-
STIX X-ray microflare observations during the Solar Orbiter commissioning phase
Authors:
Andrea Francesco Battaglia,
Jonas Saqri,
Paolo Massa,
Emma Perracchione,
Ewan C. M. Dickson,
Hualin Xiao,
Astrid M. Veronig,
Alexander Warmuth,
Marina Battaglia,
Gordon J. Hurford,
Aline Meuris,
Olivier Limousin,
László Etesi,
Shane A. Maloney,
Richard A. Schwartz,
Matej Kuhar,
Frederic Schuller,
Valliappan Senthamizh Pavai,
Sophie Musset,
Daniel F. Ryan,
Lucia Kleint,
Michele Piana,
Anna Maria Massone,
Federico Benvenuto,
Janusz Sylwester
, et al. (12 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Spectrometer/Telescope for Imaging X-rays (STIX) is the HXR instrument onboard Solar Orbiter designed to observe solar flares over a broad range of flare sizes, between 4-150 keV. We report the first STIX observations of microflares recorded during the instrument commissioning phase in order to investigate the STIX performance at its detection limit. This first result paper focuses on the temp…
▽ More
The Spectrometer/Telescope for Imaging X-rays (STIX) is the HXR instrument onboard Solar Orbiter designed to observe solar flares over a broad range of flare sizes, between 4-150 keV. We report the first STIX observations of microflares recorded during the instrument commissioning phase in order to investigate the STIX performance at its detection limit. This first result paper focuses on the temporal and spectral evolution of STIX microflares occuring in the AR12765 in June 2020, and compares the STIX measurements with GOES/XRS, SDO/AIA, and Hinode/XRT. For the observed microflares of the GOES A and B class, the STIX peak time at lowest energies is located in the impulsive phase of the flares, well before the GOES peak time. Such a behavior can either be explained by the higher sensitivity of STIX to higher temperatures compared to GOES, or due to the existence of a nonthermal component reaching down to low energies. The interpretation is inconclusive due to limited counting statistics for all but the largest flare in our sample. For this largest flare, the low-energy peak time is clearly due to thermal emission, and the nonthermal component seen at higher energies occurs even earlier. This suggests that the classic thermal explanation might also be favored for the majority of the smaller flares. In combination with EUV and SXR observations, STIX corroborates earlier findings that an isothermal assumption is of limited validity. Future diagnostic efforts should focus on multi-wavelength studies to derive differential emission measure distributions over a wide range of temperatures to accurately describe the energetics of solar flares. Commissioning observations confirm that STIX is working as designed. As a rule of thumb, STIX detects flares as small as the GOES A class. For flares above the GOES B class, detailed spectral and imaging analyses can be performed.
△ Less
Submitted 8 July, 2021; v1 submitted 18 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Sunspot characteristics at the onset of the Maunder Minimum based on the observations of Hevelius
Authors:
V. M. S. Carrasco,
J. M. Vaquero,
M. C. Gallego,
A. Muñoz-Jaramillo,
G. de Toma,
P. Galaviz,
R. Arlt,
V. Senthamizh Pavai,
F. Sánchez-Bajo,
J. Villalba Álvarez,
J. M. Gómez
Abstract:
An analysis of the sunspot observations made by Hevelius during 1642-1645 is presented. These records are the only systematic sunspot observations just before the Maunder Minimum. We have studied different phenomena meticulously recorded by Hevelius after translating the original Latin texts. We re-evaluate the observations of sunspot groups by Hevelius during this period and obtain an average val…
▽ More
An analysis of the sunspot observations made by Hevelius during 1642-1645 is presented. These records are the only systematic sunspot observations just before the Maunder Minimum. We have studied different phenomena meticulously recorded by Hevelius after translating the original Latin texts. We re-evaluate the observations of sunspot groups by Hevelius during this period and obtain an average value 7% greater than that calculated from his observations given in the current group database. Furthermore, the average of the active day fraction obtained in this work from Hevelius' records previous to the Maunder Minimum is significantly greater than the solar activity level obtained from Hevelius' sunspot observations made during the Maunder Minimum (70% vs. 30%). We also present the butterfly diagram obtained from the sunspot positions recorded by Hevelius for the period 1642-1645. It can be seen that no hemispheric asymmetry exists during this interval, in contrast with the Maunder Minimum. Hevelius noted a ~3-month period that appeared to lack sunspots in early 1645 that gave the first hint of the impending Maunder Minimum. Recent studies claim that the Maunder Minimum was not a grand minimum period speculating that astronomers of that time, due to the Aristotelian ideas, did not record all sunspots that they observed, producing thus an underestimation of the solar activity level. However, we show the good quality of the sunspot records made by Hevelius indicates that his reports of sunspots were true to the observations.
