Showing 1–17 of 17 results for author: Facchini, A

Designing for Complementarity: A Conceptual Framework to Go Beyond the Current Paradigm of Using XAI in Healthcare

Authors: Elisa Rubegni, Omran Ayoub, Stefania Maria Rita Rizzo, Marco Barbero, Guenda Bernegger, Francesca Faraci, Francesca Mangili, Emiliano Soldini, Pierpaolo Trimboli, Alessandro Facchini

Abstract: The widespread use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools in the healthcare sector raises many ethical and legal problems, one of the main reasons being their black-box nature and therefore the seemingly opacity and inscrutability of their characteristics and decision-making process. Literature extensively discusses how this can lead to phenomena of over-reliance and under-reliance, ultimately lim… ▽ More The widespread use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools in the healthcare sector raises many ethical and legal problems, one of the main reasons being their black-box nature and therefore the seemingly opacity and inscrutability of their characteristics and decision-making process. Literature extensively discusses how this can lead to phenomena of over-reliance and under-reliance, ultimately limiting the adoption of AI. We addressed these issues by building a theoretical framework based on three concepts: Feature Importance, Counterexample Explanations, and Similar-Case Explanations. Grounded in the literature, the model was deployed within a case study in which, using a participatory design approach, we designed and developed a high-fidelity prototype. Through the co-design and development of the prototype and the underlying model, we advanced the knowledge on how to design AI-based systems for enabling complementarity in the decision-making process in the healthcare domain. Our work aims at contributing to the current discourse on designing AI systems to support clinicians' decision-making processes. △ Less

Submitted 6 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Addressing Social Misattributions of Large Language Models: An HCXAI-based Approach

Authors: Andrea Ferrario, Alberto Termine, Alessandro Facchini

Abstract: Human-centered explainable AI (HCXAI) advocates for the integration of social aspects into AI explanations. Central to the HCXAI discourse is the Social Transparency (ST) framework, which aims to make the socio-organizational context of AI systems accessible to their users. In this work, we suggest extending the ST framework to address the risks of social misattributions in Large Language Models (… ▽ More Human-centered explainable AI (HCXAI) advocates for the integration of social aspects into AI explanations. Central to the HCXAI discourse is the Social Transparency (ST) framework, which aims to make the socio-organizational context of AI systems accessible to their users. In this work, we suggest extending the ST framework to address the risks of social misattributions in Large Language Models (LLMs), particularly in sensitive areas like mental health. In fact LLMs, which are remarkably capable of simulating roles and personas, may lead to mismatches between designers' intentions and users' perceptions of social attributes, risking to promote emotional manipulation and dangerous behaviors, cases of epistemic injustice, and unwarranted trust. To address these issues, we propose enhancing the ST framework with a fifth 'W-question' to clarify the specific social attributions assigned to LLMs by its designers and users. This addition aims to bridge the gap between LLM capabilities and user perceptions, promoting the ethically responsible development and use of LLM-based technology. △ Less

Submitted 26 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Comments: Extended version of the manuscript accepted for the ACM CHI Workshop on Human-Centered Explainable AI 2024 (HCXAI24)

Belief Revision in Sentential Decision Diagrams

Authors: Lilith Mattei, Alessandro Facchini, Alessandro Antonucci

Abstract: Belief revision is the task of modifying a knowledge base when new information becomes available, while also respecting a number of desirable properties. Classical belief revision schemes have been already specialised to \emph{binary decision diagrams} (BDDs), the classical formalism to compactly represent propositional knowledge. These results also apply to \emph{ordered} BDDs (OBDDs), a special… ▽ More Belief revision is the task of modifying a knowledge base when new information becomes available, while also respecting a number of desirable properties. Classical belief revision schemes have been already specialised to \emph{binary decision diagrams} (BDDs), the classical formalism to compactly represent propositional knowledge. These results also apply to \emph{ordered} BDDs (OBDDs), a special class of BDDs, designed to guarantee canonicity. Yet, those revisions cannot be applied to \emph{sentential decision diagrams} (SDDs), a typically more compact but still canonical class of Boolean circuits, which generalizes OBDDs, while not being a subclass of BDDs. Here we fill this gap by deriving a general revision algorithm for SDDs based on a syntactic characterisation of Dalal revision. A specialised procedure for DNFs is also presented. Preliminary experiments performed with randomly generated knowledge bases show the advantages of directly perform revision within SDD formalism. △ Less

Submitted 20 January, 2022; originally announced January 2022.

