-
Constraining the FRB mechanism from scintillation in the host galaxy
Authors:
Pawan Kumar,
Paz Beniamini,
Om Gupta,
James M. Cordes
Abstract:
Most FRB models can be divided into two groups based on the distance of the radio emission region from the central engine. The first group of models, the so-called `nearby' or magnetospheric models, invoke FRB emission at distances of 10$^9$ cm or less from the central engine, while the second `far-away' models involve emission from distances of 10$^{11}$ cm or greater. The lateral size for the em…
▽ More
Most FRB models can be divided into two groups based on the distance of the radio emission region from the central engine. The first group of models, the so-called `nearby' or magnetospheric models, invoke FRB emission at distances of 10$^9$ cm or less from the central engine, while the second `far-away' models involve emission from distances of 10$^{11}$ cm or greater. The lateral size for the emission region for the former class of models ($\lesssim$ 10$^7$ cm) is much smaller than the second class of models ($\gtrsim 10^9$ cm). We propose that an interstellar scattering screen in the host galaxy is well-suited to differentiate between the two classes of models, particularly based on the level of modulations in the observed intensity with frequency, in the regime of strong diffractive scintillation. This is because the diffractive length scale for the host galaxy's ISM scattering screen is expected to lie between the transverse emission-region sizes for the `nearby' and the `far-away' class of models. Determining the strength of flux modulation caused by scintillation (scintillation modulation index) across the scintillation bandwidth ($\sim 1/2πδt_s$) would provide a strong constraint on the FRB radiation mechanism when the scatter broadening ($δt_s$) is shown to be from the FRB host galaxy. The scaling of the scintillation bandwidth as $\sim ν^{4.4}$ may make it easier to determine the modulation index at $\gtrsim$ 1 GHz.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2023; v1 submitted 28 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Pulsar revival in neutron star mergers: multi-messenger prospects for the discovery of pre-merger coherent radio emission
Authors:
A. J. Cooper,
O. Gupta,
Z. Wadiasingh,
R. A. M. J. Wijers,
O. M. Boersma,
I. Andreoni,
A. Rowlinson,
K. Gourdji
Abstract:
We investigate pre-merger coherent radio emission from neutron star mergers arising due to the magnetospheric interaction between compact objects. We consider two plausible radiation mechanisms, and show that if one neutron star has a surface magnetic field $B_{\rm s} \ge 10^{12}$G, coherent millisecond radio bursts with characteristic temporal morphology and inclination angle dependence are obser…
▽ More
We investigate pre-merger coherent radio emission from neutron star mergers arising due to the magnetospheric interaction between compact objects. We consider two plausible radiation mechanisms, and show that if one neutron star has a surface magnetic field $B_{\rm s} \ge 10^{12}$G, coherent millisecond radio bursts with characteristic temporal morphology and inclination angle dependence are observable to Gpc distances with next-generation radio facilities. We explore multi-messenger and multi-wavelength methods of identification of a NS merger origin of radio bursts, such as in fast radio burst surveys, triggered observations of gamma-ray bursts and gravitational wave events, and optical/radio follow-up of fast radio bursts in search of kilonova and radio afterglow emission. We present our findings for current and future observing facilities, and make recommendations for verifying or constraining the model.
△ Less
Submitted 2 December, 2022; v1 submitted 31 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
A Comparative Analysis of Machine-learning Models for Solar Flare Forecasting: Identifying High-performing Active Region Flare Indicators
Authors:
Suvadip Sinha,
Om Gupta,
Vishal Singh,
B. Lekshmi,
Dibyendu Nandy,
Dhrubaditya Mitra,
Saikat Chatterjee,
Sourangshu Bhattacharya,
Saptarshi Chatterjee,
Nandita Srivastava,
Axel Brandenburg,
Sanchita Pal
Abstract:
Solar flares create adverse space weather impacting space and Earth-based technologies. However, the difficulty of forecasting flares, and by extension severe space weather, is accentuated by the lack of any unique flare trigger or a single physical pathway. Studies indicate that multiple physical properties contribute to active region flare potential, compounding the challenge. Recent development…
▽ More
Solar flares create adverse space weather impacting space and Earth-based technologies. However, the difficulty of forecasting flares, and by extension severe space weather, is accentuated by the lack of any unique flare trigger or a single physical pathway. Studies indicate that multiple physical properties contribute to active region flare potential, compounding the challenge. Recent developments in machine learning (ML) have enabled analysis of higher-dimensional data leading to increasingly better flare forecasting techniques. However, consensus on high-performing flare predictors remains elusive. In the most comprehensive study to date, we conduct a comparative analysis of four popular ML techniques (k-nearest neighbor, logistic regression, random forest classifier, and support vector machine) by training these on magnetic parameters obtained from the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) for the entirety of solar cycle 24. We demonstrate that the logistic regression and support vector machine algorithms perform extremely well in forecasting active region flaring potential. The logistic regression algorithm returns the highest true skill score of $0.967 \pm 0.018$, possibly the highest classification performance achieved with any strictly parametric study. From a comparative assessment, we establish that the magnetic properties like total current helicity, total vertical current density, total unsigned flux, R_VALUE, and total absolute twist are the top-performing flare indicators. We also introduce and analyze two new performance metrics, namely, severe and clear space weather indicators. Our analysis constrains the most successful ML algorithms and identifies physical parameters that contribute most to active region flare productivity.
△ Less
Submitted 2 November, 2022; v1 submitted 12 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
