Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

What do web users do? An empirical analysis of web use

Published: 01 June 2001 Publication History

Abstract

This paper provides an empirical characterization of user actions at the web browser. The study is based on an analysis of 4 months of logged client-side data that describes user actions with recent versions of Netscape Navigator. In particular, the logged data allow us to determine the title, URL and time of each page visit, how often they visited each page, how long they spent at each page, the growth and content of bookmark collections, as well as a variety of other aspects of user interaction with the web. The results update and extend prior empirical characterizations of web use. Among the results we show that web page revisitation is a much more prevalent activity than previously reported (approximately 81% of pages have been previously visited by the user), that most pages are visited for a surprisingly short period of time, that users maintain large (and possibly overwhelming) bookmark collections, and that there is a marked lack of commonality in the pages visited by different users. These results have implications for a wide range of web-based tools including the interface features provided by web browsers, the design of caching proxy servers, and the design of efficient web sites.

References

[1]
ABRAMS, D. BAECKER, R. CHIGNELL, M. 1998, Information archiving with bookmarks: personal web space construction and organization, Proceedings of CHI¿98 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 41, 48
[2]
I. AU, S. LI, Netscape communicator's collapsible toolbars, ACM Press, New York, 1998.
[3]
AYERS, E. STASKO, J. 1995, Using graphic history in browsing the world wide web, Proceedings of the 4th International World Wide Web Conference
[4]
BELLOTTI, V. ROGERS, Y. 1997, From web press to web pressure: multimedia representations and multimedia publishing, Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI¿97 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 279, 286, 22, 27
[5]
BYRNE, M. JOHN, B. WEHRLE, N. CROW, D. 1999, The tangled web we wove: a taskonomy of WWW use, Proceedings of CHI¿99 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 544, 551, 15, 20
[6]
CATLEDGE, L. PITKOW, J. 1995, Characterizing browsing strategies in the world wide web, Computer Systems and ISDN Systems: Proceedings of the 3rd International World Wide Web Conference, 27, 1065, 1073
[7]
CHI, E. PIROLLI, P. PITKOW, J. 2000, The scent of a site: a system for analyzing and predicting information scent, usage, and usability of a web site, Proceedings of CHI¿2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 161, 168
[8]
A. COCKBURN, S. GREENBERG, Issues of page representation and organisation in web browser's revisitation tools, Australian Journal of Information Systems, 7 (2000) 120-127.
[9]
COCKBURN, A. GREENBERG, S. MCKENZIE, B. JASONSMITH, M. KAASTEN, S. 1999, Webview: a graphical aid for revisiting web pages, Proceedings of the 1999 Computer Human Interaction Specialist Interest Group of the Ergonomics Society of Australia (OzCHI¿99), 15, 22
[10]
A. COCKBURN, S. JONES, Which way now? Analysing and easing inadequacies in WWW navigation, International Journal of Human¿Computer Studies, 45 (1996) 105-129.
[11]
A. DARRAGH, I. J. WITTEN, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992.
[12]
D. GOLDBERG, D. NICHOLS, B. OKI, D. TERRY, Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry, Communications of the ACM, 35 (1992) 61-70.
[13]
GREENBERG, S. COCKBURN, A. 1999, Getting back to back: alternate behaviors for a web browser's back button, 5th Conference on Human Factors and the Web, http/zing.ncsl.nist.gov/hfweb/
[14]
R. HIGHTOWER, L. RING, J. HELFMAN, B. BEDERSON, J. HOLLAN, Graphical multiscale web histories: a study of padprints, ACM Press, New York, 1998.
[15]
C. KEHOE, J. PITKOW, Surveying the territory: Gvu's five www user surveys, The World Wide Web Journal, 1 (1996) 77-84.
[16]
E. MAYO, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1933.
[17]
MCKENZIE, B. COCKBURN, A. 2001, An empirical analysis of web page revisitation, Proceedings of the 34th Hawaiian International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS34, Silver Spring, MD, IEEE Computer Society Press
[18]
J. NIELSEN, New Riders Publishing, 2000.
[19]
OLSON, M. BOSTIC, K. SELTZER, M. 1999, Berkeley db, Proceedings of the FREENIX Track: 1999 USENIX Annual Technical Conference, http/www.usenix.org/events/usenix99/fuul_ppers/olson/olson.pdf
[20]
PIROLLI, P. PITKOW, J. RAO, R. 1996, Silk from a sow's ear: extracting usable structures from the web, Proceedings of CHI¿96 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 118, 125
[21]
PITKOW, J. 1996, Gvu's www user surveys, http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/user_surveys/survey-04-1996/
[22]
G. ROBERTSON, M. CZERWINSKI, K. LARSON, D. ROBBINS, D. THIEL, M. VAN DANTZICH, Data mountain: using spatial memory for document management, ACM Press, New York, 1998.
[23]
SHARDANAND, U. MAES, P. 1995, Social information filtering: algorithms for automating `word of mouth', Proceedings of CHI¿95 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 210, 217
[24]
H. TAKANO, T. WINOGRAD, Dynamic bookmarks for the WWW, ACM Press, New York, 1998.
[25]
L. TAUSCHER, S. GREENBERG, How people revisit web pages: Empirical findings and implications for the design of history systems, International Journal of Human Computer Studies, Special issue on World Wide Web Usability, 47 (1997) 97-138.
[26]
W3Schools.com, 2001, Browser statistics, http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
[27]
WEXELBLAT, A. MAES, P. Footprints: history-rich tools for information foraging, Proceedings of CHI99 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 270, 277