Comments: Extended version with proofs of a paper under review

A Saliency based Feature Fusion Model for EEG Emotion Estimation

Authors: Victor Delvigne, Antoine Facchini, Hazem Wannous, Thierry Dutoit, Laurence Ris, Jean-Philippe Vandeborre

Abstract: Among the different modalities to assess emotion, electroencephalogram (EEG), representing the electrical brain activity, achieved motivating results over the last decade. Emotion estimation from EEG could help in the diagnosis or rehabilitation of certain diseases. In this paper, we propose a dual model considering two different representations of EEG feature maps: 1) a sequential based represent… ▽ More Among the different modalities to assess emotion, electroencephalogram (EEG), representing the electrical brain activity, achieved motivating results over the last decade. Emotion estimation from EEG could help in the diagnosis or rehabilitation of certain diseases. In this paper, we propose a dual model considering two different representations of EEG feature maps: 1) a sequential based representation of EEG band power, 2) an image-based representation of the feature vectors. We also propose an innovative method to combine the information based on a saliency analysis of the image-based model to promote joint learning of both model parts. The model has been evaluated on four publicly available datasets: SEED-IV, SEED, DEAP and MPED. The achieved results outperform results from state-of-the-art approaches for three of the proposed datasets with a lower standard deviation that reflects higher stability. For sake of reproducibility, the codes and models proposed in this paper are available at https://github.com/VDelv/Emotion-EEG. △ Less

Submitted 4 April, 2022; v1 submitted 11 January, 2022; originally announced January 2022.

Who are the arbitrageurs? Empirical evidence from Bitcoin traders in the Mt. Gox exchange platform

Authors: Pietro Saggese, Alessandro Belmonte, Nicola Dimitri, Angelo Facchini, Rainer Böhme

Abstract: We mine the leaked history of trades on Mt. Gox, the dominant Bitcoin exchange from 2011 to early 2014, to detect the triangular arbitrage activity conducted within the platform. The availability of user identifiers per trade allows us to focus on the historical record of 440 investors, detected as arbitrageurs, and consequently to describe their trading behavior. We begin by showing that a consid… ▽ More We mine the leaked history of trades on Mt. Gox, the dominant Bitcoin exchange from 2011 to early 2014, to detect the triangular arbitrage activity conducted within the platform. The availability of user identifiers per trade allows us to focus on the historical record of 440 investors, detected as arbitrageurs, and consequently to describe their trading behavior. We begin by showing that a considerable difference appears between arbitrageurs when indicators of their expertise are taken into account. In particular, we distinguish between those who conducted arbitrage in a single or in multiple markets: using this element as a proxy for trade ability, we find that arbitrage actions performed by expert users are on average non-profitable when transaction costs are accounted for, while skilled investors conduct arbitrage at a positive and statistically significant premium. Next, we show that specific trading strategies, such as splitting orders or conducting arbitrage non aggressively, are further indicators of expertise that increase the profitability of arbitrage. Most importantly, we exploit within-user (across hours and markets) variation and document that expert users make profits on arbitrage by reacting quickly to plausible exogenous variations on the official exchange rates. We present further evidence that such differences are chiefly due to a better ability of the latter in incorporating information, both on the transactions costs and on the exchange rates volatility, eventually resulting in a better timing choice at small time scale intervals. Our results support the hypothesis that arbitrageurs are few and sophisticated users. △ Less

Submitted 22 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Structural Learning of Probabilistic Sentential Decision Diagrams under Partial Closed-World Assumption

Authors: Alessandro Antonucci, Alessandro Facchini, Lilith Mattei

Abstract: Probabilistic sentential decision diagrams are a class of structured-decomposable probabilistic circuits especially designed to embed logical constraints. To adapt the classical LearnSPN scheme to learn the structure of these models, we propose a new scheme based on a partial closed-world assumption: data implicitly provide the logical base of the circuit. Sum nodes are thus learned by recursively… ▽ More Probabilistic sentential decision diagrams are a class of structured-decomposable probabilistic circuits especially designed to embed logical constraints. To adapt the classical LearnSPN scheme to learn the structure of these models, we propose a new scheme based on a partial closed-world assumption: data implicitly provide the logical base of the circuit. Sum nodes are thus learned by recursively clustering batches in the initial data base, while the partitioning of the variables obeys a given input vtree. Preliminary experiments show that the proposed approach might properly fit training data, and generalize well to test data, provided that these remain consistent with the underlying logical base, that is a relaxation of the training data base. △ Less

