User talk:Auntof6
|
2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 |
 First steps tutorialOur first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.  Getting helpMore information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
 Goodies, tips, and tricks
 Made a mistake?
|
Rd232 (talk) 14:29, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
«Вікі любить Землю» 2024: декілька днів до завершення української частини конкурсу!
[edit]
Вітання!
Нагадуємо, що конкурс «Вікі любить Землю» 2024 в Україні триває вже більше трьох тижнів і до його завершення залишилось декілька днів. У вас ще є можливість завантажити свої унікальні фото української природи до 31 липня включно.
Вже майже 65 учасників та учасниць завантажили майже 4 000 світлин.
Важливо! Цього року з міркувань безпеки до участі у фотоконкурсі приймаються лише фото, зроблені до 31 березня 2024 року (включно) для звичайних фото та до 23 лютого 2022 року (включно) для знімків з дронів та інших літальних пристроїв.
Ви також можете подати свої фото для міжнародної спеціальної номінації «Права людини та довкілля», яка має на меті збільшити доступ до знань про захист довкілля та вплив людини на природу. Детальніше читайте тут.
Статті у Вікіпедії можна допоповнювати не лише фотографіями, а й відео. Для цього також проводимо окрему спецномінацію, де відзначаємо відеоролики, які зображають пам’ятки природи України. Відео цього року можна завантажувати як звичайні фото, вони будуть враховані на спеціальну номінацію автоматично.
Просимо уважно ознайомитись з правилами конкурсу та звернути увагу на вимоги щодо якості фотографій.
Приєднуйтеся та отримайте шанс на перемогу!
Більше інформації про конкурс читайте тут. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю».
Message sent over by Aafi on behalf of OlesiaLukaniuk (WMUA) through MassMessage. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
cranach
[edit]
please consider that we always have one separate category strings for the artist and one separate string for the museum to find the files and not to hide them. To sort after museum is only a second sorting and not instead of categories by the artist. Oursana (talk) 02:54, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Oursana: I'm not sure I understand. If the image is in Category:Prints by Lucas Cranach (I) in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, then it's under categories for both the artist and the museum. Can you explain more what your concern is? -- Auntof6 (talk) 03:00, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- with Prints by Lucas Cranach (I) in the Metropolitan Museum of Art the file is not really in both, because you have to go to all museums to find a file, therefore please always use two seperate category strings for artist, for museum, for item (agony in the garden). My concern is not to hide the files. With prints exclusively sorted into cats "prints by artist in museum x" you have to search many museums to find a file. Therefore they must be in two category strings, as "prints by artist in museum x" is not really for both, the sorting is in packages by museum. This is common practise on commons and I ask you to keep the seperate strings. This extra category string is very necessary and helpful and there is no argument to delete them, like you did with the above shown example. For prints with up to 20 and more identically versions the exclusive sorting by museum, seperates the many versions of the same print, which you cannot spread over the museum's categories, they must also be together in the artist's cat as a second and main category string. --Oursana (talk) 03:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Oursana: I think I understand your concern, but I don't completely agree with it. If you look in Category:Prints by museum by artist, you will see many categories like this, so it is common practice.
- I think the category Category:Prints by Lucas Cranach (I) in the Metropolitan Museum of Art needs to stay, but maybe the files in it can be in subcategories of Category:Prints by Lucas Cranach (I). For example, there could be Category:Religious prints by Lucas Cranach (I). That doesn't currently exist, but it could be created. That would make it easier to find the print you want. -- Auntof6 (talk) 03:29, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Commons practise are at least two category strings, therefore I am not against a museum's cat but for an extra cat string by artist, like you propose now and have to do also for non religious files. Category:Prints by museum by artist does not proof anything.Oursana (talk) 09:32, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- with Prints by Lucas Cranach (I) in the Metropolitan Museum of Art the file is not really in both, because you have to go to all museums to find a file, therefore please always use two seperate category strings for artist, for museum, for item (agony in the garden). My concern is not to hide the files. With prints exclusively sorted into cats "prints by artist in museum x" you have to search many museums to find a file. Therefore they must be in two category strings, as "prints by artist in museum x" is not really for both, the sorting is in packages by museum. This is common practise on commons and I ask you to keep the seperate strings. This extra category string is very necessary and helpful and there is no argument to delete them, like you did with the above shown example. For prints with up to 20 and more identically versions the exclusive sorting by museum, seperates the many versions of the same print, which you cannot spread over the museum's categories, they must also be together in the artist's cat as a second and main category string. --Oursana (talk) 03:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
It is common praxis in the arts to have the artist's name included in the cat naming, which is more important than the museum. Furthermore one should only create necessary cats, so cats for every painting are not necessary Oursana (talk) 20:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Oursana: Okay. I was copying a naming convention I saw on other categories, but I can see how the museum's identifier could become an issue if the painting ever changes hands. In this case it helps differentiate this painting from other paintings of the same subject by the same artist, but maybe there's another way to do that.
- I'm not sure what determines what cats qualify as necessary. I often create cats for paintings (and other things) where there are multiple files. It gathers everything for an item together and allows categorization to be done on one item, the category, instead of on multiple files. When creating such categories, I have often found that not all the files for an item were categorized the same.
- All that being said, feel free to rename the category if you see fit. -- Auntof6 (talk) 21:36, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
|
Tollbooths and toll gates has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Cryptic-waveform (talk) 13:09, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Вікі любить пам'ятки 2024 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 in Ukraine
[edit]
Привіт!
З 1 по 31 жовтня запрошуємо до участі в українській частині міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України. Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут.
Окрім основних номінацій у конкурсі є дев’ять спеціальних номінацій та відзнак: «Відео», «Війна руйнує пам'ятки», «Елементи екстер'єру», «Єврейська спадщина» (включаючи караїмські), «Інтер'єри», «Німецька спадщина», «Польська спадщина», «Фотоплівка» та «Визначні місця Харкова».
Важливо! Через російське вторгнення в Україну також довелося змінити умови: у більшості випадків тільки роботи зняті до 30 червня 2024 року включно будуть прийматися на конкурс. Тільки фото інтер'єрів памяток можна подавати без обмеження за датою створення.
Приєднуйтеся!
Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про конкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!
You have received this message, because you had uploaded pictures to one of the contests of Wikimedia Ukraine or helped (for example, edited files from these contests). If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in the contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!
Мирного неба!
З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» 16:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)