S. Pepes

We report a case of diamniotic, dichorionic pregnancy presented at 24 weeks with premature rupture of the first amnionic sac. Seven days later, premature labour and delivery of the first twin took place, with unfortunate outcome. The second twin was left in utero. The management included combination of tocolytics, antibiotics and cervical cerclage. Caesarean section was performed 48 days later, at 32 weeks and we delivered a live male infant, successfully.

To describe the cardiac anomalies and outcome in the fetus with left atrial isomerism. All fetuses with a diagnosis of left atrial isomerism between 1998 and 2008 were identified. Gestational age at diagnosis, the nuchal translucency, the karyotype, the cardiac findings and outcome were noted. A literature search from 1990 identified four publications reporting 10 or more cases of fetal left atrial isomerism. The same data, where available, were collected from these papers for comparison. There were 41 fetuses with this diagnosis seen in our centre. All cases had an interrupted inferior vena cava with azygous continuation. Associated cardiac defects were similar in our series and in the 129 cases reported in the literature and are therefore grouped together. They included complete atrioventricular septal defect (68%), complete heart block (38%), viscerocardiac heterotaxy (54%), double outlet right ventricle (23%), right ventricular outflow tract obstruction (35%), left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (21%) and total anomalous pulmonary vein drainage (5%). In our series, there were 22 pregnancy terminations, seven intrauterine deaths, one neonatal death, one infant death and one was lost to follow-up. Of the continuing pregnancies only 50% in our series and 60% in the reported series survived. Left atrial isomerism presents a varied spectrum of cardiac malformations when it is detected prenatally. Complete heart block, complex cardiac abnormalities and fetal hydrops are poor prognostic features. Those with only minor cardiac malformations are at risk postnatally for biliary atresia and for bowel obstruction due to malrotation.

Objectives: Recent advances in Spatial Temporal Image Correlation (STIC) 4 D fetal echocardiography include the application of eSTIC based on electronic probe image acquisition. We aimed to directly compare the performance of conventional STIC versus eSTIC technique (B-Mode and color Doppler imaging) during off-line reconstruction of STIC/eSTIC fetal heart volume pairs. Methods: Pairs of B-Mode and Color Doppler STIC volumes were acquired sequentially by firstly conventional (STIC) followed by electronic (eSTIC) probes during 33 consecutive obstetric scans at median 23 (range 13-31) gestational weeks. The resulting 66 fetal heart volume pairs were assessed blindly off-line by a fetal cardiologist who documented feasibility of reconstruction, presence of motion artifacts, subjective image quality on a 4-level scale: 1-best to 4-non-diagnostic and morphological diagnosis, to enable a paired comparison of STIC and eSTIC in the same fetus under similar scanning conditions. Results: eSTIC volumes had higher temporal resolution (37 vs. 24 frames per second, p < .001), less motion during acquisition (12 vs. 20 cases, O.R. 7.0, p ¼ .002) and better average image quality (1.9 vs. 2.2, p ¼ .006) compared to STIC volumes. More diagnostic reconstructions were achieved by eSTIC (n ¼ 55, 86%) than STIC (n ¼ 52, 78.8%), p ¼ .001), in a comparable analysis time (mean 4.96 vs. 4.94 min). During a comparison of image quality of the original acquisition (A) and reconstructed planes (B and C planes) e STIC was superior in 22 (33%), 39 (59%) and 21 (38%) volumes, respectively, with the remaining cases being of similar quality (<10% in each plane in favor of STIC). Imaging mode and gestational age had a similar impact on both eSTIC and STIC performance: diagnostically acceptable studies in 49 (75.8%) vs. 48 (72.2%) by B-Mode, 60 (90.9%) vs. 56 (84.8%) by Color Doppler Mode, 8 (62.5%) vs. 10 (50%) in early scans, 38 (95%) vs. 38 (95%) in mid-gestation scans, and 7 (70%) vs. 6 (60%) in third trimester scans. Eight obstetric scans identified a fetus with a cardiac variant or structural abnormality. Diagnostic concordance of the two STIC approaches was comparable (40/48 concordant interpretations, kappa 0.657) all confirmed by fetal and/or postnatal echocardiography. Conclusions: eSTIC was associated with more effective 4 D fetal heart reconstruction due to reduced motion artifacts and superior image quality in all planes, when compared to STIC. Early gestation reconstructions were not generally successful using either technology. Further study is needed to define the cost-effectiveness and diagnostic impact of eSTIC over conventional STIC and their role over, or in addition to, screening 2 D fetal echocardiography by appropriately trained sonographers.

