SKM-TEA: A Dataset for Accelerated MRI Reconstruction with Dense Image Labels for Quantitative Clinical Evaluation
Authors:
Arjun D Desai,
Andrew M Schmidt,
Elka B Rubin,
Christopher M Sandino,
Marianne S Black,
Valentina Mazzoli,
Kathryn J Stevens,
Robert Boutin,
Christopher Ré,
Garry E Gold,
Brian A Hargreaves,
Akshay S Chaudhari
Abstract:
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a cornerstone of modern medical imaging. However, long image acquisition times, the need for qualitative expert analysis, and the lack of (and difficulty extracting) quantitative indicators that are sensitive to tissue health have curtailed widespread clinical and research studies. While recent machine learning methods for MRI reconstruction and analysis have sh…
▽ More
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a cornerstone of modern medical imaging. However, long image acquisition times, the need for qualitative expert analysis, and the lack of (and difficulty extracting) quantitative indicators that are sensitive to tissue health have curtailed widespread clinical and research studies. While recent machine learning methods for MRI reconstruction and analysis have shown promise for reducing this burden, these techniques are primarily validated with imperfect image quality metrics, which are discordant with clinically-relevant measures that ultimately hamper clinical deployment and clinician trust. To mitigate this challenge, we present the Stanford Knee MRI with Multi-Task Evaluation (SKM-TEA) dataset, a collection of quantitative knee MRI (qMRI) scans that enables end-to-end, clinically-relevant evaluation of MRI reconstruction and analysis tools. This 1.6TB dataset consists of raw-data measurements of ~25,000 slices (155 patients) of anonymized patient MRI scans, the corresponding scanner-generated DICOM images, manual segmentations of four tissues, and bounding box annotations for sixteen clinically relevant pathologies. We provide a framework for using qMRI parameter maps, along with image reconstructions and dense image labels, for measuring the quality of qMRI biomarker estimates extracted from MRI reconstruction, segmentation, and detection techniques. Finally, we use this framework to benchmark state-of-the-art baselines on this dataset. We hope our SKM-TEA dataset and code can enable a broad spectrum of research for modular image reconstruction and image analysis in a clinically informed manner. Dataset access, code, and benchmarks are available at https://github.com/StanfordMIMI/skm-tea.
△ Less
Submitted 13 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
Open source software for automatic subregional assessment of knee cartilage degradation using quantitative T2 relaxometry and deep learning
Authors:
Kevin A. Thomas,
Dominik Krzemiński,
Łukasz Kidziński,
Rohan Paul,
Elka B. Rubin,
Eni Halilaj,
Marianne S. Black,
Akshay Chaudhari,
Garry E. Gold,
Scott L. Delp
Abstract:
Objective: We evaluate a fully-automated femoral cartilage segmentation model for measuring T2 relaxation values and longitudinal changes using multi-echo spin echo (MESE) MRI. We have open sourced this model and corresponding segmentations. Methods: We trained a neural network to segment femoral cartilage from MESE MRIs. Cartilage was divided into 12 subregions along medial-lateral, superficial-d…
▽ More
Objective: We evaluate a fully-automated femoral cartilage segmentation model for measuring T2 relaxation values and longitudinal changes using multi-echo spin echo (MESE) MRI. We have open sourced this model and corresponding segmentations. Methods: We trained a neural network to segment femoral cartilage from MESE MRIs. Cartilage was divided into 12 subregions along medial-lateral, superficial-deep, and anterior-central-posterior boundaries. Subregional T2 values and four-year changes were calculated using a musculoskeletal radiologist's segmentations (Reader 1) and the model's segmentations. These were compared using 28 held out images. A subset of 14 images were also evaluated by a second expert (Reader 2) for comparison. Results: Model segmentations agreed with Reader 1 segmentations with a Dice score of 0.85 +/- 0.03. The model's estimated T2 values for individual subregions agreed with those of Reader 1 with an average Spearman correlation of 0.89 and average mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.34 ms. The model's estimated four-year change in T2 for individual regions agreed with Reader 1 with an average correlation of 0.80 and average MAE of 1.72 ms. The model agreed with Reader 1 at least as closely as Reader 2 agreed with Reader 1 in terms of Dice score (0.85 vs 0.75) and subregional T2 values. Conclusions: We present a fast, fully-automated model for segmentation of MESE MRIs. Assessments of cartilage health using its segmentations agree with those of an expert as closely as experts agree with one another. This has the potential to accelerate osteoarthritis research.
△ Less
Submitted 22 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
