Showing 1–8 of 8 results for author: Ganger, G R

GraphPipe: Improving Performance and Scalability of DNN Training with Graph Pipeline Parallelism

Authors: Byungsoo Jeon, Mengdi Wu, Shiyi Cao, Sunghyun Kim, Sunghyun Park, Neeraj Aggarwal, Colin Unger, Daiyaan Arfeen, Peiyuan Liao, Xupeng Miao, Mohammad Alizadeh, Gregory R. Ganger, Tianqi Chen, Zhihao Jia

Abstract: Deep neural networks (DNNs) continue to grow rapidly in size, making them infeasible to train on a single device. Pipeline parallelism is commonly used in existing DNN systems to support large-scale DNN training by partitioning a DNN into multiple stages, which concurrently perform DNN training for different micro-batches in a pipeline fashion. However, existing pipeline-parallel approaches only c… ▽ More Deep neural networks (DNNs) continue to grow rapidly in size, making them infeasible to train on a single device. Pipeline parallelism is commonly used in existing DNN systems to support large-scale DNN training by partitioning a DNN into multiple stages, which concurrently perform DNN training for different micro-batches in a pipeline fashion. However, existing pipeline-parallel approaches only consider sequential pipeline stages and thus ignore the topology of a DNN, resulting in missed model-parallel opportunities. This paper presents graph pipeline parallelism (GPP), a new pipeline-parallel scheme that partitions a DNN into pipeline stages whose dependencies are identified by a directed acyclic graph. GPP generalizes existing sequential pipeline parallelism and preserves the inherent topology of a DNN to enable concurrent execution of computationally-independent operators, resulting in reduced memory requirement and improved GPU performance. In addition, we develop GraphPipe, a distributed system that exploits GPP strategies to enable performant and scalable DNN training. GraphPipe partitions a DNN into a graph of stages, optimizes micro-batch schedules for these stages, and parallelizes DNN training using the discovered GPP strategies. Evaluation on a variety of DNNs shows that GraphPipe outperforms existing pipeline-parallel systems such as PipeDream and Piper by up to 1.6X. GraphPipe also reduces the search time by 9-21X compared to PipeDream and Piper. △ Less

Submitted 24 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

PACEMAKER: Avoiding HeART attacks in storage clusters with disk-adaptive redundancy

Authors: Saurabh Kadekodi, Francisco Maturana, Suhas Jayaram Subramanya, Juncheng Yang, K. V. Rashmi, Gregory R. Ganger

Abstract: Data redundancy provides resilience in large-scale storage clusters, but imposes significant cost overhead. Substantial space-savings can be realized by tuning redundancy schemes to observed disk failure rates. However, prior design proposals for such tuning are unusable in real-world clusters, because the IO load of transitions between schemes overwhelms the storage infrastructure (termed transit… ▽ More Data redundancy provides resilience in large-scale storage clusters, but imposes significant cost overhead. Substantial space-savings can be realized by tuning redundancy schemes to observed disk failure rates. However, prior design proposals for such tuning are unusable in real-world clusters, because the IO load of transitions between schemes overwhelms the storage infrastructure (termed transition overload). This paper analyzes traces for millions of disks from production systems at Google, NetApp, and Backblaze to expose and understand transition overload as a roadblock to disk-adaptive redundancy: transition IO under existing approaches can consume 100% cluster IO continuously for several weeks. Building on the insights drawn, we present PACEMAKER, a low-overhead disk-adaptive redundancy orchestrator. PACEMAKER mitigates transition overload by (1) proactively organizing data layouts to make future transitions efficient, and (2) initiating transitions proactively in a manner that avoids urgency while not compromising on space-savings. Evaluation of PACEMAKER with traces from four large (110K-450K disks) production clusters show that the transition IO requirement decreases to never needing more than 5% cluster IO bandwidth (0.2-0.4% on average). PACEMAKER achieves this while providing overall space-savings of 14-20% and never leaving data under-protected. We also describe and experiment with an integration of PACEMAKER into HDFS. △ Less

Submitted 15 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Comments: Published in USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI) 2020

ACM Class: B.8.1; C.4; D.4.2; D.4.5

Journal ref: 14th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI), 2020, (pp. 369-385)

Pollux: Co-adaptive Cluster Scheduling for Goodput-Optimized Deep Learning

Authors: Aurick Qiao, Sang Keun Choe, Suhas Jayaram Subramanya, Willie Neiswanger, Qirong Ho, Hao Zhang, Gregory R. Ganger, Eric P. Xing

