Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-642-25504-5_8guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Making robots persuasive: the influence of combining persuasive strategies (gazing and gestures) by a storytelling robot on its persuasive power

Published: 24 November 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Social agency theory suggests that when an (artificial) agent combines persuasive strategies, its persuasive power increases. Therefore, we investigated whether a robot that uses two persuasive strategies is more persuasive than a robot that uses only one. Because in human face-to-face persuasion two crucial persuasive strategies are gazing and gestures, the current research investigated the combined and individual contribution of gestures and gazing on the persuasiveness of a storytelling robot. A robot told a persuasive story about the aversive consequences of lying to 48 participants. The robot used persuasive gestures (or not) and gazing (or not) to accompany this persuasive story. We assessed persuasiveness by asking participants to evaluate the lying individual in the story told by the robot. Results indicated that only gazing independently led to increased persuasiveness. Using persuasive gestures only led to increased persuasiveness when the robot combined it with (the persuasive strategy of) gazing. Without gazing, using persuasive gestures diminished robot persuasiveness. The implications of the current findings for theory and design of persuasive robots are discussed.

References

[1]
Bloss, R.: Your next surgeon be a robot! Industrial Robot: An International Journal 38, 6-10 (2011).
[2]
Humphrey, C.M., Adams, J.A.: Robotic tasks for chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosive incident response. Advanced Robotics 23, 1217-1232 (2009).
[3]
Kleinke, C.L.: Compliance to requests made by gazing and touching experimenters in field settings. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13, 218-223 (1977).
[4]
Hostetter, A.B.: When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 137, 297-315 (2011).
[5]
Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places (Center for the Study of Language and Information - Lecture Notes). Center for the Study of Language and Inf. (2003).
[6]
Mutlu, B., Forlizzi, J., Hodgins, J.: A storytelling robot: Modeling and evaluation of humanlike gaze behavior. In: IEEE-RAS Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids 2006), pp. 518-523 (2006).
[7]
Garau, M., Slater, M., Bee, S., Sasse, M.A.: The impact of eye gaze on communication using humanoid avatars. In: The CHI 2001 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 309-316 (2001).
[8]
Bailenson, J.N., Beall, A.C., Blascovich, J.: Mutual gaze and task performance in shared virtual environments. The Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation 13, 313-320 (2002).
[9]
Vertegaal, R., Slagter, R., van der Veer, G., Nijholt, A.: There is more to Conversational Agents than meets the Eyes. In: The CHI 2001 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 301-308 (2001).
[10]
Cabibihan, J.-J., So, W.C., Nazar, M., Ge, S.S.: Pointing Gestures for a Robot Mediated Communication Interface. In: Xie, M., Xiong, Y., Xiong, C., Liu, H., Hu, Z. (eds.) ICIRA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5928, pp. 67-77. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).
[11]
Maricchiolo, F., Gnisci, A., Bonaiuto, M., Ficca, G.: Effects of different types of hand gestures in persuasive speech on receivers' evaluations. In: Language and Cognitive Processes, pp. 239-266. Psychology Press (2009).
[12]
Mayer, R.E., Sobko, K., Mautone, P.D.: Social cues in multimedia learning: Role of speaker's voice. Journal of Educational Psychology 95, 419-425 (2003).
[13]
Vossen, S., Ham, J., Midden, C.: What Makes Social Feedback from a Robot Work? Disentangling the Effect of Speech, Physical Appearance and Evaluation. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 52-57. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).
[14]
Bartneck, C., Kulic, D., Croft, E.: Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 1, 71-81 (2009).
[15]
Cassell, J., Pelachaud, C., Badler, N., Steedman, M., Achorn, B., Becket, T., Douville, B., Prevost, S., Stone, M.: Animated conversation: rule-based generation of facial expression, gesture & spoken intonation for multiple conversational agents. In: SIGGRAPH 1994 Proceeding of the 21st Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (1994).
[16]
Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., Tannenbaum, P.H.: The measurement of meaning. University of Illinois Press, Urbana (1957).
[17]
Mori, M.: Bukimi no tami, The uncanny valley. Energy 7, 33-35 (1970).
[18]
Ham, J., Midden, C.: A Persuasive Robotic Agent to Save Energy: The Influence of Social Feedback, Feedback Valence and Task Similarity on Energy Conservation Behavior. In: Ge, S.S., Li, H., Cabibihan, J.-J., Tan, Y.K. (eds.) ICSR 2010. LNCS, vol. 6414, pp. 335-344. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).
[19]
Siegel, M., Breazeal, C., Norton, M.I.: Persuasive robotics: The influence of robot gender on human behavior. In: IROS 2009, pp. 2563-2568 (2009).
[20]
Fogg, B.J., Nass, C.I.: Silicon sycophants: the effects of computers that flatter. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 46, 551-561 (1997).
[21]
IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E.: Persuasive Technology for Human Well-being: Setting the Scene. In: IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3962, pp. 1-5. Springer, Heidelberg (2006).
[22]
Shinozawa, K., Naya, F., Kogure, K., Yamato, J.: Effect of Robot's Tracking Users on Human Decision Making. In: Proceedings of 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Sendai, Japan, pp. 1908-1913 (2004).
[23]
Iio, T., Shiomi, M., Shinozawa, K., Akimoto, T., Shimohara, K., Hagita, N.: Entrainment of Pointing Gestures by Robot Motion. In: Ge, S.S., Li, H., Cabibihan, J.-J., Tan, Y.K. (eds.) ICSR 2010. LNCS, vol. 6414, pp. 372-381. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Understanding Roboticists' Power through Matrix Guided Technology Power AnalysisCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640766(46-56)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Power in Human-Robot InteractionProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634949(269-282)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • (2023)That's not a Good Idea: A Robot Changes Your Behavior Against Social EngineeringProceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction10.1145/3623809.3623879(63-71)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Making robots persuasive: the influence of combining persuasive strategies (gazing and gestures) by a storytelling robot on its persuasive power

