Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, A1Cafel!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

F2C ban

edit

Per Special:Diff/937465669, you are now indefinitely blocked from using Commons:Flickr2Commons due to your lack of care to ensure that the transfers are not duplicates, copyright violations, or front-running creators who prefer to upload their own images. King of ♥ 21:18, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@King of Hearts: If you decided to block me based on "front-running creators", then this is very pity, as I can never know which Flickr user wish to import their images by themselves, and they have quite different name on Commons and Flickr. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
The point is not about the fact of whether you are importing images created by people who are also active on Commons, but the spirit of whether you are doing something that disregards others' preferences just because it is legal. -- King of ♥ 06:02, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
@King of Hearts: I admit that I under-estimate somepne's preferences at first, but I agreed and made a promise to stop importing from Jelger Groeneveld's (Labrang) Flickr stream, after Krd asked me to respect photographer's request. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:13, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
It isn't just about any single issue. The consensus is that your Flickr imports in general have been problematic for many different reasons. -- King of ♥ 07:36, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
@King of Hearts: There is still someone opposes it, so it is hardly to say it reached a consensus. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Many of the oppose !voters were opposing a total site ban, but many of them still noted issues with your use of F2C. So the end result is that basically everyone who expressed an opinion on that topic was in favor of revoking your access (at a minimum). -- King of ♥ 06:27, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
@King of Hearts: Fine, I won't argue on this anymore, though I still feel that it is very pity. Do you have any suggestions that what is the appropriate time to appeal it? --A1Cafel (talk) 10:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
i believe 6 months to 1 year. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 16:01, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
@A1Cafel, You just had this happen, and you choose to continue uploading from Flickr, but using a different tool that is depreciated and broken? Please take a clue, and don't do Flickr uploads to commons for at least 6 months. Flickr is only one website on the internet, I'm sure you can find images to upload under compatible licenses. If you can't, consider helping import fonts under the Open Font License. No one wants to block you, but its moving ever closer towards that direction when things like this keep hapening. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 04:12, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

This is a clear violation of the spirit of your F2C ban. When I specified that you may use other means to import images, I hoped that you would understand the motivation behind your F2C ban (hasty low-quality transfers) and refrain from similar behavior such as using a different automated tool, so that I wouldn't have to spell out explicitly what needs to happen. Unfortunately that has failed, so I will be more clear:

  1. You may not use anything other than the Commons website (e.g. Special:UploadWizard or Special:Upload) to upload images to Wikimedia Commons.
  2. You may upload no more than 10 images per day.

Violations will be enforced by blocks. Again, the consensus in the discussion was that you were uploading too many images too quickly without proper care, so these restrictions are intended to force you to carefully vet what you upload. -- King of ♥ 05:26, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@King of Hearts: Just to be clear, can I upload 10 more files today? Or I need to wait until tomorrow? --A1Cafel (talk) 07:04, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
You have already uploaded more than 10 files today, so please wait until tomorrow. Days will always be counted using UTC. -- King of ♥ 08:04, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
@King of Hearts, See the 13 files uploaded on 18 October 2024 here: [1]. This appears to be a violation of number "2. You may upload no more than 10 images per day.". (This count does not include the single cropped image, also uploaded on the 18th) I am assuming that the "Special:ListFiles" results are shown in UTC as you noted above. -- Ooligan (talk) 23:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Ooligan: I only see 10. Perhaps you are looking at a time zone other than UTC? -- King of ♥ 02:56, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Please check everything carefully before you make such accusation, this is not the first time you make wrong accusation. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes, it was not UTC. Sorry, to take your time @King of Hearts, and my appology also to A1Cafel. -- Ooligan (talk) 03:38, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Appeal

edit

Re Special:Permalink/957319578#Review: You may now use any tool (such as F2C, Flickypedia, or V2C) to transfer photos to Wikimedia Commons, but are still restricted to 10 uploads per day (UTC). The limit is in place to ensure that you do not indiscriminately transfer everything you can find and to make cleanup easier if your uploads turn out to be problematic. -- King of ♥ 18:06, 15 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Need review

edit

183.182.121.243 15:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Maybe consolidate the deletion discussions next time?

