Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-031-04987-3_18guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Inspection of In-Vehicle Touchscreen Infotainment Display for Different Screen Locations, Menu Types, and Positions

Published: 26 June 2022 Publication History

Abstract

There has been a rapid increase in ‘In-vehicle touchscreens’ usage over the last decade, particularly for information and entertainment functions. And because of the dynamic interface functionality, the touchscreen becomes a major attraction for the automobile industry. As a result, today most car manufacturer uses touchscreen instead of static push buttons. For display screen locations, there have been two legacy display locations in the car. One is a ‘Head-up display’ and ‘Head-down display’. The head-up display is similar to jet plans mounted on top of the instrument panel board and head-down display - located on the car console. However, the HUD position won't work for touchscreen devices since the touchscreen required direct touch input from the driver for which the HUD location either blocks the road view or is out of the driver's reach. Besides, there are numbers of possibilities for HDD locations to enhance driver’s interaction and driving experience.
In the research study, we are evaluating 8 different possible “in-vehicle touch-screen designs”. (2 HDD locations for touch screen display- Top & Middle, 2 different main menu layouts- Horizontal & Vertical, 2 screen mount positions- Fixed screen vs Tilted screen according to user preference). The study focused on assessing possibilities for different HDD locations within proximity of the driver. This experiment aims to find the most effective and efficient touchscreen position with the least possible discomfort and distraction. Participants were instructed to perform a series of different Music, A/C, Seat control tasks on the developed In-vehicle infotainment prototype in the experiment. The experiment tasks were focused on controlled and real-life task-based scenarios.

