Lestath

Peter Michal Bochúň

tak sie to pisze :) --WarX 22:48, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

rrrrwa mać - podałem ci nie to n :(:(:( - tamto było HISZPAŃSKIE, a nie czeskie ... --WarX 11:52, 3 May 2006 (UTC) (sam poprawię)

Kandydaktura

Cześć. Dlaczego nie powiedziałeś, że chcesz zostać adminem na commons? Dopiero dziś się dowiedziałem. Oddałem już swój głos. Mam do Ciebie prośbę, otóż ja też potrzebuję narzędzi admińskich na commons, bo co chwilę muszę o coś prosić innych bo sam nie mogę zrobić. Napisałem swoją kandydakturę - Commons:Administrators/Requests_and_votes/LUCPOL, jeśli są tam jakieś błędy w składni to proszę popraw lub napisz mi na dyskusji co jest nie tak (mój angielski jest około en-1/en-2). Zamierzam w najbliższym czasie wpisać w/w stronę do Commons:Administrators/Requests and votes. Czy coś jeszcze trzeba zrobić? :) Pozdrawiam. LUCPOL 20:58, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Sysop

Congratulations! You are administrator now. --EugeneZelenko 14:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Festiwal

Jak mozesz, to rzuc jakies zdjecia z wczoraj :)

ps. zaczyna sie o 16 a nie o 17!

Pozdro AJF 08:44, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Admin news

Hello,

If you consent for statistics to be published about your actions as an administrator, please sign here: Commons:Administrator permission for statistics. (I expect that most people will not have a problem with it unless you are especially concerned with privacy.)

Also, please be aware that we now have a Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Please put it on your watchlist, if you haven't already!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC) P.S.: Pardon if this is a repeat (bot debugging...)

Piąte urodziny

Przypadkiem powstały dwie kategorie dla zdjęć z piątych urodzin: Category:5th birthday of Polish Wikipedia i Category:5. urodziny polskiej Wikipedii. Może lepiej będzie wrzucać wszystkie zdjęcia do pierwszej? --Derbeth ^talk 08:58, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Orzech włoski z biedronką.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orzech włoski z biedronką.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Pko 15:27, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:5. urodziny polskiej Wikipedii - Wikipedysta Ejdzej 01.JPG

• No nie bardzo wyszło, tamte dwa pozostałe wystarczą. :) A.J. 15:07, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Licencje grafik

Niejaki Knut Schäffner wyraził zgodę na publikację swoich zdjęć na następujących warunkach:

Zgadza się na użycie swoich zdjęć i prosi o przesłanie linka, na którym ewentualnie będą jego zdjęcia.
Gdyby zdjęcia miały być użyte w celu komercyjnym bądź innym niż ten, o który prosimy, mamy mu dać znać. 

(z listu od Kokorika)
Czy to pozwala umieścić je na Commons, a jeśli tak, to jaką dać licencję? Winiar^✉ 11:11, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

• Niestety nie, już odpowiedziałem Winiarowi. A.J. 12:09, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Muzeum Sułkowskich - niebieski salonik.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muzeum Sułkowskich - niebieski salonik.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Pko 14:37, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Katowice - Spodek by night.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Spodek by night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Pko 18:14, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Quality Image

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frombork - Katedra - Portal wejściowy edited.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

-- Alvesgaspar 11:12, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Seagull

You are right, ooops... Thank you, it is settled now. -- Alvesgaspar 22:47, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Quality Image

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abracadabra Gothic Tour - Asgaard - Przemysław Olbryt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

- Alvesgaspar 21:53, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Old path

Nice try, but I'm afraid that won't be enough, several purple/blue artifacts are still visible in the upper parte of the image. I suspect that no reviewer will promote the picture as it is. ;-) - Alvesgaspar 15:03, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Quality Image

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pieczęć Jagiełły.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

—JeremyA 02:23, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Quality Image

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 43. TKB - Fickowa Pokusa z Jeleśni 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

- Alvesgaspar 13:59, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

deletion of duplicates

Hello, could you please always note the exact name of the duplicate image on deletion, e.g. "duplicate od Image:Cow_123.jpg" instead of just "duplicate"? Otherwise normal users don't have a chance to substitute an image on the local projects. We need transparent log entries.

Thanks --:Bdk: 18:27, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Liceum Mickiewicza

• What do You thing about this version of my photo from QI? --> [4] Lestat 18:51, 5 November 2006 (UTC
• I think maybe you could do a little better: the picture is unsharp (see letters in pannel) and vertical lines are not parallel (see left size of picture). I believe both problems can be solved, at least partially: unsharpness by downsamplig and/or improving contrast and vertical lines by geometric manipulation. Why ask me (I'm very far from being a digital photo specialist)? Regards, Alvesgaspar 19:00, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
• PS. I didn't notice it was a new version already with some geometric manipulation. But I don't think it is enough. Alvesgaspar 19:51, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Quality Images

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikołów - Kościół pw. św. Wojciecha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malwa różowa - kwiat.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adršpašskoteplické skály 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

—JeremyA 02:45, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muzeum Sułkowskich - Zabytkowy Witraż.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

—JeremyA 02:36, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Katowice_-_Kopalnia_Katowice.jpg

Hi Lestath, this image is really good, the mood is incredible. That there is noise at RGB values around 60 is not special-this could be removed. But the image would also need some sharpening. Unfortunately the JPG compression is too high that's why good sharpening will fail. Maybe you have a higher quality version to upload? --Ikiwaner 18:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Edyta Geppert.jpg

I've been looking at this portrait for a couple of days and I like it very much. For the composition, the colouring (all black except the face), the expressive look of the artist. But I can't promote it to QI you know very well why. Can you do something to correct it? Alvesgaspar 00:17, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Are You thing about sharpness and digital noise? I know that this is minus of this photo, but I cannot do anythig with this :-((( Lestat 17:50, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I'm talking about the face being totally out of focus.... :-(( Alvesgaspar 18:35, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edyta Geppert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Ikiwaner 21:16, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Kategorie

Cześć. Czy na pewno powinno tak być? - [1]. Przecież artykuł Ruda Śląska jest w kategorii Category:Ruda Śląska, ta z kolei jest w Category:Cities in Silesia. Nie rozumię więc po co wpisywać tę kategorię (Category:Cities in Silesia) do artykułu. LUCPOL 21:25, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Logo-UFL-Uruguay.gif

Hello, You marked my image for speedy deletion and I answered back saying I'm the owner and creator of this image and have full rights to use it. I would like to know why the image was still deleted. If I'm the owner I can use it as I wish. Thanks --Mxfrodriguez 16:25, 26 December 2006 (EST)

Duck in Malbork

Hi, sorry for not being clear. ID means proper biological identificaion. What species of duck is it? It is a female, but is it e.g. a common mallard, or something else? I'll have to stop using those abbreviations. Bad habit ;-) Lycaon 23:44, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Proposal: Picture of the Year and Picture of the Month contests

I have posted a new proposal on Commons talk:Featured picture candidates regarding the creation of FP-related contests and would like your feedback on the idea. This message is being sent to some of the regular contributors to Commons:Featured picture candidates. Alvesgaspar 16:01, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

