:
Sara Faridi,
Svenja Huntemann,
Richard J. Nowakowski
Abstract:
Strong placement games (SP-games) are a class of combinatorial games whose structure allows one to describe the game via simplicial complexes. A natural question is whether well-known invariants of combinatorial games, such as "game value", appear as invariants of the simplicial complexes. This paper is the first step in that direction. We show that every simplicial complex encodes a certain type…
▽ More
Strong placement games (SP-games) are a class of combinatorial games whose structure allows one to describe the game via simplicial complexes. A natural question is whether well-known invariants of combinatorial games, such as "game value", appear as invariants of the simplicial complexes. This paper is the first step in that direction. We show that every simplicial complex encodes a certain type of SP-game (called an "invariant SP-game") whose ruleset is independent of the board it is played on. We also show that in the class of SP-games isomorphic simplicial complexes correspond to isomorphic game trees, and hence equal game values. We also study a subclass of SP-games corresponding to flag complexes, showing that there is always a game whose corresponding complex is a flag complex no matter which board it is played on.
△ Less
Submitted 8 February, 2019; v1 submitted 19 August, 2016;
originally announced August 2016.
-
Absolute Combinatorial Game Theory
Authors:
Urban Larsson,
Richard J. Nowakowski,
Carlos P. Santos
Abstract:
We propose a unifying additive theory for standard conventions in Combinatorial Game Theory, including normal-, misère- and scoring-play, studied by Berlekamp, Conway, Dorbec, Ettinger, Guy, Larsson, Milley, Neto, Nowakowski, Renault, Santos, Siegel, Sopena, Stewart (1976-2019), and others. A game {\em universe} is a set of games that satisfies some standard closure properties. Here, we reveal whe…
▽ More
We propose a unifying additive theory for standard conventions in Combinatorial Game Theory, including normal-, misère- and scoring-play, studied by Berlekamp, Conway, Dorbec, Ettinger, Guy, Larsson, Milley, Neto, Nowakowski, Renault, Santos, Siegel, Sopena, Stewart (1976-2019), and others. A game {\em universe} is a set of games that satisfies some standard closure properties. Here, we reveal when the fundamental game comparison problem, ``Is $G\su H$?'', simplifies to a constructive `local' solution, which generalizes Conway's foundational result in ONAG (1976) for normal-play games. This happens in a broad and general fashion whenever a given game universe is {\em absolute}. Games in an absolute universe satisfy two properties, dubbed {\em parentality} and {\em saturation}, and we prove that the latter is implied by the former. Parentality means that any pair of non-empty finite sets of games is admissible as options, and saturation means that, given any game, the first player can be favored in a disjunctive sum. Game comparison is at the core of combinatorial game theory, and for example efficiency of potential reduction theorems rely on a local comparison. We distinguish between three levels of game comparison; superordinate (global), basic (semi-constructive) and subordinate (local) comparison. In proofs, a sometimes tedious challenge faces a researcher in CGT: in order to disprove an inequality, an explicit distinguishing game might be required. Here, we explain how this job becomes obsolete whenever a universe is absolute. Namely, it suffices to see if a pair of games satisfies a certain Proviso together with a Maintenance of an inequality.
△ Less
Submitted 6 July, 2021; v1 submitted 6 June, 2016;
originally announced June 2016.
-
Finding Golden Nuggets by Reduction
Authors:
Urban Larsson,
Neil A. McKay,
Richard J. Nowakowski,
Angela A. Siegel
Abstract:
We introduce a class of normal play partizan games, called Complementary Subtraction. Let $A$ denote your favorite set of positive integers. This is Left's subtraction set, whereas Right subtracts numbers not in $A$. The Golden Nugget Subtraction Game has the $A$ and $B$ sequences, from Wythoff's game, as the two complementary subtraction sets. As a function of the heap size, the maximum size of t…
▽ More
We introduce a class of normal play partizan games, called Complementary Subtraction. Let $A$ denote your favorite set of positive integers. This is Left's subtraction set, whereas Right subtracts numbers not in $A$. The Golden Nugget Subtraction Game has the $A$ and $B$ sequences, from Wythoff's game, as the two complementary subtraction sets. As a function of the heap size, the maximum size of the canonical forms grows quickly. However, the value of the heap is either a number or, in reduced canonical form, a switch. We find the switches by using properties of the Fibonacci word and standard Fibonacci representations of integers. Moreover, these switches are invariant under shifts by certain Fibonacci numbers. The values that are numbers, however, are distinct, and we find a polynomial time bit characterization for them, via the ternary Fibonacci representation.
△ Less
Submitted 24 October, 2015;
originally announced October 2015.
