-
A Domain-Agnostic Approach for Characterization of Lifelong Learning Systems
Authors:
Megan M. Baker,
Alexander New,
Mario Aguilar-Simon,
Ziad Al-Halah,
Sébastien M. R. Arnold,
Ese Ben-Iwhiwhu,
Andrew P. Brna,
Ethan Brooks,
Ryan C. Brown,
Zachary Daniels,
Anurag Daram,
Fabien Delattre,
Ryan Dellana,
Eric Eaton,
Haotian Fu,
Kristen Grauman,
Jesse Hostetler,
Shariq Iqbal,
Cassandra Kent,
Nicholas Ketz,
Soheil Kolouri,
George Konidaris,
Dhireesha Kudithipudi,
Erik Learned-Miller,
Seungwon Lee
, et al. (22 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Despite the advancement of machine learning techniques in recent years, state-of-the-art systems lack robustness to "real world" events, where the input distributions and tasks encountered by the deployed systems will not be limited to the original training context, and systems will instead need to adapt to novel distributions and tasks while deployed. This critical gap may be addressed through th…
▽ More
Despite the advancement of machine learning techniques in recent years, state-of-the-art systems lack robustness to "real world" events, where the input distributions and tasks encountered by the deployed systems will not be limited to the original training context, and systems will instead need to adapt to novel distributions and tasks while deployed. This critical gap may be addressed through the development of "Lifelong Learning" systems that are capable of 1) Continuous Learning, 2) Transfer and Adaptation, and 3) Scalability. Unfortunately, efforts to improve these capabilities are typically treated as distinct areas of research that are assessed independently, without regard to the impact of each separate capability on other aspects of the system. We instead propose a holistic approach, using a suite of metrics and an evaluation framework to assess Lifelong Learning in a principled way that is agnostic to specific domains or system techniques. Through five case studies, we show that this suite of metrics can inform the development of varied and complex Lifelong Learning systems. We highlight how the proposed suite of metrics quantifies performance trade-offs present during Lifelong Learning system development - both the widely discussed Stability-Plasticity dilemma and the newly proposed relationship between Sample Efficient and Robust Learning. Further, we make recommendations for the formulation and use of metrics to guide the continuing development of Lifelong Learning systems and assess their progress in the future.
△ Less
Submitted 18 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
In-context Reinforcement Learning with Algorithm Distillation
Authors:
Michael Laskin,
Luyu Wang,
Junhyuk Oh,
Emilio Parisotto,
Stephen Spencer,
Richie Steigerwald,
DJ Strouse,
Steven Hansen,
Angelos Filos,
Ethan Brooks,
Maxime Gazeau,
Himanshu Sahni,
Satinder Singh,
Volodymyr Mnih
Abstract:
We propose Algorithm Distillation (AD), a method for distilling reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms into neural networks by modeling their training histories with a causal sequence model. Algorithm Distillation treats learning to reinforcement learn as an across-episode sequential prediction problem. A dataset of learning histories is generated by a source RL algorithm, and then a causal transf…
▽ More
We propose Algorithm Distillation (AD), a method for distilling reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms into neural networks by modeling their training histories with a causal sequence model. Algorithm Distillation treats learning to reinforcement learn as an across-episode sequential prediction problem. A dataset of learning histories is generated by a source RL algorithm, and then a causal transformer is trained by autoregressively predicting actions given their preceding learning histories as context. Unlike sequential policy prediction architectures that distill post-learning or expert sequences, AD is able to improve its policy entirely in-context without updating its network parameters. We demonstrate that AD can reinforcement learn in-context in a variety of environments with sparse rewards, combinatorial task structure, and pixel-based observations, and find that AD learns a more data-efficient RL algorithm than the one that generated the source data.
△ Less
Submitted 25 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Large Language Models can Implement Policy Iteration
Authors:
Ethan Brooks,
Logan Walls,
Richard L. Lewis,
Satinder Singh
Abstract:
This work presents In-Context Policy Iteration, an algorithm for performing Reinforcement Learning (RL), in-context, using foundation models. While the application of foundation models to RL has received considerable attention, most approaches rely on either (1) the curation of expert demonstrations (either through manual design or task-specific pretraining) or (2) adaptation to the task of intere…
▽ More
This work presents In-Context Policy Iteration, an algorithm for performing Reinforcement Learning (RL), in-context, using foundation models. While the application of foundation models to RL has received considerable attention, most approaches rely on either (1) the curation of expert demonstrations (either through manual design or task-specific pretraining) or (2) adaptation to the task of interest using gradient methods (either fine-tuning or training of adapter layers). Both of these techniques have drawbacks. Collecting demonstrations is labor-intensive, and algorithms that rely on them do not outperform the experts from which the demonstrations were derived. All gradient techniques are inherently slow, sacrificing the "few-shot" quality that made in-context learning attractive to begin with. In this work, we present an algorithm, ICPI, that learns to perform RL tasks without expert demonstrations or gradients. Instead we present a policy-iteration method in which the prompt content is the entire locus of learning. ICPI iteratively updates the contents of the prompt from which it derives its policy through trial-and-error interaction with an RL environment. In order to eliminate the role of in-weights learning (on which approaches like Decision Transformer rely heavily), we demonstrate our algorithm using Codex, a language model with no prior knowledge of the domains on which we evaluate it.
△ Less
Submitted 13 August, 2023; v1 submitted 7 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Reinforcement Learning of Implicit and Explicit Control Flow in Instructions
Authors:
Ethan A. Brooks,
Janarthanan Rajendran,
Richard L. Lewis,
Satinder Singh
Abstract:
Learning to flexibly follow task instructions in dynamic environments poses interesting challenges for reinforcement learning agents. We focus here on the problem of learning control flow that deviates from a strict step-by-step execution of instructions -- that is, control flow that may skip forward over parts of the instructions or return backward to previously completed or skipped steps. Demand…
▽ More
Learning to flexibly follow task instructions in dynamic environments poses interesting challenges for reinforcement learning agents. We focus here on the problem of learning control flow that deviates from a strict step-by-step execution of instructions -- that is, control flow that may skip forward over parts of the instructions or return backward to previously completed or skipped steps. Demand for such flexible control arises in two fundamental ways: explicitly when control is specified in the instructions themselves (such as conditional branching and looping) and implicitly when stochastic environment dynamics require re-completion of instructions whose effects have been perturbed, or opportunistic skipping of instructions whose effects are already present. We formulate an attention-based architecture that meets these challenges by learning, from task reward only, to flexibly attend to and condition behavior on an internal encoding of the instructions. We test the architecture's ability to learn both explicit and implicit control in two illustrative domains -- one inspired by Minecraft and the other by StarCraft -- and show that the architecture exhibits zero-shot generalization to novel instructions of length greater than those in a training set, at a performance level unmatched by two baseline recurrent architectures and one ablation architecture.
△ Less
Submitted 29 June, 2021; v1 submitted 25 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
