-
Assessing your Observatory's Impact: Best Practices in Establishing and Maintaining Observatory Bibliographies
Authors:
Observatory Bibliographers Collaboration,
Raffaele D'Abrusco,
Monique Gomez,
Uta Grothkopf,
Sharon Hunt,
Ruth Kneale,
Mika Konuma,
Jenny Novacescu,
Luisa Rebull,
Elena Scire,
Erin Scott,
Donna Thompson,
Lance Utley,
Christopher Wilkinson,
Sherry Winkelman
Abstract:
Observatories need to measure and evaluate the scientific output and overall impact of their facilities. An observatory bibliography consists of the papers published using that observatory's data, typically gathered by searching the major journals for relevant keywords. Recently, the volume of literature and methods by which the publications pool is evaluated has increased. Efficient and standardi…
▽ More
Observatories need to measure and evaluate the scientific output and overall impact of their facilities. An observatory bibliography consists of the papers published using that observatory's data, typically gathered by searching the major journals for relevant keywords. Recently, the volume of literature and methods by which the publications pool is evaluated has increased. Efficient and standardized procedures are necessary to assign meaningful metadata; enable user-friendly retrieval; and provide the opportunity to derive reports, statistics, and visualizations to impart a deeper understanding of the research output. In 2021, a group of observatory bibliographers from around the world convened online to continue the discussions presented in Lagerstrom (2015). We worked to extract general guidelines from our experiences, techniques, and lessons learnt. The paper explores the development, application, and current status of telescope bibliographies and future trends. This paper briefly describes the methodologies employed in constructing databases, along with the various bibliometric techniques used to analyze and interpret them. We explain reasons for non-standardization and why it is essential for each observatory to identify metadata and metrics that are meaningful for them; caution the (over-)use of comparisons among facilities that are, ultimately, not comparable through bibliometrics; and highlight the benefits of telescope bibliographies, both for researchers within the astronomical community and for stakeholders beyond the specific observatories. There is tremendous diversity in the ways bibliographers track publications and maintain databases, due to parameters such as resources, type of observatory, historical practices, and reporting requirements to funders and outside agencies. However, there are also common sets of Best Practices.
△ Less
Submitted 28 July, 2024; v1 submitted 29 December, 2023;
originally announced January 2024.
-
The Future of astronomical archives: reaching out to and engaging broader communities
Authors:
Raffaele D'Abrusco,
Glenn Becker,
Michael McCollough,
Sinh Thong,
David VanStone,
Sherry Winkelman
Abstract:
The importance of archival science increases significantly for astrophysical observatories as they mature and their archive holdings grow in size and complexity. Further enhancing the science return of archival data requires engaging a larger audience than the mission reference community, mostly because of the growth of interest in multi-wavelength and transient/time variability research. Such a g…
▽ More
The importance of archival science increases significantly for astrophysical observatories as they mature and their archive holdings grow in size and complexity. Further enhancing the science return of archival data requires engaging a larger audience than the mission reference community, mostly because of the growth of interest in multi-wavelength and transient/time variability research. Such a goal, though, can be difficult to achieve. In this paper I will describe a different approach to this question that, while minimizing technological friction and leveraging existing services, makes archival observations more accessible and increases our capability to proactively engage astronomers on potentially interesting archival records. Inspired by this strategy, the Chandra Data Archive team is working on two specific experimental projects that will hopefully demonstrate their potential while contributing to the maximization of the scientific return of the Chandra mission.
△ Less
Submitted 10 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
Robust Archives Maximize Scientific Accessibility
Authors:
J. E. G. Peek,
Vandana Desai,
Richard L. White,
Raffaele D'Abrusco,
Joseph M. Mazzarella,
Carolyn Grant,
Jenny L. Novacescu,
Elena Scire,
Sherry Winkelman
Abstract:
We present a bibliographic analysis of Chandra, Hubble, and Spitzer publications. We find (a) archival data are used in >60% of the publication output and (b) archives for these missions enable a much broader set of institutions and countries to scientifically use data from these missions. Specifically, we find that authors from institutions that have published few papers from a given mission publ…
▽ More
We present a bibliographic analysis of Chandra, Hubble, and Spitzer publications. We find (a) archival data are used in >60% of the publication output and (b) archives for these missions enable a much broader set of institutions and countries to scientifically use data from these missions. Specifically, we find that authors from institutions that have published few papers from a given mission publish 2/3 archival publications, while those with many publications typically have 1/3 archival publications. We also show that countries with lower GDP per capita overwhelmingly produce archival publications, while countries with higher GDP per capital produce guest observer and archival publications in equal amounts. We argue that robust archives are thus not only critical for the scientific productivity of mission data, but also the scientific accessibility of mission data. We argue that the astronomical community should support archives to maximize the overall scientific societal impact of astronomy, and represent an excellent investment in astronomy's future.