Submitted 26 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Journal ref: 4th Workshop on Tractable Probabilistic Modeling (TPM 2021)

Robust Model Checking with Imprecise Markov Reward Models

Authors: Alberto Termine, Alessandro Antonucci, Alessandro Facchini, Giuseppe Primiero

Abstract: In recent years probabilistic model checking has become an important area of research because of the diffusion of computational systems of stochastic nature. Despite its great success, standard probabilistic model checking suffers the limitation of requiring a sharp specification of the probabilities governing the model behaviour. The theory of imprecise probabilities offers a natural approach to… ▽ More In recent years probabilistic model checking has become an important area of research because of the diffusion of computational systems of stochastic nature. Despite its great success, standard probabilistic model checking suffers the limitation of requiring a sharp specification of the probabilities governing the model behaviour. The theory of imprecise probabilities offers a natural approach to overcome such limitation by a sensitivity analysis with respect to the values of these parameters. However, only extensions based on discrete-time imprecise Markov chains have been considered so far for such a robust approach to model checking. We present a further extension based on imprecise Markov reward models. In particular, we derive efficient algorithms to compute lower and upper bounds of the expected cumulative reward and probabilistic bounded rewards based on existing results for imprecise Markov chains. These ideas are tested on a real case study involving the spend-down costs of geriatric medicine departments. △ Less

Submitted 18 May, 2021; v1 submitted 8 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Comments: Forthcoming in the proceedings of ISIPTA 2021 (International Symposium of Imprecise Probability: Theory and Applications)

Tractable Inference in Credal Sentential Decision Diagrams

Authors: Lilith Mattei, Alessandro Antonucci, Denis Deratani Mauá, Alessandro Facchini, Julissa Villanueva Llerena

Abstract: Probabilistic sentential decision diagrams are logic circuits where the inputs of disjunctive gates are annotated by probability values. They allow for a compact representation of joint probability mass functions defined over sets of Boolean variables, that are also consistent with the logical constraints defined by the circuit. The probabilities in such a model are usually learned from a set of o… ▽ More Probabilistic sentential decision diagrams are logic circuits where the inputs of disjunctive gates are annotated by probability values. They allow for a compact representation of joint probability mass functions defined over sets of Boolean variables, that are also consistent with the logical constraints defined by the circuit. The probabilities in such a model are usually learned from a set of observations. This leads to overconfident and prior-dependent inferences when data are scarce, unreliable or conflicting. In this work, we develop the credal sentential decision diagrams, a generalisation of their probabilistic counterpart that allows for replacing the local probabilities with (so-called credal) sets of mass functions. These models induce a joint credal set over the set of Boolean variables, that sharply assigns probability zero to states inconsistent with the logical constraints. Three inference algorithms are derived for these models, these allow to compute: (i) the lower and upper probabilities of an observation for an arbitrary number of variables; (ii) the lower and upper conditional probabilities for the state of a single variable given an observation; (iii) whether or not all the probabilistic sentential decision diagrams compatible with the credal specification have the same most probable explanation of a given set of variables given an observation of the other variables. These inferences are tractable, as all the three algorithms, based on bottom-up traversal with local linear programming tasks on the disjunctive gates, can be solved in polynomial time with respect to the circuit size. For a first empirical validation, we consider a simple application based on noisy seven-segment display images. The credal models are observed to properly distinguish between easy and hard-to-detect instances and outperform other generative models not able to cope with logical constraints. △ Less

Submitted 19 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

Comments: To appear in the International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (IJAR Volume 125)

