-
Functional brain network architecture supporting the learning of social networks in humans
Authors:
Steven H. Tompson,
Ari E. Kahn,
Emily B. Falk,
Jean M. Vettel,
Danielle S. Bassett
Abstract:
Most humans have the good fortune to live their lives embedded in richly structured social groups. Yet, it remains unclear how humans acquire knowledge about these social structures to successfully navigate social relationships. Here we address this knowledge gap with an interdisciplinary neuroimaging study drawing on recent advances in network science and statistical learning. Specifically, we co…
▽ More
Most humans have the good fortune to live their lives embedded in richly structured social groups. Yet, it remains unclear how humans acquire knowledge about these social structures to successfully navigate social relationships. Here we address this knowledge gap with an interdisciplinary neuroimaging study drawing on recent advances in network science and statistical learning. Specifically, we collected BOLD MRI data while participants learned the community structure of both social and non-social networks, in order to examine whether the learning of these two types of networks was differentially associated with functional brain network topology. From the behavioral data in both tasks, we found that learners were sensitive to the community structure of the networks, as evidenced by a slower reaction time on trials transitioning between clusters than on trials transitioning within a cluster. From the neuroimaging data collected during the social network learning task, we observed that the functional connectivity of the hippocampus and temporoparietal junction was significantly greater when transitioning between clusters than when transitioning within a cluster. Furthermore, temporoparietal regions of the default mode were more strongly connected to hippocampus, somatomotor, and visual regions during the social task than during the non-social task. Collectively, our results identify neurophysiological underpinnings of social versus non-social network learning, extending our knowledge about the impact of social context on learning processes. More broadly, this work offers an empirical approach to study the learning of social network structures, which could be fruitfully extended to other participant populations, various graph architectures, and a diversity of social contexts in future studies.
△ Less
Submitted 20 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
A Community-Developed Open-Source Computational Ecosystem for Big Neuro Data
Authors:
Randal Burns,
Eric Perlman,
Alex Baden,
William Gray Roncal,
Ben Falk,
Vikram Chandrashekhar,
Forrest Collman,
Sharmishtaa Seshamani,
Jesse Patsolic,
Kunal Lillaney,
Michael Kazhdan,
Robert Hider Jr.,
Derek Pryor,
Jordan Matelsky,
Timothy Gion,
Priya Manavalan,
Brock Wester,
Mark Chevillet,
Eric T. Trautman,
Khaled Khairy,
Eric Bridgeford,
Dean M. Kleissas,
Daniel J. Tward,
Ailey K. Crow,
Matthew A. Wright
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Big imaging data is becoming more prominent in brain sciences across spatiotemporal scales and phylogenies. We have developed a computational ecosystem that enables storage, visualization, and analysis of these data in the cloud, thusfar spanning 20+ publications and 100+ terabytes including nanoscale ultrastructure, microscale synaptogenetic diversity, and mesoscale whole brain connectivity, maki…
▽ More
Big imaging data is becoming more prominent in brain sciences across spatiotemporal scales and phylogenies. We have developed a computational ecosystem that enables storage, visualization, and analysis of these data in the cloud, thusfar spanning 20+ publications and 100+ terabytes including nanoscale ultrastructure, microscale synaptogenetic diversity, and mesoscale whole brain connectivity, making NeuroData the largest and most diverse open repository of brain data.
