Cited By
View all- Vanderhaegen F(2024)Every User Has Special Needs for Inclusive MobilityHCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems10.1007/978-3-031-60480-5_15(236-248)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
Influence of automation mode use on selection rates and subjective assessment over time
Authors: 
Jordan Navarro, Etienne Jomard, Émilie Saleur, William Abrard, Julien CegarraAuthors Info & Claims
Jordan Navarro, Etienne Jomard, Émilie Saleur, William Abrard, Julien CegarraAuthors Info & ClaimsPages 609 - 624
Abstract
The main objective of the current contribution was to investigate human–machine cooperation over time. Participants were asked to choose repeatedly between four automation modes ranging from manual control to supervisory control. Three experiments were undertaken to assess the influence of previous exposure to automation and duration of automation use on automation mode selection and associated subjective assessments. In Experiment 1, automation mode selection was investigated for a short period of time and without previous exposure to automation. Short- and longer-term automation selections were investigated after brief exposure to all automation modes (Experiment 2) or more extensive exposure to a particular mode (Experiment 3). Results indicated that automation mode selection and subjective assessments are influenced by both previous automation exposure and duration of use. Automation mode selection is not primarily based on perceived performances, subjective workload or on trust and acceptance of the automation modes. In practice, the reported data support the idea that short-term studies are not necessarily well-suited to investigating human–machine cooperation issues.
References
[1]
Avril E, Valéry B, Navarro J, Wioland L, and Cegarra J Effect of imperfect information and action automation on attentional allocation Int J Human-Computer Interact 2021 37 1063-1073
[2]
Avril E, Cegarra J, Wioland L, and Navarro J Automation type and reliability impact on visual automation monitoring and human performance Int J Human-Computer Interact 2022 38 64-77
[3]
Bekiaris E, Petica S, Brookhuis K (1997) Driver needs and public acceptance regarding telematic in-vehicle emergency control aids. In: Mobility for Everyone. 4th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Berlin, Germany, pp 21–24
[4]
Bhattacherjee A and Premkumar G Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: a theoretical model and longitudinal test MIS Q 2004 28 229-254
[5]
Bliss JP and Acton SA Alarm mistrust in automobiles: how collision alarm reliability affects driving Appl Ergon 2003 34 499-509
[6]
Cegarra J, Valéry B, Avril E, Calmettes C, and Navarro J OpenMATB: a multi-attribute task battery promoting task customization, software extensibility and experiment replicability Behav Res Methods 2020 52 1980-1990
[7]
Compeau D, Higgins CA, and Huff S Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: a longitudinal study MIS Q 1999 23 145-158
[8]
Comstock JR and Arnegard RJ The multi-attribute task battery for human operator workload and strategic behavior research 1992 Washington, DC NASA Technical Memorandum
[9]
Crossman ERFW Edwards E and Lees F Automation and skills The Human Operator in Process Control 1974 London Taylor & Francis
[10]
Dingus TA, Klauer SG, Neale VL, Petersen A, Lee SE, Sudweeks JD, Perez MA, Hankey J, Ramsey DJ, and Gupta S The 100-car naturalistic driving study, Phase II-results of the 100-car field experiment. (Report No. HS-810 593) 2006 Washington, DC National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[11]
Dzindolet MT, Peterson SA, Pomranky RA, Pierce LG, and Beck HP The role of trust in automation reliance Int J Hum Comput Stud 2003 58 697-718
[12]
Eysenck HJ The structure of human personality 1970 London Methuen
[13]
Ferraro JC and Mouloua M Effects of automation reliability on error detection and attention to auditory stimuli in a multi-tasking environment Appl Ergon 2021 91
[14]
Flavell JH Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry Am Psychol 1979 34 906-911
[15]
Hancock PA Procedure and dynamic display relocation on performance in a multitask environment IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern Part ASystems Humans 2007 37 47-57
[16]
Hancock PA Automation: how much is too much? Ergonomics 2014 57 449-454
[17]
Hart SG and Staveland LE Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index) results of empirical and theoretical research Advances in Psychology 1988 Amsterdam Elsevier 139-183
[18]
Hoc J-M From human–machine interaction to human–machine cooperation Ergonomics 2000 43 833-843
[19]
Hoc J-M Towards a cognitive approach to human–machine cooperation in dynamic situations Int J Hum Comput Stud 2001 54 509-540
[20]
Hoc J-M Towards ecological validity of research in cognitive ergonomics Theor Issues Ergon Sci 2001
[21]
Hoc J-M, Young MS, and Blosseville J-M Cooperation between drivers and automation: implications for safety Theor Issues Ergon Sci 2009 10 135-160
[22]
Hoff KA and Bashir M Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust Hum Factors 2015 57 407-434
[23]
Jones E, Sundaram S, and Chin W Factors leading to sales force automation use: a longitudinal analysis J Pers Sell Sales Manag 2002 22 145-156
[24]
Kessel CJ and Wickens CD The transfer of failure- detection skills between monitoring and controlling dynamic systems Hum Factors 1982 24 49-60
[25]
Kool W, McGuire JT, Rosen ZB, and Botvinick MM Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand J Exp Psychol Gen 2010 139 665
[26]
Lee JD and See K Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance Hum Factors 2004 46 50-80
[27]
Miller WD, Schmidt KD, Estepp JR, Bowers M, Davis I (2014) An updated version of the U.S. Air Force Multi-Attribute Task Battery (AF-MATB). DTIC Document.