POTY election implementation

Some help in needed to organize the POTY election. Please check the conclusions of the discussion in Commons talk:Featured picture candidates. What do you think of doing the election in the period 15-31 January? - Alvesgaspar 15:04, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

QI discussion

There is an important discussion going on here which might result in a snowball with unwanted results. Although I agree that the actual QI guidelines should be tuned up, I can't support a considerable degrading of the existing criteria, towards some "poor man's QI" model. - Alvesgaspar 14:48, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

QI Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bytom - Piwnica Gorywodów 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Jnpet 15:19, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

POTY 2006 - translation help needed

We need someone to translate the banners and language pages of the POTY2006 competition into Polish. Can you please help or suggest another user? Please refer to Commons talk:Picture of the Year/2006 - Alvesgaspar 21:23, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

The Commons:Picture of the Year/2006 competition is due to open this Thursday, with big fanfare, and we are struggling to find someone who can translate into Polish. Would you be able to help, please? What's needed in a translation of the whole of these two pages

  * Commons:Picture of the Year/2006
  * Commons:Picture of the Year/2006/final

and also these two templates:

Interested in honouring the best of the best? Vote now in the Commons Picture of the Year competition 2006 Voting to select the finalists is open until 14th February. Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 日本語 | Nederlands | português | svenska | 中文（简体） | 中文（繁體） | +/−

What is the best picture of 2006? The candidates have been chosen. Vote for your choice now in the final of the Commons Picture of the Year competition 2006 Final voting to choose the 2006 Picture of the Year is open until 28th February. Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 日本語 | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | svenska | 粵語 | 中文（简体） | 中文（繁體） +/−

Regards --MichaelMaggs --MichaelMaggs 22:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rudy - Klasztor i kościół.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Jnpet 12:59, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

POTY 2006

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All the featured pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As the creator of one or more images nominated for the election we invite you to participate in the event. Alvesgaspar 17:28, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Could you also translate the page for phase 2 into Polish ? For now it just redirects to the English page: change the current redirect with an actual translation of the English page. Thanks, Verdy p 00:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Abzurdah

Hi. You deleted an Image:Abzurdah.png. I've said Why it should be undeleted Here.

Thanks, Jurock 22:35, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

WPKiW_-_Rzeźba_06

i have been looking at your image for some time now, you see something that i realised when you uploaded the edited version of it, is that the sky on the top was not equaly exposed as the rest of the picture. the reason for this is that you took a picture from a shadow place into the open sky, resulting in a overexposed sky, and a underexposed statue. if you look here you will see what i mind. now even when in your edition you did fixed the statue, the sky became a real problem. the only way i find to help it is buting it out :P and then correcting contrast. a bit like shown here. ofcourse all this should be done in the original file. for best results you should try to reduce the size a bit to remove some of the jpg aberrations that already start apearing on your edited version :). i hope this helps you-LadyofHats 07:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ISFJ - 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Jnpet 10:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilium 2 - kwiat.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Jnpet 11:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aeshna cyanea2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Jnpet 14:54, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gdańsk - Pomnik Stoczniowców.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Jnpet 14:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platan klonolistny - liść.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Jnpet 14:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4.FMC - Dullahan - Marek Przewłocki - 01a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Jnpet 04:17, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4.FMC - Warsztaty rzemiosła - Wyrób krajki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Jnpet 07:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Image licenses

Hello Lestath, I was looking at some of your pictures which are all very nice. I noticed that you currently license them exclusively as cc-by-sa-2.5. This is a fine thing, but it means that someone republishing a document under the popular GFDL license now has two licenses they must obey, cc-by-sa-2.5 and the GFDL. On commons we allow people to specify more than once license so that downstream users make pick the one they want. Because the GFDL is similar in overall action to CC-By-SA, many people license under both CC-By-SA and the GFDL. Would you be willing to dual license your images? If so all this requires is changing {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5|GFDL}}. If you are willing I can gladly have my bot change all your tags in a single run, so it would not cause you any trouble. Thanks for your consideration. --Gmaxwell 02:39, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

[QI]

Recently you reviewed and declined Image:Bryce Canyon Hoodoos 4 edit.JPG with the explanation "Next picture with the same - exaggeration." I was wondering what you meant by that. --Digon3 18:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

QI Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zygokaktus - kwiat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Jnpet 09:08, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jabłko - owoc.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chorzów - Skansen - Szopa na siano z Kobióra.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Jnpet 09:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Dog

The photo is not mine. :-) I just touched up the colors. David.Monniaux 20:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Male and female superb fairy wren.jpg

You previously voted in the FP candidacy of Image:Male and female superb fairy wren.jpg. This image has now been nominated for removal of its FP status. If you have not already done so, you might like to join the discussion at Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Male and female superb fairy wren.jpg. I'm notifying both pro and anti-voters. --MichaelMaggs 16:21, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Pomnik na pl. Andrzeja.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Łuskwiak nastroszony (Pholiota squarrosa).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Jnpet 10:59, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hell-Born - Baal Ravenlock 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bytom - Detal architektoniczny kamienicy - Twarz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Jnpet 03:35, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jarzębina - owoce.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--AngMoKio 12:28, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Please inform users of deletion of their images

If you delete sb's uploaded file, for whatever reason, please inform that person of the reason and fact. I was very disappointed to have to learn from another user that some of my images were deleted. Actually I see you have deleted nearly all of the images I uploaded recently; this is shocking - in many cases they were images that showed items we didn't have previously on Commons. I would like an immediate explanation. Your actions seem to be in violation of Commons:Deletion guidelines: Redundant or bad quality files never get speedily deleted. They have to be listed the usual way at Commons:Deletion requests and will only be deleted on a case by case basis.. Please restore my images, if you wish, we can discuss them on Deletion requests. Pozdrawiam, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 20:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

