Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Country Trends and Scholarly Collaboration in the ICT4D Research Community 2000–2013: : A Single Journal Study

Published: 05 December 2017 Publication History

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the country productivity, collaboration behaviour and citation impact of ICT4D researchers by examining all 378 articles published in the Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries (EJISDC) over a 14‐year period. Data were collected from the Inspec database. The most active countries and regions were identified by analysing the author affiliation details. The contributions of developing countries were compared to developed countries. The trend in the EJISDC is towards collaborative research involving 250 (66.14%) articles with multiple authors and 128 (33.86%) articles with single authors. Articles by authors from the same institution accounted for 32.01% of jointly authored articles. National or domestic collaboration accounted for 173 (45.77%) articles and international collaboration accounted for 77 (20.37%) articles. Of the 69 countries represented in the EJISDC, 51 countries collaborated globally. Regional distribution of authors showed that Africa had the strongest representation, followed by Asia and North America. Between 17.83% and 20.87% of developing countries contributed articles to the EJISDC. The results of the study show that for this journal, single‐authored articles are cited more often than multi‐authored articles in Google Scholar.

References

[1]
Aguillo, I.F. (2012) Is Google Scholar Useful for Bibliometrics? A Webometric Analysis. Scientometrics, 91, 2, 343–351.
[2]
Aksnes, D.W. (2003) Characteristics of Highly Cited Papers. Research Evaluation, 12, 3, 159–170.
[3]
Alonso, J.A., Cortez, A.L. and Klasen, S. (2014) LDC and other Country Groupings: How Useful are Current Approaches to Classify Countries in a more Heterogeneous Developing World? New York, NY, USA. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/cdp/cdp_background_papers/bp2014_21.pdf
[4]
Andrés, A. (2009) Measuring Academic Research: How to Undertake a Bibliometric Study. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
[5]
Antonakis, J., Bastardoz, N., Liu, Y. and Schriesheim, C. (2014) What Makes Articles Highly Cited? Leadership Quarterly, 25, 1, 152–179.
[6]
Avgerou, C. (2008) Information Systems in Developing Countries: A Critical Research Review. Journal of Information Technology, 23, 3, 133–146.
[7]
Bakri, A. and Willett, P. (2008) The Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science 2001–2006: A Bibliometric Study. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 13, 1, 103–116.
[8]
Bakri, A. and Willett, P. (2009) The Malaysian Journal of Computer Science: A Bibliometric Study. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 14, 2, 39–49.
[9]
Best, M.L.M. (2010) Understanding Our Knowledge Gaps: Or, Do We Have an ICT4D Field? And Do We Want One? Information Technologies & International Development, 6, 49–52.
[10]
Bornmann, L., Schier, H., Marx, W. and Daniel, H. D. (2012) What Dactors Determine Citation Counts of Publications in Chemistry besides their Quality? Journal of Informetrics, 6, 1, 11–18.
[11]
Bosquet, C. & Combes, P.‐P. (2013) Are Academics who Publish more also more Cited? Individual Determinants of Publication and Citation Records. Scientometrics, 97, 3, 831–857.
[12]
Brown, A. & Grant, G. (2010) Highlighting the Duality of the ICT and Development Research Agenda. Information Technology for Development, 16, 2, 96–111.
[13]
Burrell, J. & Toyama, K. (2009) What Constitutes Good ICTD Research? Information Technologies & International Development, 5, 3, 82–94.
[14]
Cantor, D. E., Bolumole, Y., Coleman, B. J. and Frankel, R. (2010) An Examination of Trends and Impact of Authorship Collaboration in Logistics Research. Journal of Business Logistics, 31, 1, 197–215.
[15]
Cheng, M. Y., Hen, K. W., Tan, H. P. and Fok, K. F. (2013) Patterns of Co‐authorship and Research Collaboration in Malaysia. ASLIB Proceedings, 65, 6, 659–674.
[16]
Das, P. K. (2013) Journal of Informetrics: A Cibliometric Profile. Journal of Library and Information Technology, 33, 3, 243–252.
[17]