Computational Complexity and the Nature of Quantum Mechanics

Authors: Alessio Benavoli, Alessandro Facchini, Marco Zaffalon

Abstract: Quantum theory (QT) has been confirmed by numerous experiments, yet we still cannot fully grasp the meaning of the theory. As a consequence, the quantum world appears to us paradoxical. Here we shed new light on QT by being based on two main postulates: 1. the theory should be logically consistent; 2. inferences in the theory should be computable in polynomial time. The first postulate is what we… ▽ More Quantum theory (QT) has been confirmed by numerous experiments, yet we still cannot fully grasp the meaning of the theory. As a consequence, the quantum world appears to us paradoxical. Here we shed new light on QT by being based on two main postulates: 1. the theory should be logically consistent; 2. inferences in the theory should be computable in polynomial time. The first postulate is what we require to each well-founded mathematical theory. The computation postulate defines the physical component of the theory. We show that the computation postulate is the only true divide between QT, seen as a generalised theory of probability, and classical probability. All quantum paradoxes, and entanglement in particular, arise from the clash of trying to reconcile a computationally intractable, somewhat idealised, theory (classical physics) with a computationally tractable theory (QT) or, in other words, from regarding physics as fundamental rather than computation. △ Less

Submitted 20 May, 2019; v1 submitted 12 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1902.03513

Computational Complexity and the Nature of Quantum Mechanics (Extended version)

Authors: Alessio Benavoli, Alessandro Facchini, Marco Zaffalon

Abstract: Quantum theory (QT) has been confirmed by numerous experiments, yet we still cannot fully grasp the meaning of the theory. As a consequence, the quantum world appears to us paradoxical. Here we shed new light on QT by having it follow from two main postulates (i) the theory should be logically consistent; (ii) inferences in the theory should be computable in polynomial time. The first postulate is… ▽ More Quantum theory (QT) has been confirmed by numerous experiments, yet we still cannot fully grasp the meaning of the theory. As a consequence, the quantum world appears to us paradoxical. Here we shed new light on QT by having it follow from two main postulates (i) the theory should be logically consistent; (ii) inferences in the theory should be computable in polynomial time. The first postulate is what we require to each well-founded mathematical theory. The computation postulate defines the physical component of the theory. We show that the computation postulate is the only true divide between QT, seen as a generalised theory of probability, and classical probability. All quantum paradoxes, and entanglement in particular, arise from the clash of trying to reconcile a computationally intractable, somewhat idealised, theory (classical physics) with a computationally tractable theory (QT) or, in other words, from regarding physics as fundamental rather than computation. △ Less

Submitted 9 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

The Power of the Weak

Authors: Facundo Carreiro, Alessandro Facchini, Yde Venema, Fabio Zanasi

Abstract: A landmark result in the study of logics for formal verification is Janin & Walukiewicz's theorem, stating that the modal $μ$-calculus ($μ\mathrm{ML}$) is equivalent modulo bisimilarity to standard monadic second-order logic (here abbreviated as $\mathrm{smso}$), over the class of labelled transition systems (LTSs for short). Our work proves two results of the same kind, one for the alternation-fr… ▽ More A landmark result in the study of logics for formal verification is Janin & Walukiewicz's theorem, stating that the modal $μ$-calculus ($μ\mathrm{ML}$) is equivalent modulo bisimilarity to standard monadic second-order logic (here abbreviated as $\mathrm{smso}$), over the class of labelled transition systems (LTSs for short). Our work proves two results of the same kind, one for the alternation-free fragment of $μ\mathrm{ML}$ ($μ_D\mathrm{ML}$) and one for weak $\mathrm{mso}$ ($\mathrm{wmso}$). Whereas it was known that $μ_D\mathrm{ML}$ and $\mathrm{wmso}$ are equivalent modulo bisimilarity on binary trees, our analysis shows that the picture radically changes once we reason over arbitrary LTSs. The first theorem that we prove is that, over LTSs, $μ_D\mathrm{ML}$ is equivalent modulo bisimilarity to noetherian $\mathrm{mso}$ ($\mathrm{nmso}$), a newly introduced variant of $\mathrm{smso}$ where second-order quantification ranges over "well-founded" subsets only. Our second theorem starts from $\mathrm{wmso}$, and proves it equivalent modulo bisimilarity to a fragment of $μ_D\mathrm{ML}$ defined by a notion of continuity. Analogously to Janin & Walukiewicz's result, our proofs are automata-theoretic in nature: as another contribution, we introduce classes of parity automata characterising the expressiveness of $\mathrm{wmso}$ and $\mathrm{nmso}$ (on tree models) and of $μ_C\mathrm{ML}$ and $μ_D\mathrm{ML}$ (for all transition systems). △ Less

