-
MiniBooNE and MicroBooNE Combined Fit to a 3+1 Sterile Neutrino Scenario
Authors:
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo,
B. C. Brown,
J. M. Conrad,
R. Dharmapalan,
A. Diaz,
Z. Djurcic,
D. A. Finley,
R. Ford,
G. T. Garvey,
S. Gollapinni,
A. Hourlier,
E. -C. Huang,
N. W. Kamp,
G. Karagiorgi,
T. Katori,
T. Kobilarcik,
K. Lin,
W. C. Louis,
C. Mariani,
W. Marsh,
G. B. Mills,
J. Mirabal-Martinez,
C. D. Moore,
R. H. Nelson,
J. Nowak
, et al. (14 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This letter presents the results from the MiniBooNE experiment within a full "3+1" scenario where one sterile neutrino is introduced to the three-active-neutrino picture. In addition to electron-neutrino appearance at short-baselines, this scenario also allows for disappearance of the muon-neutrino and electron-neutrino fluxes in the Booster Neutrino Beam, which is shared by the MicroBooNE experim…
▽ More
This letter presents the results from the MiniBooNE experiment within a full "3+1" scenario where one sterile neutrino is introduced to the three-active-neutrino picture. In addition to electron-neutrino appearance at short-baselines, this scenario also allows for disappearance of the muon-neutrino and electron-neutrino fluxes in the Booster Neutrino Beam, which is shared by the MicroBooNE experiment. We present the 3+1 fit to the MiniBooNE electron-(anti)neutrino and muon-(anti)neutrino data alone, and in combination with MicroBooNE electron-neutrino data. The best-fit parameters of the combined fit with the exclusive CCQE analysis (inclusive analysis) are $Δm^2 = 0.29 eV^2 (0.33 eV^2)$, $|U_{e4}|^2 = 0.016 (0.500)$, $|U_{μ4}|^2 = 0.500 (0.500)$, and $\sin^2(2θ_{μe})=0.0316 (1.0)$. Comparing the no-oscillation scenario to the 3+1 model, the data prefer the 3+1 model with a $Δχ^2/\text{dof} = 24.7 / 3 (17.3 / 3)$, a $4.3σ(3.4σ)$ preference assuming the asymptotic approximation given by Wilks' theorem.
△ Less
Submitted 9 September, 2022; v1 submitted 5 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Updated MiniBooNE Neutrino Oscillation Results with Increased Data and New Background Studies
Authors:
MiniBooNE Collaboration,
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo,
B. C. Brown,
J. M. Conrad,
R. Dharmapalan,
A. Diaz,
Z. Djurcic,
D. A. Finley,
R. Ford,
G. T. Garvey,
S. Gollapinni,
A. Hourlier,
E. C. Huang,
N. W. Kamp,
G. Karagiorgi,
T. Katori,
T. Kobilarcik,
K. Lin,
W. C. Louis,
C. Mariani,
W. Marsh,
G. B. Mills,
J. Mirabal-Martinez,
C. D. Moore,
R. H. Nelson
, et al. (17 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports a total excess of $638.0 \pm 132.8$ electron-like events ($4.8 σ$) from a data sample corresponding to $18.75 \times 10^{20}$ protons-on-target in neutrino mode, which is a 46\% increase in the data sample with respect to previously published results, and $11.27 \times 10^{20}$ protons-on-target in antineutrino mode. The additional statistics allow seve…
▽ More
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports a total excess of $638.0 \pm 132.8$ electron-like events ($4.8 σ$) from a data sample corresponding to $18.75 \times 10^{20}$ protons-on-target in neutrino mode, which is a 46\% increase in the data sample with respect to previously published results, and $11.27 \times 10^{20}$ protons-on-target in antineutrino mode. The additional statistics allow several studies to address questions on the source of the excess. First, we provide two-dimensional plots in visible energy and cosine of the angle of the outgoing lepton, which can provide valuable input to models for the event excess. Second, we test whether the excess may arise from photons that enter the detector from external events or photons exiting the detector from $π^0$ decays in two model independent ways. Beam timing information shows that almost all of the excess is in time with neutrinos that interact in the detector. The radius distribution shows that the excess is distributed throughout the volume, while tighter cuts on the fiducal volume increase the significance of the excess. We conclude that models of the event excess based on entering and exiting photons are disfavored.