Davison, R.M., Harris, R.W., Licker, P. and Shoib, G. (2005) Open Access E‐Journals: Creating Sustainable Value in Developing Countries. PACIS 2005 Proceedings, 248–256. http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2005/2
[18]
Didegah, F. and Thelwall, M. (2013) Which Factors Help Authors Produce the Highest Impact Research? Collaboration, Journal and Document Properties. Journal of Informetrics, 7, 4, 861–873.
[19]
Dodson, L., Sterling, S.R. and Bennett, J.K.J. (2013) Considering Failure: Eight Years of ITID Research. Information Technologies & International Development, 9, 2, 19–34.
[20]
Dwivedi, Y.K. (2009) An Analysis of e‐Government Research Published in Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy (TGPPP) Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 3, 1, 7–15.
[21]
Dwivedi, Y.K., Kiang, M.Y., Lal, B. and Williams, M.D. (2008) Profiling Research Published in the Journal of Electronic Commerce Research. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 9, 2, 77–91.
[22]
Dwivedi, Y.K., Lal, B., Mustafee, N. and Williams, M.D. (2008) Profiling a Decade of Information Systems Frontiers’ research. Information Systems Frontiers, 11, 1, 87–102.
[23]
Dwivedi, Y.K. and Mustafee, N. (2010) Profiling Research Published in the Journal of Enterprise Information Management (JEIM) Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 23, 1, 8–26.
[24]
Dwivedi, Y.K. and Weerakkody, V. (2010) A Profile of Scholarly Community Contributing to the International Journal of Electronic Government Research. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 6, 4, 1–11.
[25]
Elsevier . (2015a) SciVal. Retrieved July 7, 2015, from http://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scival
[26]
Elsevier . (2015b) Scopus. Retrieved June 21, 2015, from http://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus
[27]
[28]
Figg, W.D., Dunn, L., Liewehr, D.J., Steinberg, S.M., Thurman, P.W., Barrett, J.C. and Birkinshaw, J. (2006) Scientific Collaboration Results in Higher Citation Rates of Published Articles. Pharmacotherapy, 26, 6, 759–767.
[29]
Franceschet, M. (2010) The Role of Conference Publications in CS. Communications of the ACM, 53, 12, 129–132.
[30]
Gazni, A. and Didegah, F. (2011) Investigating Different Types of Research Collaboration and Citation Impact: A Case Study of Harvard University's Publications. Scientometrics, 87, 2, 251–265.
[31]
Gazni, A. and Thelwall, M. (2014) The Long‐Term Influence of Collaboration on Citation Patterns. Research Evaluation, 23, 3, 261–271.
[32]
Gitau, S., Plantinga, P. and Diga, K. (2010) ICTD Research by Africans: Origins, Interests, and Impact. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development ICTD. London, UK. http://ictdpolicy.net/pdfs/ICTD2010_AfricanICTDRsrch_GitauPlantingaDiga.pdf
[33]
Gomez, R. (2013) The Changing Field of ICTD: Growth and Maturation of the Field, 2000–2010. Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 58, 1, 1–21.
[34]
[35]
Haslam, N., Ban, L., Kaufmann, L., Loughnan, S., Peters, K., Whelan, J. and Wilson, S. (2008) What Makes an Article Influential? Predicting Impact in Social and Personality Psychology. Scientometrics, 76, 1, 169–185.
[36]
Heeks, R. (2010) An ICT4D Journal Ranking Table. Information Technologies & International Development, 6, 4, 71–75.
[37]
Heffernan, C., Lin, Y. and Thomson, K. (2012) Drawing from Development: Towards Unifying Theory and Practice of ICT4D. Journal of International Development. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jid.2882/pdf
[38]
Ibáñez, A., Bielza, C. and Larrañaga, P. (2013) Relationship among Research Collaboration, Number of Documents and Number of Citations: A Case Study in Spanish Computer Science Production in 2000–2009. Scientometrics, 95, 2, 1–28.
[39]
International Monetary Fund . (2015) World Economic Outlook: Uneven Growth Short‐ and Long‐Term Factors. Washington, D.C. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/01/
[40]
Internet World Stats . (2014) Country List based on Nations Country Grouping – Internet World Stats – ISO 3166. http://www.internetworldstats.com/list1.htm
[41]
Iribarren‐Maestro, I., Lascurain‐Sánchez, M. L. and Sanz‐Casado, E. (2009) Are Multi‐Authorship and Visibility Related? Study of Ten Research Areas at Carlos III University of Madrid. Scientometrics, 79, 1, 191–200.
[42]
