article

Do feelings matter? On the correlation of affects and the self-assessed productivity in software engineering

Authors:

Daniel Graziotin,

Xiaofeng Wang,

Pekka AbrahamssonAuthors Info & Claims

Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, Volume 27, Issue 7

Pages 467 - 487

https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1673

Published: 01 July 2015 Publication History

Abstract

No abstract available.

References

[1]

Boehm BW, Papaccio PN. Understanding and controlling software costs. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 1988; Volume 14 Issue 10: pp.1462-1477.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[2]

Stangel L. Silicon Valley's 7 happiest companies and what employees secretly say about them. Silicon Valley Business Journal 2013; pp.1. Available from: "http://perma.cc/53Q2-92E5"

Google Scholar

[3]

Drell L. The perks of working at Google, Facebook, Twitter and More {INFOGRAPHIC}. Mashable 2011; pp.1. Available from: "http://perma.cc/8SUS-6TCB"

Google Scholar

[4]

Google Inc. Benefits - Google Jobs. Google Inc., 2014; pp.1. Available from: "http://perma.cc/TC89-Q6JD"

Google Scholar

[5]

Marino A, Zabojnik J. Work-related perks, agency problems, and optimal incentive contracts. The RAND Journal of Economics 2008; Volume 39 Issue 2: pp.565-585.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[6]

Feldt R, Angelis L, Torkar R, Samuelsson M. Links between the personalities, views and attitudes of software engineers. Information and Software Technology 2010; Volume 52 Issue 6: pp.611-624.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[7]

Sommerville I, Rodden T. Human, Social and Organisational Influences on the Software Process. Cooperative Systems Engineering Group of the Lancaster University: Lancaster, UK, 1996.

Google Scholar

[8]

Colomo-Palacios R. A study of emotions in requirements engineering. Organizational, Business, and Technological Aspects of the Knowledge Society 2010; pp.1-7.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[9]

Beck K, Beedle M, Bennekum A, Cockburn A, Cunningham W, Fowler M, Grenning J, Highsmith J, Hunt A, Jeffries R, Kern J, Marick B, Martin RC, Mellor S, Schwaber K, Sutherland J, Thomas D. Manifesto for Agile software development. The Agile Alliance 2009, 2001, 2006. Available from: "http://agilemanifesto.org/"

Google Scholar

[10]

Cockburn A, Highsmith J. Agile software development, the people factor. Computer, IEEE 2001; Volume 34 Issue 11: pp.131-133.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[11]

Sampaio SCDB, Barros EA, Aquino Junior GS, Silva MJC, Meira SRDL. A review of productivity factors and strategies on software development. Fifth International Conference on Software Engineering Advances, 2010; pp.196-204.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[12]

Feldt R, Torkar R, Angelis L, Samuelsson M. Towards individualized software engineering. Proceedings of the 2008 international workshop on Cooperative and human aspects of software engineering - CHASE '08, 2008; pp.49-52.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[13]

Fischer G. Cognitive view of reuse and redesign. IEEE Software 1987; Volume 4 Issue 4: pp.60-72.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[14]

Khan IA, Brinkman W, Hierons RM. Do moods affect programmers' debug performance? Cognition, Technology & Work 2010; Volume 13 Issue 4: pp.245-258.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[15]

Ciborra C. The Labyrinths of Information: Challenging the Wisdom of Systems. Oxford University Press: New York, USA, 2002.

Google Scholar

[16]

Ashkanasy NM, Daus CS. Emotion in the workplace: The new challenge for managers. The Academy of Management Executive 2002; Volume 16 Issue 1: pp.76-86.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[17]

Oswald AJ, Proto E, Sgroi D. Happiness and productivity. The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series TWERPS no 882, 2008; Volume 1 Issue 882: pp.44.