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Designing Privacy-Protecting System with Visual Masking Based on Investigation of Privacy Concerns in Virtual Screen Sharing EnvironmentsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36981338:ISS(165-188)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
  • (2023)When Browsing Gets Cluttered: Exploring and Modeling Interactions of Browsing Clutter, Browsing Habits, and CopingProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580690(1-29)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2022)User study on link-service usage and information processing in the context of the world wide webProceedings of the 5th Workshop on Human Factors in Hypertext10.1145/3538882.3542802(1-9)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Reviews

Brian Grams

An evaluation of browser use by means of client-side logging of user activity is presented in this paper. The authors sought to update prior studies, and to provide an enhanced longitudinal analysis to contribute to future browser and browser-related technology design. The sample consisted of 17 computer science department personnel. Key in the discussions were URL revisitation and temporal characteristics. On the subject of revisitation, it would have been helpful if the authors had related this characteristic to URL traits, such as general information (news, weather), or occupation-related topics (discipline, programming). Even a rudimentary URL profile might have overcome some sampling bias, thus providing a more generalizable contribution to the literature. Addressing temporal characteristics, the authors indicated that many page visitations were short, indicating high interactivity. Unfortunately, the logging method employed provided only the time of the last site visit. While accounting for this was evidenced, it was not clear how this affected site visitation temporal analysis. Bookmark collections were characterized as rapidly growing and unmanaged. Given the study population, use and maintenance could be a function of multiple users on a single machine, or of convenience use not related to an individual user’s prevalent usage patterns. No explanation of the machine use environment, such as shared equipment, was provided. It would also have been helpful if the protocol used for evaluating invalid bookmarks, such as number of attempts to reach a site, were provided. A 404 “not found” error could indicate heavy network activity or network difficulties, not always an inactive site. Online Computing Reviews Service

Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies  Volume 54, Issue 6
June 2001
145 pages

Publisher

Academic Press, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 June 2001

Author Tags

  1. WWW
  2. navigation
  3. revisitation
  4. web use

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 07 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Designing Privacy-Protecting System with Visual Masking Based on Investigation of Privacy Concerns in Virtual Screen Sharing EnvironmentsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36981338:ISS(165-188)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
  • (2023)When Browsing Gets Cluttered: Exploring and Modeling Interactions of Browsing Clutter, Browsing Habits, and CopingProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580690(1-29)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2022)User study on link-service usage and information processing in the context of the world wide webProceedings of the 5th Workshop on Human Factors in Hypertext10.1145/3538882.3542802(1-9)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2022
  • (2022)Scrapbook: Screenshot-Based Bookmarks for Effective Digital Resource Curation across ApplicationsProceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3526113.3545678(1-13)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2022
  • (2021)KondoCloud: Improving Information Management in Cloud Storage via Recommendations Based on File SimilarityThe 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3472749.3474736(69-83)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2021
  • (2021)How to Evaluate Object Selection and Manipulation in VR? Guidelines from 20 Years of StudiesProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445193(1-20)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
  • (2021)The idiosyncrasies of everyday digital livesComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2020.106570114:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2021
  • (2020)Effects of Past Interactions on User Experience with Recommended DocumentsProceedings of the 2020 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3343413.3377977(153-162)Online publication date: 14-Mar-2020
  • (2019)ToRankExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.029123:C(212-226)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2019
  • (2018)Revisitation in Urban Space vs. OnlineProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/32870342:4(1-24)Online publication date: 27-Dec-2018
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media