△ Less
Submitted 17 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Christian Horrebow's Sunspot Observations -- II. Construction of a Record of Sunspot Positions
Authors:
Christoffer Karoff,
Carsten Sønderskov Jørgensen,
V. Senthamizh Pavai,
Rainer Arlt
Abstract:
The number of spots on the surface of the Sun is one of the best tracers of solar variability we have. The sunspot number is not only known to change in phase with the 11-year solar cycles, but also to show variability on longer time scales. It is, however, not only the sunspot number that changes in connection with solar variability. The location of the spots on the solar surface is also known to…
▽ More
The number of spots on the surface of the Sun is one of the best tracers of solar variability we have. The sunspot number is not only known to change in phase with the 11-year solar cycles, but also to show variability on longer time scales. It is, however, not only the sunspot number that changes in connection with solar variability. The location of the spots on the solar surface is also known to change in phase with the 11-year solar cycle. This has traditionally been visualised in the so-called butterfly diagram, but this is only well constrained from the beginning of the 19th century. This is unfortunate, as knowledge about the butterfly diagram could aid our understanding of the variability and the Sun-Earth connection. As part of a larger review of the work done on sunspots by the Danish astronomer Christian Horrebow, we here present a reanalysis of Christian Horrebow's notebooks covering the years 1761 and 1764 - 1777. These notebooks have been analysed in at least three earlier studies by Thiele (Astron. Nachr. 50, 257, 1859), d'Arrest (published in Wolf, Astron. Mitt. Eidgenoss. Sternwarte Zur. 4, 77, 1873) and Hoyt and Schatten (Solar Phys. 160, 387, 1995). In this article, we construct a complete record of sunspot positions covering the years 1761 and 1764 - 1777. The resulting butterfly diagram shows the characteristic structure known from observations in the 19th and 20th century. We do see some indications of equatorial sunspots in the observations we have from Cycle 1. However, in Cycle 2, which has much better coverage, we do not see such indications.
△ Less
Submitted 26 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
-
Christian Horrebow's Sunspot Observations -- I. Life and Published Writings
Authors:
Carsten Sønderskov Jørgensen,
Christoffer Karoff,
V. Senthamizh Pavai,
Rainer Arlt
Abstract:
Between 1761 and 1776, Christian Horrebow made regular observations of sunspots from Rundetaarn in Copenhagen. Based on these observations he writes in 1775 that "it appears that after the course of a certain number of years, the appearance of the Sun repeats itself with respect to the number and size of the spots". Thus, Horrebow hypothesized the idea of a cyclic Sun several decades before Heinri…
▽ More
Between 1761 and 1776, Christian Horrebow made regular observations of sunspots from Rundetaarn in Copenhagen. Based on these observations he writes in 1775 that "it appears that after the course of a certain number of years, the appearance of the Sun repeats itself with respect to the number and size of the spots". Thus, Horrebow hypothesized the idea of a cyclic Sun several decades before Heinrich Schwabe discovered the solar cycle and estimated its period. This proves the ability of Horrebow as a sunspot observer. In this article, we present a general overview of the work of Christian Horrebow, including a brief biography and a complete bibliography. We also present a translation from Danish to English of his writings on sunspots in the Dansk Historisk Almanak. These writings include tables of daily sunspot measurements of which we discuss the completeness.
△ Less
Submitted 26 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
-
Solar Physics at the Einstein Tower
Authors:
C. Denker,
C. Heibel,
J. Rendtel,
K. Arlt,
H. Balthasar,
A. Diercke,
S. J. González Manrique,
A. Hofmann,
C. Kuckein,
H. Önel,
V. Senthamizh Pavai,
J. Staude,
M. Verma
Abstract:
The solar observatory Einstein Tower (Einsteinturm) at the Telegrafenberg in Potsdam is both a landmark of modern architecture and an important place for solar physics. Originally built for high-resolution spectroscopy and measuring the gravitational redshift, research shifted over the years to understanding the active Sun and its magnetic field. Nowadays, telescope and spectrographs are used for…
▽ More
The solar observatory Einstein Tower (Einsteinturm) at the Telegrafenberg in Potsdam is both a landmark of modern architecture and an important place for solar physics. Originally built for high-resolution spectroscopy and measuring the gravitational redshift, research shifted over the years to understanding the active Sun and its magnetic field. Nowadays, telescope and spectrographs are used for research and development, i.e., testing instruments and in particular polarization optics for advanced instrumentation deployed at major European and international astronomical and solar telescopes. In addition, the Einstein Tower is used for educating and training of the next generation astrophysicists as well as for education and public outreach activities directed at the general public. This article comments on the observatory's unique architecture and the challenges of maintaining and conserving the building. It describes in detail the characteristics of telescope, spectrographs, and imagers; it portrays some of the research and development activities.
