If you were browsing
Steam's selection of
Next Fest demos
,
looking for something to play
,
Brok the Investigator
and
Hill Agency: PURITY&decay
wouldn't necessarily strike you as having an awful lot in common. One features a
cartoon alligator in the title role, the other has an indigenous Cree/Néhinaw
protagonist; one benchmarks
"
classic 80s/90s cartoons", the other "
Ghost in the Shell, and Blade Runner". Hill Agency emphasizes thinking and investigation; Brok offers "
Beat'em up" and RPG elements."
Perhaps most significantly, Brok promises "A deep and emotional narrative-rich experience", while Hill Agency comes freighted with advisories: "Violence, sexual assault, human-trafficking, drug and alcohol abuse,
self-harm and suicide, body disorders and body hatred, racism."
Despite those wildly differing pitches, the two share a number of key
elements. They're both set in the deep future, quite specifically so in the
case of Hill Agency, which opens in 2762. Brok is a little vaguer about the
timeframe but it's far enough from now for animals to have replaced humans and
for the environment to have collapsed, driving everyone who can afford it to
live under domes.
In both futures machine technology and AIs have taken some semblance of
control. Meeygen Hill, the eponymous owner of Hill Agency, inhabits
a "cybernoir Indigenous future", while Brok lives in "a futuristic "light cyberpunk" world".
Each of the two leads scratches a living as a private investigator, picking up
cases from people who either pay late or don't pay at all. They both live and
work from homes they share with extended family, an arrangement that comes
with all the privacy and respect you'd expect.
Both demos eschew anything even close to an explanation for how the world came
to be the way it is. They each adopt one of my favorite science fiction
techniques, presenting the narrative as though it takes place in a
contemporary setting as well known to the player as it is to the characters.
Context explains much; conversation, interior monologue and in-game reference
material fill out the rest as you play.
Finally, both games employ a similar set of mechanics to bring a case to its
conclusion, requiring you to collect, collate and present evidence in order to
satisfy the client. There are other similarities but those should be enough
for now.
To avoid creating any spurious sense of competition as I discuss them in
detail, I'll get the verdict out of the way at the start. I enjoyed both these
demos but I only wishlisted Brok.
Of all the demos I played during the most recent Next Fest (I still have two
more to try.) Hill Agency was the least polished. I spotted a few typos and
ran into a couple of bugs. Nothing game-breaking but indicative of a project
in need of considerable work.
It's an impression reinforced by the way the game looks. While it's a very
interesting aesthetic choice and one that appeals to me personally, the highly
sylized visual approach with its denatured color palette and the somewhat
awkward character movement leaves the whole affair with a vaguely unfinished
air.
More worryingly, the demo scenario bears remarkably little resemblance to the
kind of game I was expecting from the description on its Steam page. One thing
you'd really hope for from a demo would be a clear impression of how it would
feel to play the finished game. It's hard to see how that could be the case
here, given the extreme disparity between what you get to do, hear and see and
what the game's sales pitch leads you to expect.
The Brok demo, in contrast, is slick, polished, well-designed and thoroughly
entertaining. It offers precisely the experience you'd hope from the Steam
page and the
website. It's also huge, almost long enough to be a standalone game,
something that gives me great confidence the team behind it is capable of
producing something very substantial as a finished product. And it ends
on a cliffhanger that really makes me want to find out what happens next.
Can't really ask more of a demo than that.
The basic format of both demos consists of taking a case, investigating it,
then presenting your findings to the client. The natures of the cases are
wildly different and I'm pretty sure that if anyone was to guess from a precis
of their plots which belonged to which, they'd get them the wrong way
round.
Brok takes an apparently simple lost property case only to find it spiralling
into a dark and dangerous adventure involving drugs, stolen guns and a
policeman being doped, stripped and dumped in an alley. Meeygen Hill is tasked
by her irascible Aunt with finding out what happened to a child's toy,
Meeygen's nephew's missing Electrodog. (Spoiler! He trashed it so his aunt
would buy him the latest model.) About the only thing the two have in common
is that no-one gets paid.
The Hill Agency demo is wholesome enough to deserve a PG certificate. All you
do is stroll around the block you live on, chatting to local kids and people
you already know about whether they've seen the Electrodog. Everyone's
friendly and co-operative as you put together an almost cosy picture of life
in the neighborhood. Well, everyone except the aunt herself, who clearly
thinks finding a missing toy is about the limit of your abilities.
The investigation itself is fairly perfunctory, most of the value coming from
what you learn about the world Meeygen inhabits. The ending is very sudden and
quite disconcerting. When you finally think you've worked out what happened to
the E-dog you present your evidence to your short-tempered client, at which
point she just goes "Hmmm..." and the demo ends. I wasn't even sure I'd
come to the correct conclusion but if I was wrong I'll never know.
The strength of the Hill Agency demo is all in the setting, which I found
intriguing. Achimostawinan Game, the developers, are correct when they
say this particular future has never been seen before. Well, I certainly
haven't seen it, anyway.
That said, for a time almost three-quarters of a millennium from now, not all
that much seems to have changed. My routine complaint about near-future
settings is that they assume far too much change in too short a timeframe but
this goes way too far the other way. Both technologically and socially it
looks like it might be nearer a hundred years from now than a thousand.
