Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_36guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

A Method for Recommending Ontology Alignment Strategies

Published: 15 March 2023 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    In different areas ontologies have been developed and many of these ontologies contain overlapping information. Often we would therefore want to be able to use multiple ontologies. To obtain good results, we need to find the relationships between terms in the different ontologies, i.e. we need to align them. Currently, there already exist a number of different alignment strategies. However, it is usually difficult for a user that needs to align two ontologies to decide which of the different available strategies are the most suitable. In this paper we propose a method that provides recommendations on alignment strategies for a given alignment problem. The method is based on the evaluation of the different available alignment strategies on several small selected pieces from the ontologies, and uses the evaluation results to provide recommendations. In the paper we give the basic steps of the method, and then illustrate and discuss the method in the setting of an alignment problem with two well-known biomedical ontologies. We also experiment with different implementations of the steps in the method.

    References

    [1]
    Bodenreider, O., Burgun, A.: Characterizing the Definitions of Anatomical Concepts in WordNet and Specialized Sources. In: Proc. of the First Global WordNet Conference, pp. 223–230 (2002)
    [2]
    Ehrig, M., Staab, S., Sure, Y.: Bootstrapping Ontology Alignment Methods with APFEL. In: Proc. of the Int. Semantic Web Conference, pp. 186–200 (2005)
    [3]
    Euzenat, J.: An API for ontology alignment, version 2.1, Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (2006)
    [4]
    Kalfoglou Y. and Schorlemmer M. Ontology mapping: the state of the art The Knowledge Engineering Review 2003 18 1 1-31
    [5]
    Lambrix P. and Edberg A. Evaluation of ontology merging tools in bioinformatics Proc. of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2003 8 589-600
    [6]
    Lambrix P. and Tan H. SAMBO - A System for Aligning and Merging Biomedical Ontologies Journal of Web Semantics 2006 4 3 196-206
    [7]
    Lambrix P. and Tan H. A Tool for Evaluating Ontology Alignment Strategies Journal on Data Semantics 2007 VIII 182-202
    [8]
    Lee Y., Sayyadian M., Doan A., and Rosenthal A. eTuner: tuning schema matching software using synthetic scenarios VLDB Journal 2007 16 1 97-122
    [9]
    Mochol, M., Jentzsch, A., Euzenat, J.: Applying an Analytic Method for Matching Approach Selection. Proc. of the Int. Workshop on Ontology Matching (2006)
    [10]
    OntoWeb Consortium, A survey on ontology tools, Deliverable 1.3 (2002)
    [11]
    Shvaiko P. and Euzenat J. A Survey of Schema-Based Matching Approaches Journal on Data Semantics 2005 IV 146-171
    [12]
    Stuckenschmidt, H., Klein, M.: Structure-based partitioning of large concept hierarchies. Proc. of the 3rd Int. Semantic Web Conference, 289–303 (2004)
    [13]
    Uschold, M., Jasper, R.: A Framework for Understanding and Classifying Ontology Applications. Proc. of the IJCAI Workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods: Lessons Learned and Future Trends (1999)

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Guide Proceedings
    The Semantic Web: 6th International Semantic Web Conference, 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2007 + ASWC 2007, Busan, Korea, November 11-15, 2007. Proceedings
    Nov 2007
    748 pages
    ISBN:978-3-540-76297-3
    DOI:10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0

    Publisher

    Springer-Verlag

    Berlin, Heidelberg

    Publication History

    Published: 15 March 2023

    Author Tags

    1. Combination Algorithm
    2. Recommendation Algorithm
    3. Alignment Problem
    4. Biomedical Ontology
    5. Segment Pair

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 0
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media