Bisimulation for Higher-Order Process Calculi

Ahigher-order process calculusis a calculus for communicating systems which contains higher-order constructs like communication of terms. We analyse the notion ofbisimulationin these calculi. We argue that both the standard definition of bisimulation (i.e., the one for CCS and related calculi), as well ashigher-order bisimulationE. Astesiano, A. Giovini, and G. Reggio,in“STACS '88,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 294, pp. 207 226, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/New York, 1988; G. Boudol,in“TAPSOFT '89,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 351, pp. 149 161, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/New York, 1989; B. Thomsen, Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Computing, Imperial College, 1990] are in general unsatisfactory, because of their over-discrimination. We propose and study a new form of bisimulation for such calculi, calledcontext bisimulation, which yields a more satisfactory discriminanting power. A drawback of context bisimulation is the heavy use of universal quantification in its definition, which is hard to handle in practice. To resolve this difficulty we introducetriggered bisimulationandnormal bisimulation, and we prove that they both coincide with context bisimulation. In the proof, we exploit thefactorisation theorem: When comparing the behaviour of two processes, it allows us to “isolate” subcomponents which might give differences, so that the analysis can be concentrated on them