△ Less
Submitted 8 March, 2021; v1 submitted 30 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Significant Excess of ElectronLike Events in the MiniBooNE Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiment
Authors:
MiniBooNE Collaboration,
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo,
B. C. Brown,
L. Bugel,
G. Cheng,
J. M. Conrad,
R. L. Cooper,
R. Dharmapalan,
A. Diaz,
Z. Djurcic,
D. A. Finley,
R. Ford,
F. G. Garcia,
G. T. Garvey,
J. Grange,
E. -C. Huang,
W. Huelsnitz,
C. Ignarra,
R. A. Johnson,
G. Karagiorgi,
T. Katori,
T. Kobilarcik,
W. C. Louis,
C. Mariani,
W. Marsh
, et al. (23 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports results from an analysis of $ν_e$ appearance data from $12.84 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in neutrino mode, an increase of approximately a factor of two over previously reported results. A $ν_e$ charged-current quasielastic event excess of $381.2 \pm 85.2$ events ($4.5 σ$) is observed in the energy range $200<E_ν^{QE}<1250$~MeV. Combining these da…
▽ More
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports results from an analysis of $ν_e$ appearance data from $12.84 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in neutrino mode, an increase of approximately a factor of two over previously reported results. A $ν_e$ charged-current quasielastic event excess of $381.2 \pm 85.2$ events ($4.5 σ$) is observed in the energy range $200<E_ν^{QE}<1250$~MeV. Combining these data with the $\bar ν_e$ appearance data from $11.27 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in antineutrino mode, a total $ν_e$ plus $\bar ν_e$ charged-current quasielastic event excess of $460.5 \pm 99.0$ events ($4.7 σ$) is observed. If interpreted in a two-neutrino oscillation model, $ν_μ \rightarrow ν_e$, the best oscillation fit to the excess has a probability of $21.1\%$, while the background-only fit has a $χ^2$ probability of $6 \times 10^{-7}$ relative to the best fit. The MiniBooNE data are consistent in energy and magnitude with the excess of events reported by the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND), and the significance of the combined LSND and MiniBooNE excesses is $6.0 σ$. A two-neutrino oscillation interpretation of the data would require at least four neutrino types and indicate physics beyond the three neutrino paradigm.Although the data are fit with a two-neutrino oscillation model, other models may provide better fits to the data.
△ Less
Submitted 26 October, 2018; v1 submitted 30 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
-
First Measurement of Monoenergetic Muon Neutrino Charged Current Interactions
Authors:
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo,
B. C. Brown,
L. Bugel,
G. Cheng,
E. D. Church,
J. M. Conrad,
R. L. Cooper,
R. Dharmapalan,
Z. Djurcic,
D. A. Finley,
R. S. Fitzpatrick,
R. Ford,
F. G. Garcia,
G. T. Garvey,
J. Grange,
W. Huelsnitz,
C. Ignarra,
R. Imlay,
R. A. Johnson,
J. R. Jordan,
G. Karagiorgi,
T. Katori,
T. Kobilarcik,
W. C. Louis,
K. Mahn
, et al. (24 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We report the first measurement of monoenergetic muon neutrino charged current interactions. MiniBooNE has isolated 236 MeV muon neutrino events originating from charged kaon decay at rest ($K^+ \rightarrow μ^+ ν_μ$) at the NuMI beamline absorber. These signal $ν_μ$-carbon events are distinguished from primarily pion decay in flight $ν_μ$ and $\overlineν_μ$ backgrounds produced at the target stati…
▽ More
We report the first measurement of monoenergetic muon neutrino charged current interactions. MiniBooNE has isolated 236 MeV muon neutrino events originating from charged kaon decay at rest ($K^+ \rightarrow μ^+ ν_μ$) at the NuMI beamline absorber. These signal $ν_μ$-carbon events are distinguished from primarily pion decay in flight $ν_μ$ and $\overlineν_μ$ backgrounds produced at the target station and decay pipe using their arrival time and reconstructed muon energy. The significance of the signal observation is at the 3.9$σ$ level. The muon kinetic energy, neutrino-nucleus energy transfer ($ω=E_ν-E_μ$), and total cross section for these events is extracted. This result is the first known-energy, weak-interaction-only probe of the nucleus to yield a measurement of $ω$ using neutrinos, a quantity thus far only accessible through electron scattering.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2018; v1 submitted 11 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
-
Eight Ultra-faint Galaxy Candidates Discovered in Year Two of the Dark Energy Survey
Authors:
The DES Collaboration,
A. Drlica-Wagner,
K. Bechtol,
E. S. Rykoff,
E. Luque,
A. Queiroz,
Y. -Y. Mao,
R. H. Wechsler,
J. D. Simon,
B. Santiago,
B. Yanny,
E. Balbinot,
S. Dodelson,
A. Fausti Neto,
D. J. James,
T. S. Li,
M. A. G. Maia,
J. L. Marshall,
A. Pieres,
K. Stringer,
A. R. Walker,
T. M. C. Abbott,
F. B. Abdalla,
S. Allam,
A. Benoit-Levy
, et al. (52 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We report the discovery of eight new ultra-faint dwarf galaxy candidates in the second year of optical imaging data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES). Six of these candidates are detected at high confidence, while two lower-confidence candidates are identified in regions of non-uniform survey coverage. The new stellar systems are found by three independent automated search techniques and are ident…
▽ More
We report the discovery of eight new ultra-faint dwarf galaxy candidates in the second year of optical imaging data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES). Six of these candidates are detected at high confidence, while two lower-confidence candidates are identified in regions of non-uniform survey coverage. The new stellar systems are found by three independent automated search techniques and are identified as overdensities of stars, consistent with the isochrone and luminosity function of an old and metal-poor simple stellar population. The new systems are faint (Mv > -4.7 mag) and span a range of physical sizes (17 pc < $r_{1/2}$ < 181 pc) and heliocentric distances (25 kpc < D < 214 kpc). All of the new systems have central surface brightnesses consistent with known ultra-faint dwarf galaxies (μ< 27.5 mag arcsec$^{-2}$). Roughly half of the DES candidates are more distant, less luminous, and/or have lower surface brightnesses than previously known Milky Way satellite galaxies. Most of the candidates are found in the southern part of the DES footprint close to the Magellanic Clouds. We find that the DES data alone exclude (p < 0.001) a spatially isotropic distribution of Milky Way satellites and that the observed distribution can be well, though not uniquely, described by an association between several of the DES satellites and the Magellanic system. Our model predicts that the full sky may hold ~100 ultra-faint galaxies with physical properties comparable to the DES satellites and that 20-30% of these would be spatially associated with the Magellanic Clouds.