edit

Hi, I don't have an issue with you nominating a bunch of my uploads for deletions (you're probably right in most, if not all cases), but wouldn't it have been easier to group the discussions by topic (I noticed multiples for the Glico Man neon sign in Dotonbori and a whole bunch from the Saitama Railway Museum)? I think it's a little unreasonable to ask uploaders to essentially go to a dozen different DRs and respond to each one (most likely with the same comment). Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:13, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Will give a try next time. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Omphalographer (talk) 02:29, 9 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Press Briefing by Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre (2022-06-07).webm

edit

Hi. Would you mind if i rename the other videos of press briefings by Jean-Pierre to follow the same naming scheme? Trade (talk) 10:44, 9 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

No objection. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:46, 9 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
File:09 25 20 President Trump Delivers Remarks Upon Arrival-p42HqplrhtM.webm Could you help me find the original video and insert it into the Source field? --Trade (talk) 23:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Trade: Fixed. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Would you help move Category:White House videos into their correct subcategory as listed under Category:Videos by The White House?--Trade (talk) 05:42, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done--A1Cafel (talk) 07:17, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:E4u 80jXEAkSX4v.jpg

edit
 
File:E4u 80jXEAkSX4v.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

180.219.71.3 18:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Not like own work

edit

Source:https://nhandan.vn/chu-tich-nuoc-luong-cuong-se-tham-chinh-thuc-chile-va-peru-du-tuan-le-cap-cao-apec-post843439.html 183.182.121.243 14:03, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

UAE FOP

edit

I'm assisting with WLM in the UAE, I have deleted all those you listed without waiting the 14 days so we can purge the cache for judging via montage. We agree there is no FOP in UAE for new buildings. Gnangarra 10:32, 15 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

JWilz12345 suggested to cancel WLM competition in UAE, because it takes a lot of time for users to deal with FoP issues in the country. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:41, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
@A1Cafel, what you said needs context, however. That was a past suggestion, however ZI Jony agreed to enforce strict rules on WLM competition in UAE, to only limit eligible buildings to those that were completed before March 1993. One concern was of a different photo competition, with the concern made by a different user. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 03:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
See also Commons talk:Wiki Loves Monuments 2024/Participating countries#UAE. Luckily, 98% of the uploads are fine. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 03:14, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
File:Mohammad bin Salman - Caricature (40299007120).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ARABCREATOR7 (talk) 06:41, 17 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Mohammad bin Salman - Caricature (41386333054).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ARABCREATOR7 (talk) 06:41, 17 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Open Source Crucial - Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte of General Affairs (2020).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vera (talk) 16:27, 17 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

{{Rename||2}}

edit

You put the template like this into a few files like this one File:Photo by Immanuelle of unknown Japanese location-7088.jpg. Is it allowed and normal practice to just put the template there like that to request someone else rename a file? Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 00:05, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Immanuelle: Welcome back. The above template will put your files under Category:Media renaming requests needing target. There is no formal policy on doing this, but I think it can let those who familiar with the topic can perform the rename. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
(talk page stalker) @Immanuelle: yes, that's pretty normal. Given that others have worked out the city & district, you could probably go in with Google Maps or such, work out just where this was, and give it an appropriate file name. - Jmabel ! talk 20:59, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
What was the (talk page stalker) about? Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 21:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
An acknowledgment that I am commenting in a discussion on someone else's talk page that I wasn't explicitly invited into, and that I'm not really doing so in my capacity as an admin. If User:A1Cafel wanted to delete my comment, that would be his prerogative. - Jmabel ! talk 00:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
I appreciate every constructive comment. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your deletion requests

edit

A1Cafel: I love you for your great pleasure in asking for the deletion requests of images nobody else would care about. Revenge actions, I guess (see here above). --Cayambe (talk) 10:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

There is no any meaning of "revenge" or harming your contributions on Commons, just purely the image is violating the copyright of the creator. Statement like "nobody else would care about" is rejected by COM:PRP. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:SPF 3583 (53804268320).jpg

edit
 
File:SPF 3583 (53804268320).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 00:09, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Logo UniCT.png

edit

Hi A1Cafel, I'm writing to ask you for clarification about this license change you made. PD-Italy only applies to non-artistic photographs (and only if prior to 1976, because otherwise the photo would be still copyirighted in the US). Is there any particular reason? Thanks, Arrow303 (talk) 22:15, 27 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Below COM:TOO Italy--A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Could be, although the elephant silhouette is starting to get quite complex, but in any case the template should be {{PD-Textlogo}} {{TOO-Italy}} {{Trademark}}. {{PD-Italy}} is only for photographs produced at least 20 years ago in Italy. Arrow303 (talk) 09:56, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Changed. If you disagree with my TOO judgement, feel free to nominate it for deletion. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:24, 29 November 2024 (UTC)Reply