I have to echo the above. If an image has a somewhat questionable license status or it obviously highly non-useful... then perhaps we can error towards deletion if it is also not used. Piotrus' images, however, were fine while not fantastic photographs they could certainly be useful, and they are categorized and described so we can expect people to find them (though it would be nice if they were geocoded too). I am restoring them. --Gmaxwell 21:12, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. I know they were not perfect quality, but I upload lots of stuff as temporary placeholders until we get better quality variants. I tried geocoding but it looked too complex - maybe I'll give it another go.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 21:44, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Jasne, polski jest spoko :) Co do porzadku, calkowicie sie zgadzam (wlasnie skonczylem sortowac glowna kategorie...). Mam troche inne podejscie to Commons jednak: wrzucam wszystko moze byc choc troche pozyteczne. Lepsze marne zdjecie graffiti pod mostem niz brak zdjecia. Jak bedziemy mieli zdjecie ktore pokazuje to samo lepiej, to jasne, mozna te gorsze skasowac. Jasne, wiekszosc tych zdjec jest marna i samo to pierwszy przyznam - ale lepsze marne zdjecie niz jego brak. Czubek szpitala zza drzew np. jest lepszy od braku choc jednego zdjecia szpitala, a nawet jak ich bedzie wiecej to dopoki nie bedzie lepszych zdjec tych drzew ze szpitalem w tle, uwazam ze nalezy to zostawic. Co do opisu - napisalem co wiedzialem, i licze zawsze ze ktos bardziej zorientowany wczesniej czy pozniej rozszerzy opis. To jest w koncu idea wiki: zaczynamy (poza nielicznymi wyjatkami) od marnego szkicu, wczesniej czy pozniej skonczymy z featured jakoscia zdjec czy artykulow. Konczac, zwroc uwage ze twoje podejscie jest sprzeczne z zasadami commons (zlinkowalem wyzej): jesli zdjecie ci sie nie podoba, to nalezy zglosic do deletion requests i poinformowac uploadera, i po kilku dniach zobaczymy czy edytorzy uznaja, ze zdjecie nalezy skasowac. Zerknij, np. na Image:Tram Krakow old.JPG. Tragiczne, prawda? Tylko ze rok temu jak to wrzucalem to nie bylo zadnych zdjec tramwajów z Krakowa, a i teraz widac na nim pewne detale ktorych na nowszych, ladniejszych zdjeciach tego modelu (Image:GT-6 Fotka 097.jpg, Image:Man GT-6+B4 0565.JPG, Image:GT-6 Kraków Fotka 140.jpg) nie ma (drzwi z tego kata, tylne swiatla, itp.). Dasz gwarancje, ze to zdjecie jest calkiem bezyteczne? Upewnij sie, ze kazdy detal z 'marnego zdjecia' mamy w czyms lepszym, i dopiero wtedy kasuj, prosze.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 21:44, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Lestath, do not speedy delete bad quality images! Instead, comment here. Thanks, -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

File:AguileraDublin3.jpg

Hi!

Could you explain to me how a photograph taken by the own uploader in a live concert is "against [Commons] policy"?

Because the image in the headline has been deleted by you because of that. In the uploader talk page there's a warning, claiming the image was a copyright violation.

I'm sorry, but how could the guy be violating any copyright? I'm really confused about all of that.

Flávio, o Maddox ^go! 21:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

The image had a watermark that said "the pic says copyright Nirina Plunkett" which does not appear to match the uploader. Many images are uploaded as PD self but taken by someone else because some people think PD == anything they found on the web. The real question is why we only deleted one image out of many that probably have the same status[2]. We should probably keep all or delete on based on our judgement of the accuracy of the uploader's claims.--Gmaxwell 21:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Deletions

Hello,

Would you stop deleting images without proper procedure please. Thanks, Yann 00:50, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 43. TKB - Sierra Manta 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok ze wzgórza Chełm 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Szoltys (talk · contribs)

Please, I think that a Polish-speaking admin should talk with this user and check his uploads. I lot of them seem to be screenshots and other have source watermark. He told his is the author, but I'm not quite sure and I think a Polish speaker could handle this question better. Thanks. Dantadd✉ 14:13, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

P.S.: I sent this message to MesserWoland as well.

Quality image

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Koszutka - Pomnik rodziny.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Karol Stryja 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wróbelek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Lycaon 10:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Praha kostel SvVaclava.jpg

Thank you for your particular remarks to my first Featured picture candidate Praha kostel SvVaclava.jpg. I hope it could help me with my next snaps --Packa 06:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Normalsi - Mirek 'Koniu' Mazurczyk 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Kamienica na rogu Stawowej i Mickiewicza nocą.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WPKiW - Brama do ZOO rotated.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Myslovitz - 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DK Fanoe Windmill01.JPG

Thanks for your support! I didn't know that the image had been nominated until I was told that it had been promoted; it was a pleasant surprise. Cnyborg 20:25, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Lwowska Galeria Sztuki

... WOW ... Dech zapiera :)

Uwaga: podawaj też "licencję" obrazu (czyli PD-old). A.J. 08:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kosaciec 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lwów - Straż Pożarna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Lwowska Galeria Sztuki - Paul Merwart - The Flood.jpg

Czemu dopisałeś też Franciszka Żmurko jako autora... Obraz malowali wspólnie? A.J. 09:32, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

No ba... Ciężko oczy oderwać, ta pani na obrazie jest bardzo w stylu Żmurki ;) A.J. 21:43, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Commons:Geocoding

Hello Lestath, at the Geocoding project we have noticed that you uploaded a number of pictures from one of the less covered regions on earth. Maybe you could consider adding coordinates to some of your images. They will show up on the WikiMiniAtlas and the Google Earth Commons-layer. You can find instructions on how to add coordinates to your images at Commons:Geocoding. Thank you in advance! The Geocoding team --EugeneZelenko 14:55, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

QI

Hej, możesz nie oceniać grafik wikipedystów z pl wiki - to trochę nie ma sensu, bo ja właśnie chcę sprawdzić na ile medalowe grafiki na pl wiki są dobre. Część jak widać z naszych medali jest po prostu kiepska. Zależy mi właśnie na opinii ludzi spoza naszego środowiska. Przykuta 04:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

No jasne, poza tym to QI to czasem straszny POV :/ Przykuta 09:09, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Cybermania

Mozesz mi jakos przeslac te fotki na ktorych jestem? Herr Kriss 16:05, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Dzieki :) Herr Kriss 19:49, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Image Downtown Lviv

Dzień dobry!

Your photo of downtown Lviv is currently reviewed for QI at commons. I presume the image is stitched from several photos, and I suspect that the brownish tree at the left corner is blurred due to a certain way the stitching program handles the seam line. Does the tree look blurred in the original photo, and what software do you use for stitching? -- Klaus with K 14:59, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

P.S. sorry I ended up on your Polish talk page first, if you reply please reply here on commons...

dziękuję - I notice the blurryness is already there on the original photo. Looks like the camera is less sharp in the corners :-( -- Klaus with K 17:50, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abies koreana (szyszki).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - ul. 3-go maja 15 i 17 .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - DOKP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Katowice - Lilium.JPG

Hello Lestat,

the plant shown in the image above is not a lily (Lilium). Thus I have removed your description a while ago and placed the photo in the Category:Unidentified plants. You have restored the description now. Please don't place a wrong description. It would be rather helpful for a later determination, if you could describe where and when this plant has been photographed. Best regards, Denis Barthel 17:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lwów - Widok z wieży ratuszowej 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Muzeum Historii Katowic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muzeum Sułkowskich - Sala z galerią obrazów Petera Michała Bochúnia i innych.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zamek w Będzinie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Łódź - Pałac Izraela Poznańskiego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lwów - Katedra Ormiańska 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malbork - Baszta Kurza Stopa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sejm Śląski - Sala Marmurowa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

File:Olesko - Zamek 01.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olesko - Zamek 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hydrangea macrophylla.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

44. TKB

Image:44. TKB - Żywiec - Lestat at work.jpg ;)

Pozdro--Shannon5 17:51, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Category:Officina Ferraria Rudensia - Dymarki Cysterskie

To jakis odpust? Brakuje kategori poza lokacja... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 19:59, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Widze, ze kolega uprzejmosci ma tyle samo, co umiejetnosci kategoryzowania :( --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 19:28, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Mam lepsze rzeczy niz rozmowa na takim poziomie, bede wiedzial na przyszlosc ze pytanie sie ciebie o cokolwiek lub liczenie na grzecznosc jest bezcelowe. Zegnam pana,--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 19:39, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mahonia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Żywiec - Pałac Habsburgów.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Żywiec - Dzwonnica konkatedry.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Pieczęć Jagiełły.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Pieczęć Jagiełły.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 07:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lwów - Muzeum Historii Lwowa - Witraż.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Abies koreana (szyszki).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Abies koreana (szyszki).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 20:47, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - ul. Wilimowskiego.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WPKiW - ZOO - Surykatka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malus Floribunda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Ulica Moniuszki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Mite

Please reconsider your vote on this nomination as to avoid compromising our guidelines. Regards. Lycaon 15:55, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neon.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

QI

witam czy mógłbyś mi jakoś skrótowo opisać proces kandydowania grafik na Quality Images i jak wygląda głosowanie/ocenianie? niestety, mój angielski wysiada przy czytaniu oryginalnej instrukcji :( pozdrawiam Pudelek 21:51, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

dzięki za wyjaśnienie :) a jak to wygląda, gdy przy pierwszym etapie, czyli wypowiedzi, odezwie się kilka osób i opinie są podzielone? przenosi się automatycznie do głosowania, czy nie? rozumiem, że każdy moze przenieść zdjęcie do Consensual Review Promotion, nie tylko zgłaszający? i jeszcze jedno - jakie są ramy czasowe nominowania/odrzucania lub głosowania? czy grafika musi na jakimś projekcie być użyta? pozdrawiam Pudelek 15:04, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Silesia City Center (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Panorama z tęczą.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Świerklaniec - Rzeźba 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Yeltsin resignation.jpeg

Hi. Could you please explain why did you delete this image? It is copyrighted, but has explicit permission to use it soever. The only condition is that any reproduction or broadcasting contain a reference to the original source. This reference was specified. --Stopar 01:36, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

m-m-m??! --Stopar 13:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Why do you ignore my messages? --Stopar 14:40, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

It seems that you don't watch my talk page, so I move discussion here. Give me an answer, please.

It was signed to instant deletion. --Lestat 07:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Who did sign it? What was the reason? The only explanation I found was

22:57, 30 September 2007 Lestath (Talk | contribs) deleted "Image:Yeltsin resignation.jpeg" ‎ (copyright violation)

But there was no copyright violation -- links to the source and author's permission were provided, license type specified. What was wrong?? --Stopar 20:30, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrrhocoris apterus (Kowale bezskrzydłe).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - UŚ - WPiA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Proposal regarding Commons Photographers categories

Hi, You are currently using a Commons Photographer user template on your user page. It has been proposed to redefine the templates and a vote is currently on-going. If interested, I encourage you to participate in the voting process. -- Slaunger 13:19, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Opposing on FP

You may have the courtesy to state a reason when opposing on FP as per guidelines. Lycaon 18:21, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

FP delisting

Hello. This is a short notice to let you know I've proposed a featured picture of yours to be delisted. The nomination is here. guillom 20:36, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

The reasons why I proposed it to be delisted are on the page I linked right above. guillom 09:03, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Cieszyn

Cześć. Niestety według tych wnętrzy nie poznaję, o który kościół chodzi. W każdym razie dziękuję za fotki, które nagrywasz do Commons. Ubarwiają na pewno liczne artykuły na różnych Wikipediach. - Darwinek 21:53, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pławniowice - Park przypałacowy 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beskid Śląski - Widok w kierunku Ciśca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Pyrrhocoris apterus (Kowale bezskrzydłe).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Pyrrhocoris apterus (Kowale bezskrzydłe).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

-- Cecil 05:25, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Neon.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Neon.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

-- Cecil 06:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sanssouci - Angel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gdańsk - Mały Młyn.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escombo - Robert Ksiondz 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Złoty Potok - Dwór Krasińskich.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escombo - Jan Rogala.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

File:Lwów - Cmentarz Łyczakowski - Anioł.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lwów - Cmentarz Łyczakowski - Anioł.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Sculptor wanted

Hi, do you know the sculptor´s name of this beauty?

• and
• Beautiful woman, beautiful pic. Greetings Mutter Erde 19:37, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Beethoven piano.jpg

Hi, you just deleted Image:Beethoven piano.jpg, that had been erroneously tagged {{Cover}} by User:Christian Nurtsch. The template explicitly says "This template should only be used for obvious cases, and only where the contributor has explicitly claimed fair use; use {{Delete}} for others" but the user had not claimed 'fair use'. This is a new contributor and I was trying to help her understand the requirements and awaiting a response. Could you undelete this meantime? Thanks, --Tony Wills 10:38, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks :-) --Tony Wills 20:57, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Could you explain your opposition?

Here. Thanks in advance. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escombo - Arek 'Beno' Franosz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WPKiW - Skansen - 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rybnik - Kościół pw. Matki Boskiej Bolesnej.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Weedy scorpionfish

Hi Lestat, thanks for promoting the image of the Weedy scorpionfish on QI. After you promotion, that image seems to have disapeared. Can you help e figure out what has happened? Cheers. --Jnpet 19:47, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lviv - Arsenal - 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Nie zrozumiałem...

Witaj Pan! Nie zrozumiałem dlaczego Pan dokonał zmian licenzji do moich zdjęć (GNDF na PD)? Owszem nie mam do Pana pretenzij, chciałbym zrozumieć dlaczego?--Temporary 02:01, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reichskarte fur Urlauber 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Kamienice przy Pl. Wolności 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - 3-go Maja i Pl. Wolności.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Commons:Picture of the Year/2007

Hi, I'm writing to let you know that an image of yours that became a Commons Featured Picture during 2007 is now part of the 2007 Picture of the Year competition. If you have > 200 edits you are welcome to vote too. Thanks for contributing your valuable work and good luck. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Willa w Katowicach

witam. zaglosować zagłosuję, ale z racji swoich "umiejętności" językowych za długo się nie wypowiem :P Pudelek 11:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Neon.JPG

Sorry, I wondered a picture. I like too Image:Neon.JPG. Where did you take it. Really this picture is very very beatiful... SBM ^talk 14:49, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Портрет Елизаветы

Тебе делать нечего? Зачем ты снова залил фотографию со стеной и подписью? --Russianname 10:24, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gołębie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WPKiW - ZOO - Niedźwiedź Brunatny.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WPKiW - ZOO - Wielbłądy 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Problem z podpisem

Cześć. nie wiesz co się dzieje z podpisami na stronce z kandyturami QI? zamiast podpisu wychodzą tyldy i nie wiadomo od czego to zależy. Pudelek 22:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

to ja mam inne pytanie - jakie są w końcu wymagania dla zdjęć w QI - bo na polskiej wersji pisze 1600 na 1200 co najmniej. takie zdjęcia wrzucałem i kilka takich zdjęć dostało już QI, a tu nagle piszą mi, że są za małe, bo na angielskiej wersji pisze, że jest 1600 na 1250! Pudelek 14:16, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

multilingual caption

Hello! I am translating some quality picture captions in French these days. Unfortunately, I don't speak Polish. Is it possible for you to add an english caption to this image? Thank you very much in advance.--Berru 20:31, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viburnum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kraków - Herb.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tagetes erecta 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I look like a bit underexposure, though good watery taste and very nice detail of flower. _Fukutaro 11:08, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lwowska Galeria Sztuki - Jacek Malczewski - Pithia 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Kamienica przy Pl. Wolności 02A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Beskid Śląski - Widok w kierunku Ciśca.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Beskid Śląski - Widok w kierunku Ciśca.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 22:04, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Małe pytanko

Cześć, mam takie małe pytanko. Nie mówie zbyt dobrze po angielsku, a pod moim zdjęciem nominowanym do QI był komentarz w którym nie rozumiem zdania: "But sadly, these images has serious C/A". Mógłbyś mi to przetłumaczyć, żebym wiedział, co jest nie tak? Z góry dziękuję. --Wisnia6522 07:21, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Aha, ok, dzięki wielkie. --Wisnia6522 21:27, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Valued images nomination

Hi Lestath, Thank you for test nominating a valued image candidate. Actually we are in the process of closing all test nominations in a few hours and clear the nominations page until the official opening at June 1 0:00 UTC. I will therefore shortly "close" your nomination as "undecided", which means it ends up in Category:Undecided valued images candidates. Click on the link to see instructions on how you can re-nominate your candidate after June 1 0:00 UTC. I hope this premature closure does not scare you off, and I hope to see you back for the grand opening. Cheers, -- Slaunger 21:24, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Łódź - Kościół pw. Zesłania Ducha Świętego - Wnętrze 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vilnius - Panorama 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice panorama from a good angle - Peripitus 10:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Szanowny Panie,

zdaje się, że zdjął Pan fotografię obrazu Georga Raaba przedstawiającego portret cesarzowej Elżbiety (Galeria Lwowska).

Czy byłaby możliwość wykorzystania Pana pracy na okładce książki?

Byłabym wdzięczna za szybką odpowiedź. Bardzo Pana proszę.

Mój mejl: 1gr@nieszuflada.pl

Justyna Radczyńska

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wilno - Pałac prezydencki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments In spite of a slight distortion of some horizontal lines, this is certainly a QI. Can you add a geocoding, please? -- MJJR 20:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papaver somniferum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI quality Lycaon 20:49, 13 June 2008 (UTC) Is "Quality Image quality" a legitimate "Quality Image 'Quality Review'"? -- carol 22:10, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rudy - Aaron.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The brick background isn't very flattering, but not like that's something the photographer can change. A slight blur but otherwise well done. --Calibas 18:52, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stained glass..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Previous reviews

•  Support Choosing a VI for a category like this where there are many good options is always going to be difficult. I support this image because it meets all the criteria and has a few awards too. --Inkwina (talk • contribs) 11:57, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support =>

Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:05, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lviv.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Mbz1 (talk) 02:17, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support =>

Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vilnius - St. Casimir's Church 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could use a slight clockwise rotation. --Calibas 18:55, 20 June 2008 (UTC) #!Corrected --Lestath 00:24, 21 June 2008 (UTC) Promoted. --Calibas 18:56, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baranów Sandomierski - Krużganek 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It`s tilted. --Sfu 14:58, 21 June 2008 (UTC) Corrected and promoted --Berthold Werner 06:18, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Obelisk Orłów Śląskich 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some chromatic aberration but it's not an issue for me since it's otherwise fine. --Dilaudid 17:48, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Geocoding

It may be helpful to you to know that 0.1" of latitude corresponds to 3 m on the surface of the earth. Longitude is similar except near the poles where 0.1" is less than 1 m. In most cases, more precision is not useful and adds clutter. Thank you for geocoding your images. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 04:30, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pergamon Altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Yay, yet another quantum phenomenon! MER-C 13:02, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support All looks good. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:57, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support

=> Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 22:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

w artykule o zespole parkowo-palacowym w plawniowicach znajduje sie zdjecie opatrzone podpisem "dom kawalerow". Wg mojej wiedzy zdjecie przedstawia jednak palacowa wozownie. pozdrawiam

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kráľova hoľa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Question Should this be in the more specific category Category:Peaks in Slovakia?
 Info Done. --Lestat (talk) 10:16, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

•  Support Meets the criteria. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:01, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support

=> Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 23:42, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Gmach Politechniki Śląskiej 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like the perspective and angle of this shot. Well focused and good depth of field, as well. -- TheWB 12:26, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Skwer przy Pomniku Powstańców Śląskich 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice shot. --Sfu 06:50, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Teatr Śląski im. St. Wyspiańskiego 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Unfurtunnally is there a wire in the image. --Kolossos 11:29, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bytom - Ul. Stanisława Webera 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Kolossos 11:29, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Silesia City Center.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support the surrealistic atmosphere. --Foroa (talk) 13:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support

=> Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:24, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Moltkestrasse Katowice

Witam Szukam ulicy w Katowicach Moltkestrasse 32, lata 1940-1945 oraz Szkoły Podchorążych Rezerwy Piechoty w Katowicach lata 1935-1936 jeśli wiesz coś na ten temat odpisz na aligatormp @ wp.pl Pozdrawiam Maciek

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Edyta Geppert.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The image page has no information about where the image was taken. I would like to have that added. Besides that it fulfills all the VI criteria. -- Slaunger (talk) 23:41, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Geotaged --Lestat (talk) 13:45, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
    • Well thanks. Soryy for being such a bother, but actually what I had in mind was also that it was noted in the description that is was a concert held at "X" place, as I think that adds value. It is not evident from the position on Commons what the place is (except that I see it is a building). -- Slaunger (talk) 21:26, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
      • I added some informations in polish. --Lestat (talk) 12:06, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
        •  Support Good. Now, the information is there, and can be translated to other languages if needed. -- Slaunger (talk) 10:06, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support

=> Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:49, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Pomnik - Witkacy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good for QI --Pudelek 12:34, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Question

Dear Lestath, could you point me to the page where I can find all images on Wikimedia Commons? I have shopped for images for some articles I have contributed to on Wikipedia but I get them from other Wikipedia pages. It would be more helpful if I could go to the source of all pictures but I don't know where to find that. For instance, I looked on the page Valued Images but there is no link there to point me to all valued images that exist, only the valued image candidates. If you can help, I'd appreciate. Thanks! NancyHeise@aol.com (talk) 19:03, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bytom - Róg ul. Piłsudskiego i ul. Drzymały 01edit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kraków - Wawel - Orzeł Zygmunta Starego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good job -Pudelek 21:44, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Ul. 3-go Maja 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice image as well as place. --Sfu 17:27, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 6.FMC - Shannon - Marcin Rumiński 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Inspired portrait. --B.navez 17:50, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Featured Picture Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Katowice - Silesia City Center (2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Katowice - Silesia City Center (2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Papaver somniferum flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• As picture doesn't show all plant, the scope should be more narrow. --Sfu (talk) 18:06, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment Scope would be changed into “Papaver somniferum flower” and I would support. Cultivated for opium or for makoć ? --B.navez (talk) 19:12, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
• I changed the scope to "Papaver somniferum flower" and status to supported (vide B.navez vote) --Lestat (talk) 08:02, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

   Comment I agree this is probably B.navez' intention to support, but I am not keen with nominators voting on behalf of reviewers and changing the status. I will contact B.navez and ask for confirmation. In the meantime I have changed the status back to nominated. It is not that I think you are acting in bad faith, it is just to avoid any future confusion about this nomination. ;-) -- Slaunger (talk) 19:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

•  Support as claimed above --B.navez (talk) 02:32, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support

=> Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 23:28, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kwiat Dalii.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me, beautiful flower/picture. --Eusebius 17:53, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Kościół pw. Św. Piotra i Pawła 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful, the choir is slightly out of focus but I guess it is unavoidable, and it looks ok to me. --Eusebius 20:17, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Commons:Picture of the Year/2008/Preparation

We are starting the discussion on POTY 2008. Would you like to join? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:59, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Kościół NMP - Gargulec 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good exposure, nice composition. Vassil 21:25, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

for my information

For my information, can you explain me what do you mean by bad color balance ? Thanks. Fabienkhan (talk) 17:55, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

the critic is clearer like that, thanks. Much more useful than the previous one. Fabienkhan (talk) 21:27, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Kościół Św. Piotra i Pawła - Witraż 01A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Opava - Slezské Divadlo 01.jpg

witam. faktycznie na tym zdjęciu widać szumy. ale przy ISO-80? bardzo dziwne. nie da się tego odszumić? --Pudelek (talk) 09:01, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Mała hala Spodka 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Raduň Chateau.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  (temporary) oppose Nice colours. Can you geolocate it please? --Eusebius (talk) 14:42, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment Geotaged. --Lestat (talk) 13:15, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me! --Eusebius (talk) 13:40, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>

promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 12:27, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Kwiat Dalii.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Kwiat Dalii.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Benh (talk) 19:58, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gliwice - Poczta 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Mbdortmund 20:32, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hradec nad Morawicą - Czerwony Zamek 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments interesting picture --Pudelek 08:51, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Prośba o pomoc

Cześć. sorry że Cię męczę, ale moja znajomość angielskiego nie pozwala mi rozwikłać o co chodzi w tym tekście: "It would be nice if you would add a heading to the geocode. That gives a nice pointer on Google maps/Google earth." - chodzi o tę grafikę [3]. Geocoding jest, to co mam z tym jeszcze zrobić? wiem że gdzieś szło dodawać zdjęcia bezpośrednio na mapę, ale jak to zrobić itp. to nie mam pojęcia. pozdrawiam Pudelek (talk) 08:01, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

widzę, że coś dodałem pod tym zdjęciem. czy o to chodziło? po ja w sumie nie widzę różnicy. pozdrawiam Pudelek (talk) 12:46, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

This is a result of an automated translation. I hope it is understandable and that I am not offending anyone, because I have no idea what the following means ;-) :

Co mogę poprosić o to oprócz istniejących lokalizacji {{location dms|50|9|15.6|N|17|0|40|E|heading:X}}, gdzie heading wskazuje w kierunku kamerate, może to być napisany jako numer 1-360 stopni (w północnej zera, zwiększona zgodnie z ruchem wskazówek zegara) lub przykład. SE na południowym wschodzie. -- Slaunger (talk) 12:59, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Hej. no moim zdaniem to też lekka przesada, która zresztą za wiele nie wnosi. szczerze mówiąc z tego tłumaczenia powyżej to zrozumiałem jeszcze mniej :D pozdrawiam Pudelek (talk) 13:35, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sosnowiec - Muzuem - Pałac Schöna 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not the most exciting subject, especially for those not reading Polish, but the quality is quite good. Geocoding is not formally required -- Alvesgaspar 11:11, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Ul. Opolska 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wire is rather disturbing but quality looks OK to me. --Eusebius 11:01, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gliwice - Panorama 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raduň - Castle 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Pławniowice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  weak support This is the only general sight we have of the palace, but exposure and horizontality could be better. I would have chosen "Pławniowice Palace" for the scope. --Eusebius (talk) 07:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Support - It's good for me --Pudelek (talk) 12:50, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment I suggest adding a heading parameter. Wow, that's a whole lot of decimals on that geocode; precise to the atom! -- Slaunger (talk) 20:28, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Result: 2 support

=> Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 07:48, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Drapacz Chmur 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments No concerns. --Stevenfruitsmaak 10:00, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siemianowice Śląskie - Pomnik Wojciecha Korfantego 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments sharp, good composition --Pudelek 19:55, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Katedra Chrystusa Króla - Krypta 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for QI --Massimo Catarinella 15:57, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - BRE Bank 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice light! --Calandrella 19:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Katowice - Kościół pw. Św. Piotra i Pawła 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Katowice - Kościół pw. Św. Piotra i Pawła 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer (talk) 19:14, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Kraków_-_Church_of_St._Francis_-_Stained_glass_01.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Kraków_-_Church_of_St._Francis_-_Stained_glass_01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Teofilo (talk) 22:37, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Świerklaniec - Rzeźba 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good composition --Mbdortmund 21:24, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ghillie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Fresh point of view --Foroa (talk) 20:39, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>

promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 09:14, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kraków - Church of St. Francis - Stained glass 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 23:31, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kraków - Juliusz Słowacki Theatre by night 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A good night picture of this building. --B.navez 17:52, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kraków - Galeria Krakowska nocą.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very nice --Pudelek 13:58, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kraków - Wawel - Kaponiera 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Massimo Catarinella 11:19, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of SS. Peter and Paul in Katowice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support OK for me. Beautiful pic. --Eusebius (talk) 12:31, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>

promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 09:44, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

MP

hej. piszę do Ciebie, bo zaczynam już głupieć. limit zdjęć na QI to zdaje się 2 Megapiksele. więc dlaczego nagle ktoś się zaczął czepiać do [[4]] zdjęcia? prawie 5MP, a tu ktoś mi pisze, że ma 1,1 MB. jest limit odnośnie "ciężkości" zdjęcia czy komuś coś się zupełnie pokręciło? Pudelek (talk) 19:30, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Kraków - Church of St. Francis - Stained glass 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Kraków - Church of St. Francis - Stained glass 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer (talk) 21:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Raising the bar

