Psychophysical Demands and Perceived Workload-An Ergonomics Standpoint for Lean Production in Assembly Cells
Authors: 
Marcelo Pereira da Silva, Guilherme Luz Tortorella, Fernando Gonçalves AmaralAuthors Info & Claims
Marcelo Pereira da Silva, Guilherme Luz Tortorella, Fernando Gonçalves AmaralAuthors Info & ClaimsPages 643 - 654
Abstract
The adoption of a lean production model means a systematic implementation of various management methods and practices. Such a model presents the human element as a key factor in continuous improvement efforts, influencing workers' job content and the quality of work. However, there are few evidences regarding research on quantitative assessment of the work demand, either psychological or physical, in a lean production environment. Therefore, this study aims to analyze from an ergonomics perspective the psychophysical demand and workers' perceived workload within assembly cells undergoing a lean production implementation. The proposed method integrates complementary concepts of widely known techniques, enabling the consolidation of several assessment criteria into one particular index for both psychological and physical demands. Such a diagnostic method is illustrated in a case study from the automotive parts manufacturing sector, whose application is performed in three critical assembly cells selected by senior management. Our findings show systemic gaps between work demand and employees' profile, indicating improvement opportunities in order to provide a better work environment.
References
[1]
Babson, S. 1993. Lean or mean: The MIT model of lean production at Mazda. Labor Studies Journal, Volume 8 Issue 2, pp.3-24.
[2]
Backstrand, G., Bergman, C., Hogberg, D., &Moestam, L. 2013. Lean and its impact on workplace design. Proceedings of NES 2013 45th Nordic Ergonomics & Human Factors Society Conference, August 11-14, 2013, Reykjavik, Iceland.
[3]
Bao, S., Winkel, J., Mathiassen, S., &Shanavaz, H. 1997. Interactive effect of ergonomics and production engineering on shoulder-neck exposure: A case study of assembly work in China and Sweden. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Volume 20, pp.75-85.
[4]
Beevis, D. 2003. Ergonomics: Cost and benefits revisited. Applied Ergonomics, Volume 34, pp.491-496.
[5]
Berggren, C., Bjorkman, T., &Hollander, E. 1991. Are they beatable? Report from a field trip to study transplants, the Japanese owned auto plants in North America. Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Institute of Technology.
[6]
Brannmark, M. 2013. Lean working environments: An empirical study of 24 companies implementing lean. Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Institute of Technology.
[7]
Christmansson, M., Friden, J., &Sollerman, C. 1999. Task design, psychosocial work climate and upper extremity pain disorders effects on organizational redesign on manual repetitive assembly jobs. Applied Ergonomics, Volume 30, pp.463-473.
[8]
Conti, R., Angelis, J., Cooper, C., Faragher, B., &Gill, C. 2006. The effects of just in time/lean production on worker job stress. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Volume 26, pp.1013-1038.
[9]
Eklund, J. 2000. Development work for quality and ergonomics. Applied Ergonomics, Volume 31, pp.641-648.
[10]
Genaidy, A., &Karwowski, W. 2003. Human performance in lean production environment: Critical assessment and research framework. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, Volume 13 Issue 4, pp.317-330.
[11]
Getty, R. 1999. Ergonomics and the customer satisfaction model: Ergonomics in the language of business. Proceedings of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting, Volume 23 Issue 14, pp.815-819.
[12]
Goldberg, D., &Hillier, V. 1979. A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, Volume 9, pp.139-145.
[13]
Hagg, G. 2003. Corporate initiatives in ergonomics: An introduction. Applied Ergonomics, Volume 34, pp.3-15.
[14]
Hasle, P. 2014. Lean production: An evaluation of the possibilities for an employee supportive lean practice. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, Volume 24, pp.40-53.
[15]
Hines, P., Holweg, M., &Rich, N. 2004. Learning to evolve: A review of contemporary lean thinking. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Volume 24, pp.994-1011.
[16]
Hines, P., &Rich, N. 1997. The seven value stream mapping tools. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Volume 17, pp.46-64.
[17]
Holweg, M., &Pil, F. 2001. Successful build-to-order strategies start with the customer. Sloan Management Review, Volume 43, pp.74-83.
[18]
Jackson, P., &Martin, R. 1996. Impact of just in time on job content, employee attitudes and well-being: a longitudinal study. Ergonomics, Volume 39, pp.1-16.
[19]
Joseph, B. 2003. Corporate ergonomics programme at Ford Motor Company. Applied Ergonomics, Volume 34, pp.23-28.
[20]
Karia, N., &Asaari, M. 2006. The effects of total quality management practices on employee's work related attitudes. TQM Magazine, Volume 18, pp.30-43.
[21]
Klein, J. 1991. A re-examination of autonomy in light of new manufacturing practices. Human Relations, Volume 44, pp.21-38.
[22]
Koukoulaki, T. 2014. The impact of lean production on musculoskeletal and psychosocial risks: An examination of sociotechnical trends over 20 years. Applied Ergonomics, Volume 45, pp.198-212.
[23]
Lean, Y., &Shan, F. 2012. Brief review on physiological and biochemical evaluations on human mental workload. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, Volume 22, pp.177-187.
[24]
Leroyer, A., Kraemer-Heriaud, H., Marescaux, L., &Frimat, P. 2006. Prospective evaluation of the impact of change in the organization of work on perceived stress and health in assembly-line workers in an automobile plant. Revue d' Epidemiologie et de Sante Publique, Volume 54, pp.15-25.