[28]
Molloy R and Parasuraman R Monitoring an automated system for a single failure: vigilance and task complexity effects Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 1996 38 311-322
[29]
Mosier KL and Skitka LJ Human decision makers and automated decision aids: made for each other Automation and human performance: theory and application 1996 Boca Raton CRC Press 201-220
[30]
Mulder M, Abbink DA, and Boer ER Sharing control with haptics seamless driver support from manual to automatic control Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 2012 54 786-798
[31]
Navarro J Human–machine interaction theories and lane departure warnings Theor Issues Ergon Sci 2017 18 519-547
[32]
Navarro J A state of science on highly automated driving Theor Issues Ergon Sci 2019 20 366-396
[33]
Navarro J Are highly automated vehicles as useful as dishwashers? Cogent Psychol 2019 6 1-9
[34]
Navarro J and Hancock PA Did tools create humans? Theor Issues Ergon Sci 2022
[35]
Navarro J and Osiurak F When do we use automatic tools rather than doing a task manually? influence of automatic tool speed Am J Psychol 2015 128 77-88
[36]
Navarro J, Mars F, and Young MS Lateral control assistance in car driving: classification, review and future prospects IET Intell Transp Syst 2011 5 207-220
[37]
Navarro J, François M, and Mars F Obstacle avoidance under automated steering: impact on driving and gaze behaviours Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 2016 43 315-324
[38]
Navarro J, Heuveline L, Avril E, and Cegarra J Influence of human-machine interactions and task demand on automation selection and use Ergonomics 2018 61 1601-1612
[39]
Navarro J, Deniel J, Yousfi E, Jallais C, Bueno M, and Fort A Does false and missed lane departure warnings impact driving performances differently? Int J Human-Computer Interact 2019 35 1292-1302
[40]
Navarro J, Allali S, Cabrignac N, and Cegarra J Impact of pilot’s expertise on selection, use, trust, and acceptance of automation IEEE Trans Human-Machine Syst 2021 51 432-441
[41]
Navarro J, Osiurak F, Ha S, Communay G, Ferrier-Barbut E, Coatrine A, Gaujoux V, Hernout E, Cegarra J, Volante W, and Hancock PA Development of the Smart Tools Proneness Questionnaire (STP-Q): an instrument to assess the individual propensity to use smart tools Ergonomics 2022
[42]
Omae M, Hashimoto N, Sugamoto T, and Shimizu H Measurement of driver’s reaction time to failure of steering controller during automatic driving Rev Automot Eng 2005 26 213-215
[43]
Onnasch L Crossing the boundaries of automation -Function allocation and reliability Int J Hum Comput Stud 2015 76 12-21
[44]
Onnasch L, Wickens CD, Li H, and Manzey D Human performance consequences of stages and levels of automation: an integrated meta-analysis Hum Factors 2014 56 476-488
[45]
Osiurak F, Wagner C, Djerbi S, and Navarro J To do it or to let an automatic tool do it? The priority of control over effort Exp Psychol 2013 60 453-468
[46]
Parasuraman A and Colby CL An Updated and streamlined technology readiness index: TRI 2.0 J Serv Res 2015 18 59-74
[47]
Parasuraman R and Riley V Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 1997 39 230-253
[48]
Parasuraman R, Molloy R, and Singh IL Performance consequences of autonomation-induced “complacency” Int J Aviat Psychol 1993 3 1-23
[49]
Parasuraman R, Molloy R, and Singh IL Performance consequences of automation induced “complacency” Int J Aviat Psychol 1993
[50]
Parasuraman R, Mouloua M, and Molloy R Monitoring automation failures in human-machine systems Hum Perform Autom Syst Curr Res Trends 1994 38 45-49
[51]
Parasuraman R, Mouloua M, and Molloy R Effects of adaptive task allocation on monitoring of automated systems Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 1996 38 665-679
[52]
Parasuraman R, Hancock PA, and Olofinboba O Alarm effectiveness in driver-centered collision warning systems Ergonomics 1997 40 390-399
[53]
Parasuraman R, Sheridan TB, and Wickens CD A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern-Part A Syst Humans 2000 30 286-297
