Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

TinyVM: an energy-efficient execution infrastructure for sensor networks

Published: 01 October 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Energy-efficient implementation techniques for virtual machines (VMs) have received little attention yet: conventional wisdom claims that VMs have a diametrical effect on energy consumption, and VM-based applications are therefore short-lived. In this paper, we argue that bytecode interpretation is affordable if we synthesize VMs specifically for energy efficiency. We present TinyVM, an execution infrastructure that seamlessly integrates with C and nesC/TinyOS-based programming environments. TinyVM achieves high code density through the use of compressed bytecode as the primary program representation. Compressed bytecode allows rapid application deployment with low communication overhead. TinyVM executes compressed bytecode in place, which eliminates the need for a decompression stage and thereby reduces memory consumption on sensor nodes. Our infrastructure automates the creation of energy-efficient application-specific VMs. Applications are partitioned in machine code, bytecode, and VM instruction set extensions. Partitioning is manually controlled and/or fully guided by a discrete optimization problem that produces a partitioning with lowest energy consumption for a given program size limit. We provide experimental results for sensor network benchmarks and for selected applications on various CPU architectures including Atmega128-based motes and the ARM-based Intel iMote2. TinyVM has been released under the GNU General Public License. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

References

[1]
Johnson M, Healy M, van de Ven P, Hayes MJ, Nelson J, Newe T, Lewis E. A comparative review of wireless sensor network mote technologies. Proc. IEEE Sensors 2009, IEEE, 2009.
[2]
Polastre J, Szewczyk R, Culler D. Telos: enabling ultra-low power wireless research. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, IPSN '05, IEEE Press, 2005.
[3]
Hempstead M, Tripathi N, Mauro P, Wei G, Brooks D. An ultra low power system architecture for sensor network applications. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, ISCA '05, IEEE Press, 2005; 208–219.
[4]
Hill J, Szewczyk R, Woo A, Hollar S, Culler D, Pister K. System architecture directions for networked sensors. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, ASPLOS-IX, ACM Press, 2000; 93–104.
[5]
Beutel J. Fast-prototyping using the BTnode platform. Proceedings of the Conference on Design, Automation and Test in Europe, DATE '06, ACM Press, 2006.
[6]
Dutta P, Taneja J, Jeong J, Jiang X, Culler D. A building block approach to sensornet systems. Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems, SenSys '08, ACM Press, 2008.
[7]
Nachman L, Kling R, Adler R, Huang J, Hummel V. The Intel mote platform: a bluetooth-based sensor network for industrial monitoring. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, IPSN '05, IEEE Press, 2005.
[8]
Müller R, Alonso G, Kossmann D. SwissQM: next generation data processing in sensor networks. Proceedings of the Third Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research, CIDR 2007, Online Proceedings, http://www.cidrdb.org/, 2007.
[9]
Lin JN, Huang JL. A virtual machine-based programming environment for rapid sensor application development. Proceedings of the 31st Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference, COMPSAC '07, IEEE Computer Society, 2007; 87–95.
[10]
Simon D, Cifuentes C, Cleal D, Daniels J, White D. Java on the bare metal of wireless sensor devices: the squawk Java virtual machine. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Virtual Execution Environments, VEE '06, ACM, 2006; 78–88.
[11]
Levis P, Gay D, Culler D. Active sensor networks. Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Networked Systems Design & Implementation, NSDI'05, USENIX Association, 2005.
[12]
Koshy J, Pandey R. VMSTAR: synthesizing scalable runtime environments for sensor networks. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, SenSys '05, ACM Press, 2005; 243–254.
[13]
Balani R, Han CC, Rengaswamy RK, Tsigkogiannis I, Srivastava M. Multi-level software reconfiguration for sensor networks. Proceedings of the 6th ACM & IEEE International Conference on Embedded Software, EMSOFT '06, ACM, 2006; 112–121.
[14]
Levis P, Culler D. Maté: a tiny virtual machine for sensor networks,Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, ASPLOS-X, ACM Press, 2002.
[15]
Ertl MA, Gregg D, Krall A, Paysan B. <span>vmgen</span>—a generator of efficient virtual machine interpreters. Software-Practice and Experience. 2002; 32(3): 265–294.
[16]
Gay D, Levis P, v Behren R, Welsh M, Brewer E, Culler D. The nesC language: a holistic approach to networked embedded systems. Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 2003 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, PLDI '03, ACM Press, 2003; 1–11.
[17]
List of WSN motes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wireless_sensor_nodes, {September 2010}.
[18]
Hanson DR, Fraser CW. A Retargetable C Compiler: Design and Implementation. Addison Wesley Publishing Company: Redwood City, CA, 1995.
[19]
Burgstaller B, Scholz B, Ertl A. An embedded systems programming environment for C. Proceedings of the European Conference on Parallel Computing, Euro-Par 2006, Springer LNCS, 2006; 1204–1216.