We report a case of diamniotic, dichorionic pregnancy presented at 24 weeks with premature rupture of the first amnionic sac. Seven days later, premature labour and delivery of the first twin took place, with unfortunate outcome. The second twin was left in utero. The management included combination of tocolytics, antibiotics and cervical cerclage. Caesarean section was performed 48 days later, at 32 weeks and we delivered a live male infant, successfully.

Objectives: Recent advances in Spatial Temporal Image Correlation (STIC) 4 D fetal echocardiography include the application of eSTIC based on electronic probe image acquisition. We aimed to directly compare the performance of conventional STIC versus eSTIC technique (B-Mode and color Doppler imaging) during off-line reconstruction of STIC/eSTIC fetal heart volume pairs.
Methods: Pairs of B-Mode and Color Doppler STIC volumes were acquired sequentially by firstly conventional (STIC) followed by electronic (eSTIC) probes during 33 consecutive obstetric scans at median 23 (range 13–31) gestational weeks. The resulting 66 fetal heart volume pairs were assessed blindly off-line by a fetal cardiologist who documented feasibility of reconstruction, presence of motion artifacts, subjective image quality on a 4-level scale: 1-best to 4-non-diagnostic and morphological diagnosis, to enable a paired comparison of STIC and eSTIC in the same fetus under similar scanning conditions.
Results: eSTIC volumes had higher temporal resolution (37 vs. 24 frames per second, p < .001), less motion during acquisition (12 vs. 20 cases, O.R. 7.0, p = .002) and better average image quality (1.9 vs. 2.2, p = .006) compared to STIC volumes. More diagnostic reconstructions were achieved by eSTIC (n = 55, 86%) than STIC (n = 52, 78.8%), p = .001), in a comparable analysis time (mean 4.96 vs. 4.94 min). During a comparison of image quality of the original acquisition (A) and reconstructed planes (B and C planes) e STIC was superior in 22 (33%), 39 (59%) and 21 (38%) volumes, respectively, with the remaining cases being of similar quality (<10% in each plane in favor of STIC). Imaging mode and gestational age had a similar impact on both eSTIC and STIC performance: diagnostically acceptable studies in 49 (75.8%) vs. 48 (72.2%) by B-Mode, 60 (90.9%) vs. 56 (84.8%) by Color Doppler Mode, 8 (62.5%) vs. 10 (50%) in early scans, 38 (95%) vs. 38 (95%) in mid-gestation scans, and 7 (70%) vs. 6 (60%) in third trimester scans. Eight obstetric scans identified a fetus with a cardiac variant or structural abnormality. Diagnostic concordance of the two STIC approaches was comparable (40/48 concordant interpretations, kappa 0.657) all confirmed by fetal and/or postnatal echocardiography.
Conclusions: eSTIC was associated with more effective 4 D fetal heart reconstruction due to reduced motion artifacts and superior image quality in all planes, when compared to STIC. Early gestation reconstructions were not generally successful using either technology. Further study is needed to define the cost-effectiveness and diagnostic impact of eSTIC over conventional STIC and their role over, or in addition to, screening 2 D fetal echocardiography by appropriately trained sonographers.

We report a case of diamniotic, dichorionic pregnancy presented at 24 weeks with premature rupture of the first amnionic sac. Seven days later, premature labour and delivery of the first twin took place, with unfortunate outcome. The second twin was left in utero. The management included combination of tocolytics, antibiotics and cervical cerclage. Caesarean section was performed 48 days later, at 32 weeks and we delivered a live male infant, successfully.