Google Scholar

[18]

Zelenski JM, Murphy SA, Jenkins DA. The happy-productive worker thesis revisited. Journal of Happiness Studies 2008; Volume 9 Issue 4: pp.521-537.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[19]

Fisher CD, Noble C. A within-person examination of correlates of performance and emotions while working. Human Performance 2004; Volume 17 Issue 2: pp.145-168.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[20]

Kaplan S, Bradley JCJ, Luchman JN, Haynes D. On the role of positive and negative affectivity in job performance: a meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology 2009; Volume 94 Issue 1: pp.162-176.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[21]

Scacchi W. Understanding software productivity. Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering: Trends for the Next Decade, Hurley D ed. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.: River Edge, NJ, USA, 1995; pp.273.

Google Scholar

[22]

Shaw T. The emotions of systems developers. Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Computer personnel research Careers, culture, and ethics in a networked environment - SIGMIS CPR '04, 2004; pp.124.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[23]

Beal DJ, Weiss HM, Barros E, MacDermid SM. An episodic process model of affective influences on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 2005; Volume 90 Issue 6: pp.1054-1068.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[24]

Denning PJ. Moods. Communications of the ACM 2012; Volume 55 Issue 12: pp.33.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[25]

Abrahamsson P. Commitment development in software process improvement: critical misconceptions. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering ICSE '01, 2001; Volume 13 Issue 1: pp.71-80.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[26]

Basili VR. Software Modeling and Measurement: The Goal/Question/Metric Paradigm. University of Maryland at College Park, College Park: MD, USA, 1992.

Google Scholar

[27]

Wohlin C, Runeson P, Höst M, Ohlsson MC, Regnell B, Wesslén A. Experimentation in Software Engineering. Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[28]

Graziotin D, Wang X, Abrahamsson P. Are happy developers more productive? 14th International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement PROFES 20132013; Volume 7983: pp.50-64.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[29]

Jedlitschka A, Ciolkowski M. Reporting experiments in software engineering. In Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering. 2008, Section II, 201-228.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[30]

Chrysler E. Some basic determinants of computer programming productivity. Communications of the ACM 1978; Volume 21 Issue 6: pp.472-483.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[31]

VandenBos GR. APA Dictionary of Clinical Psychology. American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2013.

Google Scholar

[32]

Plutchik R, Kellerman H. Emotion, Theory, Research, and Experience. Academic Press: London, 1980.

Google Scholar

[33]

Kleinginna PR, Kleinginna AM. A categorized list of emotion definitions, with suggestions for a consensual definition. Motivation and Emotion 1981; Volume 5: pp.345-379.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[34]

Cabanac M. What is emotion? Behavioural Processes 2002; Volume 60 Issue 2: pp.69-83.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[35]

Parkinson B, Briner R, Reynolds S, Totterdell P. Changing Moods: The Psychology of Mood and Mood Regulation. Addison-Wesley Longman: London, 1996.

Google Scholar

[36]

Diener E. Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin 1984; Volume 95 Issue 3: pp.542-575.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[37]

Dogan T, Totan T, Sapmaz F. The role of self-esteem, psychological well-being, emotional self-efficacy, and affect balance on happiness: a path model. European Scientific Journal 2013; Volume 9 Issue 20: pp.31-42.

Google Scholar

[38]

Diener E, Wirtz D, Tov W, Kim-Prieto C, Choi D, Oishi S, Biswas-Diener R. New well-being measures: short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research 2009; Volume 97 Issue 2: pp.143-156.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[39]

Schwarz N. Feelings as information: informational and motivational functions of affective states. Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior, Higgins ET, Sorrentino RM eds. Guilford Press: New York, NY, US, 1990; pp.527-561.

Google Scholar

[40]

Schwarz N, Clore GL. Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1983; Volume 45 Issue 3: pp.513-523.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[41]

Baas M, De Dreu CKW, Nijstad BA. A meta-analysis of 25years of mood-creativity research: hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin 2008; Volume 134 Issue 6: pp.779-806.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[42]

Wegge J, Dick Van R, Fisher GK, West MA, Dawson JF. A test of basic assumptions of affective events theory AET in call centre work. British Journal of Management 2006; Volume 17 Issue 3: pp.237-254.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[43]

Weiss H, Cropanzano R. Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior 1996; Volume 18 Issue 1: pp.1-74.