-
Guaranteed Scoring Games
Authors:
Urban Larsson,
João P. Neto,
Richard J. Nowakowski,
Carlos P. Santos
Abstract:
The class of Guaranteed Scoring Games (GS) are two-player combinatorial games with the property that Normal-play games (Conway et. al.) are ordered embedded into GS. They include, as subclasses, the scoring games considered by Milnor (1953), Ettinger (1996) and Johnson (2014). We present the structure of GS and the techniques needed to analyze a sum of guaranteed games. Firstly, GS form a partiall…
▽ More
The class of Guaranteed Scoring Games (GS) are two-player combinatorial games with the property that Normal-play games (Conway et. al.) are ordered embedded into GS. They include, as subclasses, the scoring games considered by Milnor (1953), Ettinger (1996) and Johnson (2014). We present the structure of GS and the techniques needed to analyze a sum of guaranteed games. Firstly, GS form a partially ordered monoid, via defined Right- and Left-stops over the reals, and with disjunctive sum as the operation. In fact, the structure is a quotient monoid with partially ordered congruence classes. We show that there are four reductions that when applied, in any order, give a unique representative for each congruence class. The monoid is not a group, but in this paper we prove that if a game has an inverse it is obtained by `switching the players'. The order relation between two games is defined by comparing their stops in \textit{any} disjunctive sum. Here, we demonstrate how to compare the games via a finite algorithm instead, extending ideas of Ettinger, and also Siegel (2013).
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2015;
originally announced May 2015.
-
When waiting moves you in scoring combinatorial games
Authors:
Urban Larsson,
Richard J. Nowakowski,
Carlos P. Santos
Abstract:
Combinatorial Scoring games, with the property `extra pass moves for a player does no harm', are characterized. The characterization involves an order embedding of Conway's Normal-play games. Also, we give a theorem for comparing games with scores (numbers) which extends Ettinger's work on dicot Scoring games.
Combinatorial Scoring games, with the property `extra pass moves for a player does no harm', are characterized. The characterization involves an order embedding of Conway's Normal-play games. Also, we give a theorem for comparing games with scores (numbers) which extends Ettinger's work on dicot Scoring games.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2015;
originally announced May 2015.
-
Games and Complexes II: Weight Games and Kruskal-Katona Type Bounds
Authors:
Sara Faridi,
Svenja Huntemann,
Richard J. Nowakowski
Abstract:
A strong placement game $G$ played on a board $B$ is equivalent to a simplicial complex $Δ_{G,B}$. We look at weight games, a subclass of strong placement games, and introduce upper bounds on the number of positions with $i$ pieces in $G$, or equivalently the number of faces with $i$ vertices in $Δ_{G,B}$, which are reminiscent of the Kruskal-Katona bounds.
A strong placement game $G$ played on a board $B$ is equivalent to a simplicial complex $Δ_{G,B}$. We look at weight games, a subclass of strong placement games, and introduce upper bounds on the number of positions with $i$ pieces in $G$, or equivalently the number of faces with $i$ vertices in $Δ_{G,B}$, which are reminiscent of the Kruskal-Katona bounds.
△ Less
Submitted 4 September, 2015; v1 submitted 4 October, 2013;
originally announced October 2013.
-
Games and Complexes I: Transformation via Ideals
Authors:
Sara Faridi,
Svenja Huntemann,
Richard J. Nowakowski
Abstract:
Placement games are a subclass of combinatorial games which are played on graphs. We will demonstrate that one can construct simplicial complexes corresponding to a placement game, and this game could be considered as a game played on these simplicial complexes. These complexes are constructed using square-free monomials.
Placement games are a subclass of combinatorial games which are played on graphs. We will demonstrate that one can construct simplicial complexes corresponding to a placement game, and this game could be considered as a game played on these simplicial complexes. These complexes are constructed using square-free monomials.
△ Less
Submitted 4 September, 2015; v1 submitted 4 October, 2013;
originally announced October 2013.
-
Misère-play Hackenbush Sprigs
Authors:
Neil A. McKay,
Rebecca Milley,
Richard J. Nowakowski
Abstract:
A Hackenbush Sprig is a Hackenbush String with the ground edge colored green and the remaining edges either red or blue. We show that in canonical form a Sprig is a star-based number (the ordinal sum of star and a dyadic rational) in misère-play, as well as in normal-play. We find the outcome of a disjunctive sum of Sprigs in misère-play and show that it is the same as the outcome of that sum plus…
▽ More
A Hackenbush Sprig is a Hackenbush String with the ground edge colored green and the remaining edges either red or blue. We show that in canonical form a Sprig is a star-based number (the ordinal sum of star and a dyadic rational) in misère-play, as well as in normal-play. We find the outcome of a disjunctive sum of Sprigs in misère-play and show that it is the same as the outcome of that sum plus star in normal-play. Along the way it is shown that the sum of a Sprig and its negative is equivalent to 0 in the universe of misère-play dicotic games, answering a question of Allen.
△ Less
Submitted 25 February, 2012;
originally announced February 2012.
