article

Improving user productivity in modeling tools by explicitly modeling workflows

Authors:

Eugene SyrianiAuthors Info & Claims

Software and Systems Modeling (SoSyM), Volume 18, Issue 4

Pages 2441 - 2463

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-018-0678-1

Published: 01 August 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Software engineering aims to create software tools that allow people to solve particular problems in an easy and efficient way. In this regard, model-driven engineering (MDE) enables to generate software tools, by systematically modeling and transforming models. To do so, MDE relies on language workbenches: Integrated Development Environment for engineering modeling languages, designing models, executing them, and verifying them. However, the usability of these tools is far from efficient. Common MDE activities, such as creating a domain-specific language or developing a model transformation, are non-trivial and often require repetitive tasks. This results in unnecessary risings of development time. The goal of this paper is to increase the productivity of modelers in their daily activities by automating the tasks performed in current MDE tools. We propose an MDE-based solution where the user defines a reusable workflow that can be parameterized at run-time and executed. We have implemented workflows in the graphical modeling tool AToMPM. An empirical evaluation shows that the users' productivity is significantly improved.

References

[1]

Alajrami, S., Romanovsky, A., Watson, P., Roth, A.: Towards cloud-based software process modelling and enactment. In: Model-Driven Engineering on and for the Cloud, CloudMDE'14, vol. 1242, pp. 6---15 (2014)

[2]

Atkinson, C.: Meta-modelling for distributed object environments. In: Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop, pp. 90---101. IEEE (1997)

Digital Library

[3]

Atkinson, C., Gerbig, R.: Melanie: multi-level modeling and ontology engineering environment. In: International Master Class on Model-Driven Engineering: Modeling Wizards, MW '12, pp. 7:1---7:2. ACM (2012)

Digital Library

[4]

Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: The essence of multilevel metamodeling. In: Gogolla, M., Kobryn, C. (eds.) Unified Modeling Language, Modeling Languages, Concepts, and Tools, LNCS, vol. 2185, pp. 19---33. Springer (2001)

Digital Library

[5]

Buzan, T.: The Ultimate Book of Mind Maps: Unlock Your Creativity, Boost Your Memory, Change Your Life. HarperCollins, New York (2006)

[6]

Cohen, J.: Statistical power analysis. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 1(3), 98---101 (1992)

[7]

Conover, W.J.: Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York (1998)

[8]

de Lara, J., Guerra, E.: Deep meta-modelling with METADEPTH. In: Vitek, J. (ed.) Objects, Models, Components, Patterns, TOOLS'10, vol. 6141, pp. 1---20. Springer, New York (2010)

Digital Library

[9]

Eclipse: modeling workflow engine 2. https://www.eclipse.org/Xtext/documentation/306_mwe2.html (2017). Accessed 6 Apr 2017

[10]

Ellis, P.D.: The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes: Statistical Power, Meta-Analysis, and the Interpretation of Research Results. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

[11]

Erdweg, S., van der Storm, T., Völter, M., Boersma, M., Bosman, R., Cook, W.R., Gerritsen, A., Hulshout, A., Kelly, S., Loh, A., Konat, G.D.P., Molina, P.J., Palatnik, M., Pohjonen, R., Schindler, E., Schindler, K., Solmi, R., Vergu, V.A., Visser, E., van der Vlist, K., Wachsmuth, G.H., van der Woning, J.: The State of the Art in Language Workbenches. In: Erwig, M., Paige, R.F., Van Wyk, E. (eds.) Software Language Engineering, LNCS, vol. 8225, pp. 197---217. Springer, New York (2013)

[12]

France, R., Rumpe, B.: Model-driven development of complex software: a research roadmap. In: 2007 Future of Software Engineering, pp. 37---54. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2007)

Digital Library

[13]

Gamboa, M.: Using workflows to automate activities in MDE tools. Master's thesis, Université de Montréal (2016)

[14]

Gamboa, M.A., Syriani, E.: Automating activities in MDE tools. In: Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development, pp. 123---133. SciTePress (2016)

[15]

Gamboa, M.A., Syriani, E.: MODELSWARD 2016, revised and selected papers, CCIS, vol. 692, chap. Using Workflows to Automate Activities inMDE Tools, pp. 25---45. Springer, New York (2017)

[16]

Heidenreich, F., Johannes, J., Karol, S., Seifert, M., Wende, C.: Generative and transformational techniques in software engineering IV, LNCS. In: Lämmel, R., Saraiva, J., Visser, J. (eds.) Book Section Model-Based Language Engineering with EMFText, vol. 7680, pp. 322---345. Springer, New York (2013)

