Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1007/978-981-97-5562-2_16guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Stable Task Assignment with Range Partition under Differential Privacy

Published: 27 October 2024 Publication History

Abstract

With the development of cloud computing, spatial crowdsourcing (SC) has become a significant concern in data processing, including food delivery and online car-hailing. However, privacy leakage presents a challenge for requesters who need to share their task information with the server. Differential privacy (DP) is a robust privacy protection paradigm that allows the release of useful information while safeguarding requesters’ privacy. However, task assignment under DP often results in ineffective utility. In this paper, we propose a stable task assignment scheme that enables requesters to apply for workers and achieve effective stable matching while preserving the privacy of the requests (tasks). Specifically, we introduce an approach called ECM that achieves stable matching while protecting the preference of requesters. We demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of our ECM on synthetic and real datasets.

References

[2]
T. H. Chan, E. Shi, and D. Song. Private and continual release of statistics. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur., 2011.
[3]
J. Doerner, D. Evans, and A. Shelat. Secure stable matching at scale. In SIGSAC, 2016.
[4]
C. Dwork. Differential privacy. In ICALP, 2006.
[5]
C. Dwork, M. Naor, T. Pitassi, and G. N. Rothblum. Differential privacy under continual observation. In STOC, 2010.
[6]
D. Gale and L. S. Shapley. College admissions and the stability of marriage. Am. Math. Mon., 2013.
[7]
P. Golle. A private stable matching algorithm. In FC, 2006.
[8]
J. Hsu, Z. Huang, A. Roth, T. Roughgarden, and Z. S. Wu. Private matchings and allocations. In STOC, 2014.
[9]
M. Keller and P. Scholl. Efficient, oblivious data structures for MPC. In ASIACRYPT, 2014.
[10]
J. S. Kim, Y. D. Chung, and J. W. Kim. Differentially private and skew-aware spatial decompositions for mobile crowdsensing. Sensors, 2018.
[11]
McVitie DG and Wilson LB The stable marriage problem 1971 Commun ACM
[12]
H. To, G. Ghinita, and C. Shahabi. A framework for protecting worker location privacy in spatial crowdsourcing. Proc. VLDB Endow., 2014.
[13]
H. To, C. Shahabi, and L. Xiong. Privacy-preserving online task assignment in spatial crowdsourcing with untrusted server. In ICDE, 2018.
[14]
L. Wang, D. Zhang, D. Yang, B. Y. Lim, and X. Ma. Differential location privacy for sparse mobile crowdsensing. In ICDM, 2016.
[15]
Y. Zhang, Y. Mao, and S. Zhong. Joint differentially private gale-shapley mechanisms for location privacy protection in mobile traffic offloading systems. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 2016.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
Database Systems for Advanced Applications: 29th International Conference, DASFAA 2024, Gifu, Japan, July 2–5, 2024, Proceedings, Part IV
Jul 2024
563 pages
ISBN:978-981-97-5561-5
DOI:10.1007/978-981-97-5562-2

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 27 October 2024

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 11 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media