A Real-Life School Study of Confirmation Bias and Polarisation in Information Behaviour
Authors: 
Simone Kopeinik, 
Elisabeth Lex, 
Dominik Kowald, Dietrich Albert, Paul SeitlingerAuthors Info & Claims
Simone Kopeinik, Elisabeth Lex, Dominik Kowald, Dietrich Albert, Paul SeitlingerAuthors Info & ClaimsPages 409 - 422
Abstract
When people engage in Social Networking Sites, they influence one another through their contributions. Prior research suggests that the interplay between individual differences and environmental variables, such as a person’s openness to conflicting information, can give rise to either public spheres or echo chambers. In this work, we aim to unravel critical processes of this interplay in the context of learning. In particular, we observe high school students’ information behavior (search and evaluation of Web resources) to better understand a potential coupling between confirmatory search and polarization and, in further consequence, improve learning analytics and information services for individual and collective search in learning scenarios. In an empirical study, we had 91 high school students performing an information search in a social bookmarking environment. Gathered log data was used to compute indices of confirmatory search and polarisation as well as to analyze the impact of social stimulation. We find confirmatory search and polarization to correlate positively and social stimulation to mitigate, i.e., reduce the two variables’ relationship. From these findings, we derive practical implications for future work that aims to refine our formalism to compute confirmatory search and polarisation indices and to apply it for depolarizing information services.
References
[1]
Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., Adamic, L.: The role of social networks in information diffusion. In: Proceedings of WWW 2012, pp. 519–528. ACM (2012)
[2]
Bateman, S., Brooks, C., Mccalla, G., Brusilovsky, P.: Applying collaborative tagging to e-learning. In: Proceedings of WWW (2007)
[3]
Brown C and Czerniewicz L Debunking the ‘digital native’: beyond digital apartheid, towards digital democracy J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 2010 26 5 357-369
[4]
Brundidge J Encountering “difference” in the contemporary public sphere: the contribution of the internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks J. Commun. 2010 60 4 680-700
[5]
Dahlgren P The internet, public spheres, and political communication: dispersion and deliberation Polit. Commun. 2005 22 2 147-162
[6]
Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., West, R., Jurafsky, D., Leskovec, J., Potts, C.: No country for old members: user lifecycle and linguistic change in online communities. In: Proceedings of WWW 2013, pp. 307–318. ACM (2013)
[7]
De Liddo, A., Buckingham Shum, S.: The evidence hub: harnessing the collective intelligence of communities to build evidence-based knowledge (2013)
[8]
DiMaggio P, Evans J, and Bryson B Have American’s social attitudes become more polarized? Am. J. Sociol. 1996 102 3 690-755
[9]
Font F, Serrà J, and Serra X Analysis of the impact of a tag recommendation system in a real-world folksonomy ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2015 7 1 6:1-6:27
[10]
Fu, W.T.: The microstructures of social tagging: a rational model. In: Proceedings of CSCW 2008, pp. 229–238. ACM (2008)
[11]
Fu WT and Dong W Collaborative indexing and knowledge exploration: a social learning model IEEE Intell. Syst. 2012 27 1 39-46
[12]
Fu, W.T., Kannampallil, T.G., Kang, R.: A semantic imitation model of social tag choices. In: Proceedings of CSE 2009, vol. 4, pp. 66–73. IEEE (2009)
[13]
Gallardo-Echenique EE, Marqués-Molías L, Bullen M, and Strijbos JW Let’s talk about digital learners in the digital era Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 2015 16 3 156-187
[14]
Habermas J, Habermas J, and Mccarthy T The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society 1991 Cambridge MIT Press
[15]
Hommel B Convergent and divergent operations in cognitive search Cogn. Search: Evol. Algorithms Brain 2012 9 221-235
[16]
Huckfeldt R, Mendez JM, and Osborn T Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: the political consequences of heterogeneous networks Polit. Psychol. 2004 25 1 65-95
[17]
Kopeinik, S., Eskandar, A., Ley, T., Albert, D., Seitlinger, P.C.: Adapting an open source social bookmarking system to observe critical information behaviour. In: Proceedings of LILE (2018)
[18]
Kopeinik, S., Lex, E., Seitlinger, P., Albert, D., Ley, T.: Supporting collaborative learning with tag recommendations: a real-world study in an inquiry-based classroom project. In: Proc. of LAK 2017, pp. 409–418. ACM (2017)