Google Scholar

[44]

Fisher CD. Mood and emotions while working: missing pieces of job satisfaction? Journal of Organizational Behavior 2000; Volume 21 Issue 2: pp.185-202.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[45]

Ekman P. Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1971; pp.207-283.

Google Scholar

[46]

Matsumoto D, Hwang HS. Reading facial expressions of emotion. Psychological Science Agenda, American Psychological Association, 2011. Available from: "http://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2011/05/facial-expressions.aspx"

Google Scholar

[47]

Ekman P. An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion 1992; Volume 6 Issue 3: pp.169-200.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[48]

Shaver P, Schwartz J, Kirson D, O'Connor C. Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1987; Volume 52 Issue 6: pp.1061-1086.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[49]

Russell JA. A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1980; Volume 39 Issue 6: pp.1161-1178.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[50]

Lane RD, Chua PM-L, Dolan RJ. Common effects of emotional valence, arousal and attention on neural activation during visual processing of pictures. Neuropsychologia 1999; Volume 37 Issue 9: pp.989-997.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[51]

Lewin K. A Dynamic Theory of Personality. McGraw-Hill: New York, USA, 1935.

Google Scholar

[52]

Lang PJ, Greenwald MK, Bradley MM, Hamm AO. Looking at pictures: Affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. Psychophysiology 1993; Volume 30 Issue 3: pp.261-273.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[53]

Zajenkowski M, Goryńska E, Winiewski M. Variability of the relationship between personality and mood. Personality and Individual Differences 2012; Volume 52 Issue 7: pp.858-861.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[54]

Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 1994; Volume 25 Issue 1: pp.49-59.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[55]

Csikszentmihalyi M. Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement With Everyday Life. Basic Books: New York, USA, 1997.

Google Scholar

[56]

Ong JC, Cardé NB, Gross JJ, Manber R. A two-dimensional approach to assessing affective states in good and poor sleepers. Journal of Sleep Research 2011; Volume 20 Issue 2: pp.606-610.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[57]

Grimm M, Kroschel K. Evaluation of natural emotions using self assessment manikins. IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, 2005; pp.381-385.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[58]

Tsonos D, Ikospentaki K, Kouroupetrolgou G. Towards modeling of readers' emotional state response for the automated annotation of documents. IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, 2008; pp.3253-3260.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[59]

Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. International affective picture system IAPS: Technical manual and affective ratings. Gainesville FL NIMH Center for the study of emotion and attention University of Florida, 1999, Technical Report A-6.

Google Scholar

[60]

Graziotin D, Wang X, Abrahamsson P. Online Appendix for "Do feelings matter? On the correlation of affective states and the self-assessed productivity in software engineering." Figshare 2013; Volume 1 Issue 1: pp.1-6.

Google Scholar

[61]

Hektner JM, Schmidt JA, Csikszentmihalyi M. Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the Quality of Everyday Life. Sage Publications Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2007.

Google Scholar

[62]

Larson R, Csikszentmihalyi M. The experience sampling method. New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science 1983; Volume 15 Issue 15: pp.41-56.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[63]

Gueorguieva R, Krystal JH. Move over ANOVA: progress in analyzing repeated-measures data and its reflection in papers published in the Archives of General Psychiatry. Archives of General Psychiatry 2004; Volume 61 Issue 3: pp.310-317.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[64]

Laird NM, Ware JH. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 1982; Volume 38 Issue 4: pp.963-974.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[65]

Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 2008; Volume 59 Issue 4: pp.390-412.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[66]

Miner AG, Glomb TM. State mood, task performance, and behavior at work: A within-persons approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2010; Volume 112 Issue 1: pp.43-57.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[67]

Dess GG, Robinson RB. Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal 1984; Volume 5 Issue 3: pp.265-273.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[68]

Lesiuk T. The effect of music listening on work performance. Psychology of Music 2005; Volume 33 Issue 2: pp.173-191.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[69]

