The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)
Authors:
Patrick Bilic,
Patrick Christ,
Hongwei Bran Li,
Eugene Vorontsov,
Avi Ben-Cohen,
Georgios Kaissis,
Adi Szeskin,
Colin Jacobs,
Gabriel Efrain Humpire Mamani,
Gabriel Chartrand,
Fabian Lohöfer,
Julian Walter Holch,
Wieland Sommer,
Felix Hofmann,
Alexandre Hostettler,
Naama Lev-Cohain,
Michal Drozdzal,
Michal Marianne Amitai,
Refael Vivantik,
Jacob Sosna,
Ivan Ezhov,
Anjany Sekuboyina,
Fernando Navarro,
Florian Kofler,
Johannes C. Paetzold
, et al. (84 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In this work, we report the set-up and results of the Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS), which was organized in conjunction with the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2017 and the International Conferences on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2017 and 2018. The image dataset is diverse and contains primary and secondary tumors with…
▽ More
In this work, we report the set-up and results of the Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS), which was organized in conjunction with the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2017 and the International Conferences on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2017 and 2018. The image dataset is diverse and contains primary and secondary tumors with varied sizes and appearances with various lesion-to-background levels (hyper-/hypo-dense), created in collaboration with seven hospitals and research institutions. Seventy-five submitted liver and liver tumor segmentation algorithms were trained on a set of 131 computed tomography (CT) volumes and were tested on 70 unseen test images acquired from different patients. We found that not a single algorithm performed best for both liver and liver tumors in the three events. The best liver segmentation algorithm achieved a Dice score of 0.963, whereas, for tumor segmentation, the best algorithms achieved Dices scores of 0.674 (ISBI 2017), 0.702 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.739 (MICCAI 2018). Retrospectively, we performed additional analysis on liver tumor detection and revealed that not all top-performing segmentation algorithms worked well for tumor detection. The best liver tumor detection method achieved a lesion-wise recall of 0.458 (ISBI 2017), 0.515 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.554 (MICCAI 2018), indicating the need for further research. LiTS remains an active benchmark and resource for research, e.g., contributing the liver-related segmentation tasks in \url{http://medicaldecathlon.com/}. In addition, both data and online evaluation are accessible via \url{www.lits-challenge.com}.
△ Less
Submitted 25 November, 2022; v1 submitted 13 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
2D-Densely Connected Convolution Neural Networks for automatic Liver and Tumor Segmentation
Authors:
Krishna Chaitanya Kaluva,
Mahendra Khened,
Avinash Kori,
Ganapathy Krishnamurthi
Abstract:
In this paper we propose a fully automatic 2-stage cascaded approach for segmentation of liver and its tumors in CT (Computed Tomography) images using densely connected fully convolutional neural network (DenseNet). We independently train liver and tumor segmentation models and cascade them for a combined segmentation of the liver and its tumor. The first stage involves segmentation of liver and t…
▽ More
In this paper we propose a fully automatic 2-stage cascaded approach for segmentation of liver and its tumors in CT (Computed Tomography) images using densely connected fully convolutional neural network (DenseNet). We independently train liver and tumor segmentation models and cascade them for a combined segmentation of the liver and its tumor. The first stage involves segmentation of liver and the second stage uses the first stage's segmentation results for localization of liver and henceforth tumor segmentations inside liver region. The liver model was trained on the down-sampled axial slices $(256 \times 256)$, whereas for the tumor model no down-sampling of slices was done, but instead it was trained on the CT axial slices windowed at three different Hounsfield (HU) levels. On the test set our model achieved a global dice score of 0.923 and 0.625 on liver and tumor respectively. The computed tumor burden had an rmse of 0.044.
△ Less
Submitted 5 January, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
