-
Science Priorities for the Extraction of the Solid MSR Samples from their Sample Tubes
Authors:
N. Dauphas,
S. S. Russell,
D. Beaty,
F. Thiessen,
J. Barnes,
L. Bonal,
J. Bridges,
T. Bristow,
J. Eiler,
L. Ferriere,
T. Fornaro,
J. Gattacceca,
B. Hoffman,
E. J. Javaux,
T. Kleine,
H. Y. McSween,
M. Prasad,
L. Rampe,
M. Schmidt,
B. Schoene,
K. L. Siebach,
J. Stern,
N. Tosca
Abstract:
Preservation of the chemical and structural integrity of samples that will be brought back from Mars is paramount to achieving the scientific objectives of MSR. Given our knowledge of the nature of the samples retrieved at Jezero by Perseverance, at least two options need to be tested for opening the sample tubes: (1) One or two radial cuts at the end of the tube to slide the sample out. (2) Two r…
▽ More
Preservation of the chemical and structural integrity of samples that will be brought back from Mars is paramount to achieving the scientific objectives of MSR. Given our knowledge of the nature of the samples retrieved at Jezero by Perseverance, at least two options need to be tested for opening the sample tubes: (1) One or two radial cuts at the end of the tube to slide the sample out. (2) Two radial cuts at the ends of the tube and two longitudinal cuts to lift the upper half of the tube and access the sample. Strategy 1 will likely minimize contamination but incurs the risk of affecting the physical integrity of weakly consolidated samples. Strategy 2 will be optimal for preserving the physical integrity of the samples but increases the risk of contamination and mishandling of the sample as more manipulations and additional equipment will be needed. A flexible approach to opening the sample tubes is therefore required, and several options need to be available, depending on the nature of the rock samples returned. Both opening strategies 1 and 2 may need to be available when the samples are returned to handle different sample types (e.g., loosely bound sediments vs. indurated magmatic rocks). This question should be revisited after engineering tests are performed on analogue samples. The MSR sample tubes will have to be opened under stringent BSL4 conditions and this aspect needs to be integrated into the planning.
△ Less
Submitted 11 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Cosmological constraints on a dark matter -- dark energy interaction
Authors:
Mark B. Hoffman
Abstract:
It is generally assumed that the two dark components of the energy density of the universe, a smooth component called dark energy and a fluid of nonrelativistic weakly interacting particles called dark matter, are independent of each other and interact only through gravity. In this paper, we consider a class of models in which the dark matter and dark energy interact directly. The dark matter pa…
▽ More
It is generally assumed that the two dark components of the energy density of the universe, a smooth component called dark energy and a fluid of nonrelativistic weakly interacting particles called dark matter, are independent of each other and interact only through gravity. In this paper, we consider a class of models in which the dark matter and dark energy interact directly. The dark matter particle mass is proportional to the value of a scalar field, and the energy density of this scalar field comprises the dark energy. We study the phenomenology of these models and calculate the luminosity distance as a function of redshift and the CMB anisotropy spectrum for several cases. We find that the phenomenology of these models can differ significantly from the standard case, and current observations can already rule out the simplest models.
△ Less
Submitted 26 August, 2003; v1 submitted 18 July, 2003;
originally announced July 2003.
-
Kinematic Constraints to the Key Inflationary Observables
Authors:
Mark B. Hoffman,
Michael S. Turner
Abstract:
The observables $T/S$ and $n-1$ are key to testing and understanding inflation. ($T$, $S$, and $n-1$ respectively quantify the gravity-wave and density-perturbation contributions to CMB anisotropy and the deviation of the density perturbations from the scale-invariant form.) Absent a standard model, there is no definite prediction for, or relation between, $T/S$ and $n-1$. By reformulating the e…
▽ More
The observables $T/S$ and $n-1$ are key to testing and understanding inflation. ($T$, $S$, and $n-1$ respectively quantify the gravity-wave and density-perturbation contributions to CMB anisotropy and the deviation of the density perturbations from the scale-invariant form.) Absent a standard model, there is no definite prediction for, or relation between, $T/S$ and $n-1$. By reformulating the equations governing inflation we show that models generally predict $T/S \approx -5(n-1)$ or 0, and in particular, if $n>0.85$, $T/S$ is expected to be $>10^{-3}$.
△ Less
Submitted 22 June, 2000;
originally announced June 2000.