[25]
MacLeod, I. 2003. Real-world effectiveness of ergonomic methods. Applied Ergonomics, Volume 34, pp.465-477.
[26]
Maia, L., Alves, A., &Leao, C. 2013. Preparation of a textile and clothing company to lean implementation by identifying ergonomic and environmental risks. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Integrity, Reliability and Failure, June 23-27, 2013, Funchal, Portugal.
[27]
Mullarkey, S., Jackson, P., &Parker, S. 1995. Employee reaction to JIT manufacturing practices: A two-phase investigation. International Journal of Operations and Productions Management, Volume 15, pp.62-79.
[28]
NASA Task Load Index TLX. 1986. {Computerized version}. NASA-Ames Research Center, Aerospace Human Factors Research Division: Moffett Field, CA.
[29]
O'Neill, D. H. 2000. Ergonomics in industrially developing countries: Does its application differ from that in industrially advanced countries ? Applied Ergonomics, Volume 31, pp.631-640.
[30]
O'Neill, D. H. 2005. The promotion of ergonomics in industrially developing countries. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Volume 35, pp.163-168.
[31]
Paez, O., Dewees, J., Genaidy, A., Tuncel, S., Karwowski, W., &Zurada, J. 2004. The lean manufacturing enterprise: An emerging sociotechnological system integration. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, Volume 14 Issue 3, pp.285-306.
[32]
Parker, S., &Sprigg, C. 1998. A move backwards? The introduction of a moving assembly line. British Psychosocial Society Annual Occupational Psychology Conference, Leicester, UK.
[33]
Parker, S., Wall, T., &Myers, C. 1995. The effects of manufacturing initiative on employee jobs and strain. In S.Robertson Ed., Contemporary ergonomics. London: Taylor & Francis.
[34]
Regie nationales des usines Renault. Services des conditions de travail. 1976. Les profils de postes: Méthode d'analyse des conditions de travail. Paris: Masson, Sirtes.
[35]
Resnick, M., &Zanotti, A. 1997. Using ergonomics to target productivity improvements. Proceedings of 21st International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering pp. pp.185-188.
[36]
Rodríguez, D., Buyens, D., <familyNamePrefix>Van</familyNamePrefix>Landeghem, H., &Lasio, V. 2016. Impact of lean production on perceived job autonomy and job satisfaction: An experimental study. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, Volume 26 Issue 2, pp.159-176.
[37]
Rother, M., &Harris, R. 2001. Creating continuous flow: An action guide for managers, engineers and production associates. Cambridge, MA: Lean Enterprise Institute.
[38]
Rother, M., &Shook, J. 1998. Learning to see: Value stream mapping to add value and eliminate muda. Brookline, MA: Lean Enterprise Institute.
[39]
Saurin, T., &Ferreira, C. 2009. The impacts of lean production on working conditions: A case study of a harvester assembly line in Brazil. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Volume 39, pp.403-412.
[40]
Seppala, P., &Klemola, S. 2004. How do employees perceive their organization and job when companies adopt principles of lean production ? Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, Volume 14, pp.157-180.
[41]
Toralla, M., Falzon, P., &Morais, A. 2012. Participatory design in lean production: Which contribution from employees? For what end ? Work, Volume 41, pp.2706-2712.
[42]
Ulfsfalt, U., Falck, A., Forsberg, A., Dahlin, C., &Eriksson, A. 2003. Corporate ergonomics programme at Volvo Car Corporation. Applied Ergonomics, Volume 34, pp.17-22.
[43]
Vieira, L., Balbinotti, G., Varasquin, A., &Gontijo, L. 2012. Ergonomics and kaizen as strategies for competitiveness: A theoretical and practical in an automotive industry. Work, Volume 41, pp.1756-1762.
[44]
Womack, J., &Jones, D. 1996. Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth for your corporation. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
[45]
Womack, S., Armstrong, T., &Liker, J. 2009 .Lean job design and musculoskeletal disorder risk: A two plant comparison. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, Volume 19 Issue 4, pp.279-293.
[46]
Yang, C., Yeh, T., &Yang, K. 2012. The implementation of technical practices and human factors of the Toyota production system in different industries. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, Volume 22 Issue 6, pp.541-555.
[47]
Zink, K. 2000. TQM in Germany: Experiences and perspectives concerning ergonomics. Proceedings of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Volume 44 Issue 12, 2-475-2-478.
- Psychophysical Demands and Perceived Workload-An Ergonomics Standpoint for Lean Production in Assembly Cells
Recommendations
Integrating ergonomics and lean manufacturing principles in a hybrid assembly line
Bi-objective mathematical model for the design of lean processes in assembly lines.Lean principles and ergonomic requirements for workers safety are included.The model is applied to a case study from a tool case manufacturing company.Results show ...
Lean Production and information technology: Connection or contradiction?
The principles of Lean Production have enabled organisations in the manufacturing and service sectors to significantly improve their competitiveness. The application of Lean principles, derived from the Toyota Production System has enabled many ...
Motion Analysis System (MAS) for production and ergonomics assessment in the manufacturing processes
Highlights- Body digitalization and analysis during the execution of manufacturing/assembly.
- Microsoft Kinect v2™ markerless motion capture.
- Focus on both ergonomic improvement and production enhancement.
- Control volume analysis for ...
AbstractNowadays the Smart Factories operating within the Industry 4.0 revolution, require more and more reliable, fast and automatic tools for production analysis and improvement. Manufacturing companies, in which the human labour has a crucial role, ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
United Kingdom
Publication History
Published: 01 November 2016
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 15 Jan 2025