Leimu, R. and Koricheva, J. (2005) Does Scientific Collaboration Increase the Impact of Ecological Articles? BioScience, 55, 5, 438.
[43]
Levitt, J.M. and Thelwall, M. (2009) Citation Levels and Collaboration within Library and Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 3, 434–442.
[44]
Levitt, J.M. and Thelwall, M. (2010) Does the Higher Citation of Collaborative Research Differ from Region to Region? A Case Study of Economics. Scientometrics, 85, 1, 171–183.
[45]
Liu, H.‐I., Chang, B.‐C. and Chen, K.‐C. (2012) Collaboration Patterns of Taiwanese Scientific Publications in Various Research Areas. Scientometrics, 92, 1, 145–155.
[46]
Luis, J. and Aguillo, I.F. (2013) Institutional and Country Collaboration in an Online Service of Scientific Profiles: Google Scholar Citations. Journal of Informetrics, 7, 2, 394–403.
[47]
McCarty, C., Jawitz, J.W., Hopkins, A. and Goldman, A. (2013) Predicting Author H‐index using Characteristics of the Co‐Author Network. Scientometrics, 96, 2, 467–483.
[48]
Minas, H., Wright, A., Zhao, M. and Kakuma, R. (2014) International Journal of Mental Health Systems: A Bibliometric Study. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 8, 1.
[49]
Mooghali, A., Karami, N., Alijani, R. and Khasseh, A. (2012) Scientific Productions and Authorship Patterns of Top Ten Iranian Scientists. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 10, 2, 15–25.
[50]
Mukherjee, B. (2009) Scholarly Research in LIS Open Access Electronic Journals: A Bibliometric Study. Scientometrics, 80, 1, 167–194.
[51]
Must, Ü. (2012) Alone or Together: Examples from History Research. Scientometrics, 91, 2, 527–537.
[52]
Naudé, F. (2015) Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries (2000 – 2013): A Bibliometric Study. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 72, 3, 1–23.
[53]
Nielsen, L. (2011) Classifications of Countries Based on their Level of Development: How it is Done and How it Could be Done. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund,. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2011/wp1131.pdf
[54]
Oh, W., Choi, J.N. and Kim, K. (2006) Coauthorship Dynamics and Knowledge Capital: The Patterns of Cross‐disciplinary Collaboration in Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22, 3, 266–292.
[55]
ORCID: Open Researcher and Contributor ID. (2015) http://orcid.org/
[56]
Patra, S.K. (2014) Google Scholar‐based Citation Analysis of Indian Library and Information Science Journals. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 61, 3, 227–234.
[57]
Rao, K.N., Sharma, R.K., Devi, S. G. and Muralidhar, S. (2014) DESIDOC Bibliometric Analysis of the Journal of Propulsion and Power (1985–2013) Journal of Library and Information Technology, 34, 3, 271–276.
[58]
Rehn, C., Gornitzki, C., Larsson, A. and Wadskog, D. (2014) Bibliometric Handbook for Karolinska Institutet. Huddinge: Karolinska Institutet. https://kib.ki.se/sites/kib.ki.se/files/Bibliometric_Handbook_2014.pdf
[59]
Sanni, S.A. and Zainab, A.N. (2010) Google Scholar as a Source for Citation and Impact Analysis for a non‐ISI Indexed Medical Journal. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 15, 3, 35–51.
[60]
SAS Institute Inc . (2011) SAS 9.3 System Options: Reference. (2nd ed.) Cary, NC : SAS Institute Inc.
[61]
Shari, S., Haddow, G. and Genoni, P. (2012) Bibliometric and Webometric Methods for Assessing Research Collaboration. Library Review, 61, 8, 592–607.
[62]
Sin, S.J. (2011) International Coauthorship and Citation Impact: A Bibliometric Study of Six LIS Journals, 1980–2008. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 9, 1770–1783.
[63]
Slyder, J.B., Stein, B.R., Sams, B.S., Walker, D.M., Beale, B.J., Feldhaus, J.J. and Copenheaver, C.A. (2011) Citation Pattern and Lifespan: A Comparison of Discipline, Institution and Individual. Scientometrics, 89, 3, 955–966.
[64]
Solomon, J. (2009) Programmers, Professors, and Parasites: Credit and Co‐authorship in Computer Science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15, 4, 467–489.
[65]
Sonnenwald, D.H. (2007) Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 1, 643–681.
[66]
Sooryamoorthy, R. (2009) Do Types of Collaboration Change Citation? Collaboration and Citation Patterns of South African Science Publications. Scientometrics, 81, 1, 177–193.
[67]