Submitted 10 September, 2018; originally announced September 2018.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1401.4374

Model Theory of Monadic Predicate Logic with the Infinity Quantifier

Authors: Facundo Carreiro, Alessandro Facchini, Yde Venema, Fabio Zanasi

Abstract: This paper establishes model-theoretic properties of $\mathrm{FOE}^{\infty}$, a variation of monadic first-order logic that features the generalised quantifier $\exists^\infty$ (`there are infinitely many'). We provide syntactically defined fragments of $\mathrm{FOE}^{\infty}$ characterising four different semantic properties of $\mathrm{FOE}^{\infty}$-sentences: (1) being monotone and (2) (Scot… ▽ More This paper establishes model-theoretic properties of $\mathrm{FOE}^{\infty}$, a variation of monadic first-order logic that features the generalised quantifier $\exists^\infty$ (`there are infinitely many'). We provide syntactically defined fragments of $\mathrm{FOE}^{\infty}$ characterising four different semantic properties of $\mathrm{FOE}^{\infty}$-sentences: (1) being monotone and (2) (Scott) continuous in a given set of monadic predicates; (3) having truth preserved under taking submodels or (4) invariant under taking quotients. In each case, we produce an effectively defined map that translates an arbitrary sentence $\varphi$ to a sentence $\varphi^{p}$ belonging to the corresponding syntactic fragment, with the property that $\varphi$ is equivalent to $\varphi^{p}$ precisely when it has the associated semantic property. Our methodology is first to provide these results in the simpler setting of monadic first-order logic with ($\mathrm{FOE}$) and without ($\mathrm{FO}$) equality, and then move to $\mathrm{FOE}^{\infty}$ by including the generalised quantifier $\exists^\infty$ into the picture. As a corollary of our developments, we obtain that the four semantic properties above are decidable for $\mathrm{FOE}^{\infty}$-sentences. Moreover, our results are directly relevant to the characterisation of automata and expressiveness modulo bisimilirity for variants of monadic second-order logic. This application is developed in a companion paper. △ Less

Submitted 10 September, 2018; originally announced September 2018.

A Credal Extension of Independent Choice Logic

Authors: Alessandro Antonucci, Alessandro Facchini

Abstract: We propose an extension of Poole's independent choice logic based on a relaxation of the underlying independence assumptions. A credal semantics involving multiple joint probability mass functions over the possible worlds is adopted. This represents a conservative approach to probabilistic logic programming achieved by considering all the mass functions consistent with the probabilistic facts. Thi… ▽ More We propose an extension of Poole's independent choice logic based on a relaxation of the underlying independence assumptions. A credal semantics involving multiple joint probability mass functions over the possible worlds is adopted. This represents a conservative approach to probabilistic logic programming achieved by considering all the mass functions consistent with the probabilistic facts. This allows to model tasks for which independence among some probabilistic choices cannot be assumed, and a specific dependence model cannot be assessed. Preliminary tests on an object ranking application show that, despite the loose underlying assumptions, informative inferences can be extracted. △ Less

Submitted 21 June, 2018; originally announced June 2018.

Comments: SUM 2018 (12th International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management)

Index problems for game automata

Authors: Alessandro Facchini, Filip Murlak, Michał Skrzypczak

Abstract: For a given regular language of infinite trees, one can ask about the minimal number of priorities needed to recognize this language with a non-deterministic, alternating, or weak alternating parity automaton. These questions are known as, respectively, the non-deterministic, alternating, and weak Rabin-Mostowski index problems. Whether they can be answered effectively is a long-standing open prob… ▽ More For a given regular language of infinite trees, one can ask about the minimal number of priorities needed to recognize this language with a non-deterministic, alternating, or weak alternating parity automaton. These questions are known as, respectively, the non-deterministic, alternating, and weak Rabin-Mostowski index problems. Whether they can be answered effectively is a long-standing open problem, solved so far only for languages recognizable by deterministic automata (the alternating variant trivializes). We investigate a wider class of regular languages, recognizable by so-called game automata, which can be seen as the closure of deterministic ones under complementation and composition. Game automata are known to recognize languages arbitrarily high in the alternating Rabin-Mostowski index hierarchy; that is, the alternating index problem does not trivialize any more. Our main contribution is that all three index problems are decidable for languages recognizable by game automata. Additionally, we show that it is decidable whether a given regular language can be recognized by a game automaton. △ Less

Submitted 31 May, 2016; v1 submitted 6 June, 2015; originally announced June 2015.

