Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Stroke effect on legibility of Japanese characters

Published: 01 March 2017 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    This study applied a computer program to analyze the descriptors of Japanese characters, including 56 Hiragana, 56 Katakana, and 98 Kanji characters. An experiment was designed to test the legibility of these characters by 40 Japanese students studying in university. Subjects were asked to identify characters displayed in the screen center, shown initially at an illegible size and gradually enlarged until the subject recognized them. The results illustrated that the Hiragana characters were more legible than the Katakana, and the Katakana characters were more legible than the Kanji. Although the legibility thresholds were increased with the number of strokes in these three kinds of Japanese characters, the effects of the number of strokes on legibility among them were different. Increasing one stroke in a Kanji character would necessitate a 0.4-arcminute enlargement to maintain legibility, whereas no linear stroke effect was found in Hiragana and Katakana characters. This may because of the features of stroke of Hiragana and Katakana are quite different from that of Kanji. Furthermore, for Hiragana and Katakana, adding a semivoiced consonant sign 'o' to a common character would necessitate a 7-arcminute enlargement to maintain legibility and adding a voiced consonant sign ' " ' to a common character would necessitate a 10.3-arcminute enlargement to maintain legibility. The results can be used as reference for information and interface design.

    References

    [1]
    Booher, H. R. 1975. Relative comprehensibility of pictorial information and printed words in proceduralized instructions. Human Factors, Volume 17 Issue 2, pp.266-277.
    [2]
    Cai, D., Chi, C.-F., &You, M. 2001. The legibility threshold of Chinese characters in three type styles. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Volume 27, pp.9-17.
    [3]
    Cai, D., Chi, C.-F., &You, M. 2008. Assessment of English letters' legibility using image descriptors. Perceptual and Motor Skills, Volume 107, pp.618-628.
    [4]
    Chi, C.-F., Cai, D., &You, M. 2003. Applying image descriptors to the assessment of legibility in Chinese characters. Ergonomics, Volume 46 Issue 8, pp.763-779.
    [5]
    Chuang, C.-T., &Tseng, L. Y., 1995. A heuristic algorithm for the recognition of printed Chinese characters. IEEE Transaction on System, Man, and Cybernetics, Volume 25 Issue 4, pp.710-717.
    [6]
    Coren, S., Ward, L. M., &Porac, C. 1989. Sensation and perception. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
    [7]
    Cushman, W. H., &Rosenberg, D. J. 1991. Human factors in product design. New York, NY: Elsevier.
    [8]
    Dynalab, Inc. 2000. Jin-Die 2000 True Type for Window 95/98/NT/Office 2000 {Chinese version}. Taipei, Taiwan.
    [9]
    Gibson, E. J. 1969. Principles of perceptual learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [10]
    Grandjean, F., Hunting, W., &Piderman, M. 1983. VDT workstation design: Preferred setting and their effect. Human Factors, Volume 25, pp.161-175.
    [11]
    Gu, D. W. 1994. The standardization of Chinese characters. Chinese World, Volume 36, pp.33-36 in Chinese.
    [12]
    Huang, J. T., &Wang, M. Y. 1992. From unit to gestalt: Perceptual dynamics in recognizing Chinese characters. In H. C.Chen &O. J. L.Tzeng Eds., Language processing in Chinese pp. pp.3-35. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
    [13]
    Ministry of Education of Japan. 1981. Retrieved from "http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/hakusho/index.htm"
    [14]
    Miyagawa, S. 1999. The Japanese language. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved from "http://web.mit.edu/jpnet/articles/JapaneseLanguage.html#characteristics"
    [15]
    Sanders, M. S., &McCormick, E. J. 1993. Human factors in engineering and design 7th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
    [16]
    Stallings, W. 1976. Approaches to Chinese character recognition. Pattern Recognition, Volume 8, pp.87-98.
    [17]
    Stevens, S. S. 1975. Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. New York, NY: Wiley.
    [18]
    Takatsuka, T. D. 2007. Dictionary for writing Japanese 4th ed. Tokyo, Japan: Nobarasha.
    [19]
    Wikipedia2016. Japanese writing system. Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_writing_system"
    [20]
    Wong, P. Y. C., &Hsu, S. C. 1995. Design Chinese typeface using components. Proceeding of the Nineteenth Annual International Conference: Computer Software and Applications Conference 1995, September 1995 pp. pp.416-421. IEEE. "http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=524809"
    [21]
    Yang, M. L. 2001. Learning basic Japanese. Taipei, Taiwan: Shansitang.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Human Factors in Ergonomics & Manufacturing
    Human Factors in Ergonomics & Manufacturing  Volume 27, Issue 2
    March 2017
    50 pages
    ISSN:1090-8471
    EISSN:1520-6564
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

    United Kingdom

    Publication History

    Published: 01 March 2017

    Author Tags

    1. Chinese characters
    2. Hiragana
    3. Japanese characters
    4. Kanji
    5. Katakana

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 0
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media