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Guide Proceedings
    ICSR'11: Proceedings of the Third international conference on Social Robotics
    November 2011
    236 pages
    ISBN:9783642255038
    • Editors:
    • Bilge Mutlu,
    • Christoph Bartneck,
    • Jaap Ham,
    • Vanessa Evers

    Sponsors

    • Maxon Motors: Maxon Motors
    • CYBER: Cyberbotics
    • Aldebaran Robotics: Aldebaran Robotics
    • Metra Labs: Metra Labs

    Publisher

    Springer-Verlag

    Berlin, Heidelberg

    Publication History

    Published: 24 November 2011

    Author Tags

    1. Nao
    2. gazing
    3. gestures
    4. head movement
    5. persuasion
    6. persuasive robotics
    7. persuasive technology
    8. social robotics
    9. storytelling robot

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Understanding Roboticists' Power through Matrix Guided Technology Power AnalysisCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640766(46-56)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Power in Human-Robot InteractionProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634949(269-282)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
    • (2023)That's not a Good Idea: A Robot Changes Your Behavior Against Social EngineeringProceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction10.1145/3623809.3623879(63-71)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
    • (2023)Comparing Norm-Based and Role-Based Strategies for Robot Communication of Role-Grounded Moral NormsACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/357171912:3(1-25)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2023
    • (2023)Integrating Robot Manufacturer Perspectives into Legible Factory Robot Light CommunicationsACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/357073212:1(1-33)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2023
    • (2023)Virtual Reality Hand Tracking for Immersive Telepresence in Rehabilitative Serious GamingSocial Robotics10.1007/978-981-99-8715-3_1(3-12)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2023
    • (2023)Exploring the Effect of Visual-Based Subliminal Persuasion in Public Speeches Using Explainable AI TechniquesArtificial Intelligence in HCI10.1007/978-3-031-35891-3_23(381-397)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
    • (2023)On Further Reflection... Moral Reflections Enhance Robotic Moral Persuasive CapabilityPersuasive Technology10.1007/978-3-031-30933-5_19(290-304)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2022)Multiparty Interaction Between Humans and Socially Interactive AgentsThe Handbook on Socially Interactive Agents10.1145/3563659.3563665(113-154)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2022
    • (2022)Unpretty Please: Ostensibly Polite Wakewords Discourage Politeness in both Robot-Directed and Human-Directed CommunicationProceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction10.1145/3536221.3556615(181-190)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media