Measuring response functions of active materials from data
Authors:
Mehdi Molaei,
Steven A. Redford,
Wen-hung Chou,
Danielle Scheff,
Juan J. de Pablo,
Patrick W. Oakes,
Margaret L. Gardel
Abstract:
From flocks of birds to biomolecular assemblies, systems in which many individual components independently consume energy to perform mechanical work exhibit a wide array of striking behaviors. Methods to quantify the dynamics of these so called active systems generally aim to extract important length or time scales from experimental fields. Because such methods focus on extracting scalar values, t…
▽ More
From flocks of birds to biomolecular assemblies, systems in which many individual components independently consume energy to perform mechanical work exhibit a wide array of striking behaviors. Methods to quantify the dynamics of these so called active systems generally aim to extract important length or time scales from experimental fields. Because such methods focus on extracting scalar values, they do not wring maximal information from experimental data. We introduce a method to overcome these limitations. We extend the framework of correlation functions by taking into account the internal headings of displacement fields. The functions we construct represent the material response to specific types of active perturbation within the system. Utilizing these response functions we query the material response of disparate active systems composed of actin filaments and myosin motors, from model fluids to living cells. We show we can extract critical length scales from the turbulent flows of an active nematic, anticipate contractility in an active gel, distinguish viscous from viscoelastic dissipation, and even differentiate modes of contractility in living cells. These examples underscore the vast utility of this method which measures response functions from experimental observations of complex active systems.
△ Less
Submitted 30 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
Assemblathon 2: evaluating de novo methods of genome assembly in three vertebrate species
Authors:
Keith R. Bradnam,
Joseph N. Fass,
Anton Alexandrov,
Paul Baranay,
Michael Bechner,
İnanç Birol,
Sébastien Boisvert,
Jarrod A. Chapman,
Guillaume Chapuis,
Rayan Chikhi,
Hamidreza Chitsaz,
Wen-Chi Chou,
Jacques Corbeil,
Cristian Del Fabbro,
T. Roderick Docking,
Richard Durbin,
Dent Earl,
Scott Emrich,
Pavel Fedotov,
Nuno A. Fonseca,
Ganeshkumar Ganapathy,
Richard A. Gibbs,
Sante Gnerre,
Élénie Godzaridis,
Steve Goldstein
, et al. (66 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Background - The process of generating raw genome sequence data continues to become cheaper, faster, and more accurate. However, assembly of such data into high-quality, finished genome sequences remains challenging. Many genome assembly tools are available, but they differ greatly in terms of their performance (speed, scalability, hardware requirements, acceptance of newer read technologies) and…
▽ More
Background - The process of generating raw genome sequence data continues to become cheaper, faster, and more accurate. However, assembly of such data into high-quality, finished genome sequences remains challenging. Many genome assembly tools are available, but they differ greatly in terms of their performance (speed, scalability, hardware requirements, acceptance of newer read technologies) and in their final output (composition of assembled sequence). More importantly, it remains largely unclear how to best assess the quality of assembled genome sequences. The Assemblathon competitions are intended to assess current state-of-the-art methods in genome assembly. Results - In Assemblathon 2, we provided a variety of sequence data to be assembled for three vertebrate species (a bird, a fish, and snake). This resulted in a total of 43 submitted assemblies from 21 participating teams. We evaluated these assemblies using a combination of optical map data, Fosmid sequences, and several statistical methods. From over 100 different metrics, we chose ten key measures by which to assess the overall quality of the assemblies. Conclusions - Many current genome assemblers produced useful assemblies, containing a significant representation of their genes, regulatory sequences, and overall genome structure. However, the high degree of variability between the entries suggests that there is still much room for improvement in the field of genome assembly and that approaches which work well in assembling the genome of one species may not necessarily work well for another.
△ Less
Submitted 27 June, 2013; v1 submitted 23 January, 2013;
originally announced January 2013.