Wrobel MR. Emotions in the software development process. 6th International Conference on Human System Interactions HSI, 2013; pp.518-523.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[70]

Graziotin D, Wang X, Abrahamsson P. Happy software developers solve problems better: psychological measurements in empirical software engineering. PeerJ 2014; Volume 2 Issue 1: pp.e289.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[71]

Pukelsheim F. The three sigma rule. The American Statistician 1994; Volume 48 Issue 2: pp.88-91.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[72]

Robinson GK. That BLUP is a good thing: the estimation of random effects. Statistical Science 1991; Volume 6 Issue 1: pp.15-32.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[73]

Bates D. lmer, p-values and all that. R-help, 2006, 1. Available from: "http://perma.cc/LMM6-ERYW" {February 19, 2014}.

Google Scholar

[74]

R Community. Conservative ANOVA tables in lmer. R Wiki, 2006, 1. Available from: "http://perma.cc/T934-KXAG" {February 19, 2014}.

Google Scholar

[75]

Winter B. A Very Basic Tutorial for Performing Linear Mixed Effects Analyses. Merced, 2013. Available from: "http://www.bodowinter.com/tutorial/bw_LME_tutorial.pdf" {February 19, 2014}.

Google Scholar

[76]

Tremblay A, Ransijn J. LMERConvenienceFunctions: A suite of functions to back-fit fixed effects and forward-fit random effects, as well as other miscellaneous functions. CRAN, 2013. Available from: "http://cran.r-project.org/package=LMERConvenienceFunctions" {February 19, 2014}.

Google Scholar

[77]

R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2013; pp.1.

Google Scholar

[78]

Douglas Bates MMBB. CRAN - Package lme4. Available from: "http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html"

Google Scholar

[79]

Vickers AJ. How many repeated measures in repeated measures designs? Statistical issues for comparative trials. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2003; Volume 3 Issue 22: pp.22.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[80]

Kitchenham BA, Pfleeger SL, Pickard LM, Jones PW, Hoaglin DC, Emam El K, Rosenberg J. Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 2002; Volume 28 Issue 8: pp.721-734.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[81]

Tichy W. Hints for reviewing empirical work in software engineering. Empirical Software Engineering 2000; Volume 5 Issue 4: pp.309-312.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[82]

Barsade SG, Gibson DE. Group emotion: A view from top and bottom. Research on Managing Groups and Teams 1998; Volume 1 Issue 4: pp.81-102.

Google Scholar

[83]

Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White J-SS. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2009; Volume 24 Issue 3: pp.127-135.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[84]

Jacobson I, Ng P-W, McMahon PE, Spence I, Lidman S. The essence of software engineering. Communications of the ACM 2012; Volume 55 Issue 12: pp.42.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[85]

Jacobson I, Ng P-W, Spence I, McMahon PE. Major-league SEMAT. Communications of the ACM 2014; Volume 57 Issue 4: pp.44-50.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[86]

Petersen K. Measuring and predicting software productivity: A systematic map and review. Information and Software Technology 2011; Volume 53 Issue 4: pp.317-343.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[87]

Kettunen P. Orienting high software team performance: dimensions for aligned excellence. 14th International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement PROFES 20132013; Volume 7983: pp.347-350.

Crossref

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Grassi D(2024)Supporting Developers' Emotional Awareness: from Self-reported Emotions to BiometricsProceedings of the 28th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering10.1145/3661167.3661209(500-504)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3661167.3661209
Imran MChatterjee PDamevski KRoychoudhury APaiva AAbreu RStorey M(2024)Shedding Light on Software Engineering-specific Metaphors and IdiomsProceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering10.1145/3597503.3639585(1-13)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3597503.3639585
Ma YHuang YLeach KRoychoudhury APaiva AAbreu RStorey M(2024)Breaking the Flow: A Study of Interruptions During Software Engineering ActivitiesProceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering10.1145/3597503.3639079(1-12)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3597503.3639079
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

The Affect of Software Developers: Common Misconceptions and Measurements
CHASE '15: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering

The study of affects (i.e., emotions, moods) in the workplace has received a lot of attention in the last 15 years. Despite the fact that software development has been shown to be intellectual, creative, and driven by cognitive activities, and that ...
Understanding the affect of developers: theoretical background and guidelines for psychoempirical software engineering
SSE 2015: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Social Software Engineering

Affects--emotions and moods--have an impact on cognitive processing activities and the working performance of individuals. It has been established that software development tasks are undertaken through cognitive processing activities. Therefore, we ...
Discomfort, affects and coping strategies in driving activity
ECCE '08: Proceedings of the 15th European conference on Cognitive ergonomics: the ergonomics of cool interaction

Psychological comfort/discomfort is a global feeling constructed from the affective states which are lived by the users during the activity. This empirical study is about discomfort and emotions lived during all sorts of driving situations, and it is ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Software: Evolution and Process

Journal of Software: Evolution and Process Volume 27, Issue 7

July 2015

43 pages

ISSN:2047-7473

EISSN:2047-7481

Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 July 2015

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

40
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 27 Jul 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Grassi D(2024)Supporting Developers' Emotional Awareness: from Self-reported Emotions to BiometricsProceedings of the 28th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering10.1145/3661167.3661209(500-504)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3661167.3661209
Imran MChatterjee PDamevski KRoychoudhury APaiva AAbreu RStorey M(2024)Shedding Light on Software Engineering-specific Metaphors and IdiomsProceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering10.1145/3597503.3639585(1-13)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3597503.3639585
Ma YHuang YLeach KRoychoudhury APaiva AAbreu RStorey M(2024)Breaking the Flow: A Study of Interruptions During Software Engineering ActivitiesProceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering10.1145/3597503.3639079(1-12)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3597503.3639079
Zhao TGasiba TLechner UPinto-Albuquerque M(2024)Thriving in the era of hybrid workJournal of Systems and Software10.1016/j.jss.2023.111946210:COnline publication date: 1-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.jss.2023.111946
Lambiase SCatolino GPecorelli FTamburri DPalomba Fvan den Heuvel WFerrucci F(2024)An Empirical Investigation Into the Influence of Software Communities’ Cultural and Geographical Dispersion on ProductivityJournal of Systems and Software10.1016/j.jss.2023.111878208:COnline publication date: 1-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.jss.2023.111878
Ferrari AHuichapa TSpoletini PNovielli NFucci DGirardi D(2023)Using Voice and Biofeedback to Predict User Engagement during Product Feedback InterviewsACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/363571233:4(1-36)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3635712
Ritonummi SSiitonen VSalo MPirkkalainen HSivunen AChandra SBlincoe KTonella P(2023)Flow Experience in Software EngineeringProceedings of the 31st ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering10.1145/3611643.3616263(618-630)Online publication date: 30-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3611643.3616263
Madampe KHoda RGrundy J(2023)A Framework for Emotion-Oriented Requirements Change Handling in Agile Software EngineeringIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2023.325314549:5(3325-3343)Online publication date: 1-May-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TSE.2023.3253145
Laudato GScalabrino SNovielli NLanubile FOliveto RGrundy JPollock LPenta M(2023)Predicting Bugs by Monitoring Developers during Task ExecutionProceedings of the 45th International Conference on Software Engineering10.1109/ICSE48619.2023.00100(1110-1122)Online publication date: 14-May-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/ICSE48619.2023.00100
Collins CBlundell JHuddlestone JHarris D(2023)A Helping Hand: Benefits of Primary Task Haptic Augmentation on Secondary Visuospatial Task PerformanceHCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Papers10.1007/978-3-031-48038-6_22(351-362)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-48038-6_22
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Abstract

References

Cited By

Recommendations

The Affect of Software Developers: Common Misconceptions and Measurements

Understanding the affect of developers: theoretical background and guidelines for psychoempirical software engineering

Discomfort, affects and coping strategies in driving activity

Comments

Information

Published In

Publisher

Publication History

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Figures

Other

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

Affiliations