△ Less
Submitted 9 April, 2018; v1 submitted 9 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
-
NeuroStorm: Accelerating Brain Science Discovery in the Cloud
Authors:
Gregory Kiar,
Robert J. Anderson,
Alex Baden,
Alexandra Badea,
Eric W. Bridgeford,
Andrew Champion,
Vikram Chandrashekhar,
Forrest Collman,
Brandon Duderstadt,
Alan C. Evans,
Florian Engert,
Benjamin Falk,
Tristan Glatard,
William R. Gray Roncal,
David N. Kennedy,
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard,
Ryan A. Marren,
Onyeka Nnaemeka,
Eric Perlman,
Sharmishtaas Seshamani,
Eric T. Trautman,
Daniel J. Tward,
Pedro Antonio Valdés-Sosa,
Qing Wang,
Michael I. Miller
, et al. (2 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Neuroscientists are now able to acquire data at staggering rates across spatiotemporal scales. However, our ability to capitalize on existing datasets, tools, and intellectual capacities is hampered by technical challenges. The key barriers to accelerating scientific discovery correspond to the FAIR data principles: findability, global access to data, software interoperability, and reproducibility…
▽ More
Neuroscientists are now able to acquire data at staggering rates across spatiotemporal scales. However, our ability to capitalize on existing datasets, tools, and intellectual capacities is hampered by technical challenges. The key barriers to accelerating scientific discovery correspond to the FAIR data principles: findability, global access to data, software interoperability, and reproducibility/re-usability. We conducted a hackathon dedicated to making strides in those steps. This manuscript is a technical report summarizing these achievements, and we hope serves as an example of the effectiveness of focused, deliberate hackathons towards the advancement of our quickly-evolving field.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2018; v1 submitted 8 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
-
Global Brain Dynamics During Social Exclusion Predict Subsequent Behavioral Conformity
Authors:
Nick Wasylyshyn,
Brett Hemenway,
Javier O. Garcia,
Christopher N. Cascio,
Matthew Brook O'Donnell,
C. Raymond Bingham,
Bruce Simons-Morton,
Jean M. Vettel,
Emily B. Falk
Abstract:
Individuals react differently to social experiences; for example, people who are more sensitive to negative social experiences, such as being excluded, may be more likely to adapt their behavior to fit in with others. We examined whether functional brain connectivity during social exclusion in the fMRI scanner can be used to predict subsequent conformity to peer norms. Adolescent males (N = 57) co…
▽ More
Individuals react differently to social experiences; for example, people who are more sensitive to negative social experiences, such as being excluded, may be more likely to adapt their behavior to fit in with others. We examined whether functional brain connectivity during social exclusion in the fMRI scanner can be used to predict subsequent conformity to peer norms. Adolescent males (N = 57) completed a two-part study on teen driving risk: a social exclusion task (Cyberball) during an fMRI session and a subsequent driving simulator session in which they drove alone and in the presence of a peer who expressed risk-averse or risk-accepting driving norms. We computed the difference in functional connectivity between social exclusion and social inclusion from each node in the brain to nodes in two brain networks, one previously associated with mentalizing (medial prefrontal cortex, temporoparietal junction, precuneus, temporal poles) and another with social pain (anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula). Using cross-validated machine learning, this measure of global network connectivity during exclusion predicts the extent of conformity to peer pressure during driving in the subsequent experimental session. These findings extend our understanding of how global neural dynamics guide social behavior, revealing functional network activity that captures individual differences.
△ Less
Submitted 2 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
-
Individual Differences in Learning Social and Non-Social Network Structures
Authors:
Steven H. Tompson,
Ari E. Kahn,
Emily B. Falk,
Jean M. Vettel,
Danielle S. Bassett
Abstract:
Learning about complex associations between pieces of information enables individuals to quickly adjust their expectations and develop mental models. Yet, the degree to which humans can learn higher-order information about complex associations is not well understood; nor is it known whether the learning process differs for social and non-social information. Here, we employ a paradigm in which the…
▽ More
Learning about complex associations between pieces of information enables individuals to quickly adjust their expectations and develop mental models. Yet, the degree to which humans can learn higher-order information about complex associations is not well understood; nor is it known whether the learning process differs for social and non-social information. Here, we employ a paradigm in which the order of stimulus presentation forms temporal associations between the stimuli, collectively constituting a complex network structure. We examined individual differences in the ability to learn network topology for which stimuli were social versus non-social. Although participants were able to learn both social and non-social networks, their performance in social network learning was uncorrelated with their performance in non-social network learning. Importantly, social traits, including social orientation and perspective-taking, uniquely predicted the learning of social networks but not the learning of non-social networks. Taken together, our results suggest that the process of learning higher-order structure in social networks is independent from the process of learning higher-order structure in non-social networks. Our study design provides a promising approach to identify neurophysiological drivers of social network versus non-social network learning, extending our knowledge about the impact of individual differences on these learning processes. Implications for how people learn and adapt to new social contexts that require integration into a new social network are discussed.
△ Less
Submitted 8 September, 2017;
originally announced September 2017.