△ Less
Submitted 22 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
-
Sunspot positions, areas, and group tilt angles for 1611-1631 from observations by Christoph Scheiner
Authors:
R. Arlt,
V. Senthamizh Pavai,
C. Schmiel,
F. Spada
Abstract:
Digital images of the observations printed in the books "Rosa Ursina sive solis" and "Prodromus pro sole mobili" by Christoph Scheiner as well as the drawings from Scheiner's letters to Marcus Welser are analysed in order to obtain information on positions and sizes of sunspots that appeared before the Maunder minimum. In most cases, the given orientation of the ecliptic is used to set up the heli…
▽ More
Digital images of the observations printed in the books "Rosa Ursina sive solis" and "Prodromus pro sole mobili" by Christoph Scheiner as well as the drawings from Scheiner's letters to Marcus Welser are analysed in order to obtain information on positions and sizes of sunspots that appeared before the Maunder minimum. In most cases, the given orientation of the ecliptic is used to set up the heliographic coordinate system for the drawings. Positions and sizes are measured manually on the screen. Very early drawings have no indication of their orientation. A rotational matching using common spots of adjacent days is used in some cases, while in other cases, the assumption of images being aligned with a zenith-horizon coordinate system appeared to be the most probable. In total, 8167 sunspots were measured. A distribution of sunspot latitudes versus time (butterfly diagram) is obtained for Scheiner's observations. The observations of 1611 are very inaccurate, the drawings of 1612 have at least an indication of their orientation, while the remaining part of the spot positions from 1618-1631 have good to very good accuracy. We also computed 697 tilt angles of apparently bipolar sunspot groups observed in the period 1618-1631. We find that the average tilt angle of nearly 4 degrees is not significantly different from 20th-century values.
△ Less
Submitted 25 August, 2016;
originally announced August 2016.
-
Sunspot group tilt angle measurements from historical observations
Authors:
V. Senthamizh Pavai,
R. Arlt,
A. Diercke,
C. Denker,
J. M. Vaquero
Abstract:
Sunspot positions from various historical sets of solar drawings are analysed with respect to the tilt angles of bipolar sunspot groups. Data by Scheiner, Hevelius, Staudacher, Zucconi, Schwabe, and Spoerer deliver a series of average tilt angles spanning a period of 270 years, additional to previously found values for 20th-century data obtained by other authors. We find that the average tilt angl…
▽ More
Sunspot positions from various historical sets of solar drawings are analysed with respect to the tilt angles of bipolar sunspot groups. Data by Scheiner, Hevelius, Staudacher, Zucconi, Schwabe, and Spoerer deliver a series of average tilt angles spanning a period of 270 years, additional to previously found values for 20th-century data obtained by other authors. We find that the average tilt angles before the Maunder minimum were not significantly different from the modern values. However, the average tilt angles of a period 50 years after the Maunder minimum, namely for cycles 0 and 1, were much lower and near zero. The normal tilt angles before the Maunder minimum suggest that it was not abnormally low tilt angles which drove the solar cycle into a grand minimum.
△ Less
Submitted 8 March, 2016;
originally announced March 2016.
-
Sunspot areas and tilt angles for solar cycles 7-10
Authors:
V. Senthamizh Pavai,
R. Arlt,
M. Dasi-Espuig,
N. Krivova,
S. Solanki
Abstract:
Extending the knowledge about the properties of solar cycles into the past is essential for understanding the solar dynamo. This paper aims at estimating areas of sunspots observed by Schwabe in 1825-1867 and at calculating the tilt angles of sunspot groups. The sunspot sizes in Schwabe's drawings are not to scale and need to be converted into physical sunspot areas. We employed a statistical appr…
▽ More
Extending the knowledge about the properties of solar cycles into the past is essential for understanding the solar dynamo. This paper aims at estimating areas of sunspots observed by Schwabe in 1825-1867 and at calculating the tilt angles of sunspot groups. The sunspot sizes in Schwabe's drawings are not to scale and need to be converted into physical sunspot areas. We employed a statistical approach assuming that the area distribution of sunspots was the same in the 19th century as it was in the 20th century. Umbral areas for about 130,000 sunspots observed by Schwabe were obtained, as well as the tilt angles of sunspot groups assuming them to be bipolar. There is, of course, no polarity information in the observations. The annually averaged sunspot areas correlate reasonably with sunspot number. We derived an average tilt angle by attempting to exclude unipolar groups with a minimum separation of the two alleged polarities and an outlier rejection method which follows the evolution of each group and detects the moment it turns unipolar at its decay. As a result, the tilt angles, although displaying considerable scatter, place the leading polarity on average 5.85+-0.25 closer to the equator, in good agreement with tilt angles obtained from 20th-century data sets. Sources of uncertainties in the tilt angle determination are discussed and need to be addressed whenever different data sets are combined. The sunspot area and tilt angle data are provided online.
△ Less
Submitted 31 August, 2015;
originally announced August 2015.