[17]

Jacob, F., Gray, J., Wynne, A., Liu, Y., Baker, N.: Domain-specific languages for composing signature discovery workflows. In: Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling, pp. 61---64. ACM (2012)

Digital Library

[18]

Johnson, R., Woolf, B.: The Type Object Pattern. In: EuroPLoP (1996)

[19]

Kelly, S., Lyytinen, K., Rossi, M.: MetaEdit+A fully configurable multi-user and multi-tool CASE and CAME environment. In: Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, LNCS, vol. 1080, pp. 1---21. Springer, New York (1996)

Digital Library

[20]

Kelly, S., Tolvanen, J.P.: Domain-Specific Modeling: Enabling Full Code Generation. Wiley, New York (2008)

Digital Library

[21]

Kolovos, D.S., Paige, R.F., Polac, F.A., Rose, L.M.: Update transformations in the small with the Epsilon Wizard language. J. Object Technol. 6(9), 53---69 (2007)

[22]

Kolovos, D.S., Paige, R.F., Polack, F.A.C.: Novel features in languages of the epsilon model management platform. In: Modeling in Software Engineering, pp. 69---73. ACM, New York (2008)

Digital Library

[23]

Lara, J.D., Guerra, E., Cuadrado, J.S.: When and how to use multilevel modelling. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 24(12), 1---46 (2014)

Digital Library

[24]

Leblebici, E., Anjorin, A., Schürr, A.: Developing eMoflon with eMoflon. In: Di Ruscio, D., Varró, D. (eds.) Theory and Practice of Model Transformations, LNCS, vol. 8568, pp. 138---145. Springer, New York (2014)

[25]

Lecerof, A., Paternò, F.: Automatic support for usability evaluation. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 24(10), 863---888 (1998)

Digital Library

[26]

Ledeczi, A., Maroti, M., Bakay, A., Karsai, G., Garrett, J., Thomason, C., Nordstrom, G., Sprinkle, J., Volgyesi, P.: The generic modeling environment. In: Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing, Budapest, Hungary, WISP '01, vol. 17, p. 1 (2001)

[27]

Lúcio, L., Amrani, M., Dingel, J., Lambers, L., Salay, R., Selim, G.M., Syriani, E., Wimmer, M.: Model transformation intents and their properties, pp. 1---38. Software and Systems Modeling, New York (2014)

Digital Library

[28]

Lucio, L., Mustafiz, S., Denil, J., Vangheluwe, H., Jukss, M.: FTG+PM: an integrated framework for investigating model transformation chains. In: SDL 2013: Model-Driven Dependability Engineering, LNCS, vol. 7916, pp. 182---202. Springer, New York (2013)

[29]

Mahmud, M., Abdullah, S., Hosain, S.: GWDL: a graphical workflow definition language for business workflows. In: Gaol, F. (ed.) Recent Progress in Data Engineering and Internet Technology, LNCS, vol. 156, pp. 205---210. Springer, New York (2013)

[30]

Martin, D., Wutke, D., Leymann, F.: A novel approach to decentralized workflow enactment. In: Enterprise Distributed Object Computing, pp. 127---136. IEEE (2008)

Digital Library

[31]

Mernik, M., Heering, J., Sloane, A.M.: When and how to develop domain-specific languages. ACM Comput. Surv. 37(4), 316---344 (2005)

Digital Library

[32]

Alves, A., Arkin, A., Askary, S., Bloch, B., Curbera, F., Ford, M., Goland, Y., Gulzar, A. Kartha, N., Liu, C.K., et al.: OASIS: Web Services Business Process Execution Language, 2nd edn. (2007)

[33]

Object Management Group.: OMG: Software and Systems Process Engineering Metamodel specification, 2.0 edn. (2008)

[34]

Object Management Group.: OMG: Information technology--Object Management Group Unified Modeling Language, Superstructure ISO/IEC 19505-2 (2012)

[35]

Rivera, J.E., Ruiz-González, D., López-Romero, F., Bautista, J.M.: Wires*: a tool for orchestrating model transformations. Jornadas de Ingeniería del Software y Bases de Datos pp. 158---161 (2009)

[36]

Russell, N., van der Aalst, W., ter Hofstede, A.: Workflow exception patterns. In: Dubois, E., Pohl, K. (eds.) Advanced Information Systems Engineering, LNCS, vol. 4001, pp. 288---302. Springer, New York (2006)

Digital Library

[37]