△ Less
Submitted 14 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
Chandra Publication Statistics
Authors:
Arnold H. Rots,
Sherry L. Winkelman,
Glenn Becker
Abstract:
In this study we develop and propose publication metrics, based on an analysis of data from the Chandra bibliographic database, that are more meaningful and less sensitive to observatory-specific characteristics than the traditional metrics. They fall in three main categories: speed of publication; fraction of observing time published; and archival usage. Citation of results is a fourth category,…
▽ More
In this study we develop and propose publication metrics, based on an analysis of data from the Chandra bibliographic database, that are more meaningful and less sensitive to observatory-specific characteristics than the traditional metrics. They fall in three main categories: speed of publication; fraction of observing time published; and archival usage. Citation of results is a fourth category, but lends itself less well to definite statements. For Chandra, the median time from observation to publication is 2.36 years; after about 7 years 90% of the observing time is published; after 10 years 70% of the observing time is published more than twice; and the total annual publication output of the mission is 60-70% of the cumulative observing time available, assuming a two year lag between data retrieval and publication.
△ Less
Submitted 15 February, 2012; v1 submitted 6 October, 2011;
originally announced October 2011.
-
Statistical Characterization of the Chandra Source Catalog
Authors:
Francis A. Primini,
John C. Houck,
John E. Davis,
Michael A. Nowak,
Ian N. Evans,
Kenny J. Glotfelty,
Craig S. Anderson,
Nina R. Bonaventura,
Judy C. Chen,
Stephen M. Doe,
Janet D. Evans,
Giuseppina Fabbiano,
Elizabeth C. Galle,
Danny G. Gibbs II,
John D. Grier,
Roger M. Hain,
Diane M. Hall,
Peter N. Harbo,
Xiangqun,
He,
Margarita Karovska,
Vinay L. Kashyap,
Jennifer Lauer,
Michael L. McCollough,
Jonathan C. McDowell
, et al. (14 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The first release of the Chandra Source Catalog (CSC) contains ~95,000 X-ray sources in a total area of ~0.75% of the entire sky, using data from ~3,900 separate ACIS observations of a multitude of different types of X-ray sources. In order to maximize the scientific benefit of such a large, heterogeneous data-set, careful characterization of the statistical properties of the catalog, i.e., comple…
▽ More
The first release of the Chandra Source Catalog (CSC) contains ~95,000 X-ray sources in a total area of ~0.75% of the entire sky, using data from ~3,900 separate ACIS observations of a multitude of different types of X-ray sources. In order to maximize the scientific benefit of such a large, heterogeneous data-set, careful characterization of the statistical properties of the catalog, i.e., completeness, sensitivity, false source rate, and accuracy of source properties, is required. Characterization efforts of other, large Chandra catalogs, such as the ChaMP Point Source Catalog (Kim et al. 2007) or the 2 Mega-second Deep Field Surveys (Alexander et al. 2003), while informative, cannot serve this purpose, since the CSC analysis procedures are significantly different and the range of allowable data is much less restrictive. We describe here the characterization process for the CSC. This process includes both a comparison of real CSC results with those of other, deeper Chandra catalogs of the same targets and extensive simulations of blank-sky and point source populations.
△ Less
Submitted 5 May, 2011; v1 submitted 3 May, 2011;
originally announced May 2011.
-
The Chandra Source Catalog
Authors:
Ian N. Evans,
Francis A. Primini,
Kenny J. Glotfelty,
Craig S. Anderson,
Nina R. Bonaventura,
Judy C. Chen,
John E. Davis,
Stephen M. Doe,
Janet D. Evans,
Giuseppina Fabbiano,
Elizabeth C. Galle,
Danny G. Gibbs II,
John D. Grier,
Roger M. Hain,
Diane M. Hall,
Peter N. Harbo,
Xiangqun,
He,
John C. Houck,
Margarita Karovska,
Vinay L. Kashyap,
Jennifer Lauer,
Michael L. McCollough,
Jonathan C. McDowell,
Joseph B. Miller
, et al. (14 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Chandra Source Catalog (CSC) is a general purpose virtual X-ray astrophysics facility that provides access to a carefully selected set of generally useful quantities for individual X-ray sources, and is designed to satisfy the needs of a broad-based group of scientists, including those who may be less familiar with astronomical data analysis in the X-ray regime. The first release of the CSC in…
▽ More
The Chandra Source Catalog (CSC) is a general purpose virtual X-ray astrophysics facility that provides access to a carefully selected set of generally useful quantities for individual X-ray sources, and is designed to satisfy the needs of a broad-based group of scientists, including those who may be less familiar with astronomical data analysis in the X-ray regime. The first release of the CSC includes information about 94,676 distinct X-ray sources detected in a subset of public ACIS imaging observations from roughly the first eight years of the Chandra mission. This release of the catalog includes point and compact sources with observed spatial extents <~ 30''. The catalog (1) provides access to the best estimates of the X-ray source properties for detected sources, with good scientific fidelity, and directly supports scientific analysis using the individual source data; (2) facilitates analysis of a wide range of statistical properties for classes of X-ray sources; and (3) provides efficient access to calibrated observational data and ancillary data products for individual X-ray sources, so that users can perform detailed further analysis using existing tools. The catalog includes real X-ray sources detected with flux estimates that are at least 3 times their estimated 1 sigma uncertainties in at least one energy band, while maintaining the number of spurious sources at a level of <~ 1 false source per field for a 100 ks observation. For each detected source, the CSC provides commonly tabulated quantities, including source position, extent, multi-band fluxes, hardness ratios, and variability statistics, derived from the observations in which the source is detected. In addition to these traditional catalog elements, for each X-ray source the CSC includes an extensive set of file-based data products that can be manipulated interactively.
△ Less
Submitted 25 May, 2010;
originally announced May 2010.