Abstract: Pollux improves scheduling performance in deep learning (DL) clusters by adaptively co-optimizing inter-dependent factors both at the per-job level and at the cluster-wide level. Most existing schedulers expect users to specify the number of resources for each job, often leading to inefficient resource use. Some recent schedulers choose job resources for users, but do so without awareness of how D… ▽ More Pollux improves scheduling performance in deep learning (DL) clusters by adaptively co-optimizing inter-dependent factors both at the per-job level and at the cluster-wide level. Most existing schedulers expect users to specify the number of resources for each job, often leading to inefficient resource use. Some recent schedulers choose job resources for users, but do so without awareness of how DL training can be re-optimized to better utilize the provided resources. Pollux simultaneously considers both aspects. By monitoring the status of each job during training, Pollux models how their goodput (a novel metric we introduce that combines system throughput with statistical efficiency) would change by adding or removing resources. Leveraging these information, Pollux dynamically (re-)assigns resources to improve cluster-wide goodput, while respecting fairness and continually optimizing each DL job to better utilize those resources. In experiments with real DL jobs and with trace-driven simulations, Pollux reduces average job completion times by 37-50% relative to state-of-the-art DL schedulers, even when they are provided with ideal resource and training configurations for every job. Pollux promotes fairness among DL jobs competing for resources based on a more meaningful measure of useful job progress, and reveals a new opportunity for reducing DL cost in cloud environments. Pollux is implemented and publicly available as part of an open-source project at https://github.com/petuum/adaptdl. △ Less

Submitted 26 May, 2021; v1 submitted 27 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

Vilamb: Low Overhead Asynchronous Redundancy for Direct Access NVM

Authors: Rajat Kateja, Andy Pavlo, Gregory R. Ganger

Abstract: Vilamb provides efficient asynchronous systemredundancy for direct access (DAX) non-volatile memory (NVM) storage. Production storage deployments often use system-redundancy in form of page checksums and cross-page parity. State-of-the-art solutions for maintaining system-redundancy for DAX NVM either incur a high performance overhead or require specialized hardware. The Vilamb user-space library… ▽ More Vilamb provides efficient asynchronous systemredundancy for direct access (DAX) non-volatile memory (NVM) storage. Production storage deployments often use system-redundancy in form of page checksums and cross-page parity. State-of-the-art solutions for maintaining system-redundancy for DAX NVM either incur a high performance overhead or require specialized hardware. The Vilamb user-space library maintains system-redundancy with low overhead by delaying and amortizing the system-redundancy updates over multiple data writes. As a result, Vilamb provides 3--5x the throughput of the state-of-the-art software solution at high operation rates. For applications that need system-redundancy with high performance, and can tolerate some delaying of data redundancy, Vilamb provides a tunable knob between performance and quicker redundancy. Even with the delayed coverage, Vilamb increases the mean time to data loss due to firmware-induced corruptions by up to two orders of magnitude in comparison to maintaining no system-redundancy. △ Less

Submitted 20 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Report number: CMU-PDL-20-101

Accelerating Deep Learning by Focusing on the Biggest Losers

Authors: Angela H. Jiang, Daniel L. -K. Wong, Giulio Zhou, David G. Andersen, Jeffrey Dean, Gregory R. Ganger, Gauri Joshi, Michael Kaminksy, Michael Kozuch, Zachary C. Lipton, Padmanabhan Pillai

Abstract: This paper introduces Selective-Backprop, a technique that accelerates the training of deep neural networks (DNNs) by prioritizing examples with high loss at each iteration. Selective-Backprop uses the output of a training example's forward pass to decide whether to use that example to compute gradients and update parameters, or to skip immediately to the next example. By reducing the number of co… ▽ More This paper introduces Selective-Backprop, a technique that accelerates the training of deep neural networks (DNNs) by prioritizing examples with high loss at each iteration. Selective-Backprop uses the output of a training example's forward pass to decide whether to use that example to compute gradients and update parameters, or to skip immediately to the next example. By reducing the number of computationally-expensive backpropagation steps performed, Selective-Backprop accelerates training. Evaluation on CIFAR10, CIFAR100, and SVHN, across a variety of modern image models, shows that Selective-Backprop converges to target error rates up to 3.5x faster than with standard SGD and between 1.02--1.8x faster than a state-of-the-art importance sampling approach. Further acceleration of 26% can be achieved by using stale forward pass results for selection, thus also skipping forward passes of low priority examples. △ Less

Submitted 1 October, 2019; originally announced October 2019.

