Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-319-26832-3_48guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

User Similarity Adjustment for Improved Recommendations

Published: 09 December 2015 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Recommender systems are becoming more and more attractive in both research and commercial communities due to Information overload problem and the popularity of the Internet applications. Collaborative Filtering, a popular branch of recommendation approaches, makes predictions based on historical data available in the system. In particular, user based Collaborative Filtering largely depends on how users rate various items of the database and the success of such a system largely relies on pair wise similarity between users. However popular items may give a negative effect on choosing similar users of the target user. The proposed work namely User Similarity Adjustment based on Item Diversity USA_ID is designed to achieve personalized recommendations by modifying user similarity scores, for the purpose of reducing the negative effects of popular items in user based Collaborative Filtering framework. A Recommender system is focusing exclusively on achieving accurate recommendations i.e., providing the most relevant items for the needs of a user. From user's perspective, they would not be interested when they are facing monotonous recommendations even if they are accurate. Whilst much research effort is spent on improving accuracy of recommendations, less effort is taken on analyzing usefulness of recommendations. Novelty and Diversity have been identified as key dimensions of recommendation utility. It has been made clear that greater accuracy leads to lower diversity which results in accuracy-diversity trade off in personalized recommender systems. The proposed work provides an approach to increase the utility of a Recommender system by improving accuracy as well as diversity. Experiments are conducted on the bench mark data set MovieLens and the results show efficiency of the proposed approach in improving quality of predictions.

    References

    [1]
    Adamopoulos, P., Tuzhilin, A.: On unexpectedness in recommender systems: or how to expect the unexpected. In: Workshop on Novelty and Diversity in Recommender Systems DiveRS 2011, at the 5th ACM International Conference on Recommender Systems RecSys 2011, pp. 11---18, Chicago, Illinois, USA. ACM 2011
    [2]
    Adomavicius, G., Kwon, Y.: Maximizing aggregate recommendation diversity: A graph-theoretic approach. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Novelty and Diversity in Recommender Systems DiveRS 2011, pp. 3---10 2011
    [3]
    Adomavicius, G., Tuzhilin, A.: Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 176, 734---749 2005
    [4]
    Bell, R.M., Koren, Y.: Improved neighborhood-based collaborative filtering. In: KDD Cup and Workshop at the 13th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 2007
    [5]
    Bogers, T., Van Den Bosch, A.: Fusing recommendations for social bookmarking web sites. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 153, 31---72 2011
    [6]
    Brynjolfsson, E., Hu, Y., Simester, D.: Goodbye pareto principle, hello long tail: the effect of search costs on the concentration of product sales. Manage. Sci. 578, 1373---1386 2011
    [7]
    Brynjolfsson, E., Hu, Y., Smith, M.D.: Research commentary-long tails vs. superstars: the effect of information technology on product variety and sales concentration patterns. Inf. Syst. Res. 214, 736---747 2010
    [8]
    Burke, R.: Hybrid recommender systems: survey and experiments. User Mod. User-Adap. Interact. 124, 331---370 2002
    [9]
    Carbonell, J., Goldstein, J.: The use of mmr, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 335---336. ACM 1998
    [10]
    Carrer-Neto, W., Hernández-Alcaraz, M.L., Valencia-García, R., García-Sánchez, F.: Social knowledge-based recommender system. Application to the movies domain. Expert Syst. Appl. 3912, 10990---11000 2012
    [11]
    Castells, P., Vargas, S., Wang, J.: Novelty and diversity metrics for recommender systems: choice, discovery and relevance. In: International Workshop on Diversity in Document Retrieval DDR 2011 at the 33rd European Conference on Information Retrieval ECIR 2011, pp. 29---36. Citeseer 2011
    [12]
    Chuanmin, M., Xiaofei, S., Jing, M., Xin, Z.: Collaborative filtering algorithm based on random walk with choice. sekeie-14, pp. 192---196 2014
    [13]
    Ekstrand, M.D., Riedl, J.T., Konstan, J.A.: Collaborative filtering recommender systems. Found. Trends Hum.-Comput. Interact. 42, 81---173 2011
    [14]
    Gan, M., Jiang, R.: Improving accuracy and diversity of personalized recommendation through power law adjustments of user similarities. Decis. Support Syst. 553, 811---821 2013
    [15]
    Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Borchers, A., Riedl, J.: An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 230---237. ACM 1999
    [16]
    Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Terveen, L.G., Riedl, J.T.: Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. TOIS 221, 5---53 2004
    [17]
    Lathia, N., Hailes, S., Capra, L., Amatriain, X.: Temporal diversity in recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 210---217. ACM 2010
    [18]
    Linden, G., Smith, B., York, J.: Amazon. com recommendations: Item-to-item collaborative filtering. Internet Comput. 71, 76---80 2003
    [19]
    Pazzani, M.J.: A framework for collaborative, content-based and demographic filtering. Artif. Intell. Rev. 135---6, 393---408 1999
    [20]
    Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., Riedl, J.: Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 285---295. ACM 2001
    [21]
    Shani, G., Gunawardana, A.: Evaluating recommendation systems. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Kantor, P.B. eds. Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 257---297. Springer, New York 2011
    [22]
    Su, X., Khoshgoftaar, T.M.: A survey of collaborative filtering techniques. Adv. Artif. Intell. 2009, Article No. 4 2009
    [23]
    Vargas, S., Castells, P.: Rank and relevance in novelty and diversity metrics for recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 109---116. ACM 2011
    [24]
    Ziegler, C.N., McNee, S.M., Konstan, J.A., Lausen, G.: Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 22---32. ACM 2005

    Index Terms

    1. User Similarity Adjustment for Improved Recommendations
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image Guide Proceedings
        MIKE 2015: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Mining Intelligence and Knowledge Exploration - Volume 9468
        December 2015
        710 pages
        ISBN:9783319268316

        Publisher

        Springer-Verlag

        Berlin, Heidelberg

        Publication History

        Published: 09 December 2015

        Author Tags

        1. Collaborative filtering
        2. Diversity
        3. Novelty
        4. Recommendation
        5. Utility

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • 0
          Total Citations
        • 0
          Total Downloads
        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 09 Aug 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        View Options

        View options

        Get Access

        Login options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media