Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1007/11502593_13guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Sensor network calculus – a framework for worst case analysis

Published: 30 June 2005 Publication History

Abstract

To our knowledge, at the time of writing no methodology exists to dimension a sensor network so that a worst case traffic scenario can be definitely supported. In this paper, the well known network calculus is tailored so that it can be used as a tool for worst case traffic analysis in sensor networks. To illustrate the usage of the resulting sensor network calculus, typical example scenarios are analyzed by this new methodology. Sensor network calculus provides the ability to derive deterministic statements about supportable operation modes of sensor networks and the design of sensor nodes.

References

[1]
M. Weiser. The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265(3):94-104, September 1991.
[2]
R. Braden, D. Clark, and S. Shenker. Integrated Services in the Internet Architecture: an Overview. RFC 1633, June 1994.
[3]
K. Nichols, S. Blake, F. Baker, and D. Black. Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers. Proposed Standard RFC 2474, December 1998.
[4]
J.-Y. Le Boudec and P. Thiran. Network Calculus - A Theory of Deterministic Queueing Systems for the Internet. Springer, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, LNCS 2050, 2001.
[5]
Chipcon SmartRF CC1000 Data Sheet. Chipcon, www.chipcon.com. 2002.
[6]
Crossbow Technology INC. Smart Dust Training Seminar. Tutorial at the 1st IEEE European Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks (EWSN2004), Berlin, Germany, January 2004.
[7]
J. Polastre. Design and Implementation of Wireless Sensor Networks for Habitat Monitoring. Masters Thesis. University of California, Berkeley. Berkeley, CA. May 23, 2003.
[8]
A. Barroso, J. Benson, T. Murphy, U. Roedig, C. Sreenan, S. Bellis, K. Delaney, B. OFlynn. The DSYS25 Sensor Platform. Demo at the SenSys 2004. http://www.cs.ucc.ie/~ur1/pages/publications/files/sensys04barroso.pdf
[9]
P. Goyal, S. S. Lam, and H. Vin. Determining End-to-End Delay Bounds in Heterogeneous Networks. In Proceedings of Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video, 5th International Workshop, NOSSDAV 95, Durham, New Hampshire, USA. Springer LNCS 1018, April 1995.
[10]
D. Stiliadis and A. Varma. Latency-Rate Servers: A General Model for Analysis of Traffic Scheduling Algorithms. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 6(5):611624, October 1998.
[11]
Alan Demers, Srinivasan Keshav, and Scott Shenker. Analysis and Simulation of a Fair Queueing Algorithm. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, pp. 3-12, August 1989.
[12]
B. Karp and H. T. Kung, "GPSR: greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks," in Mobile Computing and Networking, pp. 243-254, 2000.
[13]
Crossbow Technology INC. Mica-2 Data Sheet. Crossbow.
[14]
http://www.xbow.com.
[15]
B. Deb, S. Bhatnagar and B. Nath. ReInForM: Reliable Information Forwarding using Multiple Paths in Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual IEEE conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN 2003), Bonn, Germany, October 2003.
[16]
U. Roedig, A. Barroso, and C. J. Sreenan. Determination of Aggregation Points in Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 30th Euromicro Conference (EUROMICRO 2004), Rennes, France, IEEE Computer Society Press, August 2004.
[17]
C. Intanagonwiwat, R. Govindan and D. Estrin. Directed Diffusion: A Scalable and Robust Communication Paradigm for Sensor Networks In Proceedings of the Sixth Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networks (MobiCOM 2000), August 2000, Boston, Massachusetts.
[18]
J. Zhang, K. Premaratne and Peter H. Bauer. Resource Allocation and Congestion Control in Distributed Sensor Networks - a Network Calculus Approach. In Proceedings of Fifteenth International Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems, University of Notre Dame, August 12-16, 2002.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Improving the Timeliness of Bluetooth Low Energy in Noisy RF EnvironmentsProceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks10.5555/3324320.3324324(23-34)Online publication date: 25-Feb-2019
  • (2018)Energy-Harvesting Wireless Sensor Networks (EH-WSNs)ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/318333814:2(1-50)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2018
  • (2018)A survey of hybrid MAC protocols for machine-to-machine communicationsTelecommunications Systems10.1007/s11235-018-0434-469:1(141-165)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2018
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Sensor network calculus – a framework for worst case analysis

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Guide Proceedings
      DCOSS'05: Proceedings of the First IEEE international conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems
      June 2005
      423 pages
      ISBN:3540264221
      • Editors:
      • Viktor K. Prasanna,
      • Sitharama S. Iyengar,
      • Paul G. Spirakis,
      • Matt Welsh

      Sponsors

      • IEEE CS TCPP: IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Parallel Processing
      • IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Distributed Processing

      Publisher

      Springer-Verlag

      Berlin, Heidelberg

      Publication History

      Published: 30 June 2005

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 19 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2019)Improving the Timeliness of Bluetooth Low Energy in Noisy RF EnvironmentsProceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks10.5555/3324320.3324324(23-34)Online publication date: 25-Feb-2019
      • (2018)Energy-Harvesting Wireless Sensor Networks (EH-WSNs)ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/318333814:2(1-50)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2018
      • (2018)A survey of hybrid MAC protocols for machine-to-machine communicationsTelecommunications Systems10.1007/s11235-018-0434-469:1(141-165)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2018
      • (2018)Toward an analytical method for SLA validationSoftware and Systems Modeling (SoSyM)10.1007/s10270-017-0604-y17:2(527-545)Online publication date: 1-May-2018
      • (2017)A Tool for xMAS-Based Modeling and Analysis of Communication Fabrics in SimulinkACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation10.1145/300544627:3(1-26)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2017
      • (2016)Statistical Delay Bound for WirelessHART NetworksProceedings of the 13th ACM Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad Hoc, Sensor, & Ubiquitous Networks10.1145/2989293.2989295(33-40)Online publication date: 13-Nov-2016
      • (2016)Impact of redundant sensor deployment over data gathering performanceJournal of Network and Computer Applications10.1016/j.jnca.2016.03.01267:C(26-42)Online publication date: 1-May-2016
      • (2014)A robust topology control solution for the sink placement problem in WSNsJournal of Network and Computer Applications10.5555/3170014.317016939:C(70-82)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2014
      • (2014)End-to-end delay bounds for variable length packet transmissions under flow transformationsProceedings of the 8th International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools10.4108/icst.Valuetools.2014.258194(31-38)Online publication date: 9-Dec-2014
      • (2013)Mathematical formalisms for performance evaluation of networks-on-chipACM Computing Surveys10.1145/2480741.248075545:3(1-41)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2013
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      View options

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media