-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Mis-centering calibration and X-ray-richness scaling relations in redMaPPer clusters
Authors:
P. Kelly,
J. Jobel,
O. Eiger,
A. Abd,
T. E. Jeltema,
P. Giles,
D. L. Hollowood,
R. D. Wilkinson,
D. J. Turner,
S. Bhargava,
S. Everett,
A. Farahi,
A. K. Romer,
E. S. Rykoff,
F. Wang,
S. Bocquet,
D. Cross,
R. Faridjoo,
J. Franco,
G. Gardner,
M. Kwiecien,
D. Laubner,
A. McDaniel,
J. H. O'Donnell,
L. Sanchez
, et al. (54 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We use Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) clusters with archival X-ray data from XMM-Newton and Chandra to assess the centering performance of the redMaPPer cluster finder and to measure key richness observable scaling relations. In terms of centering, we find that 10-20% of redMaPPer clusters are miscentered with no significant difference in bins of low versus high richness ($20<λ<40$ and $λ>40$)…
▽ More
We use Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) clusters with archival X-ray data from XMM-Newton and Chandra to assess the centering performance of the redMaPPer cluster finder and to measure key richness observable scaling relations. In terms of centering, we find that 10-20% of redMaPPer clusters are miscentered with no significant difference in bins of low versus high richness ($20<λ<40$ and $λ>40$) or redshift ($0.2<z<0.4$ and $0.4 <z < 0.65$). We also investigate the richness bias induced by miscentering. The dominant reasons for miscentering include masked or missing data and the presence of other bright galaxies in the cluster; for half of the miscentered clusters the correct central was one of the other possible centrals identified by redMaPPer, while for $\sim 40$% of miscentered clusters the correct central is not a redMaPPer member with most of these cases due to masking. In addition, we fit the scaling relations between X-ray temperature and richness and between X-ray luminosity and richness. We find a T$_X$-$λ$ scatter of $0.21 \pm 0.01$. While the scatter in T$_X$-$λ$ is consistent in bins of redshift, we do find modestly different slopes with high-redshift clusters displaying a somewhat shallower relation. Splitting based on richness, we find a marginally larger scatter for our lowest richness bin, $20 < λ< 40$. The X-ray properties of detected, serendipitous clusters are generally consistent with those for targeted clusters, but the depth of the X-ray data for undetected clusters is insufficient to judge whether they are X-ray underluminous in all but one case.
△ Less
Submitted 19 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
The impact of human expert visual inspection on the discovery of strong gravitational lenses
Authors:
Karina Rojas,
Thomas E. Collett,
Daniel Ballard,
Mark R. Magee,
Simon Birrer,
Elizabeth Buckley-Geer.,
James H. H. Chan,
Benjamin Clément,
José M. Diego,
Fabrizio Gentile,
Jimena González,
Rémy Joseph,
Jorge Mastache,
Stefan Schuldt,
Crescenzo Tortora,
Tomás Verdugo,
Aprajita Verma,
Tansu Daylan,
Martin Millon,
Neal Jackson,
Simon Dye,
Alejandra Melo,
Guillaume Mahler,
Ricardo L. C. Ogando,
Frédéric Courbin
, et al. (31 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We investigate the ability of human 'expert' classifiers to identify strong gravitational lens candidates in Dark Energy Survey like imaging. We recruited a total of 55 people that completed more than 25$\%$ of the project. During the classification task, we present to the participants 1489 images. The sample contains a variety of data including lens simulations, real lenses, non-lens examples, an…
▽ More
We investigate the ability of human 'expert' classifiers to identify strong gravitational lens candidates in Dark Energy Survey like imaging. We recruited a total of 55 people that completed more than 25$\%$ of the project. During the classification task, we present to the participants 1489 images. The sample contains a variety of data including lens simulations, real lenses, non-lens examples, and unlabeled data. We find that experts are extremely good at finding bright, well-resolved Einstein rings, whilst arcs with $g$-band signal-to-noise less than $\sim$25 or Einstein radii less than $\sim$1.2 times the seeing are rarely recovered. Very few non-lenses are scored highly. There is substantial variation in the performance of individual classifiers, but they do not appear to depend on the classifier's experience, confidence or academic position. These variations can be mitigated with a team of 6 or more independent classifiers. Our results give confidence that humans are a reliable pruning step for lens candidates, providing pure and quantifiably complete samples for follow-up studies.
△ Less
Submitted 25 April, 2023; v1 submitted 9 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
The DES Bright Arcs Survey: Candidate Strongly Lensed Galaxy Systems from the Dark Energy Survey 5,000 Sq. Deg. Footprint
Authors:
J. H. O'Donnell,
R. D. Wilkinson,
H. T. Diehl,
C. Aros-Bunster,
K. Bechtol,
S. Birrer,
E. J. Buckley-Geer,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
L. N. da Costa,
S. J. Gonzalez Lozano,
R. A. Gruendl,
M. Hilton,
H. Lin,
K. A. Lindgren,
J. Martin,
A. Pieres,
E. S. Rykoff,
I. Sevilla-Noarbe,
E. Sheldon,
C. Sifón,
D. L. Tucker,
B. Yanny,
T. M. C. Abbott,
M. Aguena
, et al. (57 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We report the combined results of eight searches for strong gravitational lens systems in the full 5,000 sq. deg. of Dark Energy Survey (DES) observations. The observations accumulated by the end of the third observing season fully covered the DES footprint in 5 filters (grizY), with an $i-$band limiting magnitude (at $10σ$) of 23.44. In four searches, a list of potential candidates was identified…
▽ More
We report the combined results of eight searches for strong gravitational lens systems in the full 5,000 sq. deg. of Dark Energy Survey (DES) observations. The observations accumulated by the end of the third observing season fully covered the DES footprint in 5 filters (grizY), with an $i-$band limiting magnitude (at $10σ$) of 23.44. In four searches, a list of potential candidates was identified using a color and magnitude selection from the object catalogs created from the first three observing seasons. Three other searches were conducted at the locations of previously identified galaxy clusters. Cutout images of potential candidates were then visually scanned using an object viewer. An additional set of candidates came from a data-quality check of a subset of the color-coadd "tiles" created from the full DES six-season data set. A short list of the most promising strong lens candidates was then numerically ranked according to whether or not we judged them to be bona fide strong gravitational lens systems. These searches discovered a diverse set of 247 strong lens candidate systems, of which 81 are identified for the first time. We provide the coordinates, magnitudes, and photometric properties of the lens and source objects, and an estimate of the Einstein radius for 81 new systems and 166 previously reported. This catalog will be of use for selecting interesting systems for detailed follow-up, studies of galaxy cluster and group mass profiles, as well as a training/validation set for automated strong lens searches.
△ Less
Submitted 3 January, 2022; v1 submitted 5 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
