Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

An augmented EDA with dynamic diversity control and local neighborhood search for coevolution of optimal negotiation strategies

Published: 01 June 2013 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we present an estimation of distribution algorithm (EDA) augmented with enhanced dynamic diversity controlling and local improvement methods to solve competitive coevolution problems for agent-based automated negotiations. Since optimal negotiation strategies ensure that interacting agents negotiate optimally, finding such strategies--particularly, for the agents having incomplete information about their opponents--is an important and challenging issue to support agent-based automated negotiation systems. To address this issue, we consider the problem of finding optimal negotiation strategies for a bilateral negotiation between self-interested agents with incomplete information through an EDA-based coevolution mechanism. Due to the competitive nature of the agents, EDAs should be able to deal with competitive coevolution based on two asymmetric populations each consisting of self-interested agents. However, finding optimal negotiation solutions via coevolutionary learning using conventional EDAs is difficult because the EDAs suffer from premature convergence and their search capability deteriorates during coevolution. To solve these problems, even though we have previously devised the dynamic diversity controlling EDA (D2C-EDA), which is mainly characterized by a diversification and refinement (DR) procedure, D2C-EDA suffers from the population reinitialization problem that leads to a computational overhead. To reduce the computational overhead and to achieve further improvements in terms of solution accuracy, we have devised an improved D2C-EDA (ID2C-EDA) by adopting an enhanced DR procedure and a local neighborhood search (LNS) method. Favorable empirical results support the effectiveness of the proposed ID2C-EDA compared to conventional and the other proposed EDAs. Furthermore, ID2C-EDA finds solutions very close to the optimum.

References

[1]
Bengoetxea E, Larrañaga P, Bloch I, Perchant A (2001) Estimation of distribution algorithms: a new evolutionary computation approach for graph matching problems. In: Lect Notes Comput Sc, vol 2134. Springer, Berlin, pp 454-468.
[2]
Brazier FMT, Cornelissen F, Gustavsson R, Jonker CM, Lindeberg O, Polak B, Treur J (2004) Compositional verification of a multiagent system for one-to-many negotiation. Appl Intell 20(2):95-117.
[3]
Chao K-M, Chen J-H, Gatward R (2002) Negotiating agents in a market-oriented grid. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE/ACM international symposium on cluster computing and the grid, p 436.
[4]
Deb K, Sindhya K, Okabe T (2007) Self-adaptive simulated binary crossover for real-parameter optimization. In: Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation, pp 1187-1194.
[5]
Erus G, Polat F (2007) A layered approach to learning coordination knowledge in multiagent environments. Appl Intell 27(3):249-267.
[6]
Faratin P, Sierra C, Jennings NR (1998) Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. Robot Auton Syst 24(3-4):59-182.
[7]
Fatima S, Wooldridge MJ, Jennings NR (2002) Optimal negotiation strategies for agents with incomplete information. In: Lect Notes Artif Int, vol 2333. Springer, Berlin, pp 377-392.
[8]
Fogel DB (1994) An introduction to simulated evolutionary optimization. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 5(1):3-14.
[9]
Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading.
[10]
Gwak J, Sim KM (2010) Novel dynamic diversity controlling EDA and its application to automated bilateral negotiation. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE international conference on bio-inspired computing: theories and applications, pp 536-544.
[11]
Gwak J, Sim KM (2010) Co-evolving best response strategies for P-S-Optimizing negotiation using evolutionary algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 2010 international multiconference of engineers and comput scientists. Lecture notes in engineering and computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 13-18.
[12]
Gwak J, Sim KM (2011) Coevolving negotiation strategies for ps-optimizing agents. In: Ao S-I, Castillo O, Huang X (eds) Intelligent control and computer engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 119-135.
[13]
Gwak J, Sim KM, Zhang M (2010) Finding near-optimal strategies for negotiation with incomplete information using a diversity controlling EDA. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on supply chain management and information systems, pp 571-577.
[14]
Isern D, Moreno A, Sánchez D, Hajnal Á, Pedone G, Varga LZ (2011) Agent-based execution of personalised home care treatments. Appl Intell 34(2):155-180.
[15]
Jennings NR, Faratin P, Lomuscio AR, Parsons S, Wooldridge MJ, Sierra C (2001) Automated negotiation: prospects, methods and challenges. Group Decis Negot 10:199-215.
[16]
Kolomvatsos K, Hadjiefthymiades S (2012) Buyer behavior adaptation based on a fuzzy logic controller and prediction techniques. Fuzzy Sets Syst 189:30-52.
[17]
Kowalczyk R (2002) Fuzzy e-negotiation agents. Soft Comput 6(5):337-347.
[18]
Lai KR, Lin MW, Yu TJ (2009) Learning opponent's beliefs via fuzzy constraint-directed approach to make effective agent negotiation. Appl Intell 33(2):232-246.
[19]
Larrañaga P, Lozano ZA (2002) Estimation of distribution algorithms: a new tool for evolutionary computation. Kluwer, Norwell.
[20]
Larrañaga P, Etxeberria R, Lozano JA, Peña JM (1999) Optimization by learning and simulation of Bayesian and Gaussian networks. Technical Report. EHU-KZAA-IK-4/99, University of the Basque Country.
[21]
Leung Y, Gao Y, Xu Z-B (1997) Degree of population diversity-- a perspective on premature convergence in genetic algorithms and itsMarkov chain analysis. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 8:1165-1176.
[22]
Matos N, Sierra C, Jennings NR (1998) Determining successful negotiation strategies: an evolutionary approach. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on multi-agent systems, pp 182-189.
[23]
Miconi T (2009) Why coevolution doesn't "work": superiority and progress in coevolution. In: Proceedings of the 12th European conference on genetic programming, pp 49-60.
[24]
Mittal S, Deb K (2009) Optimal strategies of the iterated prisoner's dilemma problem for multiple conflicting objectives. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 13(3):554-565.
[25]
Nolfi S, Floreano D (1998) Coevolving predator and prey robots: do "arms races" arise in artificial evolution? Artif Life 4:311-335.
[26]
Oliver JR (1996) A machine-learning approach to automated negotiation and prospects for electronic commerce. J Manag Inf Syst 13:83-112.
[27]
Pelikan M, Goldberg DE, Lobo FG (2002) A survey of optimization by building and using probabilistic models. Comput Optim Appl 21:5-20.
[28]
Pollack JB, Blair AD (1998) Co-evolution in the successful learning of backgammon strategy. Mach Learn 32(3):225-240.
[29]
Rosenschein JS, Zlotkin G (1994) Rules of encounter: designing conventions for automated negotiation among computers. MIT Press, Cambridge.
[30]
Rubinstein A (1985) A bargaining model with incomplete information about time preferences. Econometrica 53(5):1151-1172.
[31]
Sim KM (2002) A market driven model for designing negotiation agents. Comput Intell 18(4):618-637.
[32]
Sim KM (2005) Equilibria, prudent compromises, and the "waiting" game. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Part B, Cybern 35(4):712-724.
[33]
Sim KM (2008) An evolutionary approach for p-s-optimizing negotiation. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, pp 1364-1371.
[34]
Sim KM, An B (2009) Evolving best-response strategies for market-driven agents using aggregative fitness GA. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Part C, Appl Rev 39(3):284-298.
[35]
Sim KM, Choi CY (2003) Agents that react to changing market situations. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Part B, Cybern 33(2):188-201.
[36]
Sim KM, Guo Y, Shi B (2007) Adaptive bargaining agents that negotiate optimally and rapidly. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, pp 1007-1014.
[37]
Sim KM, Guo Y, Shi B (2009) BLGAN: Bayesian learning and genetic algorithm for supporting negotiation with incomplete information. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Part B, Cybern 39(1):198-211.
[38]
Tutkun N (2009) Optimization of multimodal continuous functions using a new crossover for the real-coded genetic algorithms. Expert Syst Appl 36(4):8172-8177.
[39]
Ursem RK (2002) Diversity-guided evolutionary algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on parallel problem solving from nature, pp 462-474.
[40]
Ursem RK (2003) Model for evolutionary algorithms and their applications in system identification and control optimization. PhD dissertation, University of Aarhus.
[41]
Wang X, Shen X, Georganas ND (2006) A fuzzy logic based intelligent negotiation agent (FINA) in ecommerce. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Canadian conference on electrical and computer engineering, pp 276-279.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Agent-based automated dynamic SLA negotiation framework in the cloud using the stochastic optimization approachApplied Soft Computing10.1016/j.asoc.2020.107040101:COnline publication date: 1-Mar-2021
  • (2020)Evolutionary Approach to Multiparty Multiobjective Optimization Problems with Common Pareto Optimal Solutions2020 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)10.1109/CEC48606.2020.9185747(1-9)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2020
  • (2019)Adaptive neuro-fuzzy behavioral learning strategy for effective decision making in the fuzzy-based cloud service negotiation frameworkJournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology10.3233/JIFS-16994236:3(2311-2322)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019
  • Show More Cited By
  1. An augmented EDA with dynamic diversity control and local neighborhood search for coevolution of optimal negotiation strategies

