AI enhanced data assimilation and uncertainty quantification applied to Geological Carbon Storage
Authors:
G. S. Seabra,
N. T. Mücke,
V. L. S. Silva,
D. Voskov,
F. Vossepoel
Abstract:
This study investigates the integration of machine learning (ML) and data assimilation (DA) techniques, focusing on implementing surrogate models for Geological Carbon Storage (GCS) projects while maintaining high fidelity physical results in posterior states. Initially, we evaluate the surrogate modeling capability of two distinct machine learning models, Fourier Neural Operators (FNOs) and Trans…
▽ More
This study investigates the integration of machine learning (ML) and data assimilation (DA) techniques, focusing on implementing surrogate models for Geological Carbon Storage (GCS) projects while maintaining high fidelity physical results in posterior states. Initially, we evaluate the surrogate modeling capability of two distinct machine learning models, Fourier Neural Operators (FNOs) and Transformer UNet (T-UNet), in the context of CO$_2$ injection simulations within channelized reservoirs. We introduce the Surrogate-based hybrid ESMDA (SH-ESMDA), an adaptation of the traditional Ensemble Smoother with Multiple Data Assimilation (ESMDA). This method uses FNOs and T-UNet as surrogate models and has the potential to make the standard ESMDA process at least 50% faster or more, depending on the number of assimilation steps. Additionally, we introduce Surrogate-based Hybrid RML (SH-RML), a variational data assimilation approach that relies on the randomized maximum likelihood (RML) where both the FNO and the T-UNet enable the computation of gradients for the optimization of the objective function, and a high-fidelity model is employed for the computation of the posterior states. Our comparative analyses show that SH-RML offers better uncertainty quantification compared to conventional ESMDA for the case study.
△ Less
Submitted 8 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
The FluidFlower International Benchmark Study: Process, Modeling Results, and Comparison to Experimental Data
Authors:
Bernd Flemisch,
Jan M. Nordbotten,
Martin Fernø,
Ruben Juanes,
Holger Class,
Mojdeh Delshad,
Florian Doster,
Jonathan Ennis-King,
Jacques Franc,
Sebastian Geiger,
Dennis Gläser,
Christopher Green,
James Gunning,
Hadi Hajibeygi,
Samuel J. Jackson,
Mohamad Jammoul,
Satish Karra,
Jiawei Li,
Stephan K. Matthäi,
Terry Miller,
Qi Shao,
Catherine Spurin,
Philip Stauffer,
Hamdi Tchelepi,
Xiaoming Tian
, et al. (8 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Successful deployment of geological carbon storage (GCS) requires an extensive use of reservoir simulators for screening, ranking and optimization of storage sites. However, the time scales of GCS are such that no sufficient long-term data is available yet to validate the simulators against. As a consequence, there is currently no solid basis for assessing the quality with which the dynamics of la…
▽ More
Successful deployment of geological carbon storage (GCS) requires an extensive use of reservoir simulators for screening, ranking and optimization of storage sites. However, the time scales of GCS are such that no sufficient long-term data is available yet to validate the simulators against. As a consequence, there is currently no solid basis for assessing the quality with which the dynamics of large-scale GCS operations can be forecasted.
To meet this knowledge gap, we have conducted a major GCS validation benchmark study. To achieve reasonable time scales, a laboratory-size geological storage formation was constructed (the "FluidFlower"), forming the basis for both the experimental and computational work. A validation experiment consisting of repeated GCS operations was conducted in the FluidFlower, providing what we define as the true physical dynamics for this system. Nine different research groups from around the world provided forecasts, both individually and collaboratively, based on a detailed physical and petrophysical characterization of the FluidFlower sands.
The major contribution of this paper is a report and discussion of the results of the validation benchmark study, complemented by a description of the benchmarking process and the participating computational models. The forecasts from the participating groups are compared to each other and to the experimental data by means of various indicative qualitative and quantitative measures. By this, we provide a detailed assessment of the capabilities of reservoir simulators and their users to capture both the injection and post-injection dynamics of the GCS operations.
△ Less
Submitted 9 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