References

[1]
Ablassmeier, M., Poitschke, T., Wallhoff, F., Bengler, K., Rigoll, G.: Eye Gaze studies comparing head-up and head-down displays in vehicles. In: IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, vol. 1, pp. 2250—2252. IEEE, Piscataway (2007)
[2]
Ariza, M., Zato, J.G., Naranjo, J.E.: HMI design in vehicles based in usability and accessibility concepts. In: 12th International Workshop on Computer Aided Systems Theory, EUROCAST 2009. Archivo Digital UPM, Madrid (2009)
[3]
Buhmann, A., Hellmueller, L.: Pervasive entertainment, ubiquitous entertainment. centre for the study of communication and culture. Santa Clara: A Quarterly Review of Communication Research (2009)
[4]
Burnett, G., Crossland, A., Large, D.R., Harvey, C.: The impact of interaction mechanisms with in- vehicle touch screens on task performance. In: Conference: Ergonomics & Human Factors. Stratford-upon-Avon, UK (2019)
[5]
Burnett G, Lawson G, Millen L, and Pickering C Designing touchpad user-interfaces for vehicles: which tasks are most suitable? Behav. Inf. Technol. 2011 30 3 403-414
[6]
Burrell, A., Sodan, A.: Web interface navigation design: which style of navigation-link menus do users prefer? In: International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops, Atlanta, GA, USA, pp. 3–7. IEEE Computer Society (2006)
[7]
Callahan, J., Hopkins, D., Weiser, M., Shneiderman, B.: An empirical comparison of pie vs. linear menus. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 95–100. Association for Computing Machinery, Washington, D.C., USA (1988)
[8]
Card, S.: User perceptual mechanisms in the search of computer command menus. In: Proceedings of Human Factors in Computer Systems, pp. 190–196. ACM, New York (1982)
[9]
Card SK, Moran TP, and Newell A The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction 1983 Hillsdale Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
[10]
Chiang, I.: Usability Testing Basics. Techsmith (2015). https://www.techsmith.com/
[11]
Chisholm, S.L., Caird, J.K., Lockhart, J., Fern, L.: Driving Performance while engaged in MP-3 player interaction: effects of practice and task difficulty on PRT and eye movements. In: 4th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, pp. 238–245. Driving Assessment (2007)
[12]
Conley, C., Gabbard, J., Smith, M.: ead-Up vs. Head-down displays: examining traditional methods of display assessment while driving. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 185–192, New York, NY, USA. Automotive'UI 2016 (2016)
[13]
Eren, A., Burnett, G., Large, D.R.: Can in-vehicle touchscreens be operated with zero visual demand? An exploratory driving simulator study. In: International Conference on Driver Distraction and Inattention. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (2015)
[14]
Fang, X., Holsapple, C.W.: An empirical study of web site navigation structures’ impacts on web site usability. Decis. Supp. Syst. 43(2), 476–491 (2007)
[15]
Faulkner X and Hayton C When left might not be right J. Usability Stud. 2011 6 4 245-256
[16]
[17]
Fitts, P.M.: The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J. Exp. Psychol. 47(6), 381–391 (1954)
[18]
Green, P.: The 15-second rule for driver information systems. In: America Conference Proceedings (CD) (standard (J2364)), pp. 1–9 (1999)
[19]
Hagen, L., Herdman, C., Brown, M.: The Perfomance consts of digital head-up displays. In: International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, pp. 244–246, Dayton, Ohio (2007)
[20]
Hemenway, K.: Psychological issues in the use of icons in command menus. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 20–23. ACM, New York (1982)
[21]
Hodgson, G., Ruth, S.R.: The use of menus in the design of on-line sytems: a retrospective view. ACM SIGCHI Bull. 17(1), 16–22 (1985)
[22]
Horrey, W.J., Wickens, C.D., Alexander, A.L.: The effects of head-up display clutter and in-vehicle display separation on concurrent driving performance. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 47, no. 16, pp. 1880–1884 (2003)
[23]
Horrey WJ, Wickens CD, and Consalus KP Modeling drivers’ visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 2006 12 2 67-78
[24]
Horrey, W., Alexander, A., Wickens, C.D.: Does workload modulate the effects of in-vehicle display location on concurrent driving and side task performance. In: Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference, vol. 217, pp. 1–20. Dearborn, Michigan (2003)
[25]
Jokinen JP, Wang Z, Sarcar S, Oulasvirta A, and Ren X Adaptive feature guidance: modelling visual search with graphical layouts Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2020 136 1-22
[26]
Jose, R., Lee, G., Billinghurst, M.: A comparative study of simulated augmented reality displays for vehicle navigation. In: Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, pp. 40–48 (2016)
[27]
Large, D.R., Burnett, G., Crundall, E., Lawson, G.: Twist it, touch it, push it, swipe it: evaluating secondary input devices for use with an automotive touchscreen HMI. In: Automotive'UI 2016 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 161–168. ACM, Ann Arbor (2016)
[28]
Lawrence, J., Risser, M., Prinzel: Head-Up Displays and Attention Capture. NASA, Man/System Technology and Life Support. NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States. NTRS (2004)
[29]
Leuthold S, Schmutz P, Bargas-Avila J, Tuch AN, and Opwis K Vertical versus dynamic menus on the world wide web: eye tracking study measuring the influence of menu design and task complexity on user performance and subjective preference Comput. Hum. Behav. 2011 27 459-472
[30]
Liu, Y.-C., Wen, M.-H.: Comparison of head-up display (HUD) vs. head-down display (HDD): driving performance of commercial vehicle operators in Taiwan. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 61(5), 679–697 (2004)
[31]
