-
Bringing discrete-time Langevin splitting methods into agreement with thermodynamics
Authors:
Joshua Finkelstein,
Chungho Cheng,
Giacomo Fiorin,
Benjamin Seibold,
Niels Grønbech-Jensen
Abstract:
In light of the recently published complete set of statistically correct Gronbech-Jensen (GJ) methods for discrete-time thermodynamics, we revise a differential operator splitting method for the Langevin equation in order to comply with the basic GJ thermodynamic sampling features, namely the Boltzmann distribution and Einstein diffusion, in linear systems. This revision, which is based on the int…
▽ More
In light of the recently published complete set of statistically correct Gronbech-Jensen (GJ) methods for discrete-time thermodynamics, we revise a differential operator splitting method for the Langevin equation in order to comply with the basic GJ thermodynamic sampling features, namely the Boltzmann distribution and Einstein diffusion, in linear systems. This revision, which is based on the introduction of time scaling along with flexibility of a discrete-time velocity attenuation parameter, provides a direct link between the ABO splitting formalism and the GJ methods. This link brings about the conclusion that any GJ method has at least weak second order accuracy in the applied time step. It further helps identify a novel half-step velocity, which simultaneously produces both correct kinetic statistics and correct transport measures for any of the statistically sound GJ methods. Explicit algorithmic expressions are given for the integration of the new half-step velocity into the GJ set of methods. Numerical simulations, including quantum-based molecular dynamics (QMD) using the QMD suite LATTE, highlight the discussed properties of the algorithms as well as exhibit the direct application of robust, time step independent stochastic integrators to quantum-based molecular dynamics.
△ Less
Submitted 21 October, 2021; v1 submitted 7 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
The Challenge of Stochastic Størmer-Verlet Thermostats Generating Correct Statistics
Authors:
Joshua Finkelstein,
Chungho Cheng,
Giacomo Fiorin,
Benjamin Seibold,
Niels Grønbech-Jensen
Abstract:
In light of the recently developed complete GJ set of single random variable stochastic, discrete-time Størmer-Verlet algorithms for statistically accurate simulations of Langevin equations, we investigate two outstanding questions: 1) Are there any algorithmic or statistical benefits from including multiple random variables per time-step, and 2) are there objective reasons for using one or more m…
▽ More
In light of the recently developed complete GJ set of single random variable stochastic, discrete-time Størmer-Verlet algorithms for statistically accurate simulations of Langevin equations, we investigate two outstanding questions: 1) Are there any algorithmic or statistical benefits from including multiple random variables per time-step, and 2) are there objective reasons for using one or more methods from the available set of statistically correct algorithms? To address the first question, we assume a general form for the discrete-time equations with two random variables and then follow the systematic, brute-force GJ methodology by enforcing correct thermodynamics in linear systems. It is concluded that correct configurational Boltzmann sampling of a particle in a harmonic potential implies correct configurational free-particle diffusion, and that these requirements only can be accomplished if the two random variables per time step are identical. We consequently submit that the GJ set represents all possible stochastic Størmer-Verlet methods that can reproduce time-step-independent statistics of linear systems. The second question is thus addressed within the GJ set. Based in part on numerical simulations of complex molecular systems, and in part on analytic scaling of time, we analyze the apparent difference in stability between different methods. We attribute this difference to the inherent time scaling in each method, and suggest that this scaling may lead to inconsistencies in the interpretation of dynamical and statistical simulation results. We therefore suggest that the method with the least inherent time-scaling, the GJ-I/GJF-2GJ method, be preferred for statistical applications where spurious rescaling of time is undesirable.
△ Less
Submitted 19 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Comparison of Modern Langevin Integrators for Simulations of Coarse-Grained Polymer Melts
Authors:
Joshua Finkelstein,
Giacomo Fiorin,
Benjamin Seibold
Abstract:
For a wide range of phenomena, current computational ability does not always allow for fully atomistic simulations of high-dimensional molecular systems to reach time scales of interest. Coarse-graining (CG) is an established approach to alleviate the impact of computational limits while retaining the same algorithms used in atomistic simulations. It is of importance to understand how algorithms s…
▽ More
For a wide range of phenomena, current computational ability does not always allow for fully atomistic simulations of high-dimensional molecular systems to reach time scales of interest. Coarse-graining (CG) is an established approach to alleviate the impact of computational limits while retaining the same algorithms used in atomistic simulations. It is of importance to understand how algorithms such as Langevin integrators perform on non-trivial CG molecular systems, and in particular how large of an integration time step can be used without introducing unacceptable amounts of error into averaged quantities of interest. To investigate this, we examined three different Langevin integrators on a CG polymer melt: the recently developed BAOAB method by Leimkuhler and Matthews, the Gronbech-Jensen and Farago method, or G-JF, and the frequently used Brunger-Brooks-Karplus integrator, also known as BBK. We compute and analyze key statistical properties for each. Our results indicate that the three integrators perform similarly when using a small friction parameter; however, outside of this regime the use of large integration steps produces significant deviations from the predicted diffusivity and steady-state distributions for all integration methods examined with the exception of G-JF.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