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Applied Intelligence
      Applied Intelligence  Volume 38, Issue 4
      June 2013
      162 pages

      Publisher

      Kluwer Academic Publishers

      United States

      Publication History

      Published: 01 June 2013

      Author Tags

      1. Dynamic diversity control
      2. Estimation of distribution algorithms
      3. Negotiation agents
      4. Optimal negotiation strategy
      5. Population diversity

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 12 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2021)Agent-based automated dynamic SLA negotiation framework in the cloud using the stochastic optimization approachApplied Soft Computing10.1016/j.asoc.2020.107040101:COnline publication date: 1-Mar-2021
      • (2020)Evolutionary Approach to Multiparty Multiobjective Optimization Problems with Common Pareto Optimal Solutions2020 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)10.1109/CEC48606.2020.9185747(1-9)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2020
      • (2019)Adaptive neuro-fuzzy behavioral learning strategy for effective decision making in the fuzzy-based cloud service negotiation frameworkJournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology10.3233/JIFS-16994236:3(2311-2322)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019
      • (2016)Adaptive Probabilistic Behavioural Learning System for the effective behavioural decision in cloud trading negotiation marketFuture Generation Computer Systems10.1016/j.future.2015.12.00758:C(29-41)Online publication date: 1-May-2016
      • (2014)Biogeography-based optimization with improved migration operator and self-adaptive clear duplicate operatorApplied Intelligence10.1007/s10489-014-0527-z41:2(563-581)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2014
      • (2014)A one-shot bargaining strategy for dealing with multifarious opponentsApplied Intelligence10.1007/s10489-013-0497-640:4(557-574)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2014

      View Options

      View options

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media