Tvarak: Software-managed hardware offload for DAX NVM storage redundancy

Authors: Rajat Kateja, Nathan Beckmann, Gregory R. Ganger

Abstract: Tvarak efficiently implements system-level redundancy for direct-access (DAX) NVM storage. Production storage systems complement device-level ECC (which covers media errors) with system-checksums and cross-device parity. This system-level redundancy enables detection of and recovery from data corruption due to device firmware bugs (e.g., reading data from the wrong physical location). Direct acces… ▽ More Tvarak efficiently implements system-level redundancy for direct-access (DAX) NVM storage. Production storage systems complement device-level ECC (which covers media errors) with system-checksums and cross-device parity. This system-level redundancy enables detection of and recovery from data corruption due to device firmware bugs (e.g., reading data from the wrong physical location). Direct access to NVM penalizes software-only implementations of system-level redundancy, forcing a choice between lack of data protection or significant performance penalties. Offloading the update and verification of system-level redundancy to Tvarak, a hardware controller co-located with the last-level cache, enables efficient protection of data from such bugs in memory controller and NVM DIMM firmware. Simulation-based evaluation with seven data-intensive applications shows Tvarak's performance and energy efficiency. For example, Tvarak reduces Redis set-only performance by only 3%, compared to 50% reduction for a state-of-the-art software-only approach. △ Less

Submitted 26 August, 2019; originally announced August 2019.

MLSys: The New Frontier of Machine Learning Systems

Authors: Alexander Ratner, Dan Alistarh, Gustavo Alonso, David G. Andersen, Peter Bailis, Sarah Bird, Nicholas Carlini, Bryan Catanzaro, Jennifer Chayes, Eric Chung, Bill Dally, Jeff Dean, Inderjit S. Dhillon, Alexandros Dimakis, Pradeep Dubey, Charles Elkan, Grigori Fursin, Gregory R. Ganger, Lise Getoor, Phillip B. Gibbons, Garth A. Gibson, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Justin Gottschlich, Song Han, Kim Hazelwood , et al. (44 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Machine learning (ML) techniques are enjoying rapidly increasing adoption. However, designing and implementing the systems that support ML models in real-world deployments remains a significant obstacle, in large part due to the radically different development and deployment profile of modern ML methods, and the range of practical concerns that come with broader adoption. We propose to foster a ne… ▽ More Machine learning (ML) techniques are enjoying rapidly increasing adoption. However, designing and implementing the systems that support ML models in real-world deployments remains a significant obstacle, in large part due to the radically different development and deployment profile of modern ML methods, and the range of practical concerns that come with broader adoption. We propose to foster a new systems machine learning research community at the intersection of the traditional systems and ML communities, focused on topics such as hardware systems for ML, software systems for ML, and ML optimized for metrics beyond predictive accuracy. To do this, we describe a new conference, MLSys, that explicitly targets research at the intersection of systems and machine learning with a program committee split evenly between experts in systems and ML, and an explicit focus on topics at the intersection of the two. △ Less

Submitted 1 December, 2019; v1 submitted 29 March, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

MLtuner: System Support for Automatic Machine Learning Tuning

Authors: Henggang Cui, Gregory R. Ganger, Phillip B. Gibbons

Abstract: MLtuner automatically tunes settings for training tunables (such as the learning rate, the momentum, the mini-batch size, and the data staleness bound) that have a significant impact on large-scale machine learning (ML) performance. Traditionally, these tunables are set manually, which is unsurprisingly error-prone and difficult to do without extensive domain knowledge. MLtuner uses efficient snap… ▽ More MLtuner automatically tunes settings for training tunables (such as the learning rate, the momentum, the mini-batch size, and the data staleness bound) that have a significant impact on large-scale machine learning (ML) performance. Traditionally, these tunables are set manually, which is unsurprisingly error-prone and difficult to do without extensive domain knowledge. MLtuner uses efficient snapshotting, branching, and optimization-guided online trial-and-error to find good initial settings as well as to re-tune settings during execution. Experiments show that MLtuner can robustly find and re-tune tunable settings for a variety of ML applications, including image classification (for 3 models and 2 datasets), video classification, and matrix factorization. Compared to state-of-the-art ML auto-tuning approaches, MLtuner is more robust for large problems and over an order of magnitude faster. △ Less

Submitted 20 March, 2018; originally announced March 2018.