Manufacturers, A.: Statement of principles, criteria and verification procedures on driver interactions with advanced in-vehicle information and communication systems. Draft Version 3.0, Alliance of Automobile Manufactures, Washington, DC, USA (2003)
[32]
McGookin, D., Brewster, S., Jiang, W.: Investigating touchscreen accessibility for people with visual impairments. In: Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Building Bridges, Lund, Sweden, pp. 298–307. Association for Computing Machinery (2008)
[33]
Molich, R., Hornbaek, K., Krug, S., Johnson, J., Scott, J.: Usability and Accessibility (7.4) (2008). www.techsmith.com
[34]
Mourant, R.R., Rockwell, T.H.: Mapping eye-movement patterns to the visual scene in driving: an exploratory study. Hum. Fact. 12(1), 81–87 (1970)
[35]
Murano, P., Lomas, T.: Menu positioning on web pages. Does it matter? Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 6(4) (2015)
[36]
Murano, P., Oenga, K.: The impact on effectiveness and user satisfaction of menu positioning on web pages. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 3–9 (2012)
[37]
Louveton, N., McCall, R.: Driving while using a smartphone-based mobility application: evaluating the impact of three multi-choice user interfaces on visual- manual distraction. Appl. Ergon. 54, 196–204 (2016)
[38]
Ng, A., Brewster, S.: An evaluation of touch and pressure-based scrolling and haptic feedback for in-car touchscreens. Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 11–20. Oldenburg, Germany. ACM (2017)
[39]
NHTSA: Visual-Manual NHTSA Driver Distraction Guidelines for Portable and Aftermarket Devices. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Washington, DC (2016)
[40]
Nielsen, J.: End of Web Design. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/end-of-web-design. Accessed 22 July 2000
[41]
Normark, C., Tretten, P., Gärling, A.: Do redundant head-up and head-down display configurations cause distractions? In: Driving Assessment Conference, pp. 398–404. Big Sky, Montana, USA (2009)
[42]
Previc F The neuropsychology of 3-D space Psychol. Bull. 1998 124 2 123-164
[43]
Purucker, C., Naujoks, F., Prill, A., Neukum, A.: Evaluating distraction of in-vehicle information systems while driving by predicting total eyes-off-road times with keystroke level modeling. Appl. Ergon. (n.d.)
[44]
Rydstrom, A., Brostrom, R., Bengtsson, P.: A comparison of two contemporary types of in-car multifunctional interfaces. Appl. Ergon. (43), 507–514 (2012)
[45]
Santos, J., Merat, N., Mouta, S., Brookhuis, K.W.: The interaction between driving and in-vehicle information systems: comparison of results from laboratory, simulator and real-world studies. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 8(2), 135–146 (2005)
[46]
Stanton N, Hedge A, Brookhuis K, Salas E, and Hendrick H Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods 2005 Taylor & Francis
[47]
Topliss, B., Harvey, C., Burnett, G.: How long can a driver look? Exploring time thresholds to evaluate head-up display imagery. In: 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 9–18, New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery (2020)
[48]
Tretten, P., Gärling, A., Nilsson, R., Larsson, T.: An on-road study of head-up display: preferred location and acceptance levels. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 55, pp. 1914–1918. SAGE Journals (2011)
[49]
Vilchez J Representativity and univocity of traffic signs and their effect on trajectory movement in a driving-simulation task: regulatory signs J. Safety Res. 2018 66 101-111
[50]
Wang Y, Mehler B, Reimer B, Lammers V, D'Ambrosio LA, and Coughlin JF The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: a comparison with field testing Ergonomics 2010 53 3 404-420
[51]
Weinberg, G., Harsham, B., Forlines, C., Medenica, Z.: Contextual push-to-talk: shortening voice dialogs to improve driving performance. In: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 113–122 (2010)
[52]
Wickens C Multiple resources and performance prediction Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 2002 3 2 159-177

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Technology Scan of Touchscreen Trends in Passenger VehiclesProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3640792.3675729(149-159)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Interaction with a 3D Surface for an Innovative Input Experience on a Central ConsoleProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3640792.3675707(136-148)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024

Index Terms

  1. Inspection of In-Vehicle Touchscreen Infotainment Display for Different Screen Locations, Menu Types, and Positions
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Guide Proceedings
    HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems: 4th International Conference, MobiTAS 2022, Held as Part of the 24th HCI International Conference, HCII 2022, Virtual Event, June 26 – July 1, 2022, Proceedings
    Jun 2022
    649 pages
    ISBN:978-3-031-04986-6
    DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-04987-3
    • Editor:
    • Heidi Krömker

    Publisher

    Springer-Verlag

    Berlin, Heidelberg

    Publication History

    Published: 26 June 2022

    Author Tags

    1. In-vehicle touch screen display
    2. Human machine interface
    3. Automotive user interfaces
    4. Touch screen display locations
    5. Menu types

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)A Technology Scan of Touchscreen Trends in Passenger VehiclesProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3640792.3675729(149-159)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Interaction with a 3D Surface for an Innovative Input Experience on a Central ConsoleProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3640792.3675707(136-148)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024

    View Options

    View options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media