Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-642-27216-5_2acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A case study in model selection for policy engineering: simulating maritime customs

Published: 02 May 2011 Publication History

Abstract

The progress of containers through customs is more often an exercise in negotiation rather than a structured queuing process. As soon as a regulatory process involves negotiation, corruption becomes a factor. Studies by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and other organizations reveal that customs corruption is not easily combated by policy changes. Simulation of potential reform policies in the maritime customs context can provide insights for decision makers. In this paper we present a work-in-progress case study of simulation technique selection for modelling social complexity in the domain of maritime customs. We give evidence (1) to the applicability of a methodological approach that includes evaluation and reasoned selection of a modelling paradigm, and (2) to the applicability of agent-based simulation.

References

[1]
Arroyo, J., Hassan, S., Gutiérrez, C., Pavón, J.: Re-thinking simulation: a methodological approach for the application of data mining in agent-based modelling. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 16(4), 416-435 (2010).
[2]
Gonzalez de Asis, M.: Reducing corruption at the local level. World Bank (2000).
[3]
Axtell, R.: Why agents? On the varied motivations for agent computing in the social sciences. Working Paper 17, Brookings Institution (2000).
[4]
van Baalen, P., Zuidwijk, R., van Nunen, J.: Port inter-organizational information systems: Capabilities to service global supply chains. Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management 2(2-3), 81-241 (2008).
[5]
Bankes, S.C.: Agent-based modeling: A revolution? Proc. National Academy of Sciences 99(Suppl. 3), 7199-7200 (2002).
[6]
Barber, K. S., Liu, T. H., Han, D.C.: Agent-Oriented Design. In: Garijo, F. J., Boman, M. (eds.) MAAMAW1999. LNCS, vol. 1647, pp. 28-40. Springer, Heidelberg (1999).
[7]
Beirut Container Terminal Consortium: Port of Beirut, http://portdebeyrouth.com
[8]
Bergkvist, M., Davidsson, P., Persson, J. A., Ramstedt, L.: A Hybrid Micro-Simulator for Determining the Effects of Governmental Control Policies on Transport Chains. In: Davidsson, P., Logan, B., Takadama, K. (eds.) MABS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3415, pp. 236-247. Springer, Heidelberg (2005).
[9]
Cargomaster Group of Companies: Company profile (2006), http://groupage.com
[10]
Second food scandal in a week as fake products found. The Daily Star (September 25, 2010).
[11]
Davidsson, P.: Agent based social simulation: A computer science view. J. Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5(1), 7 (2002).
[12]
Davidsson, P., Holmgren, J., Kyhlbäck, H., Mengistu, D., Persson, M.: Applications of Agent Based Simulation. In: Antunes, L., Takadama, K. (eds.) MABS 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4442, pp. 15-27. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).
[13]
Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Jonker, C. M.: Towards Agents for Policy Making. In: David, N., Sichman, J. S. (eds.) MABS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5269, pp. 141-153. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).
[14]
Dignum, V., Dignum, F., Osinga, S. A., Hofstede, G. J.: Normative, cultural and cognitive aspects of modelling policies. In: Proc. 2010 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 720-732 (2010).
[15]
Duggar, E., Duggar, M.: Corruption, culture and organizational form. Working paper, Social Science Research Network (November 2004).
[16]
Edmonds, B., Moss, S.: From KISS to KIDS - An 'Anti-Simplistic' Modelling Approach. In: Davidsson, P., Logan, B., Takadama, K. (eds.) MABS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3415, pp. 130-144. Springer, Heidelberg (2005).
[17]
Edmonds, B.: The Use of Models - Making MABS More Informative. In: Moss, S., Davidsson, P. (eds.) MABS 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1979, pp. 15-32. Springer, Heidelberg (2001).
[18]
Finger, M., Schuler, P.: Implementation of Uruguay Round Commitments: The Development Challenge. Blackwell, Oxford (2000).
[19]
Gal, Y., Kraus, S., Gelfand, M., Khashan, H., Salmon, E.: An adaptive agent for negotiating with people in different cultures. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (to appear).
[20]
Galán, J. M., Izquierdo, L. R., Izquierdo, S. S., Santos, J. I., del Olmo, R., López-Paredes, A., Edmonds, B.: Errors and artefacts in agent-based modelling. J. Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 12(1:1) (2009).
[21]
Ghorbani, A., Dignum, V., Dijkema, G.: An analysis and design framework for agent-based social simulation. In: Proc. of AAMAS 2011 Workshop on Agent-based Modeling for Policy Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan (May 2011).
[22]
Gilbert, N., Troitzsch, K. G.: Simulation for the Social Scientist, 2nd edn. Open University Press, Buckingham (2005).
[23]
Hamill, L.: Agent-based modelling: The next 15 years. J. Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 13(4:7) (2010).
[24]
Hammond, R.: Endogenous transition dynamics in corruption: An agent-based computer model. Working Paper 19, Brookings Institution (2000).
[25]
Hassan, S., Pavón, J., Antunes, L., Gilbert, N.: Injecting data into agent-based simulation. In: Takadama, K., et al. (eds.) Simulating Interacting Agents and Social Phenomena, vol. 7, pp. 173-185. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).