[20]
Ernst J, Evans WS, Fraser CW, Lucco S, Proebsting TA. Code compression. Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, PLDI '97, ACM, 1997; 358–365.
[21]
Fraser CW, Myers EW, Wendt AL. Analyzing and compressing assembly code. SIGPLAN Notes. 1984; 19(6): 117–121.
[22]
Liao S, Devadas S, Keutzer K. Code density optimization for embedded DSP processors using data compression techniques. Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Advanced Research in VLSI, ARVLSI '95, IEEE Computer Society, 1995.
[23]
Kozuch M, Wolfe A. Compression of embedded system programs. Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Computer Design: VLSI in Computer & Processors, ICCS '94, IEEE Computer Society, 1994; 270–277.
[24]
Lekatsas H, Wolf W. SAMC: a code compression algorithm for embedded processors. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems. 1999; 18(12): 1689–1701.
[25]
Cooper KD, McIntosh N. Enhanced code compression for embedded RISC processors. Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 1999 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, PLDI '99, ACM, 1999; 139–149.
[26]
Debray S, Evans W. Profile-guided code compression. Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 2002 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, PLDI '02, ACM, 2002; 95–105.
[27]
Latendresse M, Feeley M. Generation of fast interpreters for Huffman compressed bytecode. Science of Computer Programming. 2005; 57(3): 295–317.
[28]
Fourer R, Gay DM, Kernighan B. 1989. AMPL: a mathematical programming language. In Algorithms and Model Formulations in Mathematical Programming, Wallace SW (ed.). Springer-Verlag: New York; 150–151.
[29]
Nazhandali L, Minuth M, Austin T. SenseBench: toward an accurate evaluation of sensor network processors. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization, IEEE Computer Society, 2005; 197–203.
[30]
Malan DJ. Crypto for tiny objects, Technical Report TR-04-04, Harvard University, 2004.
[31]
Guthaus MR, Ringenberg JS, Ernst D, Austin TM, Mudge T, Brown RB. MiBench: a free, commercially representative embedded benchmark suite. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Workshop on Workload Characterization, IEEE Computer Society, 2001; 3–14.
[32]
Titzer B, Lee D, Palsberg J. Avrora: scalable sensor network simulation with precise timing. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, IPSN '05, IEEE Press, 2005; 477–482.
[33]
Costa N, Pereira A, Serodio C. Virtual machines applied to WSN's: the state-of-the-art and classification. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Systems and Networks Communications, ICSNC '07, IEEE Computer Society, 2007.
[34]
Bay H, Ess A, Tuytelaars T, Van Gool L. Speeded-up robust features (SURF). Computer Vision and Image Understanding. 2008; 110(3): 346–359.
[35]
Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Spec CPU 2000, 2000. http://www.spec.org/.
[36]
Hong K, Park J, Kim T, Kim S, Kim H, Ko Y, Park J, Burgstaller B, Scholz B. TinyVM, an efficient virtual machine infrastructure for sensor networks. Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, SenSys '09, ACM, 2009; 399–400.
[37]
Kim H, Hong K, Kim S, Kim T, Park J, Ko Y, Burgstaller B, Scholz B. Billy get your guns: fast barrel-shift decoding for in-place execution of Huffman-encoded bytecode streams. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Technologies and Applications, Korea Information Processing Society, IEEE Technical Co-Sponsorship, 2008.
[38]
Kim H, Hong K, Kim S, Kim T, Park J, Ko Y, Burgstaller B, Scholz B. Billy get your guns: fast barrel-shift decoding for in-place execution of Huffman-encoded bytecode streams, Technical Report TR-0001, Yonsei University, Dept. Computer Science, ELC Lab, Seoul, Korea, 2008.
[39]
Kim T, Kim S, Hong K, Kim H, Park J, Ko Y, Burgstaller B, Scholz B. An efficient mixed-mode execution environment for C on mobile phone platforms. Proceedings of the 2009 WRI World Congress on Computer Science and Information Engineering, IEEE Computer Society, 2009; 320–328.
[40]
Park Jiin, Park Jinhyung, Song W, Yoon S, Burgstaller B, Scholz B. Treegraph-based instruction scheduling for stack-based virtual machines. Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Bytecode Semantics, Verification, Analysis and Transformation (Bytecode 2011), Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, Elsevier, 2011.
[41]
Park J, Jeong Y, Burgstaller B. An LLVM backend for stack-based virtual machines. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Embedded Technology, ISET 2010, Institute of Embedded Engineering of Korea, 2010.
[42]
TinyVM Web Site. http://elc.yonsei.ac.kr/TinyVM.htm.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Middleware Technologies for Smart Wireless Sensor Networks towards Internet of Things: A Comparative ReviewWireless Personal Communications: An International Journal10.1007/s11277-020-07748-7116:3(1539-1574)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2021
  • (2019)Improved Ahead-of-time Compilation of Stack-based JVM Bytecode on Resource-constrained DevicesACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/334117015:3(1-44)Online publication date: 13-Aug-2019
  • (2017)Internet of things (IoT)Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Internet of Things and Machine Learning10.1145/3109761.3109768(1-12)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2017