[54]
Reagan IJ and Bliss JP Perceived mental workload, trust, and acceptance resulting from exposure to advisory and incentive based intelligent speed adaptation systems Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 2013 21 14-29
[55]
Santiago-espada Y, Myer RR, Latorella KA, Comstock JR (2011) The multi-attribute task battery II ( MATB-II ) software for human performance and workload research : a user’s guide NASA/TM–2011–217164, pp 1–269
[56]
Sauer J and Chavaillaz A How operators make use of wide-choice adaptable automation: observations from a series of experimental studies Theor Issues Ergon Sci 2018 19 135-155
[57]
Scerbo MW Karwowski W Dynamic function allocation International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors 2006 London CRC/Taylor & Francis 1080-1082
[58]
Scerbo MW (1996) Theoretical perspectives on adaptive automation.
[59]
Sheridan TB and Verplank WL Human and computer control of undersea teleoperators 1978 Cambridge DTIC Document
[60]
Singh IL, Molloy R, and Parasuraman R Automation-induced “complacency”: development of the complacency-potential rating scale Int J Aviat Psychol 1993 3 111-122
[61]
Stanton NA and Young MS Vehicle automation and driving performance Ergonomics 1998 41 1014-1028
[62]
Tomasello M, Kruger AC, and Ratner HH Cultural learning Behav Brain Sci 1993 16 495-511
[63]
Venkatesh V and Bala H Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions Decis Sci 2008 39 273-315
[64]
Venkatesh V and Davis FD A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies Manage Sci 2000 46 186-204
[65]
Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, and Davis FD User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view MIS Q 2003 27 425-478
[66]
Wilson TD, Reinhard DA, Westgate EC, Gilbert DT, Ellerbeck N, Hahn C, Brown CL, and Shaked A Just think: the challenges of the disengaged mind Science 2014 345 75-77
Index Terms
- Influence of automation mode use on selection rates and subjective assessment over time
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Adaptable automation for a more human-centered work design? Effects on human perception and behavior
Highlights- Experiment analyzes benefits of adaptable automation compared to static automation.
- Adaptable automation has positive effects on autonomy, satisfaction, role perception.
- Adaptable automation does not significantly impair ...
AbstractThis experiment systematically examines whether, in safety-critical environments such as Air Traffic Control, the negative effects of increasing automation associated with static automation concepts can be mitigated by adaptable automation. ...
Use of role games in automation assessment
ATACCS '11: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Application and Theory of Automation in Command and Control SystemsIn this paper, the use of the role-based game technique to assess the impact of automation in humans is proposed. The results and outputs of this assessment can be obtained using different types of role-based games. To do this, firstly human factors in ...
The Measurement of the Propensity to Trust Automation
Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. Applications and Case StudiesAbstractIn recent years, there has been a focus on not just how people work with automation, but how humans interact with and rely on automation in human-automation teams. Few studies have examined how propensity to trust in automation influences trust ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Berlin, Heidelberg
Publication History
Published: 01 November 2022
Accepted: 24 August 2022
Received: 30 March 2022
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 14 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Vanderhaegen F(2024)Every User Has Special Needs for Inclusive MobilityHCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems10.1007/978-3-031-60480-5_15(236-248)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024