[26]
Henesey, L., Davidsson, P., Persson, J. A.: Agent based simulation architecture for evaluating operational policies in transshipping containers. J. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 18(2), 220-238 (2009).
[27]
Henesey, L. E., Notteboom, T. E., Davidsson, P.: Agent-based simulation of stakeholders relations: An approach to sustainable port and terminal management. In: Proc. Intl. Association of Maritime Economists Annual Conf., pp. 314-331 (2003).
[28]
Hindriks, K. V., Jonker, C. M., Tykhonov, D.: Let's DANS! an analytic framework of negotiation dynamics and strategies. Multi Agent and Grid Systems (to appear).
[29]
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., Minkov, M.: Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2010).
[30]
Hofstede, G. J., Jonker, C. M., Verwaart, T.: Computational Modeling of Culture's Consequences. In: Bosse, T., Geller, A., Jonker, C. M. (eds.) MABS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6532, pp. 136-151. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).
[31]
Hoogendoorn, M., Jonker, C., Maanen, P.v., Treur, J.: Agent-based analysis and simulation of meta-reasoning processes in strategic naval planning. Knowledge-Based Systems Journal 22, 589-599 (2009).
[32]
Hors, I.: Fighting corruption in customs administration: What can we learn from recent experiences? OECD Development Centre Working Paper 175 (2001).
[33]
Klitgaard, R., MacLean-Abaroa, R., Parris, H. L.: Corrupt Cities: A Practical Guide to Cure and Prevention. ICS Press, Oakland (2000)
[34]
Kunsch, P., Kavathatzopoulos, I., Rauschmayer, F.: Modelling complex ethical decision problems with operations research. Omega 37(6), 1100-1108 (2009)
[35]
Langseth, P.: Prevention: An effective tool to reduce corruption. In: Proc. ISPAC Conf. on Responding to the Challenge of Corruption (1999)
[36]
Lebanese Customs Authority: Lebanese customs, www.customs.gov.lb/customs
[37]
Leombruni, R., Richiardi, M.: Why are economists sceptical about agent-based simulations? Physica A 355, 103-109 (2005)
[38]
Lokuge, P., Alahakoon, D.: Improving the adaptability in automated vessel scheduling in container ports using intelligent software agents. European J. Operational Research 177(3), 1985-2015 (2007)
[39]
Makhoul, J., Harrison, L.: Intercessory wasta and village development in Lebanon. Arab Studies Quarterly 26(3), 25-41 (2004)
[40]
Marietto, M. B., David, N., Sichman, J. S., Coelho, H.:Aclassification of paradigmatic models for agent-based social simulation. In: Proc. MABS 2003, pp. 193-208 (2003)
[41]
Moss, S.: Alternative approaches to the empirical validation of agent-based models. J. Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 11(1), 5 (2008)
[42]
Muller, G.: Intermodal Freight Transportation, 4th edn. Eno Transportation Foundation and Intermodal Association of North America, Washington, DC (1999)
[43]
Norling, E., Sonenberg, L., Rönnquist, R.: Enhancing Multi-Agent Based Simulation with Human-Like Decision Making Strategies. In:Moss, S., Davidsson, P. (eds.) MABS 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1979, pp. 214-228. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
[44]
Pommeranz, A., Visser, W., Broekens, J., Wiggers, P., Hindriks, K., Jonker, C.: DUO meta-model for knowledge elicitation and bidding support in NSS. In: Proc. of 11th Group Decision and Negotiation Conference, pp. 120-123 (2010)
[45]
Rawwas, M.Y. A., Patzer, G. L., Vitell, S. J.: A cross-cultural investigation of the ethical values of consumers: The potential effect of war and civil disruption. J. Business Ethics 17, 435-448 (1998)
[46]
Rizk, C.: Hariri launches anti-corruption, public services initiative: Premier calls for modernization of bureaucratic processes. The Daily Star (July 30, 2010)
[47]
Rose-Ackerman, S.: Corruption and government. International Peacekeeping 15(3), 328-343 (2008)
[48]
Savarimuthu, B. T. R., Cranefield, S., Purvis, M. A., Purvis, M. K.: Obligation norm identification in agent societies. J. Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 13(4:3) (2010)
[49]
Seleim, A., Bontis, N.: The relationship between culture and corruption: A crossnational study. J. Intellectual Capital 10(1), 165-184 (2009)
[50]
Sidani, Y., Gardner, W. L.: Work values in the Arab culture: The case of Lebanese workers. The Journal of Social Psychology 140(5), 597-607 (2000)
[51]
Situngkir, H.: Money-Scape: A generic agent-based model of corruption. Computational Economics Archive 0405008, EconWP (2004)
[52]
Sycara, K., Dai, T.: Agent reasoning in negotiation. In: The Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation. Springer, New York (to appear)
[53]
Takadama, K., Kawai, T., Koyama, Y.: Micro- and macro-level validation in agentbased simulation. J. Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 11(2:9) (2008)
[54]
Terán, O.: UnderstandingMABS and social simulation:Switching between languages in a hierarchy of levels. J. Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 7(4:5) (2004)
[55]
The World Bank: Helping countries combat corruption: The role of the World Bank, poverty reduction and economic management network. Tech. rep (1997)
[56]
Transparency International: The global corruption report 2009. Tech. rep (2009)
[57]
Turan, N., Dai, T., Sycara, K., Weingart, L.: Toward a unified negotiation framework: Leveraging strengths in behavioral and computational communities. In: Proc. IJCAI 1999 Workshop on Modeling Intercultural Collab. and Negotiation (2009)
[58]
Wilkenfeld, J.: Reflections on simulation and experimentation in the study of negotiation. International Negotiation 9(3), 429-439 (2004)

