User talk:Anatol Svahilec

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Anatol Svahilec!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 00:49, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Svahilec.jpg

[edit]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Svahilec.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Svahilec.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

LX (talk, contribs) 13:17, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Přihlaste své fotky do Czech Wiki Photo 2020!

[edit]
Czech Wiki Photo
Czech Wiki Photo

Milí fotografové a editoři projektů Wikimedia,

každý rok společně nahrajete na Commons tisíce svobodných fotografií. Chceme vám všem poděkovat a také vás ocenit. Vyberte ty nejlepší z vašich fotek a přihlaste je do 30. 10. 2020 do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo 2020! Soutěž je otevřená i úplným nováčkům. Autoři tří nejlepších fotek si odnesou vouchery do Foto Škoda a speciální wiki-odznaky. Přihlášené fotky bude hodnotit i Honza Rybář, držitel Czech Press Photo.

Baví vás focení pro Commons i mimo soutěže? Staňte se fotografem Wikimedie, půjčujeme fototechniku a proplácíme cesty - více na Fotíme Česko.

Těšíme se na vaše snímky!
Za spolek Wikimedia Česká republika
Jakub Holzer
jakub.holzer@wikimedia.cz -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:UstrhrbitovPlzen-AdolfPytlik 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anatol Svahilec (talk) 22:03, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olšany-HerminaLaukotova 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anatol Svahilec (talk) 21:00, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ahoj, narazil jsem na informace u obrázku, které asi nebudou úplně přesné. Autorem asi nebude archiv. Doplnil jsem tam, že je to fotografie anonymní. V takovém případě to ale také nikdo nemohl fotku uvolnit pod licencí CC-BY-SA. Myslím, že lepší je licence {{PD-anon-70-EU}}. Nebo je to jinak? zdraví --Gampe (talk) 08:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kazeto Přerov 1 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anatol Svahilec (talk) 16:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Gumruch (talk) 02:28, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:52, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there!
Thanks a lot for your confidence! :) Anatol Svahilec (talk) 00:55, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Josef II za hladu roku 1772 návštěvou v pražské nemocnici (Obrázkové dějiny národa českého, 1910).png seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Anatol Svahilec Poznámka k této reprodukci: jedná se o reprodukci obrazu z Cyklu nástěnných maleb v letohrádku Belveder, cituji: Císař Josef II. v Praze za hladu roku 1771, realizace: 1858, Kompoziční náčrt: Christian Ruben (1805—1875), nástěnná malba: Karel Svoboda (1824—1870), Třetí Rubenův ikonografický program z 1. 6. 1856; kompoziční náčrt schválil císař František Josef 6. 8. 1857. Gampe (talk) 15:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


File:Nela Boudová (2022).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kacir (talk) 10:58, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Božena Vrbatová-Krejčová.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abzeronow (talk) 16:02, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chybná licence

[edit]

Ahoj, upozorňuji na tebou nahrané obrázky do kategorie Album representantů všech oborů veřejného života Česko-Slovenského. Pokud to jsou anonymní fotky, pak patří pod licenci {{PD-anon-70-EU}}, těžko můžeš tvrdit, že anonymní autor v roce 1927 uvolnil svou fotografii pod {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Zdraví Gampe (talk) 20:15, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


File:Album representantů všech oborů veřejného života československého - 1927 - Martin Benka.png has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: uploader request deletion, copyright violation)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Martin wolf.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 16:58, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Album representantů všech oborů veřejného života československého - 1927 - Martin Benka.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prosfilaes (talk) 20:25, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Special:MyLanguage/== Fotografie z knih a jejich kategorizace ==

Zdravím. Do kategorií odpovídajících konkrétním knihám patří pouze fotografie, které se v těchto knihách nacházejí, nikoliv fotografie z jiných knih. Např. File:Josef Pačes.png patří do F. Soukup - Revoluce práce, ale nikoliv do T. Čapekː The Čechs (Bohemians) in America neboť srovnáním s originálem je vidět, že v dotyčné knize je sice podobná fotografie, ovšem dost odlišně zpracovaná. Až bude tuto knihu někdo např. zpracovávat pro Wikisource, bude potřebovat mít v dané kategorii správné fotografie. -- Jan Kameníček (talk) 00:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Opět zdravím. Tak jsem tedy tu kategorii z dotyčné fotografie odstranil, ovšem mezitím jsem našel stejný problém u jiné, a sice File:Bank of Europe, Český dům, Jan Hus Presbyterian Church - New York City.png. Tuto fotografii jste opět zakategorizoval do T. Čapekː The Čechs (Bohemians) in America, ačkoliv z této knihy nepochází. Tam se nachází o dost jiná fotografie, srovnat můžete zde. Kategorii jsem tedy opět odstranil.
Kromě toho to ale vypadá, že mylně uvádíte dokonce i zdroje, odkud fotografie pocházejí. Na tento problém jsem narazil u File:Josef L Lesikar.png, která zcela jistě není převzata z uvedeného zdroje, protože tam se tato fotografie nachází jednak v kvalitnějším provedení (srovnejte část nad hlavou) a jednak v jiném barevném odstínu.
Z výše uvedeného lze tedy předpokládat, že takových problémů může být více. Mohl byste je prosím všechny dohledat a uvést na pravou míru? Díky za pochopení. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 01:25, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dobrý den, uvádíte u těchto fotografií licenci CC-BY-SA. Jste si jistý, že tehdejší autor uvolnil tato díla pod touto licencí, která začala existovat před několika lety? :) --Palu (talk) 18:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Handover of the Novogeorgievsk fortress on August 19, 1915.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Handover of the Novogeorgievsk fortress on August 19, 1915.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

[edit]

English · français

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:Serbian campaign (1915). ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 18:27, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'll do. Thanks for the instructions! Anatol Svahilec (talk) 18:28, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:The Italian torpedo floating tank "Grillo", overcoming an obstacle in Pula attack, August 1918 (H. Rösch).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 22:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Categories need parent categories

[edit]

Thank you for creating a new category or categories. When creating new categories as you did at Category:Alfred Steinitzer, please try to include one or more parent categories:

Categories that lack parent categories appear on one of these reports:

Please make sure your categories aren't in these reports by adding categories to them.

Thank you. (This is a standardized talk page message)


 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 09:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]