[19]
Kuhn, A., Cahill, C., Quintana, C., Schmoll, S.: Using tags to encourage reflection and annotation on data during nomadic inquiry. In: Proceedings of CHI 2011, pp. 667–670. ACM (2011)
[20]
Ley T and Seitlinger P Dynamics of human categorization in a collaborative tagging system: how social processes of semantic stabilization shape individual sensemaking Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015 51 140-151
[21]
Lin N et al. The dynamic features of delicious, Flickr, and YouTube J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 2012 63 1 139-162
[22]
Livingstone S Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education Oxford Rev. Educ. 2012 38 1 9-24
[23]
MacKuen M, Wolak J, Keele L, and Marcus GE Civic engagements: resolute partisanship or reflective deliberation Am. J. Polit. Sci. 2010 54 2 440-458
[24]
Marinho LB et al. Recommender Systems for Social Tagging Systems 2012 Heidelberg Springer
[25]
McGrew S, Breakstone J, Ortega T, Smith M, and Wineburg S Can students evaluate online sources? Learning from assessments of civic online reasoning Theory Res. Soc. Educ. 2018 46 2 165-193
[26]
Nikolov D, Oliveira DF, Flammini A, and Menczer F Measuring online social bubbles PeerJ Comput. Sci. 2015 1 e38
[27]
Pariser E The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding From You 2011 London Penguin
[28]
Sarmiento JW and Stahl G Group creativity in interaction: collaborative referencing, remembering, and bridging Intl. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2008 24 5 492-504
[29]
Schulz-Hardt S, Frey D, Lüthgens C, and Moscovici S Biased information search in group decision making J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2000 78 4 655
[30]
Schwind C and Buder J Reducing confirmation bias and evaluation bias: when are preference-inconsistent recommendations effective-and when not? Comput. Hum. Behav. 2012 28 6 2280-2290
[31]
Seitlinger P, Ley T, and Albert D Verbatim and semantic imitation in indexing resources on the web: a fuzzy-trace account of social tagging Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 2015 29 1 32-48
[32]
Seitlinger P et al. Balancing the fluency-consistency tradeoff in collaborative information search with a recommender approach Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2018 34 6 557-575
[33]
Stroud NJ Polarization and partisan selective exposure J. Commun. 2010 60 3 556-576
[34]
Wagner C, Singer P, Strohmaier M, and Huberman B Semantic stability and implicit consensus in social tagging streams IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 2014 1 1 108-120
[35]
Wang, Y., Luo, J., Niemi, R., Li, Y.: To follow or not to follow: analyzing the growth patterns of the trumpists on Twitter. In: Proceedings of ICWSM (2016)
[36]
Xu, Z., Fu, Y., Mao, J., Su, D.: Towards the semantic web: collaborative tag suggestions. In: Proceedings of WWW (2006)
Index Terms
- A Real-Life School Study of Confirmation Bias and Polarisation in Information Behaviour
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Antecedents of information systems user behaviour – extended expectation-confirmation model
The study examines antecedents that affect information systems IS users' behaviour and influence their decision to either continue or discontinue with IS use. Two models were used: the expectation-confirmation model of IS continuance ECM-IS and the ...
Information technology adoption behavior life cycle: Toward a Technology Continuance Theory (TCT)
For over a decade, researchers have devoted much effort to construct theoretical models, such as the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Expectation Confirmation Model (ECM) for explaining and predicting user behavior in IS acceptance and ...
Understanding determinants of information systems users’ behaviour: a comparison of two models in the context of integrated accounting and budgeting software
This study examines determinants that affect the behaviour of information systems IS users, and influence of the users’ decisions to continue using IS by two models: the technology acceptance model TAM and the expectation-confirmation model of IS ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Sep 2019
797 pages
ISBN:978-3-030-29735-0
DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-29736-7
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019.
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Berlin, Heidelberg
Publication History
Published: 16 September 2019
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in