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Initial Results from an Agent-Based Simulation of Housing in Urban BeirutProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems10.5555/3237383.3238066(2045-2047)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2018
  • (2018)On Collusion and CoercionProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems10.5555/3237383.3237940(1622-1630)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2018
  • (2016)Assessing Maritime Customs Process Re-Engineering using Agent-Based SimulationProceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems10.5555/2936924.2937040(786-795)Online publication date: 9-May-2016
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
AAMAS'11: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Advanced Agent Technology
May 2011
504 pages
ISBN:9783642272158
  • Editors:
  • Francien Dechesne,
  • Hiromitsu Hattori,
  • Adriaan Mors,
  • Jose Miguel Such,
  • Danny Weyns

Sponsors

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 02 May 2011

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. corruption
  2. maritime customs
  3. model selection
  4. multiagent-based simulation
  5. process modelling

Qualifiers

  • Article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,155 of 5,036 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 14 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Initial Results from an Agent-Based Simulation of Housing in Urban BeirutProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems10.5555/3237383.3238066(2045-2047)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2018
  • (2018)On Collusion and CoercionProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems10.5555/3237383.3237940(1622-1630)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2018
  • (2016)Assessing Maritime Customs Process Re-Engineering using Agent-Based SimulationProceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems10.5555/2936924.2937040(786-795)Online publication date: 9-May-2016
  • (2015)Towards Agent-Based Simulation of Maritime CustomsProceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/2772879.2773361(1637-1638)Online publication date: 4-May-2015
  • (2013)Envisioning complexity in healthcare systems using discrete event simulation and social network analysisProceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining10.1145/2492517.2500325(1094-1095)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2013

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media