Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Expert views about missing AI narratives: is there an AI story crisis?

Published: 25 August 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Stories are an important indicator of our vision of the future. In the case of artificial intelligence (AI), dominant stories are polarized between notions of threat and myopic solutionism. The central storytellers—big tech, popular media, and authors of science fiction—represent particular demographics and motivations. Many stories, and storytellers, are missing. This paper details the accounts of missing AI narratives by leading scholars from a range of disciplines interested in AI Futures. Participants focused on the gaps between dominant narratives and the untold stories of the capabilities, issues, and everyday realities of the technology. One participant proposed a “story crisis” in which these narratives compete to shape the public discourse on AI. Our findings indicate that dominant narratives distract and mislead public understandings and conceptions of AI. This suggests a need to pay closer attention to missing AI narratives. It is not simply about telling new stories, it is about listening to existing stories and asking what is wanted from AI. We call for realistic, nuanced, and inclusive stories, working with and for diverse voices, which consider (1) story-teller; (2) genre, and (3) communicative purpose. Such stories can then inspire the next generation of thinkers, technologists, and storytellers.

References

[1]
Amoore L Cloud ethics 2020 Durham Duke University Press
[2]
Applin SA and Flick C Facebook's Project Aria indicates problems for responsible innovation when broadly deploying AR and other pervasive technology in the Commons J Responsible Technol 2021 5
[3]
Bareis J and Katzenbach C Talking AI into being: The narratives and imaginaries of national AI strategies and their performative politics Sci Technol Human Values 2021
[4]
Benjamin R Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the New Jim Code 2019 Medford Polity
[5]
Berditchevskaia & Baeck, 2020, The future of minds and machines . https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/future-minds-and-machines/ .Accessed 14 February 2022.
[6]
Blom JN and Hansen KR Click bait: forward-reference as lure in online news headlines J Pragmat 2015 76 87-100
[7]
Bory P Deep new: the shifting narratives of artificial intelligence from Deep Blue to AlphaGo Convergence 2019 25 4 627-642
[8]
Braun V and Clarke V Using thematic analysis in psychology Qual Res Psychol 2006 3 2 77-101
[9]
Bryson JJ The artificial intelligence of the ethics of artificial intelligence. The Oxford handbook of ethics of AI Computer Sci 2020
[10]
Cave S and Dihal K Hopes and fears for intelligent machines in fiction and reality Nature Machine Intelligence 2019 1 2 74-78
[11]
Cave S and Dihal K The whiteness of AI Philosophy Technol 2020 33 4 685-703
[12]
Cave, S., Craig, C., Dihal, K., Dillon, S., Montgomery, J., Singler, B., & Taylor, L. (2018). Portrayals and perceptions of AI and why they matter. The Royal Society.
[13]
Cave, S., Coughlan, K., & Dihal, K. (2019, January). " Scary Robots" Examining Public Responses to AI. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 331–337).
[14]
Cave S, Dihal K, and Dillon S AI narratives: A history of imaginative thinking about intelligent machines 2020 Oxford Oxford University Press
[15]
Chubb, J., & Maloney, L. (2021) AI what’s that sound? Stories and Sonic framing of AI, https://blog.betterimagesofai.org/ai-whats-that-sound-stories-and-sonic-framing-of-ai/, Accessed 11 February 2022
[16]
Chubb J, Cowling P, and Reed D Speeding up to keep up: exploring the use of AI in the research process AI & Soc 2021
[17]
Coeckelbergh M Narrative responsibility and artificial intelligence AI Soc 2021
[18]
Crawford K The atlas of AI 2021 New Haven Yale University Press
[19]
Devlin K Turned on: Science, sex and robots 2018 London Bloomsbury Publishing
[20]
Dihal, K., Hollanek, T., Rizk, N., Weheba, N., & Cave, S. (2021). Imagining a Future with Intelligent Machines A Middle Eastern and North African Perspective. Canbridge: The Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence.
[21]
Dillon S and Craig C Storylistening: Narrative evidence and public reasoning 2021 London Routledge
[22]
Fast, E., & Horvitz, E. (2017, February). Long-term trends in the public perception of artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 31, No. 1).
[23]
Felt U Asveld L, Dam-Mieras R, Swierstra T, Lavrijssen S, Linse K, and Hoven J Response-able practices” or new bureaucracies of virtue”: the challenges of making RRI work in academic environments Responsible innovation 2017 Cham Springer 49-68
[24]
Hao, 2021 Stop talking about AI ethics. It’s time to talk about power. https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/04/23/1023549/kate-crawford-atlas-of-ai-review/ Accessed 29 June 2022
[25]
Hare. S., (2022). The Rise of AI could be a great British Story retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/feb/13/the-rise-of-ai-could-be-a-great-british-story-but-lets-do-it-the-right-way, Accessed 15 February 2022
[26]
Hermann I Beware of fictional AI narratives Nature Machine Intelligence 2020 2 11 654-654
[28]
Hudson AD, Finn E, and Wylie R What can science fiction tell us about the future of artificial intelligence policy? AI Soc 2021