Russell, N., van der Aalst, W., ter Hofstede, A., Edmond, D.: Workflow resource patterns: identification, representation and tool support. In: Pastor, O., Falcão e Cunha, J. (eds.) Advanced Information Systems Engineering, LNCS, vol. 3520, pp. 216---232. Springer, New York (2005)

Digital Library

[38]

Russell, N., van der Aalst, W., ter Hofstede, A., Mulyar, N.: Workflow control-flow patterns: a revised view. Technical report BPM-06-22, BPM Center (2006)

[39]

Schmidt, D.C.: Model-driven engineering. IEEE Comput. 39(2), 25---31 (2006)

Digital Library

[40]

Shapiro, S.S., Wilk, M.B.: An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52(3/4), 591---611 (1965)

[41]

Steinberg, D., Budinsky, F., Paternostro, M., Merks, E.: EMF: Eclipse Modeling Framework, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley Professional, Boston (2008)

Digital Library

[42]

Syriani, E., Ergin, H.: Operational semantics of UML activity diagram: an application in project management. In: RE 2012 Workshops, pp. 1---8. IEEE (2012)

[43]

Syriani, E., Kienzle, J., Vangheluwe, H.: Exceptional transformations. In: Tratt, L., Gogolla, M. (eds.) Theory and Practice of Model Transformation, LNCS, vol. 6142, pp. 199---214. Springer, New York (2010)

Digital Library

[44]

Syriani, E., Vangheluwe, H.: A modular timed model transformation language. J. Softw. Syst. Model. 12(2), 387---414 (2011)

Digital Library

[45]

Syriani, E., Vangheluwe, H., LaShomb, B.: T-Core: a framework for custom-built transformation languages. Softw. Syst. Model. 14(3), 1215---1243 (2015)

Digital Library

[46]

Syriani, E., Vangheluwe, H., Mannadiar, R., Hansen, C., Van Mierlo, S., Ergin, H.: AToMPM: A web-based modeling environment. In: Invited Talks, Demonstration Session, Poster Session, and ACM Student Research Competition, MODELS'13, vol. 1115, pp. 21---25. CEUR-WS.org (2013)

[47]

Whittle, J., Hutchinson, J., Rouncefield, M.: The state of practice in model-driven engineering. IEEE Softw. 31(3), 79---85 (2014)

[48]

WMC: terminology and glossary. Technical report WFMC-TC-1011, Workflow Management Coalition (1999)

[49]

WMC: process definition interface--XML process definition language 2.00. Technical report WFMC-TC-1025, Workflow Management Coalition (2005)

Cited By

Giraudet TCombemale BWimmer MChechik MEgyed A(2024)Interactivity and Collaboration in the Context of Heterogeneous ModelingProceedings of the ACM/IEEE 27th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems10.1145/3652620.3688205(174-179)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3652620.3688205
Iung ACarbonell JMarchezan LRodrigues EBernardino MBasso FMedeiros B(2020)Systematic mapping study on domain-specific language development toolsEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-020-09872-125:5(4205-4249)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10664-020-09872-1

Recommendations

Model-driven engineering with domain-specific meta-modelling languages

Domain-specific modelling languages are normally defined through general-purpose meta-modelling languages like the MOF. While this is satisfactory for many model-driven engineering (MDE) projects, several researchers have identified the need for domain-...
Model transformation by-example: a survey of the first wave
Conceptual Modelling and Its Theoretical Foundations

Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) places models as first-class artifacts throughout the software lifecycle. In this context, model transformations are crucial for the success of MDE, being comparable in role and importance to compilers for high-level ...
IML: Towards an Instructional Modeling Language
MODELSWARD 2019: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development

Existing software modeling languages and tooling often contain features far beyond the comprehension of novice users. Additionally, tools focus on specific aspects of the model-driven software engineering (MDSE) process with little to no connection ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Software and Systems Modeling (SoSyM)

Software and Systems Modeling (SoSyM) Volume 18, Issue 4

August 2019

407 pages

ISSN:1619-1366

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © Copyright © 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 01 August 2019

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Giraudet TCombemale BWimmer MChechik MEgyed A(2024)Interactivity and Collaboration in the Context of Heterogeneous ModelingProceedings of the ACM/IEEE 27th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems10.1145/3652620.3688205(174-179)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3652620.3688205
Iung ACarbonell JMarchezan LRodrigues EBernardino MBasso FMedeiros B(2020)Systematic mapping study on domain-specific language development toolsEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-020-09872-125:5(4205-4249)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10664-020-09872-1

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents