Commons:特色圖片候選

COM:FPC

This project page in other languages:

跳轉至評選區

特色圖片評選

歡迎來到特色圖片評選！社群將在此投票決定圖片是否會被選為維基共享資源最優秀的圖片之一，即特色圖片，每日圖片的影象便是從特色圖片中選取的。特色圖片是中文維基百科最令人感到印象深刻，也是最具百科性的圖片或圖表。諺語有云：“一畫勝千言。”特色圖片能夠讓條目的內容更加清楚豐富。如果你認為你已經創作或找到了一張可能有價值的影象，請把它加到“提名”部分。如果在10天后達成了共識，影象就會成功入選。

這裡列出了特色圖片的評選記錄，你也可以在下方檢視按時間順序列出的圖片：2004年、2005年, 2006年、2007年、2008年、2009年、2010年、2011年、2012年、2013年、2014年、2015年、2016年、2017年、2018年、2019年、2020年 、2021年、2022年 以及本月。

關於我們最好的照片的另一個概述，請參閱我們的年度評選。

你可以：

增加一個新提名
查閱影象評估指南
瞭解現在的評選
重申特色圖片
檢視目前的除名
閱覽特色圖片評選標準
參閱目錄

規範

投票週期為10天，之後的投票將無效。
歡迎匿名使用者提名並參與討論。
提名者可以隨時撤回提名。
每個註冊使用者都可以投票，匿名使用者的票將不統計。
如果提名5天后沒有支援票，該提名將以不通過提前結束。
如果提名5天后有至少10個支援票，且沒有反對票，該提名將以通過提前結束。
通過的標準：至少7個支援票，支援票與反對票比例大於2/1。
完成的投票儲存在存檔。
參見投票結束後操作指引。

提名

如果您認為您已經找到或拍攝了一張可能符合標準的影象，並使用了適當的影象描述和版權標記許可，那麼請按照如下步驟操作：

1. 按照括號內的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名影象名稱.jpg）在下方的文字框輸入影象名稱，然後點選“建立新提名”按鈕。

如果本次提名為第n次提名，請按照括號內的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名影象名稱.jpg/2）展開操作。

所有的新圖片集提名頁面都應按照括號內的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My nomination）進行。

2. 按照編輯頁面上的說明進行操作並儲存頁面。（注：開啟編輯頁面後，您在上方看到的“LIST OF NOMINATIONS (Put your nominations to the TOP of this section (after this comment))”大意為“這裡是候選圖片列表，請將您的提名提交到本節的頂部（在本行後）”；您在下方看到的“DO NOT ADD NEW NOMINATIONS ABOVE THIS LINE, BUT ON TOP”大意為“不要在本行上方新增新的貼士（除了頂部）”。）

3. 點選此處並按如下格式在圖片候選區的頂端加入新內容：

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名影象名稱.jpg}}

推薦操作：請COM:FP的列表處新增一個分類。

可選操作：如果您不是影象的建立者，請通知在他/她的討論頁添入“{{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~”（不含括號）。

注意調校你的熒光屏

光暗度

在討論影象的光暗度的時候，投票者有必要知道他們的螢幕顯示有否被適當地調整。不同的螢幕顯示，它們顯示陰影細節的能力亦大有不同。旁邊為一幅畫了四個暗灰色的圓圈的圖片。如果您能辨明其中三個（甚至四個）圈子，那表示你的的螢幕可以正確地顯示陰影細節。如果你只能夠看到三個以下的圈子，你可能需要調整你的螢幕以及/或者電腦顯示設定。一些顯示裝置可能無法被調整至觀察陰影細節的最理想度數，故此請在投票的時候考慮這點。如果可行的話，也可以考慮把它打印出來。

色彩度

在伽瑪調整的螢幕顯示上從幾尺之外觀看右圖，圖中四個不同顏色的圈子會自然混入背景之中。如果他們完全跟背景混合，你則須要調校你的伽瑪設定（在電腦的輸出設定上，而不在於螢幕顯示），直到它們能彼此融合。調校的過程也許會非常困難，然而輕微的偏差並不是致命傷。未能更正的個人電腦顯示通常會顯示出比背景深色的圈子。請注意，在液晶顯示（無論膝上電腦或者平面螢幕）上觀看圖片，你的觀看角度有很大可能影響螢幕上的影象質素。如有需要，請點選影象以獲得更多技術資訊。

Featured picture candidates

File:Fighting for the Dunghill - or - Jack Tar settling Buonaparte.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Jan 2025 at 12:31:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Posters and advertisements
Info created by James Gillray, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Info Satirical caricature about the fight between the British and the French over Malta. The cartoonist has misplaced Malta, possibly confusing its location with that of Cyprus.
Support -- Yann (talk) 12:31, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Russula (Russulafamilie) 24-10-2024. (d.j.b).jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Jan 2025 at 05:50:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Russulaceae
Info Russula, oddly shaped Russula in decline. Focus stack of 146 photos. This Russula dies back in beautiful colors and contributes to biodiversity.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:50, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:50, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reconnaissance de la Terre Adelie, le 20 Janvier 1840.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Jan 2025 at 01:47:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical
Info created by Léon Sabatier after Louis Le Breton and Auguste Étienne François Mayer - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:47, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:47, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really interesting and beautiful artwork Cmao20 (talk) 03:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:13, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Табла во црквата во Тресонче (2).jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 23:28:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Doors
Info created by Petrovskyz – uploaded by Petrovskyz – nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:28, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:28, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think this motif has potential but it seems tilted and not centred, so I'm not sure the composition is quite there for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 03:04, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've corrected the tilt and centred the picture.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:005c Greater flamingos courtship display in the Camargue during mating season Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 21:57:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:57, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:57, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice posture, interresting light and high level of detail of a bird in its natural environment. I've suggested a crop (see image note) with less empty space around -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thank you for the review, crop done, new version uploaded -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:54, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent light and superb quality Cmao20 (talk) 03:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Proboscis bats (81721).jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 21:20:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Order_:_Chiroptera_(Bats)
Info Proboscis bats (Rhynchonycteris naso), also known as long-nosed bats, resting on a branch during the day in Alajuela Province, Costa Rica. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:20, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:20, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note - There is another active nomination of this subject, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Proboscis bats (81745).jpg. It was suggested there that this shot may be preferable. As it's a totally different photo (not another version of the same photo), it does not quality as an alternative in the same nom. Figured I'd just nominate it separately to see what happens. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:20, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support They are both FP. If the consensus is that only one should be promoted, I'll change my vote and strike my support on whichever has the least support. Cmao20 (talk) 21:53, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support These bats look like natural branches of a tree. And I find this picture better than the other one, due to a more appealing light, higher level of detail, and a great background, that makes the subject standing out visually. -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I prefer this one and -as I would do with an alt- oppose the other one. Poco a poco (talk) 22:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:EP2D-0165 Ploschad Tryokh Vokzalov Station Moscow 2023-06-10 4424.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 19:48:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
Info I thought this was a great composition, with the sweeping curves of the platform and the Moscow Leningradskaya Hotel, an important and historic landmark, in the background. Created by Mike1979 Russia – uploaded by Mike1979 Russia – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simply stunning! Wolverine X-eye 20:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. I agree the composition is well balanced, and find the light compelling -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:09, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:07, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yaqub Qomarudin Dibiazah (talk) 11:04, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agama bibronii, Batna Province.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 18:02:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Agamidae (Dragon Lizards)
Info created by Blackmysterieux – nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good find, however, I had to correct the gallery for you, it would be appreciated if you could make sure that's correct in future. Cmao20 (talk) 19:52, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The shadows ruin this image for me. Wolverine X-eye 20:27, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Калязинская колокольня вечером.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 16:14:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
Info The flooded bell tower of St. Nicholas Cathedral. Kalyazin. Tver region, Russia. All by Елена Нечипоренко -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 16:14, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 16:14, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Stunning motif and composition, but it seems tilted to me Cmao20 (talk) 19:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the water is not horizontal -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:51, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you were right. I fixed it Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 07:25, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stazione ferroviaria di Riomaggiore1.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 14:58:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train_stations
Info: Riomaggiore railway station, Liguria, Italy. Second nomination; redeveloped to improve fidelity. Also visible is the Via dell'Amore coastal path, which is quite prone to rockslides due to the nearly vertical bedding of the cliffs. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:58, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:58, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:49, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It looks Overprocessed -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:42, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Impressive; if it is overprocessed, it don't bother me. —Bruce1ee^talk 07:13, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rhön von Westen.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 10:35:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Hesse
Info The Rhön Mountains seen from the west (Horst). All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 10:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 10:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not just a large panorama but a satisfying composition too Cmao20 (talk) 14:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:08, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 18:47, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Three golden statues of the Buddha at Wat Mai with colorful clouds at sunset in Luang Prabang Laos.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 02:23:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
Info created – uploaded – nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:23, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:23, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful place, excellent light Cmao20 (talk) 14:34, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 16:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Proboscis bats (81745).jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 02:03:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Order_:_Chiroptera_(Bats)
Info Proboscis bats (Rhynchonycteris naso), also known as long-nosed bats, resting on a branch during the day in Alajuela Province, Costa Rica. Debated nominating File:Proboscis bats (81721).jpg instead (3 in frame, with slightly more detail), but I think I mildly prefer the composition of this one. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I will support both versions, but I think File:Proboscis bats (81721).jpg is better. More appealing light, higher level of detail, and I find the background great, because the subject stands out visually. These bats look like natural branches of a tree. -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:34, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: As I mentioned in my nomination, I was unsure which of two shots to put forward. Basile suggested the other one may be better, but there's been support for this one since then. As it's an entirely different shot, rather than another version of the same photo, it doesn't qualify as an alternative, so I've just gone ahead and nominated it in parallel here: Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/candidate_list#File:Proboscis_bats_(81721).jpg. I also put a pointer from that one to this nom. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:22, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain per my support here and comment above. Both are FP-level, but only one should be promoted, in my opinion, because very similar. -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I supported the another version about, they are too similar to become both FP in my opinion Poco a poco (talk) 22:41, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grover Cleveland by Charles Milton Bell.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 01:24:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1880-1889
Info created by Charles Milton Bell – uploaded and restored by Wcamp9 – nominated by Wcamp9 -- Wcamp9 (talk) 01:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wcamp9 (talk) 01:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not with this yellow tint. Yann (talk) 09:51, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The yellow is too prominent. Wolverine X-eye 20:23, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Black-and-white version

Support - Wcamp9 (talk) 03:56, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
May I suggest that you adjust the contrast? Yann (talk) 09:17, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose We should not get in the habit of treating "make historic image black and white" as if that's a good thing, or a default improvement. Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:51, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tortuga carey (Eretmochelys imbricata), islas Ad Dimaniyat, Omán, 2024-08-15, DD 15.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Jan 2025 at 15:30:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Cheloniidae (Sea Turtles)
Info Portrait of a Hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata), Ad Dimaniyat Islands, Oman. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice face. Wolverine X-eye 18:39, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another one for the 'featured pictures that could be repurposed as memes' category. Seriously though, excellent quality and detail Cmao20 (talk) 20:55, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:52, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support What a look. – Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 18:46, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:59, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valère castle in Sion, Switzerland, Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Jan 2025 at 09:52:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Switzerland
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some technical limitations due to an old drone sensor but the overall composition, light and colors are beautiful to me. Also, this is a shot from a unique perspective that can't be reproduced because it's not possible to fly a drone there anymore due to a change of regulation (it was previously only possible with drones bellow 500g like the Mavic Air used for this) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:11, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Now that's a high vantage point. Wolverine X-eye 18:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 19:50, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:20, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. Excellent weather and superb composition from this special viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:37, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:04, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:55, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed very beautiful colours, light, and composition; we can excuse the technical limitations thanks to these virtues and to the special situation (it’s a pity about all these excessive drone regulations). – Aristeas (talk) 10:05, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 16:18, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Phasmoconus lynceus 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Jan 2025 at 08:47:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Conidae
Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:47, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 08:47, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty shell, usual great quality Cmao20 (talk) 14:11, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love them shells. Wolverine X-eye 18:41, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:21, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:04, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:53, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:57, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 10:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schwäbisch Hall - Altstadt - Salinenstraße - Ansicht von NNW (1).jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2025 at 13:37:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info I thought this was a superb composition with magical light. No similar FPs. created by Aristeas – uploaded by Aristeas – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:37, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:37, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 15:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 16:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good choice. Wolverine X-eye 20:42, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition with the water in front, mirror effect and good weather. (The blurred face at the right is fortunately very small, almost invisible, perhaps it was not even necessary.) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:41, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:06, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much for the nomination, Cmao20, and all of you for your support! – Aristeas (talk) 11:47, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 11:58, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:04, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 10:37, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice shot, was passing that bridge in winter. --Mile (talk) 11:47, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 16:20, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 00:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Бар-Бургазы. 4 июня 2017 года.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2025 at 12:41:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Siberian Federal District
Info created and uploaded by Alexandr frolov – nominated by AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:41, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:41, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition Cmao20 (talk) 13:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Really nice photo and composition, but IMHO too much saturation in the sky (with a cyan colour prevalence) makes it an ordinary one, sorry. Terragio67 (talk) 18:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:04, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Beautiful composition and impressive landscape. But I understand Terragio67’s concerns about the sky: these pure colours look somewhat artificial to me. – Aristeas (talk) 09:55, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:34, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:04.03 副總統前往花蓮瞭解災害情形及救援進度 - 53629407644.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2025 at 10:30:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Others
Info created by Shufu Liu, uploaded by 鐵路1, nominated by Yann
Info Rescue workers near the semi-collapsed ten-story Uranus Building on Xuanyuan Road after the 2024 Hualien earthquake.
Support Average quality, but can't be taken again, and a lot of wow. -- Yann (talk) 10:30, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--🚊。鐵路Railway ^Talk 11:01, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No, definitely not with that problem of perspective, which gives the impression that all the buildings are collapsing, while in fact there is only one in the center. But believe it or not, I was working on a derivative version of this file on my computer to propose a "delist and replace" nomination on en-Wikipedia. In addition to this major problem of perspective, the sky is horribly dotted with many dust spots. The resolution is not great and I'm not sure that, even with these corrections, it can become a FP on Commons. Still, I'm going to upload another version soon, so you can compare. To finish, I'm not sure the file name, that translates into "04.03 The Vice President went to Hualien to learn about the disaster situation and rescue progress - 53629407644" really describes the image. I don't think the Vice President is a fireman :-) Best regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:31, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done: File:Rescue workers near the semi-collapsed ten-story Uranus Building on Xuanyuan Road after the 2024 Hualien earthquake.jpg -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:15, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

{{Support}} only perspective corrected version; Oppose original version. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:43, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AirshipJungleman29, your (double) vote will be invalid for the User:FPCBot we use here for the result. There is no alternative yet, thus I've fixed your (invalid) support. -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:48, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Now Yann has added the alt, AirshipJungleman29, you are free to cast your green support below. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:59, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose this version but would support Basile's version. The perspective problems in this one are the killer. If you're illustrating a collapsing building you really need to aim for realism. With no perspective correction it genuinely looks like all the buildings are damaged and leaning. Cmao20 (talk) 13:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose against, subject very interesting but "it would be possible to take a better photo" => there are some stain on the tract-sin. Olivier LPB (talk) 15:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Support --Yann (talk) 14:01, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:32, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better focus on the central theme.--Paracel63 (talk) 17:29, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:28, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:59, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:05, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:34, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much for the editing, Basile! – Aristeas (talk) 19:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 21:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:23, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:06, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:47, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Not candid at all with Ms. Yuval Gargir.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2025 at 10:55:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by Flavio Grynszpan (Flavio~ on Flickr) – uploaded by DGtal – nominated by DGtal -- DGtal (talk) 10:55, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- DGtal (talk) 10:55, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Only 1,844 × 2,305 pixels and I don't think the stains in the background are really professional -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:31, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but per Basile, it is a very beautiful portrait but quite low resolution for FP and the stains in the background are impossible not to notice once you've seen them. Cmao20 (talk) 13:43, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why is her neck divided into 2 colors? -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I assume it's a shadow, but the transition does seem somewhat abrupt. Strange processing. Cmao20 (talk) 13:51, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ultra-realistic AI work? (And there's a similar "abrupt shadow" under the nose). Compare the shadow on the cheek and those ones, there's a huge difference. I don't think it's skin pigmentation either, the surface is too large -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:03, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's a 2012 image taken during a professional workshop (read the technique details in image description). It was probably a mistake to nominate this, but it isn't AI. DGtal (talk) 14:10, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I read the description but this description doesn't explain this weird shadow. Note that we also meet fake images here sometimes.

It's not AI because we can find other photos associated to this name, on the web. But please also add {{PR}} on the file page.

The odd thing also is that the shadow is on the skin but not on the shirt. It really doesn't look natural to me -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose after 2 days, until the riddle is solved -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question Do people have eyes like this? Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:00, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is certainly a softbox or reflector behind, but the big mystery for me is really this zebra stripe, which clearly seems artificial, unless it is something unknown that I would like to discover. Huge café au lait spot? Unlikely. Then, if it's a technical issue of post-treatment, the use of this picture on Wikidata, Wikipedia, etc. can be quite embarrassing for the person. -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Lighting is not an ideal one. Wolverine X-eye 20:43, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Howlett (Isambard Kingdom Brunel Standing Before the Launching Chains of the Great Eastern), The Metropolitan Museum of Art - restoration1.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2025 at 23:49:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1850-1859
Info created by Robert Howlett, restored and uploaded by Bammesk, nominated by Yann
Info Famous photograph from 1857, listed in List of photographs considered the most important, which has also its own article: Isambard Kingdom Brunel Standing Before the Launching Chains of the Great Eastern.
Support -- Yann (talk) 23:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Iconic photo Cmao20 (talk) 01:36, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Question How do you get 5,616 × 7,334 pixels from the source? I find only 2,851 x 3,722 real megapixels. Was the image upscaled? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's a question for the original file uploader. Based on the uploader's contributions, perhaps at the time the source offered a higher resolution scan, or something along those lines, but I don't know. Bammesk (talk) 04:23, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Bammesk. @Crisco 1492: how do you get so many pixels? -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:34, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Basile Morin. The maximum resolution file on the zoomify was larger than the resolution available for download. They seem to have changed their algorithm for zooming since then, but if you compare the zoom at maximum resolution with the copy we have here, theirs actually goes even bigger. Now, whether that means they were drawing from a higher resolution file that isn't shared, or their zoom mechanism allows going past 100%, I don't know. All of my Met uploads from the period were at the highest resolution available in zoomify. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:55, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the answer. The restoration work is in my opinion very good. But not sure all these pixels are "real" / useful -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:39, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Excellent photograph and restoration. While I understand Basile's concerns, looking at the chain on his watch and the brim of his hat this appears to be reasonably sharp for the age at the current resolution. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:08, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:54, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 17:33, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 18:15, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Chris/Crisco 1492. – Aristeas (talk) 19:28, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:45, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skradinski buk waterfall – NP Krka – 2016.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2025 at 17:29:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Croatia
Info Skradinski buk waterfall on the river Krka in the Krka National Park, Croatia. Created by Skot – uploaded by Skot – nominated by Skot -- Skot (talk) 17:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Skot (talk) 17:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful waterfalls and nice light. Terragio67 (talk) 23:04, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:30, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:07, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:32, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:06, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Appealing composition and nice weather. A shame for the blown highlights that could be improved -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:42, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Basile Morin Thanks for the comment, I did some local highlight recovery in Lightroom - could you please check if it is better now? Skot (talk) 15:31, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Much better, well done! -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:34, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support WOW + good quality => support Olivier LPB (talk) 15:48, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:52, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice quality. Wolverine X-eye 20:41, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:55, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A study in shades of green. – Aristeas (talk) 19:26, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:08, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 10:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bateau à vapeur Rhone à aubes Belle Époque Rhône sur le lac Leman en Suisse.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2025 at 16:33:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Boats
Info It is the last steamboat built entirely in Switzerland, put into service in 1927 and renovated three years ago. Subject photographed from a fast ferry that had the right of way and on which I fortunately found myself in a favorable position. Created, uploaded and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 16:33, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 16:33, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light, good composition. --Yann (talk) 17:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:30, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:51, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 06:09, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:55, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Yann. – Aristeas (talk) 19:22, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:09, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 10:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa Capilla, París, Francia, 2022-11-01, DD 80-82 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2025 at 12:54:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Paris
Info Upper chapel of the Sainte-Chapelle, located in the medieval Palais de la Cité (residence of the Kings of France until the 14th century), Île de la Cité in the Seine, Paris, France. It was commissioned by King Louis IX and its construction began sometime after 1238 and the chapel was consecrated on 26 April 1248. The Sainte-Chapelle is considered among the highest achievements of the Rayonnant period of Gothic architecture, and it has one of the most extensive 13th-century stained glass collections anywhere in the world. Note: we have no FPs of this jewel (to me the jewel in Paris). Probably due to the fact that it's always packed with people and tripods are not allowed. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 12:54, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:54, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Extraordinary. Even better since you were not allowed to use a tripod. Cmao20 (talk) 13:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:22, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 16:39, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Great way to show this so-difficult-to-photograph marvel. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:51, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Very impressive!!! And per Cmao20 - Je-str (talk) 17:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unique stuff. Wolverine X-eye 19:23, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:07, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Finally an adequate, excellent photo of that wonderful chapel. Thank you very much, Poco! – Aristeas (talk) 09:57, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:34, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 16:04, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:55, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:03, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:06, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:10, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 10:41, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Walk Off the Earth performing at Caesars Windsor, 2025-01-03 31.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2025 at 11:51:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#Musicians_and_singers_performing
Info all by — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:51, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:51, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 16:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Some noise and not really sharp, but I like the situation too much. --XRay 💬 17:10, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks good. Wolverine X-eye 19:24, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 17:36, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 22:32, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:55, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:03, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not bad for a smartphone photo. --Ermell (talk) 22:33, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Callionima falcifera mounted specimen

Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2025 at 09:38:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Male dorsal
Male ventral
Female dorsal
Female ventral

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Sphingidae (Hawk Moths)
Info Callionima falcifera mounted specimen male and female created and uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus – nominated by Olivier LPB -- Olivier LPB (talk) 09:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Olivier LPB (talk) 09:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks to all butterfly lovers... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:57, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

and moth lovers, Monsieur. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:52, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:52, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:30, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:36, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:31, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 16:41, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:39, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Oh wow. Wolverine X-eye 19:27, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:48, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:55, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:03, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:19, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black-naped Monarch 0A2A8267.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2025 at 07:56:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Monarchidae (Monarch Flycatchers)
Info created and uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Kaim Amin -- Kaim Amin (talk) 07:56, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kaim Amin (talk) 07:56, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Too much empty space IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 12:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support A square crop would improve this one, but still good Cmao20 (talk) 13:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Info Kaim Amin, I have made a cropped version of this image that reduces the amount of empty space here. If you like this version and think it would improve this nomination's chances of success, I can add it as an alternative? Cmao20 (talk) 21:46, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Cmao20, Sure go ahead. I wasn't sure how to do it otherwise I'd have done it myself. — Kaim Amin (talk) 09:42, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support (would also support crop) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:03, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:59, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative version

Support . Pinging Kaim Amin, Poco a poco, Giles Laurent, Harlock81 to notify about alternative version. Cmao20 (talk) 13:25, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for pinging me. I prefer the first one, but my support is for both versions. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the ping Cmao20 but as Poco a Poco says I think the image needs lead room on the left. I would support an alternative with square crop that has more lead room to the left or an alternative with a crop with same format as the original but with less space at top and left or an alternative horizontal 4:3 format -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:09, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'd have left a bit more of space as lead room on the left but I still prefer this one. Thank you for the alt version, Cmao20 --Poco a poco (talk) 23:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a fan of this crop. If anything, a slight from to the left and the top of the original, but I prefer as is. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Kaaba during Hajj (edited).jpg (delist)

Visit the nomination page.

Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2025 at 06:43:09

Old (to delist)
File:The Kaaba during Hajj (edited).jpg
New (for replacement)
File:The Kaaba during Hajj - edited.jpg
(from original)

Info: Reasons to delist:

Wrong nomination and upload made by Aliphotography sockpuppet of indef blocked user ArionStar. See the original nomination here;
High compression rate and quality reduced (only 5.76 MB instead of 21.09 MB for the new version);
Non standard profile "Display P3" instead of the original "sRGB IEC61966-2.1".

Technical improvements made from the original photo taken by Adli Wahid, in addition to the consensual crop suggested by Fernando and SHB2000:

Tilt fixed, perspective improved in accordance with COM:I (check the left side of the Kaaba and the pillar on the right side of the picture for example);
Chromatic aberration reduced / removed around the light spots;
Minor noise reduction made with Topaz Denoise AI;
Very slight sharpening (unsharpened version also available in the history of the file page);
Improved file page presentation, better categorization, addition of wikisource. (More suggestions welcome);
Original profile restored.

Notifications to the previous participants: @Cmao20, SHB2000, Aristeas, BigDom, MZaplotnik, VulcanSphere, Terragio67, Thi, Famberhorst, and Yann: -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:43, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delist and replace -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:43, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace due to involvement with ArionStar sock. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:10, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace --Yann (talk) 10:26, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:53, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Poco a poco (talk) 12:23, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Better version Cmao20 (talk) 12:55, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Perfect now. Terragio67 (talk) 13:36, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Better. MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:05, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Better. --Famberhorst (talk) 18:34, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Thank you very much for the improvements, Basile! – Aristeas (talk) 10:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace I join Aristeas in thanking Basile Morin for the improvements. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:39, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poster for The Lucky Star (1899) by Dudley Hardy.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2025 at 21:48:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Music_and_Opera
Info created by Dudley Hardy – restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:54, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:27, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:30, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 17:55, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 22:31, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:55, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dotonburi River Namba Japan by Don Ramey Logan.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2025 at 20:18:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Japan
Info created – uploaded and nominated by - Don (talk) 20:18, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Don (talk) 20:18, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Probably not a QI. Mobile phone photo with several technical issues, including perspective, white balance, and blown highlights problems -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose very noisy + blown highlights. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but although the composition is nice, you'll struggle with a phone camera quality at night. This one has a very low level of detail preserved at full size. Also the camera only has a 50 megapixel sensor so I'm not sure where 90 megapixels came from. Cmao20 (talk) 13:27, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peace River Valley.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2025 at 14:27:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#British Columbia
Info: Peace River Valley in autumn colours; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:27, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:27, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful panorama and I love the subtle changes in the landscape across its span Cmao20 (talk) 18:25, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Oh my. Wolverine X-eye 20:36, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:54, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful panorama and also interesting due to the disposition of the clouds caused by the particular orography of the area. --Terragio67 (talk) 16:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:40, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I love the photo (and don't want to be pixel-peeper), but there are some stitching errors in the image (blurry areas). See notes (probably I haven't catched all of them). — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:07, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Reading the comments on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kiskatinaw River Bridge.jpg – it could be caused by some optical distortion of your lens, because there is striking difference of sharpness in the panorama. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  - You're correct, the unsharp areas are the artifacts of the lens, not the stitcher. I took care of the most problematic parts prior to nominating. I'm currently travelling with a small laptop, and, unfortunately, I won't be able to edit this immediately. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:47, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 22:31, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Until it's fixed. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 07:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:56, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 10:41, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kiskatinaw River Bridge.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2025 at 14:28:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Canada
Info: Kiskatinaw River Bridge, part of the Alaska Highway, British Columbia -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:28, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:28, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Very striking and good colours but the corner sharpness is not so good Cmao20 (talk) 18:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Subject in the shadow with overcast sky, dull light and bland colors, sorry. I don't find the picture very appealing, in state. There's no exif data in the file page but I guess the angle was very wide to create these strong distorsions. The structure itself is unimpressive to me -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Cmao. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The compo doesn't work for me, the lighting is not good either. Poco a poco (talk) 12:26, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:49, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pont Besalú 1.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2025 at 08:11:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Spain
Info created & uploaded by Mikipons – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 08:11, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 08:11, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition and light Cmao20 (talk) 12:46, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:44, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing light. --Rbrechko (talk) 19:04, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:24, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Appealing composition, interesting building and compelling light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:35, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 10:07, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:39, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral It's a pity that the sky is oversaturated a bit, IMO. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Beautiful view, good light. There are traces of rather coarse masking (with double contours) at the border of the sky in the top-right corner. – Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 18:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Temporary oppose. There is a significant amount of sky replacement. See notes. Some work was done because of cranes in 2008. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles. --Milseburg (talk) 10:47, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Perspective of columns Inside the Garbhagriha of Shri Ananthashayana Temple.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2025 at 04:55:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#India
Info C, U & N by iMahesh (talk) 04:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support For me this is a somewhat oppressive recording.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:12, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking perspective, good quality Cmao20 (talk) 12:45, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 13:01, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:41, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:34, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose whatever that thing at the back right is really distracting for an FP. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I attempted to remove it using Photoshop, but when I zoom in, the modification is visible. iMahesh (talk) 10:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting architecture, narrow space handled well with good perspective. Took the liberty to change the gallery link slightly because the photo shows the interior of a religious building. – Aristeas (talk) 10:08, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. iMahesh (talk) 10:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Церковь Преображения Господня, Ижма фото 13.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2025 at 15:55:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
Info Church of the Transfiguration, Arkhangelsk region created by Александр Антонов гугл-картовский - uploaded and nominated by FBilula (talk) 15:55, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FBilula (talk) 15:55, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Good photo but could do with a perspective correction. I still support because the subject and the colour contrasts are quite nice Cmao20 (talk) 16:19, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Image is in the right place, but please check the perspective and either centre the building or frame it to the side. --Fernando (talk) 15:06, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 11:00, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Central position isnt so good, somehow snow helped. I would stil coped a bit to get church biger. Love colors, like postcard. --Mile (talk) 12:08, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:19, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Fernando Poco a poco (talk) 12:34, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 15:49, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oriental hanging lanterns. Souk Haddadine, Marrakech Medina (سوق الحدادين مراكش).jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2025 at 13:49:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Lighting_devices
Info Oriental hanging lanterns. Souk Haddadine, Marrakech Medina, Marocco (سوق الحدادين مراكش). My shot. --Mile (talk) 13:49, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 13:49, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:37, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:28, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wowǃ --Terragio67 (talk) 19:22, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support MZaplotnik^(talk) 00:47, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:19, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, I know that this is a difficult shot, but it has too messy composition for what I would expect from the FP. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vintage Smile.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2025 at 21:13:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Traditions
Info Moriones Lenten Rites (Marinduque, Philippines). Men & women wearing the Roman soldier masks are the Moriones. The name comes from the Morion helmets, which were worn in 16th and 17th century Spain. Created by EMMAN A. FORONDA – uploaded by EMMAN A. FORONDA – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 21:13, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zquid (talk) 21:13, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Interesting contrast between mask and real, smooth and wrinkled. Fun photo.--Paracel63 (talk) 11:50, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like the idea but I think there is vignetting Cmao20 (talk) 13:08, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 15:42, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:24, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 11:26, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Image is nice, but vignetting and clarity/contrast is too harsh. Cropping to the left is too tight.--Fernando (talk) 15:08, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great idea. IMHO the vignetting is neither too strong nor disturbing. The crop is tight, but it serves a clear purpose, as in this case it intensifies the visual effect. – Aristeas (talk) 15:27, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]