Hi Jan,

You might want take a look at this discussion -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:16, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WPKiW - Ogród Japoński 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I don't know what is japanese at this garden, but the photograph is QI. --Berthold Werner 17:33, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kraków - Kościół Świętej Trójcy - Kaplica Myszkowskich 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good picture of a church interior despite the spotlight reflections. Vassil 12:04, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nakło Śląskie - Pałac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 18:10, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kraków - Sukiennice 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Plus: panoramic view, nice straight perspective. Minus: colour saturation a bit strong, blue sky starts to look artificial, the people on the left distracting.--Tango7174 00:24, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Ul. Warszawska 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice, even if windows don't seem to be perfectly aligned. Maybe it's cables which causes this impression --Pom² 14:52, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WPKiW - Skansen - Chałupa z Krasów.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image, some brightness correction needed --Twdragon 17:30, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rudy - Kościół Św. Marii Magdaleny 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Twdragon 21:46, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WPKiW - Skansen - Kapliczka 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kraków - Wawel Cathedral 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kraków - Światowid ze Zbrucza 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your edit of my comment on QI

You probably meant well, trrying to clarify with this edit. The first insertion of an oppose is certainly valid (as moving to CR implies an oppose), my comment however was deliberately not marked as an oppose to avoid early closure and to indicate that it is a minor fixable issue. --Dschwen (talk) 22:00, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Ul. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like the use of shadows. --Eusebius 16:22, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kraków - Collegium Iuridicum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Ul. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice image - crisp and clear. It's a shame about the street furniture (especially the light), but otherwise a very nice image. Promoting before Eusebius says he doesn't like the tree :p Mattbuck 18:48, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Dzień niepodległości 2008 - 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The strength is in the red, the faces look almost like CGI, these two feature are IMHO srtong enough to consider this as a color category image. Gnangarra 11:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Casiña da Moura - Encoro das Maus de Salas - Muiños - Ourense.jpg

I tried to correct again the noises, but the result is not good, I believe, Culd you review again the image please? Thank´s for your time. --Lansbricae ^{(Ti dirás)} 10:56, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Yes, your edition is so good. When I read your message in my talk page I don´t understand nothing and think you are saying me, better if I job in a Polish Bank. :-). Later I saw your edition and think that you wrote a wrong link to the image. Now I'll try learn to do seems to you, with others images... Thank´s for your edition. --Lansbricae ^{(Ti dirás)} 19:34, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nakło Śląskie palace.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment - The scope is too generic, the palace should be identified and the photo geotagged -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:51, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

•  Comment Photo is geotaged and in Nakło Śląskie is only one palace. --Lestat (talk) 14:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
  •  Comment OK, but does the palace have a name? If not, I guess "Nakło Śląskie palace" would look more natural for a scope. Other criteria ok. --Eusebius (talk) 17:45, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
    •  Comment Maybe Donnersmarck Palace in Nakło Śląskie? --Lestat (talk) 21:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
      •  Question Is Donnersmarcków the Polish name? If so, "Donnersmarcków palace, Nakło Śląskie"? --Eusebius (talk) 22:47, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
    •  Comment No, it is name of german family and this scope is not so good. I change it to "Nakło Śląskie palace", ok? --Lestat (talk) 10:48, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me. --Eusebius (talk) 11:13, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>

promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 12:51, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Bazylika Św. Franciszka 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. --Eusebius 23:13, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Stole your user page template

I sort of "borrowed" your user page template, because I liked it - hope you don't mind? --AlexanderKlink (talk) 22:52, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casina da Moura - Encoro das Maus de Salas - Muinos - Ourense - Lestat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments acceptable quality. Lycaon 20:32, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helsingør - Harbour.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. Lycaon 20:40, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Link between photographers page

Hello.

I have made a topic called "More good photographers" on my user page. You could create a similar topic on your user page and you could include me in it. --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:36, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Bazylika Św. Franciszka 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. I wonder why it wasn't promoted the first time -Alvesgaspar 20:41, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gliwice - Katedra Św. Piotra i Pawła 01 - Ołtarz główny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice picture. A bit soft but well within QI standards -- Alvesgaspar 11:38, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Biblioteka Śląska 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good perspective and exposure. --PieCam 20:33, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Katedra - Kaplica 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Acarpentier 17:36, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

FOP

Hi there. I won't bother you with the pictures you've nominated for QI, but from what I understand of the Polish FOP (COM:FOP#Poland, [5]), it is limited (in the case of a "freedom" acceptable on Commons) to "roads, streets, squares or gardens" (see article 33). --Eusebius (talk) 07:41, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Zdjęcie roku

Witam. usiłuję zdobyć token do głosowania, ale coś mi nie wychodzi. zgodnie z instrukcją wpisuję adres http://stable.toolserver.org/poty/vote?action=token&wiki=pl.wikipedia.org&username=Pudelek, ale wyświetla się tylko error file not found. Nie wiesz może czy ja coś robię źle, czy jest jakiś błąd? pozdrawiam --Pudelek (talk) 11:39, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lviv - Roman-Catholic Catedral of St. Mary - Stained glass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok imho --Berthold Werner 12:48, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kraków - Kościół Świętej Trójcy - Nawa główna 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you please add Geo location --Berthold Werner 10:36, 22 January 2009 (UTC) Done. --Lestath 11:07, 23 January 2009 (UTC) OK --Berthold Werner 11:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)  CommentVaults are quite blury (due to perspective correction I suppose), and overexposed walls and archs on the left. --Coyau 14:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Important proposal

I wrote a proposal for equalizing the different picture formats on FPC Please have a look. Best regards --Richard Bartz (talk) 20:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

witam kuzynie nie wiem cz bedziesz mnie jeszcze pamietal przypadkowo znalazlam twoje zdjecie pozdrowienia ania z koszutki

hi

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toruń - Old Town by night 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Attractive night view. --Iotatau 09:48, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice - Rynek 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. Maedin 11:08, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toruń - Poczta Główna 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

De-adminship warning

Deutsch | Español

Dear Lestath. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you

Belorussian Girl in Santorini - Greece.jpg

I'm sorry but File:Belorussian Girl in Santorini - Greece.jpg is the correct name because the girl is Belorussian, so File:Russian Girl in Santorini - Greece.jpg have to be delete. Thanks, Jacopo Werther (talk) 22:33, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you so much. You have a lot of very nice pics. Cześć, Jacopo Werther (talk) 22:41, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toruń - Leaning Tower 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments interesing subject --Pudelek 08:29, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toruń - Baszta Gołębnik 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Marcok 14:30, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zabrze - Poczta Główna 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Marcok 14:30, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kraków - St. Mary Church 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 09:09, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Photographers Blackbelt

		THE PHOTOGRAPHER'S BLACKBELT
		I hereby award at you this Photographers Blackbelt for your outstanding and excellent pictures. --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:50, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toruń - Muzeum Okręgowe - Naczynie do ablucji 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good job --Cayambe 14:48, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toruń - Hotel Bulwar.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --George Chernilevsky 09:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

International Photoworkshop

Hello, motivated by the six Fotoworkshops of the German Wikipedia an international Photoworkshop in the Swedish Nyköping will be launched during the Easter Weekend 2010. Nyköping was chosen since Skavsta Airport is a Ryanair Base and very close to Stockholm. Further information can be found on Commons:Photoworkshop_Nyköping_2010.--Prolineserver (talk) 22:17, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Wykorzystanie zdjęcia na stronie www

Witaj,

Mam zapytanie, Chciałabym prawdopodobnie tymczasowo wykorzystać jedno z Twoich zdjęć panoramy Katowic (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Katowice_-_Panorama_z_tęczą.jpg) na stronie internetowej. Czy nie masz nic przeciwko ? pozdrawiam, Lilly M 13:50, 13 marca 2010 (UTC)

Old Katowice

Hi! Thanks so much for posting this photo - the building which is now Vision Express shop was, in the 1860's, Danzigers Conditorei. Albert Danziger, the owner of the business is my great, great... grandfather. I found the name and address (Friedrichsplatz) of the business in the 1910 Kattowitz address book, and traced Friedrichsplatz to Rynek. Although the facade has changed a little, the building has survived much better than its neighbours. If you have LizardTech DJVU you can see the 1867 photo at http://www.sbc.org.pl/dlibra/doccontent?id=252&dirids=1, otherwise I can email a copy to you, if you are interested. You can find me on english wikipedia. Thanks again -- Timberframe.