Index Terms

  1. TinyVM: an energy-efficient execution infrastructure for sensor networks

    Recommendations

    Reviews

    William M. Waite

    TinyVM has a typical stack architecture, but in this paper, no details of its instruction set or register structure are given. Rather, the authors present a complex infrastructure for creating energy-efficient execution images on a variety of hardware. Their basic idea is to decompose a program into components, each of which is implemented in one of three ways: as byte code for TinyVM, as a domain-specific extension of TinyVM, or as native code for the underlying machine. Each implementation technique has advantages and disadvantages with respect to speed, space, and energy consumption. The trick is to find the best combination according to some predefined criteria. The paper begins with a discussion of the compilation environment that allows a program to be split, with each part processed appropriately, and the results to be combined. The authors then consider the problem of performing the split automatically. They prove that this multi-objective problem is nondeterministic polynomial-time (NP) hard, but provide an approximation algorithm. Results from the approximation algorithm are then presented and discussed, and related work reviewed. I found the paper interesting, particularly the range of technology that the authors used to build their infrastructure. The explanations of the infrastructure are clear, but to get some of the subtleties, I found it necessary to look into the paper's extensive references. Nevertheless, the material is accessible to anyone with a rudimentary understanding of compiler construction. Online Computing Reviews Service

    Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

    Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Software
    Software  Volume 42, Issue 10
    October 2012
    119 pages
    ISSN:0038-0644
    EISSN:1097-024X
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 October 2012

    Author Tags

    1. binary/bytecode partitioning
    2. bytecode compression
    3. mixed-mode execution
    4. virtual machines

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)Middleware Technologies for Smart Wireless Sensor Networks towards Internet of Things: A Comparative ReviewWireless Personal Communications: An International Journal10.1007/s11277-020-07748-7116:3(1539-1574)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2021
    • (2019)Improved Ahead-of-time Compilation of Stack-based JVM Bytecode on Resource-constrained DevicesACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/334117015:3(1-44)Online publication date: 13-Aug-2019
    • (2017)Internet of things (IoT)Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Internet of Things and Machine Learning10.1145/3109761.3109768(1-12)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2017

    View Options

    View options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media