Containment for Conditional Tree Patterns

Authors: Alessandro Facchini, Yoichi Hirai, Maarten Marx, Evgeny Sherkhonov

Abstract: A Conditional Tree Pattern (CTP) expands an XML tree pattern with labels attached to the descendant edges. These labels can be XML element names or Boolean CTPs. The meaning of a descendant edge labelled by A and ending in a node labelled by B is a path of child steps ending in a B node such that all intermediate nodes are A nodes. In effect this expresses the until B, A holds construction from t… ▽ More A Conditional Tree Pattern (CTP) expands an XML tree pattern with labels attached to the descendant edges. These labels can be XML element names or Boolean CTPs. The meaning of a descendant edge labelled by A and ending in a node labelled by B is a path of child steps ending in a B node such that all intermediate nodes are A nodes. In effect this expresses the until B, A holds construction from temporal logic.This paper studies the containment problem for CTP. For tree patterns (TP), this problem is known to be coNP-complete. We show that it is PSPACE-complete for CTP. This increase in complexity is due to the fact that CTP is expressive enough to encode an unrestricted form of label negation: ${*}\setminus a$, meaning "any node except an a-node". Containment of TP expanded with this type of negation is already PSPACE-hard. CTP is a positive, forward, first order fragment of Regular XPath. Unlike TP, CTP expanded with disjunction is not equivalent to unions of CTP's. Like TP, CTP is a natural fragment to consider: CTP is closed under intersections and CTP with disjunction is equally expressive as positive existential first order logic expanded with the until operator. △ Less

Submitted 6 June, 2015; v1 submitted 7 March, 2015; originally announced March 2015.

Journal ref: Logical Methods in Computer Science, Volume 11, Issue 2 (June 9, 2015) lmcs:1564

Deciding the Borel complexity of regular tree languages

Authors: Alessandro Facchini, Henryk Michalewski

Abstract: We show that it is decidable whether a given a regular tree language belongs to the class ${\bf Δ^0_2}$ of the Borel hierarchy, or equivalently whether the Wadge degree of a regular tree language is countable. We show that it is decidable whether a given a regular tree language belongs to the class ${\bf Δ^0_2}$ of the Borel hierarchy, or equivalently whether the Wadge degree of a regular tree language is countable. △ Less

Submitted 14 March, 2014; originally announced March 2014.

Comments: 15 pages, 2 figures

Weak MSO: Automata and Expressiveness Modulo Bisimilarity

Authors: Facundo Carreiro, Alessandro Facchini, Yde Venema, Fabio Zanasi

Abstract: We prove that the bisimulation-invariant fragment of weak monadic second-order logic (WMSO) is equivalent to the fragment of the modal $μ$-calculus where the application of the least fixpoint operator $μp.\varphi$ is restricted to formulas $\varphi$ that are continuous in $p$. Our proof is automata-theoretic in nature; in particular, we introduce a class of automata characterizing the expressive p… ▽ More We prove that the bisimulation-invariant fragment of weak monadic second-order logic (WMSO) is equivalent to the fragment of the modal $μ$-calculus where the application of the least fixpoint operator $μp.\varphi$ is restricted to formulas $\varphi$ that are continuous in $p$. Our proof is automata-theoretic in nature; in particular, we introduce a class of automata characterizing the expressive power of WMSO over tree models of arbitrary branching degree. The transition map of these automata is defined in terms of a logic $\mathrm{FOE}_1^\infty$ that is the extension of first-order logic with a generalized quantifier $\exists^\infty$, where $\exists^\infty x. φ$ means that there are infinitely many objects satisfying $φ$. An important part of our work consists of a model-theoretic analysis of $\mathrm{FOE}_1^\infty$. △ Less

Submitted 22 January, 2014; v1 submitted 17 January, 2014; originally announced January 2014.

Comments: Technical Report, 57 pages