-
EMU/GAMA: A Technique for Detecting Active Galactic Nuclei in Low Mass Systems
Authors:
Jahang Prathap,
Andrew M. Hopkins,
Aaron S. G. Robotham,
Sabine Bellstedt,
José Afonso,
Ummee T. Ahmed,
Maciej Bilicki,
Malcolm N. Bremer,
Sarah Brough,
Michael J. I. Brown,
Yjan Gordon,
Benne W. Holwerda,
Denis Leahy,
Ángel R. López-Sánchez,
Joshua R. Marvil,
Tamal Mukherjee,
Isabella Prandoni,
Stanislav S. Shabala,
Tessa Vernstrom,
Tayyaba Zafar
Abstract:
We propose a new method for identifying active galactic nuclei (AGN) in low mass ($\rm M_*\leq10^{10}M_\odot$) galaxies. This method relies on spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting to identify galaxies whose radio flux density has an excess over that expected from star formation alone. Combining data in the Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA) G23 region from GAMA, Evolutionary Map of the Universe…
▽ More
We propose a new method for identifying active galactic nuclei (AGN) in low mass ($\rm M_*\leq10^{10}M_\odot$) galaxies. This method relies on spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting to identify galaxies whose radio flux density has an excess over that expected from star formation alone. Combining data in the Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA) G23 region from GAMA, Evolutionary Map of the Universe (EMU) early science observations, and Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE), we compare this technique with a selection of different AGN diagnostics to explore the similarities and differences in AGN classification. We find that diagnostics based on optical and near-infrared criteria (the standard BPT diagram, the WISE colour criterion, and the mass-excitation, or MEx diagram) tend to favour detection of AGN in high mass, high luminosity systems, while the ``ProSpect'' SED fitting tool can identify AGN efficiently in low mass systems. We investigate an explanation for this result in the context of proportionally lower mass black holes in lower mass galaxies compared to higher mass galaxies and differing proportions of emission from AGN and star formation dominating the light at optical and infrared wavelengths as a function of galaxy stellar mass. We conclude that SED-derived AGN classification is an efficient approach to identify low mass hosts with low radio luminosity AGN.
△ Less
Submitted 18 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
EMU/GAMA: Radio detected galaxies are more obscured than optically selected galaxies
Authors:
U. T. Ahmed,
A. M. Hopkins,
J. Ware,
Y. A. Gordon,
M. Bilicki,
M. J. I. Brown,
M. Cluver,
G. Gürkan,
Á. R. López-Sánchez,
D. A. Leahy,
L. Marchetti,
S. Phillipps,
I. Prandoni,
N. Seymour,
E. N. Taylor,
E. Vardoulaki
Abstract:
We demonstrate the importance of radio selection in probing heavily obscured galaxy populations. We combine Evolutionary Map of the Universe (EMU) Early Science data in the Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA) G23 field with the GAMA data, providing optical photometry and spectral line measurements, together with Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) infrared (IR) photometry, providing IR luminosi…
▽ More
We demonstrate the importance of radio selection in probing heavily obscured galaxy populations. We combine Evolutionary Map of the Universe (EMU) Early Science data in the Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA) G23 field with the GAMA data, providing optical photometry and spectral line measurements, together with Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) infrared (IR) photometry, providing IR luminosities and colours. We investigate the degree of obscuration in star forming galaxies, based on the Balmer decrement (BD), and explore how this trend varies, over a redshift range of 0<z<0.345. We demonstrate that the radio detected population has on average higher levels of obscuration than the parent optical sample, arising through missing the lowest BD and lowest mass galaxies, which are also the lower star formation rate (SFR) and metallicity systems. We discuss possible explanations for this result, including speculation around whether it might arise from steeper stellar initial mass functions in low mass, low SFR galaxies.
△ Less
Submitted 19 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
The James Webb Space Telescope Mission
Authors:
Jonathan P. Gardner,
John C. Mather,
Randy Abbott,
James S. Abell,
Mark Abernathy,
Faith E. Abney,
John G. Abraham,
Roberto Abraham,
Yasin M. Abul-Huda,
Scott Acton,
Cynthia K. Adams,
Evan Adams,
David S. Adler,
Maarten Adriaensen,
Jonathan Albert Aguilar,
Mansoor Ahmed,
Nasif S. Ahmed,
Tanjira Ahmed,
Rüdeger Albat,
Loïc Albert,
Stacey Alberts,
David Aldridge,
Mary Marsha Allen,
Shaune S. Allen,
Martin Altenburg
, et al. (983 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Twenty-six years ago a small committee report, building on earlier studies, expounded a compelling and poetic vision for the future of astronomy, calling for an infrared-optimized space telescope with an aperture of at least $4m$. With the support of their governments in the US, Europe, and Canada, 20,000 people realized that vision as the $6.5m$ James Webb Space Telescope. A generation of astrono…
▽ More
Twenty-six years ago a small committee report, building on earlier studies, expounded a compelling and poetic vision for the future of astronomy, calling for an infrared-optimized space telescope with an aperture of at least $4m$. With the support of their governments in the US, Europe, and Canada, 20,000 people realized that vision as the $6.5m$ James Webb Space Telescope. A generation of astronomers will celebrate their accomplishments for the life of the mission, potentially as long as 20 years, and beyond. This report and the scientific discoveries that follow are extended thank-you notes to the 20,000 team members. The telescope is working perfectly, with much better image quality than expected. In this and accompanying papers, we give a brief history, describe the observatory, outline its objectives and current observing program, and discuss the inventions and people who made it possible. We cite detailed reports on the design and the measured performance on orbit.
△ Less
Submitted 10 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