[29]
Jameson F Archaeologies of the future: The desire called utopia and other science fictions 2005 London Verso
[30]
Jasanoff S and Kim SH Dreamscapes of modernity 2015 Chicago Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power
[31]
Jobin A, Ienca M, and Vayena E The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines Nat Mach Intell 2019 1 9 389-399
[32]
Kang M Sublime dreams of living machines 2011 Cambridge Harvard University Press
[33]
Katz Y Artificial Whiteness: Politics and Ideology in Artificial Intelligence 2020 Columbia Columbia University Press
[34]
Kearney R On Stories 2002 London Routledge
[35]
Kelley, P. G., Yang, Y., Heldreth, C., Moessner, C., Sedley, A., Kramm, A., & Woodruff, A. (2021, July). Exciting, Useful, Worrying, Futuristic: Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence in 8 Countries. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 627–637).
[36]
Kim MS Meta-narratives on machinic otherness: beyond anthropocentrism and exoticism AI & Soc 2022
[37]
Kress N Computer virus. Asimov’s Science Fiction 2001 25 4 102-135
[38]
LaGrandeur K Androids and intelligent networks in early modern literature and culture: artificial slaves 2013 London Routledge
[39]
Marvin C When old technologies were new: Thinking about electric communication in the late nineteenth century 1990 Oxford Oxford University Press
[40]
Mayor A Gods and robots: myths, machines, and ancient dreams of technology 2018 Princeton Princeton University Press
[41]
McAdams DP and Guo J Narrating the generative life Psychol Sci 2015 26 475-483
[42]
Mead GH Dewey J The philosophy of the present Murphy AE 1959 La Salle Open Court
[43]
Miles MB, Huberman AM, and Saldana J Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook 2014 Thousand Oaks Sage
[44]
Miller K Jackson M and Shelly M A Matter of Perspective: Discrimination, Bias, and Inequality in AI Legal Regulations, Implications, and Issues Surrounding Digital Data 2020 IGI Global Hershey 182-202
[45]
Milne G Smoke & Mirrors: how hype obscures the future and how to see past it 2020 Russell Square Robinson
[46]
Noble SU Algorithms of oppression: how search engines reinforce racism 2018 New York New York University Press
[47]
O'Neil C Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy 2016 Largo Crown
[48]
Ouchchy L, Coin A, and Dubljević V AI in the headlines: the portrayal of the ethical issues of artificial intelligence in the media AI & Soc 2020 35 4 927-936
[49]
Pinch TJ and Bijker WE The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other Soc Stud Sci 1984 14 399-441
[50]
Robbins (2016) Artificial Intelligence: Gods, egos and Ex Machina, https://www.theguardian.com/science/the-lay-scientist/2016/jan/26/artificial-intelligence-gods-egos-and-ex-machina, Accessed 21 September 2021
[51]
Rosen P Up the vélorution: appropriating the bicycle and the politics of technology. Appropriating Technology: Vernacular Science and Social Power 2002 Minneapolis University of Minnesota Press
[52]
Samuel G, Diedericks H, and Derrick G Population health AI researchers’ perceptions of the public portrayal of AI: a pilot study Public Underst Sci 2021 30 2 196-211
[53]
Sconce J Haunted media: Electronic presence from telegraphy to television 2000 Durham Duke Univ Press
[54]
Slota SC, Fleischmann KR, Greenberg S, Verma N, Cummings B, Li L, and Shenefiel C Good systems, bad data? Interpretations of AI hype and failures Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technol 2020 57 1
[55]
Stathoulopoulos, K., & Mateos-Garcia, J. C. (2019). Gender diversity in AI research. Available at SSRN 3428240.
[56]
Stratton & Milford (2017) The future of artificial intelligence: two experts disagree. The Conversation, https://theconversation.com/the-future-of-artificial-intelligence-two-experts-disagree-79904, Accessed 10 April 2021
[57]
Truitt ER Medieval robots 2015 Pennsylvania University of Pennsylvania Press
[59]
Vallor S Technology and the virtues: A philosophical guide to a future worth wanting 2016 Oxford Oxford University Press
[60]
Vallor, S. (2021) Challenging and redrawing framings of technology to serve human flourishing and justice. https://edinburgh-innovations.ed.ac.uk/2021/08/04/mobilising-the-intellectual-resources-of-the-arts-and-humanities/, Accessed 28 Sept 2021
[61]
Wade M Virtuous play: the ethics, pleasures, and burdens of brain training Science as Culture 2018 27 3 296-321
[62]
Ward M Seeming Human: Artificial Intelligence and Victorian Realist Character 2018 Columbus The Ohio State University Press
[63]
Yee S You bet she can fuck”–Trends in Female AI Narratives within Mainstream Cinema: Ex Machina and Her Ekphrasis Images, Cinema, Theory Media. 2017 17 1 85-98
[64]
Zhang, B., & Dafoe, A. (2020, February). US public opinion on the governance of artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM ConferSence on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 187–193).

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image AI & Society
AI & Society  Volume 39, Issue 3
Jun 2024
683 pages

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 25 August 2022
Accepted: 01 August 2022
Received: 29 September 2021

Author Tags

  1. Narratives
  2. Futures
  3. Artificial intelligence
  4. Storytelling
  5. Technology

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media