Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1007/11799511_19guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Ontology analysis on complexity and evolution based on conceptual model

Published: 20 July 2006 Publication History

Abstract

With the tremendous development in size, the complexity of ontology increases. Thus ontology evaluation becomes extremely important for developers to determine the fundamental characteristics of ontologies in order to improve the quality, estimate cost and reduce future maintenance. Our research examines the concepts and their hierarchy in ontology conceptual model, the common feature of most ontologies, which reflects the fundamental complexity. We suggest some well-defined metrics of complexity, which mainly examine the quantity, ratio and correlativity of concepts and relationships, to evaluate ontology from the viewpoint of complexity and evolution. In the study, we measured three ontologies in Gene Ontology to verify our metrics. The results indicate that these metrics works well, and the biological process ontology is the most complex one from the view of complexity, and the molecular function ontology is the unsteadiest one from the view of evolution.

References

[1]
http://www.geneontology.org/
[2]
W. Nejdl, B. Wolf, C. Qu, S. Decker, M. Sintek, A. Naeve, M. Nilsson, M. Palmr, and T. Risch. Edutella: a p2p networking infrastructure based on rdf. In Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on World Wide Web, pages 604-615. ACM Press, 2002.
[3]
T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila. The semantic web. Scientific American, 284(5): 34-43, May 2001.
[4]
A. Das, W. Wu, D. McGuinness, Industrial Strength Ontology Management', The Emerging Semantic Web, IOS Press, 2002.
[5]
Sirin, E., J. Hendler and B. Parsia, 2003. Semiautomatic composition of web services using semantic description. Web Services: Modeling, Architecture and Infrastructure Workshop in Conjunction with ICEIS2003.
[6]
Stojanovic L. and Motik B.: Ontology Evolution within Ontology Editors. In Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management 2002, pp 53-62. Siguenza, Spain, 30th September.
[7]
S. Staab, H.-P. Schnurr, R. Studer and Y. Sure, Knowledge Processes and Ontologies, IEEE Intelligent Systems. 16(1), Jan./Feb. 2001. Special Issue on Knowledge Management, 2001.
[8]
Wand, Y. and Weber, R. Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling - A Research Agenda. Information Systems Research, 2002, 13 (4), pp. 363- 376.
[9]
Corcho, O. & Gomez-Perez A. A road map to ontology specification languages. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management, Juan-les-Pins, France, 2000, pp. 80-96.
[10]
A. Burton-Jones, V.C. Storey, V. Sugumaran, and P. Ahluwalia. Assessing the effectiveness of the daml ontologies for the semantic web. In Eighth International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems, June 2003.
[11]
Haining Yao, Anthony Mark Orme and Letha Etzkorn. Cohesion Metrics for Ontology Design and Application, Journal of Computer Science 1(1): 107-113, 2005
[12]
Dazhou Kang, Baowen Xu, Jianjiang Lu, William C. Chu. "A Complexity Measure for Ontology Based on UML," 10th IEEE International Workshop on Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems (FTDCS'04) pp. 222-228
[13]
Idris Hsi, "Analyzing the Conceptual Coherence of Computing Applications Through Ontological Excavation", PhD Thesis Proposal, May 13, 2004.
[14]
Chris. Mungall, Increased complexity in the GO, http://www.fruitfly.org/~cjm/obol/ doc/go-complexity.html

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
DILS'06: Proceedings of the Third international conference on Data Integration in the Life Sciences
July 2006
296 pages
ISBN:3540365931
  • Editors:
  • Ulf Leser,
  • Felix Naumann,
  • Barbara Eckman

Sponsors

  • metanomics: metanomics
  • metanomicshealth: metanomicshealth
  • IBMR: IBM Research
  • Microsoft Research: Microsoft Research
  • EBI Industry Program: EBI Industry Program

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 20 July 2006

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 27 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media