Swain, C.K., Swain, D. and Rautaray, B. (2013) Bibliometric Analysis of Library Review from 2007 to 2011. Library Review, 62, 8/9, 602–618.
[68]
Swain, D.K. (2013) Journal Bibliometric Analysis: A Case Study on Internet Research. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/985/
[69]
Swain, D.K. (2014a) International Information and Library Review: A Ten Years Bibliometric Study. International Information & Library Review, 46 (3–4), 113–124. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10572317.2014.951589
[70]
Swain, D.K. (2014b) Journal Bibliometric analysis: A Case Study on Quality Assurance in Education. International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 4, 4. http://eprints.rclis.org/22997/1/4706.pdf
[71]
Swain, D.K. and Panda, K.C. (2012) Journal of Intellectual Property Rights : A Bibliometric Study. Chinese Librarianship: An International Electronic Journal, 33, 1–12. www.iclc.us/cliej/cl33SP.pdf
[72]
Tella, A. and Aisha Olabooye, A. (2014) Bibliometric Analysis of African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science from 2000–2012. Library Review, 63, 4/5: 305–323.
[73]
Thapa, D. and Sæbø, O. (2014) Exploring the Link between ICT and Development in the Context of Developing Countries: A Literature Review. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 64, 1, 1–15.
[74]
Thomson Reuters . (2015a) InCitesTM. http://about.incites.thomsonreuters.com/
[76]
Thomson Reuters . (2015c) Web of Science. http://wokinfo.com/citationconnection/
[77]
United Nations . (2015) World Economic Situation and Prospects (WESP) 2015. United Nations.
[78]
Wagner, C. S. (2006) International Collaboration in Science and Technology: Promises and Pitfalls. Science and Technology Policy for Development, Dialogues at the Interface. https://www.google.co.za/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CBwQFjAAahUKEwj0lMzKnbPIAhXB7RQKHcPQAzg&url=http://knowledge.cta.int/content/download/8020/86283/file/Knowledge_Wagner.pdf&usg=AFQjCNF28VDiXBesILi5CC8LTI1h72y9CA
[79]
Wainer, J., Goldenstein, S. and Billa, C. (2011) Invisible Work in Standard Bibliometric Evaluation of Computer Science. Communications of the ACM, 54, 5, 141.
[80]
Walsham, G. and Sahay, S. (2006) Research on Information Systems in Developing Countries: Current Landscape and Future Prospects. Information Technology for Development, 12, 1, 7–24.
[81]
Wan, K., Anyi, U., Zainab, A.N., Anuar, N.B. and Anyi, K.W.U. (2009) Bibliometric Studies on Single Journals: A Review. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 14, 1, 17–55.
[82]
Ward, J., Bejarano, W. and Dudas, A. (2015) Scholarly Social Media Profiles and Libraries: A Review. Liber Quarterly, 24, 4, 174–204.
[83]
Williams, K., Lenstra, N., Ahmed, S. and Liu, Q. (2013) Research Note: Measuring the Globalization of Knowledge: The Case of Community Informatics. First Monday, 18, 8), 1–12. http://www.firstmonday.dk/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4347
[84]
[85]
Zainab, A.N. (2000) Publication Productivity, Focus on Institutional, Collaborative and Communicational Correlates: A Review of Literature. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 5, 1, 53–94.
[86]
Zainab, A.N., Anyi, K.W.U. and Anuar, N.B. (2009) A Single Journal Study: Malaysian Journal of Computer Science. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science, 22, 1, 1–18.
[87]
Zhang, L. (2011) Proceeding Papers or Journal Articles? A Comparative Analysis on Computer science versus Economics, Business and Management. In 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Electronic Commerce (AIMSEC), (pp. 1319–1322) IEEE.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries
The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries  Volume 72, Issue 1
January 2016
170 pages
EISSN:1681-4835
DOI:10.1002/isd2.2016.72.issue-1
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 05 December 2017

Author Tags

  1. Collaboration
  2. co‐authoring
  3. multi‐authorship
  4. scientific cooperation
  5. joint authorship
  6. Information and Communication Technologies for Development
  7. ICT4D
  8. ICTD
  9. Developmental informatics
  10. Community informatics
  11. Bibliometrics
  12. Google Scholar

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 12 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media