Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-540-87877-3_10guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

A Multi-level Methodology for Developing UML Sequence Diagrams

Published: 20 October 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Although the importance of UML Sequence Diagrams is well recognized by the object-oriented community, they remain a very difficult UML artifact to develop. In this paper we present a multi-level methodology to develop UML Sequence Diagrams. Our methodology is significant in three aspects. First, it provides a multilevel procedure to facilitate ease of the development process. Second, it makes use of certain patterns to ensure the validity of SQDs. Third, it uses consistency checks with corresponding use-case and class diagrams. Throughout the steps of the method we present rules and patterns demonstrating correct and incorrect diagramming of common situations through examples. The purpose of this study is to serve as a reference guide for novice sequence diagram modelers. This methodology is particularly useful for novice practitioners who face challenges in learning the process of SQD development.

References

[1]
Ambler, S.W.: UML 2 Sequence Diagram Overview (2008a), http://www.agilemodeling.com/artifacts/sequenceDiagram.htm
[2]
Ambler, S.W.: UML Sequence Diagramming Guidelines (2008b), http://www.agilemodeling.com/style/sequenceDiagram.htm
[3]
Aredo, D.B.: Semantics of UML sequence diagrams in PVS. In: UML 2000 Workshop on Dynamic Behavior in UML Models, Semantic Questions, York, UK (2000).
[4]
Arlow, J., Neustadt, I.: UML and the Unified Process: Practical Object-Oriented Analysis and Design. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2002).
[5]
Baker, P., Bristow, P., Jervis, C., King, D., Mitchell, B., Burton, S.: Detecting and resolving semantic pathologies in UML sequence diagrams. In: 10th European Software Engineering Conference, pp. 50-59. ACM, New York (2005).
[6]
Bist, G., MacKinnon, N., Murphy, S.: Sequence diagram presentation in technical documentation. In: 22nd Annual International Conference on Design of Communication: The Engineering of Quality Documentation, pp. 128-133. ACM, New York (2004).
[7]
Chonoles, M.J., Schardt, J.A.: UML 2 for Dummies. Wiley, Hoboken (2003).
[8]
Fowler, M.: UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2000).
[9]
Jacobson, I.: Object Oriented Software Engineering: A Use Case Driven Approach. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (1992).
[10]
Larman, C.: Applying UML and Patterns: An Introduction to Object-Oriented Analysis and Design and Iterative Development. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (2004).
[11]
Li, L.: Translating Use Cases to Sequence Diagrams. In: 15th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, Washington, DC, pp. 293-296 (2000).
[12]
Merdes, M., Dorsch, D.: Experiences with the development of a reverse engineering tool for UML sequence diagrams: A case study in modern java development. In: 4th International Symposium on Principles and Practice of Programming in Java, pp. 125-134. ACM, New York (2006).
[13]
Object Management Group. UML 2.0 Superstructure Final Adopted specification (2003), http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ptc/2003-08-02
[14]
Pooley, R., Stevens, P.: Using UML: Software Engineering with Objects and Components. Addison-Wesley, Harlow (1999).
[15]
Robinson, W.N., Woo, H.G.: Finding Reusable UML Sequence Diagrams Automatically. IEEE Software 21(5), 60-67 (2004).
[16]
Rountev, A., Connell, B.H.: Object naming analysis for reverse-engineered sequence diagrams. In: 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 254-263. ACM, New York (2005).
[17]
Rowlett, T.: The Object-Oriented Development Process: Developing and Managing a Robust Process for Object-Oriented Development. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2001).
[18]
Song, I.-Y.: Developing Sequence Diagrams in UML. In: 20th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, pp. 368-382. Springer, London (2001).
[19]
Xia, F., Kane, G.S.: Defining the Semantics of UML Class and Sequence Diagrams for Ensuring the Consistency and Executability of OO Software Specification. In: 1st International Workshop on Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis, Taipei, Taiwan (2003).

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
ER '08: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling
October 2008
548 pages
ISBN:9783540878766
  • Editors:
  • Qing Li,
  • Stefano Spaccapietra,
  • Eric Yu,
  • Antoni Olivé

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 20 October 2008

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media