△ Less
Submitted 6 November, 2015; v1 submitted 14 August, 2015;
originally announced August 2015.
-
Using L/E Oscillation Probability Distributions
Authors:
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo,
B. C. Brown,
L. Bugel,
G. Cheng,
E. D. Church,
J. M. Conrad,
R. Dharmapalan,
Z. Djurcic,
D. A. Finley,
R. Ford,
F. G. Garcia,
G. T. Garvey,
J. Grange,
W. Huelsnitz,
C. Ignarra,
R. Imlay,
R. A. Johnson,
G. Karagiorgi,
T. Katori,
T. Kobilarcik,
W. C. Louis,
C. Mariani,
W. Marsh,
G. B. Mills,
J. Mirabal
, et al. (19 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper explores the use of $L/E$ oscillation probability distributions to compare experimental measurements and to evaluate oscillation models. In this case, $L$ is the distance of neutrino travel and $E$ is a measure of the interacting neutrino's energy. While comparisons using allowed and excluded regions for oscillation model parameters are likely the only rigorous method for these comparis…
▽ More
This paper explores the use of $L/E$ oscillation probability distributions to compare experimental measurements and to evaluate oscillation models. In this case, $L$ is the distance of neutrino travel and $E$ is a measure of the interacting neutrino's energy. While comparisons using allowed and excluded regions for oscillation model parameters are likely the only rigorous method for these comparisons, the $L/E$ distributions are shown to give qualitative information on the agreement of an experiment's data with a simple two-neutrino oscillation model. In more detail, this paper also outlines how the $L/E$ distributions can be best calculated and used for model comparisons. Specifically, the paper presents the $L/E$ data points for the final MiniBooNE data samples and, in the Appendix, explains and corrects the mistaken analysis published by the ICARUS collaboration.
△ Less
Submitted 11 July, 2014;
originally announced July 2014.
-
Improved Search for $\bar ν_μ\rightarrow \bar ν_e$ Oscillations in the MiniBooNE Experiment
Authors:
The MiniBooNE Collaboration,
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo,
B. C. Brown,
L. Bugel,
G. Cheng,
E. D. Church,
J. M. Conrad,
R. Dharmapalan,
Z. Djurcic,
D. A. Finley,
R. Ford,
F. G. Garcia,
G. T. Garvey,
J. Grange,
W. Huelsnitz,
C. Ignarra,
R. Imlay,
R. A. Johnson,
G. Karagiorgi,
T. Katori,
T. Kobilarcik,
W. C. Louis,
C. Mariani,
W. Marsh,
G. B. Mills
, et al. (20 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports results from an analysis of $\bar ν_e$ appearance data from $11.27 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in antineutrino mode, an increase of approximately a factor of two over the previously reported results. An event excess of $78.4 \pm 28.5$ events ($2.8 σ$) is observed in the energy range $200<E_ν^{QE}<1250$ MeV. If interpreted in a two-neutrino oscilla…
▽ More
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports results from an analysis of $\bar ν_e$ appearance data from $11.27 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in antineutrino mode, an increase of approximately a factor of two over the previously reported results. An event excess of $78.4 \pm 28.5$ events ($2.8 σ$) is observed in the energy range $200<E_ν^{QE}<1250$ MeV. If interpreted in a two-neutrino oscillation model, $\barν_μ\rightarrow\barν_e$, the best oscillation fit to the excess has a probability of 66% while the background-only fit has a $χ^2$-probability of 0.5% relative to the best fit. The data are consistent with antineutrino oscillations in the $0.01 < Δm^2 < 1.0$ eV$^2$ range and have some overlap with the evidence for antineutrino oscillations from the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND). All of the major backgrounds are constrained by in-situ event measurements so non-oscillation explanations would need to invoke new anomalous background processes. The neutrino mode running also shows an excess at low energy of $162.0 \pm 47.8$ events ($3.4 σ$) but the energy distribution of the excess is marginally compatible with a simple two neutrino oscillation formalism. Expanded models with several sterile neutrinos can reduce the incompatibility by allowing for CP violating effects between neutrino and antineutrino oscillations.
△ Less
Submitted 12 March, 2013; v1 submitted 11 March, 2013;
originally announced March 2013.
-
A Combined $ν_μ\to ν_e$ and $\barν_μ\to \barν_e$ Oscillation Analysis of the MiniBooNE Excesses
Authors:
MiniBooNE Collaboration,
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo,
B. C. Brown,
L. Bugel,
G. Cheng,
E. D. Church,
J. M. Conrad,
R. Dharmapalan,
Z. Djurcic,
D. A. Finley,
R. Ford,
F. G. Garcia,
G. T. Garvey,
J. Grange,
W. Huelsnitz,
C. Ignarra,
R. Imlay,
R. A. Johnson,
G. Karagiorgi,
T. Katori,
T. Kobilarcik,
W. C. Louis,
C. Mariani,
W. Marsh,
G. B. Mills
, et al. (20 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports results from an analysis of the combined $ν_e$ and $\bar ν_e$ appearance data from $6.46 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in neutrino mode and $11.27 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in antineutrino mode. A total excess of $240.3 \pm 34.5 \pm 52.6$ events ($3.8 σ$) is observed from combining the two data sets in the energy range $200<E_ν^{QE}<1250$ Me…
▽ More
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports results from an analysis of the combined $ν_e$ and $\bar ν_e$ appearance data from $6.46 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in neutrino mode and $11.27 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in antineutrino mode. A total excess of $240.3 \pm 34.5 \pm 52.6$ events ($3.8 σ$) is observed from combining the two data sets in the energy range $200<E_ν^{QE}<1250$ MeV. In a combined fit for CP-conserving $ν_μ\rightarrow ν_e$ and $\barν_μ\rightarrow\barν_e$ oscillations via a two-neutrino model, the background-only fit has a $χ^2$-probability of 0.03% relative to the best oscillation fit. The data are consistent with neutrino oscillations in the $0.01 < Δm^2 < 1.0$ eV$^2$ range and with the evidence for antineutrino oscillations from the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND).
△ Less
Submitted 27 August, 2012; v1 submitted 19 July, 2012;
originally announced July 2012.
-
Test of Lorentz and CPT violation with Short Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Excesses
Authors:
The MiniBooNE Collaboration,
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo,
C. E. Anderson,
A. O. Bazarko,
S. J. Brice,
B. C. Brown,
L. Bugel,
J. Cao,
L. Coney,
J. M. Conrad,
D. C. Cox,
A. Curioni,
R. Dharmapalan,
Z. Djurcic,
D. A. Finley,
B. T. Fleming,
R. Ford,
F. G. Garcia,
G. T. Garvey,
J. Grange,
C. Green,
J. A. Green,
T. L. Hart,
E. Hawker,
W. Huelsnitz
, et al. (63 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The sidereal time dependence of MiniBooNE electron neutrino and anti-electron neutrino appearance data are analyzed to search for evidence of Lorentz and CPT violation. An unbinned Kolmogorov-Smirnov test shows both the electron neutrino and anti-electron neutrino appearance data are compatible with the null sidereal variation hypothesis to more than 5%. Using an unbinned likelihood fit with a Lor…
▽ More
The sidereal time dependence of MiniBooNE electron neutrino and anti-electron neutrino appearance data are analyzed to search for evidence of Lorentz and CPT violation. An unbinned Kolmogorov-Smirnov test shows both the electron neutrino and anti-electron neutrino appearance data are compatible with the null sidereal variation hypothesis to more than 5%. Using an unbinned likelihood fit with a Lorentz-violating oscillation model derived from the Standard Model Extension (SME) to describe any excess events over background, we find that the electron neutrino appearance data prefer a sidereal time-independent solution, and the anti-electron neutrino appearance data slightly prefer a sidereal time-dependent solution. Limits of order 10E-20 GeV are placed on combinations of SME coefficients. These limits give the best limits on certain SME coefficients for muon neutrino to electron neutrino and anti-muon neutrino to anti-electron neutrino oscillations. The fit values and limits of combinations of SME coefficients are provided.
△ Less
Submitted 22 June, 2012; v1 submitted 15 September, 2011;
originally announced September 2011.