Dab Rudy

Hi Lestath,

I'm letting you know I've used one of your pictures on http://www.monumentaltrees.com/en/images/2822/. Tbc (talk) 18:11, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

File:CMM_-_Model_chłodniowca_typu_B-360.JPG

File:CMM_-_Model_chłodniowca_typu_B-360.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

79.237.163.206 08:07, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Lestath, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:55, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

De-adminship warning

Dear Lestath. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you Trijnstel (talk) 21:41, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Zdjęcia katowickiej moderny

Szanowny Panie, zgodnie z licencją Wikipedii pozwoliłem sobie wykorzystać kilka Pana świetnych zdjęć, które chciałbym również wykorzystać na wystawie w Muzeum Miejskim w Tychach - "Modernizm w województwie śląskim w latach 1922-1939"

Z uszanowaniem, Jacek Dębski Kustosz Działu Sztuki MM Tychy j.debski@muzeummiejskie.tychy.pl

permission to use image

Kia ora Jan we are seeking permission to use your image here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cybermania_-_Wii_players.JPG We are using the image in a video clip for an educational website. As it has a GNU licence on it we would have to watermark the image within the video with the url for the GNU licence. This often muddies the video and as such we're seeking permission to use the image without doing this. However we would of course acknowledge you and provide url's for the CC and GNU licences it is under, within our acknowledgements. Could you email me so we might discuss possibilities in a private forum.

Kind Regards Rachel rachel@cwa.co.nz

Zdjęcia lodowisk

Cześć! Widzę, że publikujesz duzo zdjec z roznych miast. Czy masz moze w swoich zasobach i moglbys opublikowac zdjecia lodowisk - chodzi mi o lodowiska z Opola, Bytomia, Sosnowca (albo tez innych). Jeśli to mozliwe to prosilbym bo brakuje takich zdjec. W razie czego podaję kategorię: Category:Ice hockey venues in Poland Pozdrawiam. --Lowdown (talk) 20:25, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

De-adminship

Cześć Lestath! It is with a regret that I inform you that, following our de-adminship policy, you had your administrator rights on Wikimedia Commons removed today by a Wikimedia steward.

I would like to use this opportunity to thank you for your efforts and contributions in making Wikimedia Commons what it is today (no big words intended!). If you'll feel like doing so at some point, please feel free to re-apply for adminship at COM:RFA. Again, thanks for all the help you gave us, and (hopefully) see you back soon! odder (talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Lestath, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 16:27, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Use of a photo of Władysław Trebunia...

Hello,

I'm writing on behalf of an author here at W. W. Norton, who would like to include one of your photos in his upcoming book on the history of the violin. Can you write to me at jshreve@wwnorton.com to make sure we have all the details correct? Thank you very much for your time.

Warm wishes, Jeff Shreve

WLM Barnstar

My image got nominated for the international finals of Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, the world's largest photo contest!

Location?

Hi Lestath - do you have a location for File:Jarzębina - owoce.JPG, please? Locations greatly increase the value of images. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 10:49, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Barbara Blida

• Czy zamierzasz jeszcze kiedyś odwiedzić Siemianowice Śl. ? Jest może szansa na fotkę jej grobu ? Pleonazm9084 (talk) 08:24, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

PN

Mam pewne pytanie. Planuję wrzucić grafikę zawierającą układ klawiatury według jednej z polskich norm (PN-97), który nie wszedł w życie. Czy grafika będzie zgodna z regulaminem i nie będzie to naruszało praw autorskich PKN? --CzakNoris (talk) 14:38, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

WLM-HU potos

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Lestath, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Lestath, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Вікі любить Землю, 1–31 травня / Wiki Loves Earth, May 1–31, 2014

Вітаємо!

З 1 по 31 травня 2014 буде проходити конкурс «Вікі любить Землю», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Цього року конкурс став міжнародним. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in english) 20:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Superowe Galeria, Witam Nordmensch (talk) 22:02, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

New level {{User PH-4}}

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 16:05, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

PH-4

This user is able to take professional quality photographs.

Global account

Hi Lestath! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:18, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	For the panoramic view of old city of Lviv! Aarp65 (talk) 18:30, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2015 в Україні. Увага! Опитування / Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Ukraine. Survey

Вітаємо!

8 липня 2015 року вийшов закон №122-ЗРК/2015 «Про внесення змін до Закону Республіки Крим ”Про об'єкти культурного спадку в Республіці Крим”», яким об'єкти культурної спадщини Криму було визнано такими, що підлягають державній охороні Російської Федерації. Спираючись на це, НП «Вікімедіа РУ» та спільнота російських учасників вікіпроектів цього року проводить щорічний фотоконкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки» в Росії уже із Кримом у своїх конкурсних списках. Просимо висловитися щодо того, якою, на Вашу думку, має бути українська частина. Також Ви можете висловити Ваші ідеї щодо поліпшення конкурсу.Опитування за лінком / Survey is here.

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» / сторінка на Вікісховищі. 20:12, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

fotografia Katedry Na Wawelu

Witam,

chciałbym nabyć prawa do wykorzystania Pańskiego zdjęcia przedstawiającego Katedrę Wawelską na pocztówce z Krakowa. Uprzejmie proszę o kontakt.

Pozdrawiam Adam — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 31.179.115.241 (talk) 08:27, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Fotografie Katedry Wawelskiej

Kontakt do mnie to +48 502 421 985 Adam — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 31.179.115.241 (talk) 08:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Zapytanie o zdjęcie ze Lwowa

Cześć!

Widziałem na Commons, że byłeś kiedyś we Lwowie. Nie zrobiłeś przypadkiem zdjęcia Kopcowi Unii Lubelskiej? Z tego co widzę, to nie ma na Commons ani jednego zdjęcia współczesnego tego obiektu, same przedwojenne... Gdybyś miał coś do wrzucenia, byłbym niezmiernie wdzięczny. --Gower (talk) 16:49, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Červený Kláštor Monastery 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:25, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued image promotion

★ An image you created has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Dormition, Lviv.

-- ELEKHH^T 00:34, 17 March 2022 (UTC)