-
CovidCTNet: An Open-Source Deep Learning Approach to Identify Covid-19 Using CT Image
Authors:
Tahereh Javaheri,
Morteza Homayounfar,
Zohreh Amoozgar,
Reza Reiazi,
Fatemeh Homayounieh,
Engy Abbas,
Azadeh Laali,
Amir Reza Radmard,
Mohammad Hadi Gharib,
Seyed Ali Javad Mousavi,
Omid Ghaemi,
Rosa Babaei,
Hadi Karimi Mobin,
Mehdi Hosseinzadeh,
Rana Jahanban-Esfahlan,
Khaled Seidi,
Mannudeep K. Kalra,
Guanglan Zhang,
L. T. Chitkushev,
Benjamin Haibe-Kains,
Reza Malekzadeh,
Reza Rawassizadeh
Abstract:
Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is highly contagious with limited treatment options. Early and accurate diagnosis of Covid-19 is crucial in reducing the spread of the disease and its accompanied mortality. Currently, detection by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the gold standard of outpatient and inpatient detection of Covid-19. RT-PCR is a rapid method, however, it…
▽ More
Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is highly contagious with limited treatment options. Early and accurate diagnosis of Covid-19 is crucial in reducing the spread of the disease and its accompanied mortality. Currently, detection by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the gold standard of outpatient and inpatient detection of Covid-19. RT-PCR is a rapid method, however, its accuracy in detection is only ~70-75%. Another approved strategy is computed tomography (CT) imaging. CT imaging has a much higher sensitivity of ~80-98%, but similar accuracy of 70%. To enhance the accuracy of CT imaging detection, we developed an open-source set of algorithms called CovidCTNet that successfully differentiates Covid-19 from community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and other lung diseases. CovidCTNet increases the accuracy of CT imaging detection to 90% compared to radiologists (70%). The model is designed to work with heterogeneous and small sample sizes independent of the CT imaging hardware. In order to facilitate the detection of Covid-19 globally and assist radiologists and physicians in the screening process, we are releasing all algorithms and parametric details in an open-source format. Open-source sharing of our CovidCTNet enables developers to rapidly improve and optimize services, while preserving user privacy and data ownership.
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2020; v1 submitted 6 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Adaptive Decision Making via Entropy Minimization
Authors:
Armen E. Allahverdyan,
Aram Galstyan,
Ali E. Abbas,
Zbigniew R. Struzik
Abstract:
An agent choosing between various actions tends to take the one with the lowest cost. But this choice is arguably too rigid (not adaptive) to be useful in complex situations, e.g., where exploration-exploitation trade-off is relevant in creative task solving or when stated preferences differ from revealed ones. Here we study an agent who is willing to sacrifice a fixed amount of expected utility f…
▽ More
An agent choosing between various actions tends to take the one with the lowest cost. But this choice is arguably too rigid (not adaptive) to be useful in complex situations, e.g., where exploration-exploitation trade-off is relevant in creative task solving or when stated preferences differ from revealed ones. Here we study an agent who is willing to sacrifice a fixed amount of expected utility for adaptation. How can/ought our agent choose an optimal (in a technical sense) mixed action? We explore consequences of making this choice via entropy minimization, which is argued to be a specific example of risk-aversion. This recovers the $ε$-greedy probabilities known in reinforcement learning. We show that the entropy minimization leads to rudimentary forms of intelligent behavior: (i) the agent assigns a non-negligible probability to costly events; but (ii) chooses with a sizable probability the action related to less cost (lesser of two evils) when confronted with two actions with comparable costs; (iii) the agent is subject to effects similar to cognitive dissonance and frustration. Neither of these features are shown by entropy maximization.
△ Less
Submitted 1 December, 2018; v1 submitted 18 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
-
An information theory for preferences
Authors:
Ali E. Abbas
Abstract:
Recent literature in the last Maximum Entropy workshop introduced an analogy between cumulative probability distributions and normalized utility functions. Based on this analogy, a utility density function can de defined as the derivative of a normalized utility function. A utility density function is non-negative and integrates to unity. These two properties form the basis of a correspondence b…
▽ More
Recent literature in the last Maximum Entropy workshop introduced an analogy between cumulative probability distributions and normalized utility functions. Based on this analogy, a utility density function can de defined as the derivative of a normalized utility function. A utility density function is non-negative and integrates to unity. These two properties form the basis of a correspondence between utility and probability. A natural application of this analogy is a maximum entropy principle to assign maximum entropy utility values. Maximum entropy utility interprets many of the common utility functions based on the preference information needed for their assignment, and helps assign utility values based on partial preference information. This paper reviews maximum entropy utility and introduces further results that stem from the duality between probability and utility.
△ Less
Submitted 22 October, 2003;
originally announced October 2003.
-
The Algebra of Utility Inference
Authors:
Ali E. Abbas
Abstract:
Richard Cox [1] set the axiomatic foundations of probable inference and the algebra of propositions. He showed that consistency within these axioms requires certain rules for updating belief. In this paper we use the analogy between probability and utility introduced in [2] to propose an axiomatic foundation for utility inference and the algebra of preferences. We show that consistency within th…
▽ More
Richard Cox [1] set the axiomatic foundations of probable inference and the algebra of propositions. He showed that consistency within these axioms requires certain rules for updating belief. In this paper we use the analogy between probability and utility introduced in [2] to propose an axiomatic foundation for utility inference and the algebra of preferences. We show that consistency within these axioms requires certain rules for updating preference. We discuss a class of utility functions that stems from the axioms of utility inference and show that this class is the basic building block for any general multiattribute utility function. We use this class of utility functions together with the algebra of preferences to construct utility functions represented by logical operations on the attributes.
△ Less
Submitted 22 October, 2003;
originally announced October 2003.