In part, I think that may be because the demo just doesn't include most of
what's in the broader description, specifically the elite society living
in the Risen city, accessed by a space elevator. There's not even any
real sense of the "thriving Indigenous (Néhinaw) Metropolis" because
all you see are a a few residential locations that look as though they could
be part of any contemporary North American dormitory town right now.
The re-indigenizing of the North American continent is a very interesting
concept but the demo doesn't really have much of a chance to focus on it.
There's a smattering of Cree language, as promised, and the characters have
what I take to be Cree-appropriate appearances and outfits but of course
having a science fiction setting undercuts all of that. Everyone in SF looks
and speaks differently so the impact is dissipated.
All of that said, it's still an enjoyable demo, although the mechanics need a
little polish. The characters are amiable, the writing is approachable and the
graphics are striking. The rough edges can be sanded down and the mechanics
can be tweaked. I don't worry too much about that. The trouble is, I don't
feel it's given me much of an impression of what the full game might be like.
If anything, it may have done the opposite. That's a real problem for a
demo.
I'm confident I know exactly what Brok the Investigator will be like on
release, which is why I wishlisted it. It's going to be solid, well-written,
well illustrated, charming, funny and satisfying. Assuming it comes out at a
sensible price, it's also going to be great value for money.
It's already clear it'll have an intriguing setting, about which I want to
learn more, personable characters I'll want to spend time with and puzzles
I'll enjoy solving. It will have mechanics that let me play the way I want to
play, choosing my own difficulty levels and letting me solve puzzles my way.
It will even have considerable replayability, unusual for a genre which
revolves around finding out who did what to whom, when and how.
As a demo, this one's got everything, really. I can't fault it. As I mentioned
in my last post, it's quite possibly the longest demo I've ever played but at
no point did I find myself getting impatient or hoping it would finish. On the
contrary, I found the story involving and the gameplay fun. The time zipped
by.
According to the developer's description, Brok the Investigator is "15 to 20 hours long on first playthrough" although if that's an accurate assessment I must have already played at
least a quarter of the game just in the demo. Seems unlikely.
Partly it's because I really took my time but even the playthroughs on
YouTube, where everyone clearly already knows exactly what to do and where to go,
mostly take between ninety minutes and a couple of hours. The game uses a
branching narrative structure, with different paths depending on the choices
you make, there are multiple ways to handle problems and there's a collection
feature, too.
I had been mildly apprehensive about the beat-em-up aspect of the game but any
concerns I might have had were settled even before the first scene.
COWCAT would seem to be one of those rare and exemplary developers who
understand that players like to play games according to their own preferences,
not those of the designers.
There are several difficulty settings including one for people who only care
about the story. I chose that one, which meant I had absolutely no difficulty
whatsoever with the fights. Even if I had struggled, it wouldn't have
mattered. Each fight also offers the option of skipping it entirely, allowing
you to completely disregard the beat-em-up side of the game and play the whole
thing as if it were a straight point and click adventure, should you so
desire.
The fights are too much fun to skip. Brok is an ex-boxer and he knows how to
handle himself. Beating up Squealers (Bad guy rats... or are they?) for
picking on innocent down-and-outs (...Or are they?) and rumbling with
robots gives the game a robust tactility often lacking in adventure games.
In addition to the numerous logic problems you'd expect in any adventure game,
there are several mechanical or practical challenges to overcome. Each is a
different mini-game and for once I can honestly say they were all fun to play.
I particularly liked the one where you have to push items along a maze of
pipes with an extendable "snake". I got the item I was looking for on
the first try but I carried on and got the rest, too, just for the fun of it.
Conversation with the various characters is a pleasure to engage with for a
couple of reasons. Most importantly, it's very nicely written. Characters have
recognizably different speech patterns and they express themselves in a manner
appropriate to their situation. Some have smart mouths and crack wise, others
have too much on their mind to throw out casual jokes.
One of the annoying things about Hill Agency is the way NPCs repeat the exact
same dialog every time you revisit them, unless you've triggered some plot
element to change it. It's not a criticism of that game so much as it is one
of the whole genre. In Brok, you never have to hear any of the dialog twice if
you don't want to. There's an option to suppress all previously-heard
conversation. I used it with great satisfaction.
The game is fully voiced and the voice acting is good to very good. Brok
himself is excellent, full of character and able to convey a wide range of
emotions, something he's required to do by the fast-changing circumstances of
the plot. Graff, his stepson, is almost lugubriously adolescent. In the
full game he can be played as the main character, "switchable at any time" with Brok, although if that's an option in the demo I didn't find it.
The dialog keeps throwing up one-liners worthy of screenshots that would make
excellent posters or T-shirts, as you can see from some I've used for this
post. Ironically, the one issue I did briefly have with the demo was the Steam
screenshot function not working. Even though the instructions said to press
F12 as usual, doing so had no effect.
For some reason, the functionality has transferred to PrtScr, which works but
also minimizes the game window. A text box pops up telling you where the
screenshot has been saved. It's not in the Steam folder. I got used to that
soon enough. Taking shots that way had no deleterious effects on the game
despite all the opening and closing of windows. Other than that, I had no
technical issues whatsoever.
I could go on at length about the dialog, the plot, the characters, the world
building. Any and all of them would make a post of their own. It would be
overkill for a demo, though, or so I'm thinking. I'll save it for the full
game, when it launches, something that's scheduled to happen later this year.
I have two more demos left to play, one of which, according to
Paeroka, is as exceptionally short as Brok was exceptionally long. With luck and
dog willing I'll get to those tomorrow.